England vs India: Mohammed Siraj fined for Ben Duckett send-off in Lord's Test
This marks Siraj's second demerit point within a 24-month period, having previously received one during the second Test against Australia in Adelaide last year. Players who accumulate four or more demerit points in two years face suspension.On the field, India was put in a strong position to win the Lord's Test thanks to a four-wicket haul by Washington Sundar, whose off-spin came into play after the pacers had done the early damage. Sundar's timely wickets helped India bowl England out for 192 in the final session.Mohammed Siraj had made a significant impact during the morning session, while Jasprit Bumrah returned to polish off the tail.At stumps on day four, India's chase of 193 was faltering on a rapidly deteriorating pitch, with the visitors struggling at 58 for four. They had lost key batters Yashasvi Jaiswal, Karun Nair, captain Shubman Gill, and night watchman Akash Deep, leaving the contest finely poised heading into day five.- EndsTune InYou May Also Like
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
ENG vs IND: Why Ben Stokes and Jasprit Bumrah's workload management is incomparable
Ben Stokes gave more than his all in the Lord's Test, guiding England to a thrilling 22-run win over India and helping his side take a 2-1 lead in the five-match series. From leading as captain to delivering crucial knocks of 44 and 33, claiming five wickets, and executing a stunning direct-hit run-out to dismiss Rishabh Pant, Stokes produced a complete all-round performance that few players could came as no surprise when Stokes was named Player of the Match - his efforts were central to England clinching the narrowest-ever Test win by runs at the iconic London venue. His wholehearted commitment to demanding conditions earned widespread praise from across the cricketing the wake of Stokes' all-action display, comparisons have emerged with Jasprit Bumrah. The Indian pacer has recently been at the center of discussions around workload management, particularly following a back injury sustained during the New Year's Test against Australia. Bumrah missed the Edgbaston Test to manage his workload, a decision that sparked debate, especially after his lone-wolf performance in Leeds, where he took a five-wicket haul in the first innings. But with Stokes' superhuman effort at Lord's, the topic of workload management has once again Pathan critical of BumrahStokes stole the spotlight once again after delivering an extraordinary spell, bowling nearly 14 overs on the trot in the second innings. He bowled five overs late on Day 4, then resumed on Day 5 to send down another nine consecutive overs, showcasing immense endurance and India all-rounder Irfan Pathan weighed in critically on the workload debate, calling it "overrated." He argued that India haven't utilised Jasprit Bumrah to his full potential. According to Pathan, Bumrah's workload was already managed with rest during the Edgbaston Test, and he should have been available more for the Lord's match."Ben Stokes bowled a marathon 9.2 over spell in the morning on day five. What a player he is. He bowls, bats and executes a crucial run out of Rishabh Pant but there is no talk of workload management. But with India it is not like that."Bumrah bowls five overs and waits for Joe Root to come out to bat when you need to control the game (in the second innings). It was disappointing," Pathan said on his YouTube channel."His workload was managed having not played at Edgbaston. When you play a match, there is no workload. You have to win at all costs. The Indian camp could have done that better," Pathan the question is, can one compare Bumrah and Stokes' workload?Different career, different workloadWhile both are indispensable to their teams, their roles-and by extension, their physical demands-differ significantly. Stokes is a genuine all-rounder, balancing leadership, batting in the middle order, and bowling extended spells when on the other hand, is a frontline fast bowler whose job revolves entirely around high-intensity, pace-heavy spells that place a unique strain on the body, particularly the back and intensity, frequency, and type of overs they bowl aren't directly comparable. Stokes may bowl long spells, but often at a more controlled pace and with strategic variation. Bumrah's workload includes bursts of express pace, toe-crushing yorkers, and relentless pressure - requiring more recovery time, especially after it's important to consider the format demands. Stokes is currently active in only one format - Test cricket. He hasn't featured in a T20I since England's title-winning campaign at the 2022 T20 World Cup, and his last ODI appearance came during the 2023 ODI World Cup. In contrast, Bumrah remains an all-format player for India, even though he hasn't played a T20I since the 2024 T20 World Cup in the West Indies and the distinction matters. The scheduling, recovery time, and preparation across formats significantly add to an all-format player's physical and mental toll. While Stokes can now channel all his energy into red-ball cricket, Bumrah continues to navigate the demands of Tests, ODIs, and T20s - making workload management not just sensible, but IPL factorFor Indian cricketers, the Indian Premier League (IPL) holds prime importance. Beyond high-quality cricket, the IPL is a massive commercial enterprise focused on branding, distribution, TRPs, and revenue generation. If marquee players like Virat Kohli, MS Dhoni, or Jasprit Bumrah were to skip the IPL, it could negatively impact these factors, leading to lower viewership and, consequently, reduced international stars like Mitchell Starc and Ben Stokes have opted out of the IPL multiple times to prioritize international cricket and preserve their fitness, the scenario is different for Indian players like Bumrah and Kohli. Technically, they can also choose to sit out the IPL - no rules prevent them - but there are strong, unspoken pressures that make it difficult to pull example, Bumrah played intense cricket for two months straight before heading to England for the high-profile Test series. This raises concerns about the risk of injury due to overexertion. Bumrah's ongoing battles with injuries over the years have been challenging both for him and the Indian team, making workload management a delicate balancing when it comes to workload management, comparing Bumrah and Stokes isn't entirely fair. Both are invaluable to their teams and possess the rare ability to change the course of a match single-handedly. However, their career trajectories and demands differ now committed solely to Test cricket, enjoys more space for recovery and rest. Bumrah, in contrast, remains a three-format player for India and regularly features in the high-intensity environment of the IPL - leaving far less room for eyes will be on both players when the fourth and penultimate Test begins on July 23 at Emirates Old Trafford in Manchester.- EndsTune InYou May Also Like
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Jasprit Bumrah & Rishabh Pant OUT, 3 Players IN! India's Likely Playing XI For 4th Test
Last Updated: The fourth Test of the ongoing five-match series between India and England will be played at Old Trafford in Manchester from July 23 to 27. After suffering a heartbreaking defeat by 22 runs in the third Test against England at Lord's, the Indian men's cricket team would like to come up with a big show in the fourth Test to level the series. The fourth red-ball match of the ongoing five-match series between India and England will be played at Old Trafford in Manchester from July 23 to 27. For the match at Old Trafford, Indian team management could make multiple changes to the playing XI. World No. 1 Test bowler Jasprit Bumrah could be rested for the game next week as part of his workload management. Before the start of the series, chief selector Ajit Agarkar, head coach Gautam Gambhir, captain Shubman Gill, and even Bumrah himself confirmed that he will play only three matches in England, and since the pacer has already featured in two matches out of three played so far, there is a high possibility that he will miss the game in Manchester to return for the final fixture at The Oval in London from July 31 to August 4. In addition to Bumrah, wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant could also miss the match in Manchester. Pant suffered a finger injury during the first day's play of the Lord's Test, and as a result, he didn't keep after 34 overs in the first innings. There is still no clarity over Pant's injury. If he misses out, then Dhruv Jurel will replace him in the playing XI. The 24-year-old stumper from Agra impressed with his glovework during the third Test, and he has amassed a total of 202 runs in six innings of four Tests played so far. Jurel's best score in Test cricket is 90, which he registered against the English team in Ranchi last year. Another player whose place is under threat for the Manchester Test is Karun Nair. The 33-year-old right-handed batter has failed to impress with his batting in the three matches played so far. He could make way for Sai Sudharsan, who played the first Test in Leeds but was dropped for the next two fixtures. Akash Deep could only manage to take one wicket in the third Test, but if Bumrah misses out due to workload management, then he is likely to retain his place. Prasidh Krishna, Shardul Thakur, Arshdeep Singh, and Kuldeep Yadav are the other four bowlers in India's Test squad for the England series, and for the game at Old Trafford, Arshdeep could come in for Bumrah. Arshdeep is a left-arm pacer, and his inclusion will bring variety to India's bowling attack. India's likely playing XI for the 4th Test against England: Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Sai Sudharsan, Shubman Gill (C), Ravindra Jadeja, Dhruv Jurel (WK), Nitish Kumar Reddy, Washington Sundar, Arshdeep Singh, Akash Deep, Mohammed Siraj view comments First Published: July 15, 2025, 09:57 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
India ‘umpired' down but victory for Test cricket
There is no denying that poetic justice was rendered at the Mecca of the gentleman's game on Monday as regards the purest form of cricket-Test match. The third match of the India-England Test series may have ended in heartbreak for Team India and millions of fans back home, but the team went down with guns blazing till the very last minute. Taken on a positive note, the exciting match saw the pendulum swinging hither and thither, which is what such an extraordinary match should be. In sports parlance, the Lord's Test had all the ingredients that delights the connoisseurs of the purest form of cricket, for whom who wins eventually hardly matters. They are keen on how the match progresses, the ups and downs and the advantage going from one side to the other down to the wire. Simply put the third India-England showdown had all the elements that typify a glorious Test match- superlative drama, display of grit and courage, the never-say-die spirit to stay in the hunt staring at adversity and an anti-climax finish but respect intact for the losing side's display of extraordinary courage when the chips seemed down. Incidentally, till the very end it seemed like the writing was on the wall for both the hosts and the visiting team. The Lord's Test symbolized the traditionally held notion-no match is won till the last ball is bowled. On that count, it makes for a classic testimonial for Test cricket. However, caught in this celebratory euphoria one should not forget that the match also brought back the darker and murkier side of the game because of which cricket was in the news for all the wrong reasons before the advent of technology-the dreaded umpiring that was forever biased towards the host team. It is shameful that umpiring raised its ugly head during the third India-England Test and that too in the game's most revered headquarters. Umpiring was not just shoddy or bizarre but one in which the umpire's came up with decisions that were hugely condemnable and severely punishable. Alas, it made for an unsporting cut of a match that should have entered the record books as one of most closely fought Test battles with players from neither side budging or buckling under pressure. It was anybody's game before tea on the final day. With their dubious decisions, umpires played spoilsport, especially Australian umpire Paul Reiffel, whose contentious decisions not only changed the script of the final day proceedings but also took the match away from India. Questionable LBW verdicts added to India's frustration even on the fourth day, while the situation worsened on the deciding day, a day when a series of calls went against the visitors. It blew into a full-fledged controversy after K L Rahul was adjudged not out and the subsequent DRS review overturned the call, a decision that was ridiculed by Sunil Gavaskar. Ravichandran Ashwin was equally furious when earlier Reiffel declared Shubman Gill out caught behind off a delivery that missed the bat by a 'mile'. There were several such umpiring goof-ups that turned the tables against India. These will take old-timers back to the pre-third umpire days when biased umpiring invariably destroyed the winning prospects of visiting teams and some decisions almost destroyed the 'gentleman' image of the great game and led to international chaos. Hopefully, umpiring blues will be a thing of the past as India heads to Manchester for the furth Test, slated to commence on July 23.
