Dionisio Gutiérrez Leads Summit for Freedom and Democracy in Ibero-America
The event was inaugurated on May 20 in Madrid with the "Dinner for Freedom", an evening that marked the beginning of three days of idea exchange and proposal analysis. In his speech, Gutiérrez warned about the advance of populism and authoritarianism in Latin America and called for restoring trust in politics through integrity. He also evoked the moral and intellectual legacy of Mario Vargas Llosa in upholding the values of freedom and democracy across Ibero-America.
The following day, at the historic Ateneo de Madrid, Gutiérrez took part in the events organized by the Liberty and Democracy Group and the International Foundation for Freedom. There, he highlighted the shared commitment to building a free, institutional, and pluralistic Ibero-America. "We need to promote liberal principles in the face of ideological confusion affecting both the elites and the citizenry," Gutiérrez told an audience of former presidents, lawmakers, writers, and scholars.
The summit's central session took place on May 22 at the Teatro Campoamor in Oviedo, where Gutiérrez officially opened the 6th Citizen Convention before an audience of 1,300 attendees and two dozen media outlets.
In his speech in Oviedo, Gutiérrez was emphatic: "Freedom is a wounded word in Latin America. We live under the false freedom of despots, who distort it, manipulate it, and turn it into an instrument of subjugation." In response to this decline, he announced the creation of the Permanent Academic Forum, a space to debate ideas and turn them into concrete proposals for the region.
To close the 6th Citizen Convention, a special tribute to Ibero-American migration was held at the Archivo de Indianos and Museo de la Emigración in Colombres, Asturias. There, Dionisio Gutiérrez raised the flag of Guatemala as a symbol of the historic bond between both sides of the Atlantic.
The event honored the memory of Ibero-American migrants as builders of identity and freedom—an emotional finale that reaffirmed the Encuentro's spirit of integration.
For more information, please visit our website or write to contacto@fundacionlibertad.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dionisio-gutierrez-leads-summit-for-freedom-and-democracy-in-ibero-america-302473732.html
SOURCE Fundación Libertad y Desarrollo
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Want to save American democracy? Let teens vote.
Across the country, a growing movement led by young people is calling for cities and states to lower the voting age to 16 in local, state and school board elections. In a moment when the foundations of American democracy are under strain, when civic trust is eroding and polarization is deepening, one powerful act of democratic innovation is hiding in plain sight. We need to lower the voting age to 16. Zohran Mamdani's recent win in the New York City Democratic primary for mayor, mainly driven by young people, provides a source of inspiration for that type of reform. So does the British government's decision to lower the voting age to 16 before the United Kingdom's next general election. Sixteen- and 17-year-olds already contribute in meaningful ways to our society. They work jobs, pay taxes and, in many cases, help support their families. They are organizers, caretakers and changemakers. Yet, despite being affected by policy decisions ranging from school funding to climate action to gun safety, they remain locked out of the most fundamental mechanism of democratic participation, the right to vote. It's time to change that. Across the country, a growing movement led by young people is calling for cities and states to lower the voting age to 16 in local, state and school board elections. At Vote16USA, we support this youth-led push to make our democracy more just, representative and resilient. When we empower youth to have a say in their communities, we fortify our democratic future. Opinion: Zohran Mamdani rallied Gen Z voters. We can't abandon him now. Research shows younger people are ready to vote Research shows that 16-year-olds are ready to vote. Studies in developmental psychology, including those published by the American Psychological Association, demonstrate that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive maturity − the 'cold cognition' − required to make informed decisions in structured settings like the voting booth. What's more, 16 and 17 are ideal ages to begin voting. At this stage in life, many young people live in stable home environments, attend school and are surrounded by supportive adults. These conditions make them more likely to adopt voting as a habit, and the earlier the habit is formed, the more likely it is to persist. In contrast, many 18-year-olds cast their first ballots while in that destabilizing transition to college or work, often without the support systems that reinforce civic participation. We don't question the logic of teaching civics in high school, so why not allow students to practice it meaningfully by voting? Give teens voice in elections: Why we should lower the voting age to 16 for federal elections | Opinion In places where the voting age has already been lowered, like Takoma Park and Hyattsville, Maryland, 16- and 17-year-olds have voted at higher rates than older adults. Even before they can vote, young people are already leading. From organizing school walkouts for climate justice to testifying at statehouses for racial equity and mental health resources, youth are showing they have both the interest and the understanding to influence policy. Lowering the voting age gives them the recognition and the voice they deserve. US has long history of increasing voter eligibility Historically, our democracy has welcomed more eligible voters. From the expansion of suffrage to women and Black Americans to the Voting Rights Act and beyond, we have moved toward greater inclusion. Lowering the voting age continues that arc toward justice. Some worry that young people will just vote like their parents. But data from the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement show that young people are more likely to develop their own political views with influence from school, peers and independent media. As to the question about whether younger voters would participate, turnout is not about age, it's about access, support and civic culture. Opinion: Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us. We live in a time of democratic fragility. Attacks on voting rights, polarization and institutional distrust have made it clear: democracy cannot coast on inertia. We need bold, proven interventions to restore civic faith. Lowering the voting age is just that. It doesn't require new technology or costly overhauls. It's an idea already proven in jurisdictions across the U.S. and globally, including Argentina, Austria, Brazil and parts of Germany. Momentum is growing here. In recent years Berkeley and Oakland, California, have passed measures to lower the voting age in school board elections. In 2024, Newark, New Jersey became the first city in the state to allow 16-year-olds to vote in local school board races. State legislators in New York, Minnesota, Oregon, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Mexico, Washington D.C., Maine and elsewhere have introduced legislation to follow suit. Lowering the voting age is a call to trust young people with democracy and to rebuild democracy from the ground up − for all of us. LaJuan Allen is the executive director of Vote16USA, which supports youth-led efforts to lower the voting age in local, state and federal elections.
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran's Army Repairs Air Defenses for New War
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran has replaced air defence systems damaged during last month's clash with Israel, a senior military official said, as Tehran prepares for potential further military action with nuclear talks in the balance. With both Iran and Israel rearming and accusations flying, the threat of a renewed war continues to loom over the Middle East. Newsweek has reached out to the State Department as well as the foreign ministries of Iran and Israel. Why It Matters The restoration of Iran's air defenses highlights the growing risk of renewed conflict. Following coordinated Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian targets last month, Tehran accused Israel of acting with U.S. and NATO backing, framing the confrontation as part of a broader Western campaign. This escalation moves beyond a bilateral dispute, raising the possibility of a larger regional war involving multiple powers and proxy groups. This photo provided Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025, by the Iranian Army, shows a missile system during a military drill, Iran. This photo provided Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025, by the Iranian Army, shows a missile system during a military drill, Iran. Mahdi Vaziri/AP Photo What to Know According to Iran's Defah Press news agency, Iranian air defence systems sustained significant damage during June's conflict when Israel took control of the skies over Iran for a short time, allowing them to carry out attacks with less resistance. Rear Admiral Mahmoud Mousavi, acknowledged the losses but stressed a swift recovery. "Some of our defense systems were damaged in this war; but with the efforts of my comrades the damaged systems were replaced and deployed in predetermined locations." he said. Iran's military says it restored its air defenses using domestically developed systems. Its current arsenal includes the long-range Bavar-373 and Russian-supplied S-300 platforms. Defah Press did not report any recent imports of foreign-made equipment. Status of Nuclear Talks Meanwhile, Iran, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom are set to hold nuclear talks in Istanbul on Friday following warnings that the failure to resume negotiations could lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Tehran. The scheduled talks come after the foreign ministers of these E3 nations, along with the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi late last week. The E3, China, and Russia remain parties to the 2015 nuclear deal, which the Trump administration exited in 2018. Tehran says its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, European Union High Representative Federica Mogherini, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond and U.S. Secretary... Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, European Union High Representative Federica Mogherini, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, from left, pose for a group photo following talks with Iran on their nuclear program in Vienna, Austria, Tuesday, July 14, 2015. World powers and Iran announce a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement. More Ronald Zak/AP Photo What People Are Saying Iran's Rear Admiral Mahmoud Mousavi: "The Zionist enemy sought to destroy Iran's defence capabilities, and some of our defence systems were damaged in this war; But with the efforts of my comrades, the damaged systems were replaced and deployed in predetermined locations." Israel's Military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir: "The campaign against Iran is not over. We are entering a new phase." Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snapback' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground." What Happens Next With its air defenses restored and nuclear diplomacy back on the table, Iran is positioning itself for parallel military and political engagement as Western powers weigh whether to reimpose UN sanctions before an October 18 deadline.
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
An Attack on the Medical Establishment Buried in a 1,800-Page Regulation
For decades, the prices Medicare pays doctors for different medical services have been largely decided not by Medicare itself, but by a powerful industry group, the American Medical Association. An committee meets in secret to determine the difficulty and time demands of each type of medical visit, test and procedure, and then recommends to Medicare how much doctors should be paid for performing them. And for decades, critics have complained that this process unfairly rewards surgeons and other specialists, at the expense of primary care physicians and other generalists. Medicare officials have been loath to change it because it has spared them from needing their own staff and budget to make such pricing decisions, along with the unpleasant politics of adjudicating conflicts between competing groups of physicians. But a change buried inside a 1,803-page proposed regulation published last Monday suggests the Trump administration would like to move away from this longstanding system. If finalized, it could begin overturning a process that has entrenched pay advantages for certain kinds of doctors. 'We're modernizing Medicare by correcting outdated assumptions in how physician services are valued,' said Chris Klomp, a deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in an email. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
