Trump administration repeals Clinton-era rule in effort to reduce wildfires
SANTA FE, N.M. - U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced plans on Monday to reverse a Clinton-era policy in an effort to reduce wildfires caused by a lack of forest management.
The policy change was announced at the annual Western Governors Association meeting in New Mexico where Utah Gov. Spencer Cox was joined by six other state executives who had mixed reactions to the news.
Western states will be disproportionately impacted by the repeal of the so-called 'roadless rule' established in 2001 by President Bill Clinton to block road building, mining and logging on 58 million acres of undeveloped national forest lands.
Around 30% of the National Forest System falls under the rule, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But this number jumps to 50% in Utah, 45% in Idaho and 40% in Montana, Rollins said.
'This misguided rule prohibits the Forest Service from thinning and cutting trees to prevent wildfires and when fires start, the rule limits our firefighters access to quickly put them out,' Rollins said.
Since implementation of the rule began, the area burned by wildfires each year has more than doubled from around 3 million acres to over 6 million acres, Rollins said.
Her agency is currently monitoring 19 large fires across western states, Rollins said, including the Forsyth Fire in Pine Valley, Utah, which Cox visited on Sunday after it destroyed 13 homes.
Rollins attributed this increase to the 'roadless rule' while Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, said the increase in wildfires has been caused by warming weather.
'Climate change is the biggest problem in fueling these damaging fires,' Grisham said to some applause. 'We can do climate mitigation and force health resilience and recovery.'
Cox called the announcement 'really big news' for the state of Utah, which, unlike Colorado and Idaho, is not exempt from the restriction.
For years, Utah has tried to do more to manage its national forests, including entering into a 'shared stewardship' agreement with the Trump administration, which was renewed under President Joe Biden, to treat thousands of acres of national forest lands.
'Utah has been really such a great model for this,' Rollins said.
The work of periodically clearing underbrush and thinning trees was controversial where Utah tried it, Cox said, but doing so has resulted in saving 'an entire subdivision' of 50 homes in at least one instance of a wildfire in Utah.
Managing forests actually results in cleaner watersheds and more wildlife, according to Cox, who called for additional federal funding for shared stewardship projects to clean out national forest lands.
'A good forest is like a garden,' Cox said. 'You actually have to tend it and take care of it, and if we do this the right way we can prevent fires and improve production.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Revised Senate bill includes updated Lee language to sell public lands
The 940-page bill Senate Republican leaders unveiled Friday night to implement President Trump's agenda includes a section pushed by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) to sell public lands, although a smaller amount of land than was in a provision rejected earlier in the week by Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. The updated language in the bill directs the secretary of the Interior Department to select for sale not less than 0.25 percent and not more than 0.50 percent of the Bureau of Land Management's land with certain restrictions. The Interior secretary would be directed to 'dispose' of land that has the 'highest value,' is nominated for sale by state and local governments, is adjacent to existing developed areas, has access to existing infrastructure and is suitable for residential housing. Any land sold by the Interior Department must be used solely for the development of housing or to build infrastructure to support housing. Federally protected land including national monuments, national recreation areas, components of national wilderness and components of national wild and scenic rivers would be excluded from sale. Interior would not be allowed to sell public lands located more than five miles from the border of a population center of at least 1,000 people. The revised language reduces the amount of land the Interior Department would be allowed to sell compared to legislation Lee unveiled earlier this month. The earlier text directed the Interior secretary to select between 0.5 percent and 0.75 percent of Bureau of Land Management land for sale. The Senate parliamentarian on Monday ruled that the original language mandating the sale of millions of acres of public land from both the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service violated the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule determines what legislation is eligible to be protected from a filibuster and allowed to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote. Provisions must be primarily budgetary in nature to comply with the Byrd Rule. The provisions would apply to public lands in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. The issue is controversial, even among Republicans. Five House Republicans this week said they would vote against the bill if the provision remained in it when it came back to the lower chamber. Senate Republicans are racing to pass the Trump agenda megabill this weekend despite a number of uncertainties. Leadership had hoped to hold a vote Saturday but the timing remains fluid. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sheehy says he'll vote ‘yes' to advance Trump megabill, but will lead push against land sales
Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) says he'll vote to advance President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' but will lead an amendment stripping the sale of public lands from the measure. Sheehy initially said he would vote against the motion to proceed because the bill includes language to sell millions of acres of public lands, becoming the fourth senator to vow a 'no' vote and putting the bill in serious danger of stalling on the Senate floor. 'I oppose the sale of public lands and will vote no on the motion to proceed if it is included,' Sheehy posted on X on Saturday afternoon. Moments later, however, Sheehy reversed himself. 'I have just concluded productive discussions with leadership. I will be leading an amendment to strip the sale of public lands from this bill. I will vote yes on the motion to proceed,' he posted on X. 'We must quickly pass the Big Beautiful Bill to advance President Trump's agenda.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has told colleagues to expect a 4 p.m. vote to advance the measure. The legislation includes language sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) directing the secretary of the Interior to sell between 0.25 percent and 0.5 percent of public lands to build more housing throughout the American West. The provision directing the Bureau of Public Lands to sell millions of acres appears to exempt Montana, which was not among the 11 states named in the bill. Sheehy expressed confidence Saturday that the amendment would have adequate support for adoption. 'Looks like we have the votes to support that,' he told The Hill. 'So now, with that support for leadership, we're going to move forward.' 'I think the overall passage was endangered if we didn't have the amendment, and that's why we're offering it, because not only was it probably not going to pass here, it was definitely not going to pass in the House,' he said. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) also said Saturday that he worked on the amendment with Sheehy and Senate budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). He added that the vote threshold in order to pass it would also be set 'at 51 votes.' 'It'll help ensure passage, certainly in the house,' Daines told reporters. 'I know we have some House members that, like Congressman [Ryan] Zinke from Montana, who has firmly said he's opposed the bill unless this this provision is struck, and so this helps us ensure we get the bill passed in the House as well.' Three other Republican senators have said they will either vote to proceed to the bill or final passage of the bill for various reasons: Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Thune can only afford three defections and still advance the bill. Republicans control 53 Senate seats. Tillis told reporters after a closed-door meeting with colleagues Saturday that he will vote against the bill because of steep cuts to federal Medicaid spending and urged GOP leaders to return to the Medicaid changes passed by the House last month. 'I'm going to vote no on motion to proceed and on final passage,' he said. 'I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form,' Tillis said in a statement released by his office. He said the bill 'would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities.' 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population,' he warned. Johnson said he's voting 'no' on the motion to proceed because he just got his copy of the legislation at 1:23 am and hasn't had a chance to read it carefully. He wants Senate Republican leaders to add substantially bigger spending cuts to the bill and has proposed targeting mandatory spending programs outside of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. 'I'm not going to vote for motion to proceed today. We just got the bill. I got my first copy about 1:23 in the morning, this morning,' he said on 'Fox & Friends Weekend.' Paul is a hard 'no' vote because the legislation includes a provision to raise the debt limit by $5 trillion. Thune said his leadership team would know when the vote is held where exactly his colleagues stand on the bill. 'We'll get to the vote here before long and we'll answer all those questions,' he said when asked about the threatened 'no' votes from Sheehy, Tillis, Johnson and Paul. Updated at 4:42 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 House Republicans say they will vote against GOP megabill over public land sales
A group of five House Republicans says it will vote against the GOP's tax and spending bill over provisions in the Senate version that would mandate the sale of land owned by the federal government. 'We support the OB3 passed by the House and generally accept changes to the bill that may be made by the Senate. However, we cannot accept the sale of federal lands that Senator [Mike] Lee seeks,' wrote GOP Reps. Ryan Zinke (Mont.), Mike Simpson (Idaho), Dan Newhouse (Wash.), Cliff Bentz (Ore.) and David Valadao (Calif.). 'If a provision to sell public lands is in the bill that reaches the House floor, we will be forced to vote no,' they added. Zinke has publicly said he would not support the bill if it mandates the sale of public lands, but a group of five would be enough to actually prevent the bill from passing, since Republicans can only afford to lose three House votes if every Democrat remains opposed as expected. 'It is our hope that the Senate Parliamentarian strips any language from the bill regarding public lands sales, but we hope we can count on you once again to hear our concerns and work with Senate Leadership to remove the provision that will tank the entire Republican agenda,' the quintet said in their letter, which was addressed to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). Republicans are seeking to pass their bill through a process known as budget reconciliation, which allows some measures to pass through the Senate with a simple majority, evading the filibuster. The parliamentarian, who acts as the Senate's referee on what can pass through reconciliation, has already rejected a proposal from Lee to sell off public lands. However, Lee has said he would try again to pass a narrower set of public land sales. Text obtained by The Hill indicates that the revised plan would still sell of 1.2 million acres. While controversial, the public land sales is far from the only intra-party fight facing the legislation. Members are also feuding over provisions related to the extent of cuts to Medicaid and climate friendly tax credits, as well as federal tax deductions for people who live in areas with high state and local taxes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
