Ahead of new talks, Iran blames Europeans for nuclear deal collapse
The 2015 agreement -- reached between Iran and UN Security Council permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany -- imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
However, it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Donald Trump's first term as president, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and reimposed sweeping sanctions.
Though Europe pledged continued support, the mechanism to offset US sanctions never effectively materialised, forcing many Western firms to exit Iran and deepening its economic crisis.
"Iran holds the European parties responsible for negligence in implementing the agreement," said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ahead of Friday's talks in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany on the deal's future.
Tehran will also host a trilateral meeting Tuesday with Chinese and Russian representatives to discuss the nuclear issue and potential sanctions.
The Chinese foreign ministry said Beijing would "continue to play a constructive role in pushing relevant sides to restart dialogue and negotiations, and reach a solution that takes in account the legitimate concerns of all parties".
In recent weeks, the three European powers have threatened to reimpose international sanctions on Tehran, accusing it of breaching its nuclear commitments.
Germany said the Istanbul talks would be at the expert level, with the European trio working "flat out" to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution.
"If no solution is reached by the end of August... the snapback also remains an option for the E3," said its foreign ministry spokesman, Martin Giese.
A clause in the 2015 agreement allows for UN sanctions on Iran to be reimposed through a "snapback" mechanism in the event of non-compliance.
However, the agreement expires in October, leaving a tight deadline.
- 'No intention of speaking with America' -
The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 accord.
That is a short step from the 90 percent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon.
Using the snapback clause was "meaningless, unjustifiable and immoral", Baqaei told a news conference, arguing that Iran only began distancing itself from the agreement in response to Western non-compliance.
"Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement," he said.
Western powers -- led by the United States and backed by Israel, Iran's arch-enemy -- have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons capability.
Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production.
Tehran and Washington had held five rounds of nuclear talks since April, but a planned meeting on June 15 was cancelled after Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, triggering a 12-day conflict.
"At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America," Baqaei said Monday.
Israel launched on June 13 a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, targeting key military and nuclear facilities.
The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz.
bur-sbr/dv/jsa
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
H&F's Verisure Targets €3 Billion-Plus IPO in Stockholm
Verisure and its backers could seek to raise about €3 billion ($3.5 billion) to €4 billion in the security firm's Stockholm initial public offering, according to people familiar with the matter, which would make it Europe's largest listing in three years. The IPO is expected to consist largely of new shares in order to help Verisure pay down debt, said the people, who asked not to be identified as the information is private. Existing investors in the company, which is majority owned by private equity firm Hellman & Friedman, may also offer shares as part of the IPO, the people added.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How "Tokenized" Stocks Are Revolutionizing Investment Access
Key Points Robinhood is now offering tokenized stocks to European investors, with plans to offer them to U.S. investors soon. Tokenized stocks are blockchain versions of traditional stocks, and can be traded just like crypto tokens. Before investing in tokenized stocks, it's important to read all the fine print, to make sure you understand what you actually own. 10 stocks we like better than Robinhood Markets › Tokenization has been one of the hottest buzzwords in the crypto industry for the past 12 months. Now we're finally starting to see what can happen when blockchain technology meets traditional stock market investing. On June 30, Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) shook up the financial world with the launch of tokenized stocks for retail investors. According to Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev, these tokenized stocks represent the greatest innovation in capital markets in decades. But what, exactly, are they? And what do they mean for investors? What are tokenized stocks? Tokenization refers to the transformation of real-world assets into digital assets that live on the blockchain. Ownership in that asset is represented by a digital token that can be traded just like any crypto token. In this case, the real-world assets being transformed are stocks, and the place to trade them is on Robinhood's trading platform. For now, trading in these tokenized stocks will take place 24/5, but according to Robinhood, trading will soon be 24/7. It can be helpful to think of these tokenized stocks as digital twins. Robinhood buys a real-world stock, and then, with a little blockchain alchemy, transforms that into a digital token. In theory, this digital token will then mimic the price action of the real-world stock on a 1:1 basis. If the value of Company X goes up by 10% in one day, then the value of your token will go up by 10% as well. Pros Tokenization provides a number of advantages for retail investors. For one, investors get the enhanced liquidity of being able to trade these tokens on the blockchain. Second, they get access to the speed, efficiency, security, and transparency of blockchain technology. Third, they can trade tiny fractional shares of any company's stock that has been tokenized. According to Robinhood, tokenized stocks will modernize the traditional system of buying and selling stocks. If you've ever been frustrated by not being able to trade equities on the weekend or on holidays, then tokenized stocks represent a possible solution. In addition, once you have the token, you can then do different things with it that simply aren't possible in the world of traditional finance, all thanks to the power of decentralized finance. Robinhood is launching its tokenized stock offerings in Europe first, as a way of giving European investors access to the U.S. market. Robinhood says that more than 200 tokenized stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) will be available for trading on its platform. In the future, U.S. investors might be buying tokenized stocks from Europe, Asia, or Latin America. Cons However, there are drawbacks to tokenized stocks. The primary goal is to give investors exposure to the price of the underlying real-world stock. They do not confer any traditional stock ownership privileges. There are no voting rights, for example. And if the stock pays dividends, you may not receive those dividends. You really have to read the fine print. For example, Robinhood says that its tokenized stocks will, indeed, pay dividends to investors. It depends on the blockchain smart contracts and how they are written for each token. Things get more complex once you move beyond publicly traded companies. For example, it is also possible to create tokenized equity in private companies. At its June investor event in France, Robinhood actually gave away tokens for OpenAI and SpaceX, arguably two of the hottest privately held tech companies right now. That caused a bit of an uproar. OpenAI, for example, immediately spoke out and said that these tokens are not OpenAI equity, and do not represent any type of ownership interest in the company. The company did not work with Robinhood on the launch of these tokens, and warned investors to be careful. Robinhood says that the ultimate goal is to open up the world of private markets to retail investors. Why should ultra-wealthy accredited investors be the only ones who can invest early in a hot tech company? Why should venture capitalists be the primary gatekeepers to these companies? That's potentially what makes tokenized stocks so revolutionary. They could lead to a transfer of power, money, and influence in the financial world. They could fundamentally change the way we think about the valuation of companies, both public and private. And they could forever blur the line between investing in public companies and investing in private companies. Outlook for American investors Right now, regulators in the U.S. are racing to keep up with the pace of crypto innovation. Until all the regulatory issues get worked out, these tokenized stocks from Robinhood will only be available to European investors. The good news is that several crypto platforms, in competition with Robinhood, are now working on tokenized stocks for U.S. investors. My prediction is that tokenized stocks will be mainstream in the U.S. by the end of next year. Now that the Trump administration has let the crypto genie out of the bottle, crypto innovation is taking place at an unprecedented scale and pace. Tokenized stocks are just the first in what should be a long line of new innovations for the individual investor. Should you buy stock in Robinhood Markets right now? Before you buy stock in Robinhood Markets, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Robinhood Markets wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Dominic Basulto has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's How "Tokenized" Stocks Are Revolutionizing Investment Access was originally published by The Motley Fool
CNET
40 minutes ago
- CNET
Apple Encryption Safe After All? UK Reportedly Plans to Backtrack on Backdoor Demands
Apple's reputation for providing a private and secure experience for people who use its products and services is among the highest in the industry. All that has been under threat this year, as the UK government has asked Apple to provide it with backdoor access to the iCloud accounts not only of British citizens, but of people around the world. But it looks like following pressure from the US, the UK might have decided to reverse course. As reported by the Financial Times on Sunday, the Home Office (the UK equivalent to the State Department) will likely have to backtrack on its demands from Apple following intervention from senior US political figures, including Vice President JD Vance. The Home Office declined to comment on the report, which quoted an unnamed source from the government department as saying "messing with their tech companies, was "a big red line in the US." Ensuring people's data and communications are properly encrypted is a key selling point for Apple, which has always prided itself on offering customers a high level of privacy and security. It's long maintained that there is no "backdoor" it could simply provide access to, and that creating one would put the company and its users at risk of exploitation from bad actors. Reports that the UK was seeking backdoor access in order to assist with criminal investigations was first reported by the Washington Post in February of this year. The same month, Apple pulled its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature in the UK, providing iCloud users with less protection than they get elsewhere. At the time the company said it was "gravely disappointed" to have to make the move, "especially given "the continuing rise of data breaches and other threats to customer privacy." Apple did not respond to a request for comment on Monday.
