
Woman knocks on ex's door after suspicious feeling and whole world crumbles
Alice thought she was rekindling a lost romance when she reconnected with Mark, a childhood friend. Instead, she became the victim of a devastating romance fraud
Alice thought she was rekindling a lost romance when she reconnected with Mark, a childhood friend and former schoolmate. Instead, she became the victim of a devastating romance fraud that cost her £42,000 and left her emotionally shattered.
Unlike most romance scams, which begin online between strangers, Alice, a solicitor from Shropshire, knew her fraudster personally. She and Mark, not their real names, had once dated briefly in their twenties, shared dozens of mutual friends on Facebook, and had exchanged occasional birthday greetings over the years.
Their renewed connection began in October 2020, when Mark started messaging her regularly. They bonded over shared memories, tastes in music and food, and soon met in person at a pub they had frequented as teenagers.
"It was amazing. It was like my youth was back," Alice told the BBC. "We had a shared history. I felt completely at home with him."
Their relationship developed quickly. Mark met Alice's friends and family, and she trusted him completely.
So when he confided that he was struggling with business debts due to the coronavirus pandemic, she didn't question it. He even showed her threatening messages to back up his claims and said he couldn't bring her to his home for safety reasons.
"He made it very clear that he needed help," she said. "I was essentially in a position where I wanted to save him."
By April 2021, Alice had loaned him £20,000. As a solicitor, she took the precaution of formalising the loan in writing and verifying that Mark was in the process of selling his property to repay her. But the sale never materialised - and neither did the repayments.
Over time, the amount she lent him ballooned. Alice paid for everything from rent and clothes to medical treatments and therapy sessions. She even covered the cost of a car and funded trips to Wimbledon and Croatia. She was there for Mark emotionally, and he was even by her side when her grandfather died.
But behind the scenes, Mark was living a double life. In October 2023, after lending him a total of £57,000 - of which he had only repaid £14,000 - Alice ended the relationship over the phone. Feeling suspicious, she drove to Mark's house for the first time. There, she encountered a woman she recognised as Mark's supposed ex, Julie, standing in the driveway with Mark's dog, whose vet bills Alice had paid.
Julie told Alice to leave and warned her not to return, accusing her of stalking. Mark had reportedly told Julie a completely different story. When Alice insisted she could prove their relationship, Julie threatened to call the police.
Alice's final meeting with Mark took place in a supermarket car park, where he claimed he had cancer and had gone back to Julie for emotional support. But when Alice spoke with a neighbour, the truth emerged: Mark had been living with Julie the entire time.
"For the whole period he was with me, promising a life together, he was going home to her every day," Alice said.
The couple moved out shortly after Alice's confrontation. Their landlady later confirmed that Mark still owed her five months' rent.
Alice reported the matter to police in December 2023, but was initially told it was a civil matter and that no crime had been committed. Undeterred, she sought help from Love Said, a charity supporting victims of emotional and financial abuse.
Co-founder Anna Rowe told the BBC that many police forces lack awareness of "in-person" romance fraud, often dismissing it or shaming the victims.
With the charity's support, Alice filed a report with Action Fraud. "They asked, 'Are you saying this man deliberately entered a relationship to get your money?' And I said, 'Yes, I am.''
On the anniversary of their breakup in 2024, Alice received a £120 bank transfer from Mark. He reportedly told investigators he plans to repay the debt monthly - meaning it would take him 30 years to clear, by which time Alice will be 80.
Detective Inspector Daniel Fenn, from West Mercia Police 's economic crime and cyber unit, said romance fraud cases are often complex and emotionally charged. "We have trained officers dedicated to tackling fraud and additional resources in place to investigate these types of crimes,' he said.
But for Alice, the damage is already done. She says it's not just about the money, as the scammer also stole "my trust, my love, my future".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
38 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Dodgy Facebook crook tried to sell me shady £80 Fire Stick… then threatened to come to my HOUSE
Exclusive FIRED UP Dodgy Facebook crook tried to sell me shady £80 Fire Stick… then threatened to come to my HOUSE The Sun's tech editor warns how Facebook crooks are targeting vulnerable Brits - and attempting to get inside their homes


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Ukrainian refugee attacked after secret affair exposed – but furious Scots host stands by love-rat boyfriend
The Ukrainian moved in with the couple after fleeing to Scotland to escape war FORBIDDEN LVIV Ukrainian refugee attacked after secret affair exposed – but furious Scots host stands by love-rat boyfriend Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A CHICKEN factory worker threw boiling coffee in the face of her refugee lodger for having a fling with her boyfriend — but revealed she is standing by him and wants to have his baby. Miaoro Sosu, 42, attacked Liudmyla Furnika, 49, after her affair with love rat Cristian Maftei, 43, was exposed but has vowed to stand by him. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Cheating Maftei and Sosu say they have plans to marry after she was this week spared jail for the scalding at Perth Sheriff Court Credit: Alan MacGregor Ewing 4 Liudmyla Furnika, pictured, was attacked after her affair with the love rat was exposed Credit: Facebook / Lyudmila Mykhaylova The Ukrainian moved in with the couple after fleeing to Scotland to escape war. Cheating Maftei and Sosu say they have plans to marry after she was this week spared jail for the scalding at Perth Sheriff Court. Sosu told The Scottish Sun: 'I want to have a baby now. 'I think we will get married. 'For a long time I wanted to have a baby but he lost his battery. 'If she never came here none of this would have happened. 'There was a reason for it. 'We want to start over.' Sosu and farm worker Maftei had been together more than a decade when they welcomed Ms Furnika to their flat in Coupar Angus, Perthshire. The two women became close and would eat together with the host saying she cooked for her guest 'many times'. Jilted husband punched cheating wife's new lover after catching them in bed then 'threatened to burn down marital home' They even ended up working in the same plant on opposite shifts. But within weeks of her arrival, the refugee and Maftei had begun a secret affair. Sosu — who arrived in Scotland nine years ago from Craiova, Romania — discovered the truth months later and cornered her friend in the kitchen of their top-floor flat. She punched Ms Furnika repeatedly on the head before being dragged away by her unfaithful boyfriend who told her to 'relax'. Sosu threw hot coffee in her face in the incident in October 2023. The pair say the victim has since moved out but lives nearby and they often see her in the street but 'do not talk'. 4 The Ukrainian moved in with the couple after fleeing to Scotland to escape war Credit: Facebook / Lyudmila Mykhaylova 4 Sosu revealed she is standing by her boyfriend and wants to have his baby Credit: Alan MacGregor Ewing Maftei, from Constanta, Romania, said: 'I have learned a lesson. 'I think Miaoro and I will get married, one day it will happen.' Sosu was ordered to carry out 225 hours' unpaid work and pay her victim £1,000 in compensation. She said: 'It is the only time I have ever been in trouble. 'It is too much money. 'It is not fair.'


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Lord Hermer's denial of two-tier justice is a disgrace
This week, Lord Hermer was asked by the BBC about two-tier justice, the idea that the British state treats ethnic minorities more favourably than the white working class. This perception, so corrosive to faith in the rule of law, has become widespread since the crackdown on the Southport unrest last summer. Never one to read the public or political mood, Starmer's lawyer ally simply issued a blunt and contemptuous denial. Such claims are 'frankly disgusting', he said, and indeed 'offensive' to police, prosecutors and courts. He added that instead of criticising the British justice system, politicians 'need to get behind it, not seek to undermine it'. (Perhaps he should have a word with the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who earlier this year had to intervene to block sentencing guidelines which she herself labelled 'two-tier'.) It's a woefully tone-deaf performance, suggesting that Hermer doesn't even understand why the Government's response to the Southport unrest gave rise to charges of unfairness. He argued that people were wrong to compare the policing of London Gaza marches, often awash with anti-Semitism but 'not producing violence', with the Southport unrest, since this saw attacks against police officers. No one would say violent rioters shouldn't be treated robustly. But what Hermer ignores is the way the state dealt fiercely with white, working-class Southport rioters in a way it never does with more favoured groups. Just weeks before, when rioters in ultra-diverse Harehills, Leeds, overturned a police car and set a bus on fire, the police reportedly ran away. Meanwhile, days into the Southport unrest, when armed Muslim mobs formed supposedly in order to protect their local communities, the police let them have free rein. In Birmingham on August 5, the result was a pub being attacked, with a man outside it suffering a lacerated liver, amid other disorder. Even more than this double-standard though, it is the punitive crackdown on online speech that has caused there were many who found themselves charged and remanded in custody for social media posts, the most high-profile is Lucy Connolly, imprisoned for 31 months for a single nasty tweet (which she later deleted) on the night of the Southport murders. As the Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, Lord Hermer personally approved the prosecution of Mrs Connolly for stirring up racial hatred, despite having the constitutional power not to. Hermer has also declined to seek to review lenient sentences for gang grooming offenders – but in his political judgement, it was in the public interest for Connolly to face up to seven years in prison over one nasty tweet. Former Attorney General Suella Braverman says she would not have consented to the charge. 'We don't have a two-tiered justice system', insists Hermer. We have an 'independent justice system'. But can anyone really look at the state response to Southport and claim it 'independent' from politics? Sir Keir Starmer politicised the justice system the moment he claimed all of those involved were 'far-Right thugs', who had come from out of town to cause chaos. In reality, subsequent analysis of the arrest data along with a recent report by the police inspectorate have poured cold water on those claims. Politicians were also swiftly claiming that online speech was a principal cause, with Hermer himself crowing that 'you cannot hide behind your keyboard'. This narrative was no less dubious – no one needed to be told by social media to be angry about the horrific murders of three children. Yet both became reasons for the police, the CPS and the courts to throw the book at people like Connolly over tweets. '[T]heir intention was always to hammer me', as Lucy told the Telegraph earlier this year. Lucy's two-tier treatment continues to this day. First, she was denied release on temporary license to care for her daughter and sick husband. This is a privilege which even murderers are sometimes granted, and which has been granted to others at Lucy's prison. Now she says she's being cruelly mistreated in prison. Does Hermer seriously think it's 'disgusting' to see this as unfair? Hermer can deny two-tier justice all he likes, but the more the public hears about cases like Connolly, the more the charge rings true. A recent YouGov poll found public confidence in the judicial system at an all-time low, with the proportion expressing 'no confidence at all' rising four per cent since last June. Berating people who feel these concerns will not make them go away.