Peter Thiel's Palantir poses a grave threat to Americans
Draw a second circle around all the assets devoted to the US military.
A third around all assets being devoted to helping the Trump regime collect and compile personal information on millions of Americans.
And a fourth circle around the parts of Silicon Valley dedicated to turning the US away from a democracy into a dictatorship led by tech bros.
Where do the four circles intersect?
At a corporation called Palantir Technologies and a man named Peter Thiel.
In JRR Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, a 'palantír' is a seeing stone that can be used to distort truth and present selective visions of reality. During the War of the Ring, a palantír falls under the control of Sauron, who uses it to manipulate and deceive.
Palantir Technologies bears a striking similarity. It sells an AI-based platform that allows its users – among them, military and law enforcement agencies – to analyze personal data, including social media profiles, personal information and physical characteristics. These are used to identify and surveil individuals.
In March, Trump signed an executive order requiring all agencies and departments of the federal government to share data on Americans. To get the job done, Trump chose Palantir Technologies.
Palantir is now poised to combine data gleaned from the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. Meanwhile, the administration wants access to citizens' and others' bank account numbers and medical claims.
Will the Trump regime use an emerging super-database to advance Trump's political agenda, find and detain immigrants, and punish critics? Will it make it easier for Trump to spy on and target his ever-growing list of enemies and other Americans? We'll soon find out.
Thirteen former Palantir employees signed a letter this month urging the corporation to stop its work with Trump.
Linda Xia, who was a Palantir engineer until last year, said the problem was not with the company's technology but with how the Trump administration intended to use it. 'Combining all that data, even with the noblest of intentions, significantly increases the risk of misuse,' she told the New York Times.
Even some Republicans are concerned. Representative Warren Davidson, a Republican of Ohio, told Semafor such work could be 'dangerous': 'When you start combining all those data points on an individual into one database, it really essentially creates a digital ID. And it's a power that history says will eventually be abused.'
Last week, a group of Democratic lawmakers sent a letter to Palantir, asking for answers about huge government contracts the company got. The lawmakers are worried that Palantir is helping make a super-database of Americans' private information.
Behind their worry lie several people who are behind Palantir's selection for the project, starting with Elon Musk.
Musk's so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) was behind Palantir's selection. At least three Doge members had worked at Palantir, the Times reported, while others had worked at companies funded by Peter Thiel, an investor and a founder of Palantir, who still holds a major stake in it.
Thiel has worked closely with Musk, who devoted a quarter of a billion dollars to getting Trump re-elected and then, as head of Doge, helped eviscerate swaths of the government without congressional authority.
Thiel also mentored JD Vance, who worked for Thiel at one of his venture funds. Thiel subsequently bankrolled Vance's 2022 senatorial campaign. Thiel introduced Vance to Trump and later helped Vance become his vice-presidential pick.
Thiel also mentored the billionaire David Sacks, who also worked with Thiel at PayPal. As a student at Stanford University, Sacks wrote for the Stanford Review, the rightwing student newspaper Thiel founded as an undergraduate there in 1987. Sacks is now Trump's 'AI and crypto czar'.
The CEO of Palantir is Alex Karp, who said on an earnings call earlier this year that the company wants 'to disrupt and make the institutions we partner with the very best in the world and, when it's necessary, to scare enemies and on occasion kill them'.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Palantir recently disclosed that Karp received $6.8bn in 'compensation actually paid' in 2024 (you read that right) – making him the highest-paid chief executive of a publicly traded company in the United States.
A former generation of wealthy US conservatives backed candidates like Barry Goldwater because they wanted to conserve American institutions.
But this group – Thiel, Musk, Sacks, Karp and Vance, among others – doesn't seem to want to conserve much of anything, at least not anything that occurred after the 1920s, including social security, civil rights and even women's right to vote.
As Thiel has written:
The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics. Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women – two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians – have rendered the notion of 'capitalist democracy' into an oxymoron.
Hello?
If 'capitalist democracy' is becoming an oxymoron, it's not because of public assistance or because women got the right to vote. It's because billionaire capitalists like Musk and Thiel are intent on killing democracy.
Not incidentally, the 1920s marked the last gasp of the Gilded Age, when America's robber barons ripped off so much of the nation's wealth that the rest of the US had to go deep into debt both to maintain their standard of living and to maintain overall demand for the goods and services the nation produced.
When that debt bubble burst in 1929, we got the Great Depression. Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler then emerged to create the worst threats to freedom and democracy the modern world had ever witnessed.
If the US learned anything from the first Gilded Age and the fascism that grew like a cancer in the 1930s, it should have been that gross inequalities of income and wealth fuel abuses of political power – as Trump, Musk, Thiel, Karp and other oligarchs have put on full display – which in turn generate strongmen who destroy both democracy and freedom.
The danger inherent in Palantir's AI-powered super-database on all Americans is connected to the vast wealth and power of those associated with the corporation, and their apparent disdain for democratic institutions.
Had you walked to the end of Trump's military-birthday parade and gazed above the president's reviewing stand, you'd have seen on a giant video board an advertisement for Palantir – one of the chief sponsors of the event.
Tolkien's palantír fell under the control of Sauron. Thiel's Palantir is falling under the control of Trump. How this story ends is up to all of us.
Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sleepless in the Senate well: Late-night ball game, cornered holdout, partisan tacos and Trump's fave breakfast
John Fetterman was pissed off. Then again he started out that way, far before there was a hint that watching Republicans get to 51 votes on President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill would take an over-24-hour marathon session in the Senate chamber. The Democratic Pennsylvania senator, who had lamented on camera a day earlier about not being able to join his family at the beach, had just heard his aide tell him eight more amendments remained. 'Eight f***in' more?' he exclaimed. 'You're kidding.' Because Fetterman wore his trademark Carhartt shirt and shorts rather than a suit and tie, he could not be on the Senate floor at that moment, very late Monday, er, make that early Tuesday. Time of day/night had become a blur by that point. That's a shame, I thought, because typically watching the floor activity is the one joy of the so-called vote-a-rama session where senators haggle over various provisions of a budget bill being passed under reconciliation. For someone who likes C-SPAN as much as I unashamedly admit I do, viewing such a wonky spectacle from the gallery is like a live concert. And that makes a vote-a-rama the legislative equivalent of the Eras Tour. That is if Taylor Swift played for nearly 27 hours. For those who have never covered a vote-a-rama, they are near equal parts consequential debate and kabuki theater. Republicans planned to pass the bill via budget reconciliation, which allows legislation to pass with a simple majority as long as it relates to spending. This leads to rapid fire introduction of amendments by either side. Republicans can push for amendments that otherwise could not pass in committee, while Democrats can try to introduce poison pill legislation to kill the bill. As senators filed in Monday morning, I caught Sen. Lisa Murkowski — hours before she would become the center of the rebellion against the bill's passage — to ask her about renewable energy efforts that are targeted for destruction in this bill. But the Alaska Republican was already in no mood to chat. 'I haven't decided whether to share comments with reporters this morning or not,' she said. 'You're the first one to ask me a question this morning, so you win the bonu round.' Anyone who has covered Murkowski recently can tell that the senior senator is fed up with having to answer for every little thing Trump says or does. If she had her druthers, she would focus on Native-Alaskan affairs, working on the budget and on energy policy. Just last week, Murkowski released her memoir in which she touted her independent streak. Oftentimes, she will try to avoid reporters or joke with them to avoid them asking hard questions. But after some thought, Murkowski gave a semi-substantive answer. 'I don't want to see us backslide on clean energy,' she told The Independent. Then the vote-a-rama kicked off. Early in the evening, Democrats felt that they might have a shot to sink the bill. Early-morning or late-night votes can often be dramatic. Look no further than the thumbs-down the late John McCain delivered that saved the Affordable Care Act during the first Trump administration. Democrats kept saying Republicans didn't have the votes or that the GOP was too divided. They also hoped to exploit some of those fissures as they offered amendment after amendment — all of which naturally failed — until they seemed to run out of steam. Then, Democrats switched to offering motions to recommit, a motion which would cause the legislation to be referred back the Senate committee of its jurisdiction. Eventually, Sen. John Kennedy, who despite being a graduate of Oxford often puts on a heavily affected Louisiana Cajun accent, complained about his Republican colleagues allowing Democrats to offer these motions, which were a futile effort because no number of Republicans would even think of sending these bills back to committee. 'We might as well have been standing around, sucking on our teeth.' he said. Kennedy wasn't wrong. But Republicans faced a bind. For one, they had to find a way to appease Murkowski and her fellow moderate Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. In 2017, both joined McCain in his opposition to repeal the Affordable Care Act and they have considerable leverage. Collins had particular issue with the fact the bill put a cap on the amount that states could levy on provider taxes to raise money to receive matching Medicaid dollars. Rural hospitals could go under as a result since many of them rely on Medicaid recipients. To try and make up for that deficit to the hospitals, the bill created a $25 billion rural hospital fund. But Collins had an amendment to raise that amount to $50 billion. It didn't go well. Only 22 senators voted for it, and a majority of her Republican colleagues opposed it. One of the only Republicans who joined her was Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who had spent the past month wringing his hands about Medicaid cuts but ultimately decided to vote for the bill. When that failed, it looked like Collins would certainly join Tillis and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky in opposing the bill. She later lamented that the Senate should have done two reconciliation bills instead of 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which Trump requested it be called. 'I think that would have been a better approach,' Collins told me as pulled a roll-around suitcase back to the Senate floor. That meant that everything hinged on Murkowski. Republicans had loaded up the bill with pork for her, including a way to shield Alaska from a provision that would require that the state shoulder the cost of SNAP and another that would prevent it from being hit by cuts to Medicaid. This led to Senate leadership frequently — and literally — cornering and badgering Murkowski. At one point, Thune, former majority leader McConnell, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and fellow Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan had her cornered on the Senate floor. This led to a series of back-and-forths where Thune and reporters would zip back to his office. They lifted up their phones to get audio of the lanky beanpole Thune's soft-spoken tone as kept saying Republicans were close. Of course, doing a long-haul vote-a-rama calls for sustenance. At one point, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent socialist who caucuses with the Democrats, was seen munching a bag of snacks, while Democrat Ruben Gallego of Arizona went to go see if the tacos his party ordered for catering were any good. (Note: As a Mexican-American who lives in D.C., I can tell you they will not be as good as anything found in Arizona). Gallego also was not buying that Republicans had a deal. 'If you have to stall this long, it means you have a shit bill,' he told me. Unsurprisingly, the longer senators went on, the more exhausted they got and the more caffeine was required. Shortly after my third or fourth caffeinated beverage, I ran into Sen. Tommy Tuberville, the Republican former Auburn University head football coach, who told me, 'I'm braindead brother' as he sipped on some coffee. When Sen. Mike Lee of Utah proposed a rollback of renewable energy credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota had her arms folded in her fleece — not just because she helped craft those parts of the bill to combat climate change, but because Lee had spread disgusting conspiracy theories about the killing of her fellow Minnesotan, former statehouse speaker Melissa Hortman. Meanwhile, Thom Tillis, the North Carolina Republican who had clashed with Trump about the bill and then said he would not run for re-election, walked around like a man who had given his two weeks' notice and even spent time with progressive Democrats like Elizabeth Warren. The night into day also saw Warren and her former presidential rival Amy Klobuchar occasionally chatting. At one point, Democratic Sens. Adam Schiff of California, Mark Kelly of Arizona, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Mark Warner of Virginia made their way to hang out with Republican Sens. Mike Rounds of South Dakota and Kennedy. But, alas, all good things must come to an end. Well, things anyway. Around the time some senators and reporters went to watch the sunrise, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas ordered his Republican colleagues breakfast from McDonald's, one of Trump's favorite fast food choices, according to HuffPost's Igor Bobic. No word if Trump made the fries himself. At that point, around 7 am, I was simultaneously crabby, too excited to go to sleep if I'd gone home anyway, tired, but also jittery from all the caffeine I ingested, so my editor sent me home. In the end, Collins, Tillis and Paul voted alone against the bill — but what I'd taken to calling the Denali Deal for Murkowski had galvanized the agreement for a 50-50 vote with Vance giving the 51st vote. Some may remark on why Murkowski joined leadership this time but it is fairly clear that she did not want to be remembered as another McCain, let alone another Mitt Romney and certainly not another Liz Cheney. Like the latter two, she is the child of a prominent Republican leader. But at her core, Murkowski wants to be remembered for looking out for Alaska's interests. And in her mind, that likely meant shielding her state from the bill's worst excesses. But her actions reveal the hollowness of the One Big Beautiful Bill, which now must be passed with the new amendments, by the House once again. Very few people on the Republican side can defend the cuts to safety-net programs, since it still balloons the deficit. Rather, they tout the items they pay for, even when it is still unpopular. For now, Republicans are speed-running through breaking all of the typical decorum rules of the world's supposedly greatest deliberative body in service of Trump. And it will take longer than a so-called Byrd Bath to wash out the stains from their parliamentary sins. Then again, maybe I'm just tired.
Auto Blog
18 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Tesla Drops Killer Model 3 Lease Deal for July
View post: Nissan Sales Are Down, But These 3 Cheap Cars Are Flying Off the Lot Tesla Model 3 Lease deal for July If Tesla's mildly redesigned Model 3 has been on your shopping list for a while, the automaker's newest lease deal might make it more appealing for you. The lease deals vary depending on which model you choose and how much money you put down, but they seem to be nationwide. Always check Tesla's website yourself for potential personalized offers. The Model 3 Long Range RWD can be had for $349/month for 36 months with $3,000 down and 10,000 miles per year. The Long Range AWD model jumps to $549/month for 36 months with $3,000 down and 10,000 miles per year. Lastly, the Performance AWD has the highest cost, at $849/month for 36 months with $3,000 down and 10,000 miles per year. The down payments can be adjusted for lower monthly payments, but there are limits depending on the model you choose. Interested parties may also be eligible for the $7,500 Tesla incentive, along with a $1,000 off Military, First Responder, Teacher, and Student offer, or a $1,000 Tesla Credit and $1,000 cash from Lyft for verified Lyft drivers. Tesla Model 3 — Source: Tesla Would you rather have $0 down? Potential lessees who want to save money on the upfront costs can pay $0 at signing, with some adjustments to the monthly payment. We have estimated the monthly payments by spreading the amount at signing over the lease's term. Given the equal down payment, all models would carry an extra ~$83 per month. The Model 3 Long Range RWD would get a total estimated monthly payment of $432, the Long Range AWD would jump to $632, while the Performance AWD would increase to $932. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. What do you get in the newest Tesla Model 3 Long Range? The newest Model 3 was upgraded last year to a 79.7 kWh lithium-ion battery that bestows the car with 286 hp and a 0-60 mph time of 4.9 seconds in the single-motor RWD or 4.2 seconds in the dual-motor AWD. That former RWD setup will give you an EPA-estimated 363 miles of range, while the AWD drops down slightly to 346 miles. Charging speed is slightly lower in the AWD as well, with it adding up to 185 miles in 15 minutes compared to the RWD's 195 miles in 15 minutes. If power is your goal, though, you should opt for the Model 3 Performance. Its dual-motor AWD setup boasts a trim-topping 510 hp and a 0-60 mph time of 2.9 seconds. Its EPA-estimated range suffers heavily, however, dropping to 298 miles. Its charging abilities are also lacking compared to its siblings, adding up to 142 miles in 15 minutes. Other goodies, like sports seats and adaptive suspensions, are also included. 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance — Source: Tesla The 24 cu ft of cargo space is the same across all three models, with the cabin sporting a 15.4-inch landscape-oriented touchscreen that controls infotainment and most vehicular functions, including shifting duties. No Android Auto or Apple CarPlay is available, putting the Model 3 at a heavy disadvantage compared to other EVs, but at least you can play games on the infotainment screen while you wait. The Model 3 Long Range RWD starts at $42,490, the Long Range AWD starts at $47,490, while the Performance AWD starts at $54,990. Final thoughts Lease offers can vary based on location and specific vehicle configuration (trim level, options, etc.) and are subject to credit approval. Advertised payments typically exclude taxes, title, registration, and other potential fees. To take advantage of this offer or to get a precise quote based on your needs (including an official $0 down option), visit the official Tesla website here. *Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle. About the Author Gabriel Ionica View Profile
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
UPenn bans transgender athletes from female sports and revokes some of Lia Thomas' records in Trump admin deal
Transgender college swimming champion Lia Thomas has been stripped of some of her records after the University of Pennsylvania caved to pressure from the Trump administration. In a statement Tuesday evening, the Department of Education announced it had reached a deal with the university to ban trans women from competing in women's sports and to "restore" trans women's swimming titles to their cisgender (or non-trans) competitors. Penn confirmed it would fully comply with President Donald Trump's executive order on "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism", which demands that sports, changing rooms, and toilets be segregated by birth sex alone. In exchange, the Department will drop its civil rights case alleging that Penn discriminated against cis women by allowing Thomas to compete following her transition. Within hours of the announcement, Penn had removed Thomas from its online list of college records and replaced her with cis counterparts — albeit without erasing her name entirely. Instead, there is now a footnote that reads: "Competing under eligibility rules in effect at the time, Lia Thomas set program records in the 100, 200 and 500 freestyle during the 2021-22 season." Thomas is yet to react publicly to Penn's decision. The Independent has reached out to a representative of Thomas' for comment. Tuesday's deal only affects Penn's own records, not Thomas's victories in intercollegiate competitions — which Trump's administration is separately trying to revoke. It also lets stand her record in the 400 yard relay race, since that was achieved and shared with three other women. "While Penn's policies during the 2021-2022 swim season were in accordance with NCAA eligibility rules at the time, we acknowledge that some student-athletes were disadvantaged by these rules," college president J. Larry Jameson said. "We recognize this and will apologize to those who experienced a competitive disadvantage or experienced anxiety because of the policies in effect at the time." Thomas made history in 2022 when she won first place in the NCAA's Division I 500 yard freestyle race, becoming the first openly trans athlete to ever achieve the top prize in college sports. Analysis of college swimming stats by The Independent found that Thomas, who had been on hormone therapy for three years, swam about on par with other top female swimmers and did not appear to have any unfair advantage. But Thomas became a figure of hate among anti-trans activists and a cause célèbre for Republicans, named on stage by Trump and featured in GOP election adverts about "men pretending to be women". Her former competitor Riley Gaines, who tied with Thomas for fifth place in the NCAA 200-yard freestyle, has become a prominent conservative activist, while three former Penn athletes sued the college for discrimination. In March the Trump administration suspended $175m in research funding for the university, publicly blaming its "policies forcing women to compete with men in sports". "Today is a great victory for women and girls not only at the University of Pennsylvania, but all across our nation," Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Tuesday. "The Department commends UPenn for rectifying its past harms against women and girls, and we will continue to fight relentlessly to restore Title IX's proper application and enforce it to the fullest extent of the law."
