
Gold and its miners may enjoy a ‘critical mineral' upgrade
Gold is not a vital component of advanced manufacturing like other critical minerals such as rare earths, lithium and copper.
But the precious metal appears to be undergoing a subtle shift in how it is viewed by governments and investors.
Since countries moved away from the gold standard by the early 1970s, gold has largely been viewed as a relatively niche part of investment portfolios and government reserves.
Gold was something that was added to portfolios as an inflation hedge or during times of heightened geopolitical tensions.
In some ways, the role of gold in both central bank and investment portfolios was overtaken by bonds, with U.S. Treasuries becoming the most important of these assets.
But the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency is leading to a global reassessment of the relative safety of U.S. assets, the independence of the Federal Reserve and the likely worsening of the U.S. fiscal position.
Add in Mr. Trump's attacks on the rule of law in the United States and the likely hit to both the U.S. and global economies from his trade policies, and the stage is set for a reevaluation of the role of gold.
The precious metal has gained 32.3 per cent from a low of US$2,536.71 an ounce hit on November 14 in the days after Mr. Trump's victory over his Democratic Party rival, former Vice President Kamala Harris.
It reached a record high of US$3,500.05 an ounce on April 22, and has since retreated slightly to close at US$3,357.08 on Wednesday.
While gold's day-to-day moves are still largely driven by the news cycle, the overall backdrop looks supportive.
The World Gold Council released a report last month in which it surveyed 73 central banks, and 95 per cent of them expected the official sector to increase holdings in the coming 12 months.
'This is a record high since it was first tracked in the 2019 survey and represents a 17-per-cent increase from the 2024 findings,' the council said.
Central banks are also moving to repatriate more of their holdings back to their home countries and away from the United States, a further sign that there is a loss of confidence in U.S. assets and the policies of the Trump administration.
Gold is also well-placed as one of the few viable alternatives if more governments, fund managers and private investors outside the United States form the view that the era of U.S. exceptionalism is over and that U.S. Treasuries are now a riskier asset as the country's fiscal position deteriorates.
Another factor that is showing the positive story for gold is the performance of gold mining equities.
Major gold producers have seen their share prices rise at a far faster pace than the actual metal.
There are several reasons why this could be the case, including the expectation that shareholders will receive higher dividend payouts in the future and that companies are being rewarded for showing capital discipline in prior years.
But it also may be that investors are starting to re-rate gold mining companies in the expectation that gold becomes a more vital and larger part of portfolios, both public and private.
For example, shares in Newmont (NEM-N, NGT-T) , the world's largest listed gold miner, have risen 63 per cent from their most recent low on December 30 to close at US$60.06 on Wednesday.
Canada's Barrick Mining (B-N, ABX-T) has seen its shares gain 40.6 per cent in U.S. dollar terms from its recent low on December 19 to the close on Wednesday.
Anglogold Ashanti (AU-N) shares in New York have surged 108 per cent from the low on December 30 to the close of US$46.66 on Wednesday, while Gold Fields (GFI-N) has seen a gain of 88 per cent in U.S. dollar terms from its November 14 low to the close on Wednesday.
If gold does become a more central part of investment strategies, the listed miners are likely to become more attractive, given the difficulty of finding and developing new projects and the long time between exploration and production.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up.
Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Decision Notice - CIRO Hearing Panel issues its Reasons for Decision in the matter of Scott Nicolas Zurevinski
CALGARY, AB , /CNW/ - Following a settlement hearing held on May 15, 2025 pursuant to the Mutual Fund Dealer Rules, on June 23 , a hearing panel of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization ( CIRO) issued its reasons for decision in the matter of Scott Nicolas Zurevinski . The hearing panel's reasons for decision are available at: Re Zurevinski 2025 CIRO 30 In their reasons for decision, the hearing panel found that Scott Zurevinski failed in his obligations regarding the proper execution of client account documents, by signing a client's signature on account forms and submitting them to the Dealer Member for processing. The hearing panel also confirmed a fine of $10,000 and costs of $2,500 imposed on Scott Zurevinski as part of the settlement. At all material times, Scott Zurevinski was registered in Alberta with Investors Group Financial Services Inc. Scott Zurevinski is currently registered in Alberta , British Columbia and Saskatchewan as a dealing representative with Acumen Capital Finance Partners Limited. * * * The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) is the national self-regulatory organization that oversees all investment dealers, mutual fund dealers and trading activity on Canada's debt and equity marketplaces. CIRO is committed to the protection of investors, providing efficient and consistent regulation, and building Canadians' trust in financial regulation and the people managing their investments. For more information, visit All information about disciplinary proceedings relating to current and former member firms and individual registrants under the Investment Dealer and Partially Consolidated Rules (for investment dealers), the Mutual Fund Dealer Rules (for mutual fund dealers) and the Universal Market Integrity Rules (UMIR) is available on CIRO's website. Background information regarding the qualifications and disciplinary history, if any, of advisors currently employed by CIRO-regulated investment firms is available free of charge through the AdvisorReport service. Information on how to make dealer, advisor or marketplace-related complaints is available by calling 1-877-442-4322. CIRO investigates possible misconduct by its member firms and individual registrants. It can bring disciplinary proceedings which may result in sanctions including fines, suspensions, permanent bars, expulsion from membership, or termination of rights and privileges for individuals and firms.


Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump's massive spending bill is set to become law. Now, the reckoning begins
From the start, U.S. President Donald Trump wanted Congress to deliver a 'big, beautiful' spending bill. The measure approved on a deeply fractured Capitol Hill Thursday was indisputably big. As for the other word in the President's formula, beauty is in the eyes of the beholders. Or, as Shakespeare taught in Love's Labour's Loss, 'Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye,/Not utter'd by base sale of chapmen's tongues.' In this case, the chapmen − a term derived from the Middle English word meaning salesman, an apt description of Mr. Trump himself − are the White House officials who demanded the spending and tax cuts in the 1,000-page piece of legislation in a frantic race to meet the President's Independence Day deadline. What's really in Trump's big spending bill? But at full flower, this is not an American beauty rose for an unlikely, ungainly collection of lawmakers and activists: The Republican rebels − reluctant warriors wrangled by the President into supporting the package but who remain aghast at the failure to reign in the budget debt; Democrats who again failed to have even a glancing effect on the process or content and revile the US$4.5-trillion in tax cuts, mainly for the wealthy; advocates for the poor recoiling at the cuts in services, especially for the 11 million who may lose health coverage; and Republican strategists who believe that the administration's signature domestic initiative betrays the new GOP constituency of workers. This isn't a case where the virtue of compromise can be espied in the fact that no one is entirely happy. In this case, no one, beside Mr. Trump and his most loyal subalterns, is the least bit happy. Except in one dimension: Everyone involved in this monster piece of legislation − which includes work requirements for medical assistance for the poor, tax cuts for employees paid largely in tips, and increased border-security and defence spending − is glad that it is over. In his landmark 1885 book on Congress, written 28 years before he became president, Woodrow Wilson spoke of 'the dance of legislation,' saying analysts 'must struggle through its mazes as best you can to its breathless end.' This time, the dance was unusually lacking in grace and fluid movement. 'It's especially messy this time because members found ways around the usual legislative discipline,' said Sarah Binder, a George Washington University expert on Congress. 'Republicans found new ways to stretch rules and pack in their priorities. The sausage-making looked especially bad.' Now, the reckoning begins. There are massive cuts in food-assistance programs, in health care subsidies, and in federal programs splayed across almost every element of American life, including environmental initiatives to battle climate change. Though the administration argued that it was an attack on spending and an assault on the estimated US$36-trillion federal debt, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projects it adds nearly US$4-trillion to it. Republican rebels were particularly aggrieved by the failure to trim the US$1.3-trillion annual federal deficit. That's because some of the tax cuts in the budget package are the result of making permanent the temporary reductions in levies passed in the first Trump administration. Additionally, the measure increases the level of state and local taxes Americans can deduct from their net income when preparing their federal tax forms next April. The details − some arcane, and many barely if at all known to the lawmakers themselves − are examples of how the Trump ascendancy is a radical departure from American tradition. For all their brave anti-spending rhetoric consistent with the Republican ethos of their respective eras, Dwight Eisenhower didn't dent the Franklin Roosevelt New Deal and though Ronald Reagan shrunk the size of the federal government by about 5 per cent, over-all federal spending in his White House years was up by nearly 70 per cent. The final days of the negotiations included 16 hours in which the legislation was drearily read aloud in the Senate chamber and a record-breaking 8-hour and 45-minute delaying speech by Democratic House Leader Hakeem Jeffries. They won their party no benefit and only provided the White House more time to placate skeptics. The end result of the lobbying was a vivid affirmation of the 'all-politics-is-local' aphorism popularized by former House Speaker Thomas 'Tip' O'Neill. Senator Lisa Murkowski, a key GOP resister, won special nutrition-assistance and medical benefits for her Alaska constituents, while Maine's Susan Collins insisted on raising the level of federal support for rural hospitals, but failed to prevail and ended up opposing the bill. There were additional dramas playing out as the lawmakers wrestled, wrangled and warred over specific elements of the package. One was the personal agony of Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, whose resistance to many Trump entreaties won him the enduring enmity of the President. He finally succumbed to the pressure, which included a classic Trump social-media denunciation of a fellow Republican ('Tillis is a talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!'), and announced he wouldn't seek re-election, thus avoiding a bruising primary against a Trump-endorsed surrogate. Another was how, in their drive to win approval of the spending package, Republican members of the legislative branch tested the boundaries of rules and customs much the way the President has done in the executive branch. One example: a dodge permitting the extension of the US$3.8-trillion of the tax cuts not to count against the budgetary cost of the bill. A third was the renewal of the feud between Mr. Trump and Elon Musk, who threatened to start a third party if the legislation were passed. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' He wrote on his X platform. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The response from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: 'I admire Elon's leadership on rockets. I will take care of the finances.' That, too, will be a matter of contention in this age of contention.


CTV News
12 minutes ago
- CTV News
Mexican boxer Chavez Jr. arrested by U.S. immigration officers, DHS says
Canelo Alvarez, right, of Mexico, gets hit by Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., of Mexico, during their catch weight boxing match, Saturday, May 6, 2017, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/John Locher) Mexican boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. has been arrested by U.S. immigration officers and is being processed for expedited removal from the country, the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement on Thursday. The DHS said Chavez, a Mexican citizen, had an active arrest warrant against him in Mexico for what it said was his involvement in organized crime and trafficking firearms, ammunition, and explosives. 'Under President Trump, no one is above the law - including world-famous athletes,' said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. Brendan O'Brien, Reuters