LynnMall attack inquest: Police set to give evidence
Supplied
Warning: This story contains graphic details that may upset some readers.
The coronial inquest into the death of LynnMall attacker Ahamed Samsudeen continues on Wednesday, after a forensic pathologist explained
why he had zero chance of surviving as many as a dozen gunshot wounds
.
Samsudeen stabbed four women and one man with a kitchen knife at a Countdown supermarket in Auckland's New Lynn in 2021, before being shot and killed by police.
Two others were injured trying to stop him from harming others.
Forensic pathologist Dr Kilak Kesha conducted the post-mortem on Samsudeen after his death. He told the inquest the attacker died quickly from the gunshot wounds, describing four of them as rapidly fatal because they pierced vital organs.
Kesha described a bullet that passed through the left side of Samsudeen's chest, while being questioned by police counsel Alysha McClintock.
"That's one of the wounds that you considered may have been among those the most rapidly fatal?" McClintock asked.
'Yes, because it passed through the spleen, and the intestines," Kesha said.
Kesha described some of the other gunshot wounds and the impact these had on Samsudeen's body.
"It passed through the heart, the lungs, causing significant bleeding. This one passed through the aorta, the liver, the stomach, and small bowel, causing blood to accumulate in the abdomen."
Ross Tomlinson.
Photo:
RNZ/Marika Khabazi
Earlier in the inquest, survivor Ross Tomlinson
described how he used nappies from the supermarket shelves to help with Samsudeen's wounds after he was shot
.
A former paramedic with a decade's experience, he said he believed Samsudeen could not have been saved.
McClintock asked Kesha what impact as many as a dozen gunshot wounds would have.
"Is there anything else that you would add about the overall impact on the human body of receiving a total of potentially up to 12 gunshot wounds?" she said.
"After the autopsy, looking at all the injuries, survivability is zero," Kesha replied.
Coroner Marcus Elliott asked about Samsudeen's movements in the moments after he was shot.
"Death is not instantaneous - it takes time to bleed, your heart's got to pump and that blood's got to be lost through the broken vessels," Kesha said.
"People can walk, they can stumble, they can take a few steps, it depends how rapidly the blood is lost."
"So if he had formed the intention at that point to charge, to use that word, it would have been possible for him to do so?" Elliott asked, with Kesha responding that was correct.
The inquest continues on Wednesday with evidence from police officers.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
12 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Patient not drug tested hours before second killing, father alleges
The man's father alleged that on the day he killed for a second time, he was supposed to be drug tested. Photo: RNZ A mental health patient was not drug tested on the day he committed his second killing because the staffer believed he was "acting cagey", his father alleges. The man was subject to a compulsory treatment order at the time, which meant that drug screening occurred on a voluntary basis. But if he failed the test, the clinician would then need to assess whether the patient should be re-called to hospital. RNZ earlier revealed the man - who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing - was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time after killing someone he believed was possessed. RNZ is unable to publish details regarding either killings due to an appeal against name suppression that is due to be heard by the Court of Appeal. RNZ has obtained a copy of a letter from the man's father to the presiding judge. Do you know more? Email The man's father alleged that on the day he killed for a second time, he was supposed to be drug tested. "He turned up for the appointment but was not tested because the staff member said that he was acting cagey and she didn't want to make him feel like he was being picked on. "This is a so-called health professional who observed unusual behaviour from a person with severe mental health issues and they didn't do anything about it. She didn't test him and basically allowed him to leave. A few hours later [he killed again]." The man said his son told him he had to go have a drug test "so he was expecting it, but nothing came of it". The man's second killing "could and should have been prevented," the father says. "How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?" In the weeks leading up to the second killing, the man's mental health was "rapidly declining", a judge earlier said. He was admitted to a mental health facility following an altercation with a relative. About a week later he was released. He was having relationship problems and was using cannabis. Five days after he was released from the mental health facility, he stabbed someone to death. In his letter, he said his son had mental health issues "for most of his life". "I have attended countless appointments and meetings relating to [him] and his treatment, and I have full knowledge of the process, his medication and it's effectiveness, the downsides and how he has responded over the years. "I have met his doctors and psychiatrists and have a good understanding of the mental health system, what services are provided and some of it's failings." He discussed his son's admission to a mental health facility before the second killing when his mental health "deteriorated". He said the staff should not have released his son. The second killing was "predictable if anyone bothered to look at the warning signs and do something about it," he said. "Predictable in the sense that [he] was on a downward spiral. Maybe not predictable with the exact date and time, but the warning signs were there for the health professionals to see. To use their judgement and training and to actually do something about what they saw instead of just letting it go because it gets too hard for them." He said the health system was "not aggressive enough to make decisions". "For more than 5 years I visited [him] every night in one of their institutions, so I know full well what goes on inside the walls. There are more questions than answers. The health system had [him] in their custody and released him. A health professional saw [him] on the day he killed [again], described him as being cagey, did not do the blood test and let him go without doing anything. How? Who is accountable? How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?" RNZ put the allegations regarding the drug test to both Health New Zealand and the Ministry of Health. Health New Zealand (HNZ) said an external review of the care the patient received leading up to their alleged offending is in progress. They did not comment on the allegations. In most situations screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and could include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders, an HNZ spokesperson said. "However, screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested." Director of Mental Health Dr John Crawshaw said in a statement that in circumstances like these an independent review is triggered to investigate the incident and make recommendations for changes to services and for those recommendations to be acted on. A review was still underway. "The claim of reported drug use and delays in drug testing would be most appropriately investigated by the independent review commissioned by Health New Zealand." In relation to drug testing, a Ministry of Health spokesperson said screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and can include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders. "Screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested. "For further background, it also depends on whether the person is on an inpatient order or a community treatment order. If the testing is part of a condition of leave on an inpatient order it can result in the leave being cancelled. If the person is on a community treatment order, the responsible clinician would then need to assess whether there is enough concern to direct the patient to be treated as an inpatient. It's important to note that this applies to people under ordinary Mental Health Act orders and there is a separate process for special patients." Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said any serious incident, particularly one where someone was killed was a "cause of very serious concern". "That is why it is important that reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on. My focus is on ensuring agencies involved are putting in place the necessary changes to help prevent these incidents occurring again. "There is an external review underway, and it would be my expectation that this review will cover the care this person received leading up to the incident." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 minutes ago
- RNZ News
First public hearings into New Zealand's Covid-19 response to begin
The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 is looking into the government's response to the pandemic and its effects. Photo: RNZ The first public hearings into New Zealand's Covid response get underway today - with a focus on lockdowns and vaccines. The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 is looking into the government's response to the pandemic and its effects. It is the first time submissions will be heard publicly, with the sessions live-streamed. This week's hearings particularly concentrate on the impact of the extended lockdown in Auckland and Northland in 2021 and on vaccine mandates and safety. In a minute issued on the Inquiry's website chair Grant Illingworth KC said that would include the effect on "social division and isolation, health and education, and business activity. "We will also hear from experts about the key decisions and their consequences, and lessons to be learned from what happened." The hearings would be in secure hearing rooms, with commissioners, witnesses, lawyers and media present. There was no provision for public attendance beyond those submitting but the live streams would run and be available as recordings as well, the minute said. Witnesses would be questioned by lawyers helping the inquiry, and commissioners could ask questions. A second public hearing was due next month in Wellington. That was to hear from key decisions makers who "led and informed" the government's response to the pandemic. This Royal Commission was set up under the previous Labour government, but its brief was expanded under the current government, with Illingworth taking the chairing role. A report from the first phase was delivered last year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
30 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Covid-19 Inquiry: Who is being 'excluded' from inquiry hearings
Photo: People with Long Covid are disappointed they will not be prioritised as part of public hearings about the government's pandemic response. Phase two of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the official response to Covid-19 gets underway in Auckland on Monday, and will run until Thursday. It will hear from everyday people and their experiences of the government's decisions over vaccine use and lockdowns, including the extended lockdowns in Auckland and Northland. It will also hear from businesses and organisations affected. Long Covid Support Aotearoa spokesperson Catherine Appleby said she felt in choosing its focus, the inuiry had missed an opportunity to include the perspectives of people with post-Covid conditions. "A massive mistake really, to do that, because we were directly affected and our lives are still particularly affected as well." Appleby worked as a nurse at an urgent care centre when Covid-19 hit in 2020. Each day, after her shift, she would have to strip down her clothes on her doorstep, in the hope she wouldn't transmit Covid to her whānau. It's something many other healthcare practitioners did. In 2022, she caught Covid-19 herself. She returned to work thinking she was recovered, but the symptoms didn't go away. She reduced her hours of work in the hope it would improve things, but it didn't. "Finally, I just had to decide, and at that stage, I was over two and a half years into Long Covid, and I thought, "I'm looking down the barrel of non-recovery. If I want to have any chance of recovery, I just have to stop working completely." Auckland spent more than 100 days in lockdown starting in August 2021. Photo: 123RF Appleby explained there were significant effects on people with Long Covid. It often affects their ability to work, leading to loss of income, lack of financial and health system support, and impacts on social and family life, she said. She said thousands of people experience Long Covid across Aotearoa, all the more reason to include their voices in the hearings this week. "Covid is still around, and the Long Covid numbers are likely to increase. Even if you are immunized, the estimate is up to 10% of people who catch the infection will get Long Covid." Long Covid Support Aotearoa has called for an inquiry into the condition, much like the one held across the ditch in Australia between 2022 and 2023. A new Otago-led study, published in the International Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, found that more than 20 per cent of children and young people in Aotearoa are experiencing significant, persistent health symptoms following Covid-19. Lead Author and Associate Professor from the University of Otago's Department of Public Health, Julie Bennett, said her team conducted interviews with nearly 4300 children (or their parents for those under 16) to understand their experiences and symptoms after Covid-19 infection. The symptoms included things like headaches, fatigue, coughs, and anxiety, which they didn't have before having Covid, she said. "They were also reporting that they were unable to attend school because of having these symptoms, or they were unable to attend things like going to sporting events or activities that they normally would be able to do. These symptoms weren't just happening; they were actually limiting their ability to be able to participate in life." Regarding New Zealand's response, Professor Bennett said having a proper pandemic plan in place is key. "We did manage to get together really quickly, a good group of people to be able to make decisions, and making really hard decisions, on the spur of the moment, often with little information, but trying to do it as evidence-based as they could." Instead of focusing on Long Covid, the hearings this week will cover Government decisions relating to lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine safety, and how these key decisions affected things like social division and isolation, health and education, and business activity. Hearings this week are part of phase two of the Royal Commission's Inquiry. Photo: Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois has been an outspoken voice on the economic toll that successive lockdowns have had on the hospitality industry, especially in Auckland. She said the restrictions saw multiple businesses close as a result, a hard hit on her industry. "If there were some different decisions made around the lockdowns, the restrictions in trading, we would still see some of those businesses operating today, no doubt." At the time, she was an outspoken voice, consistently advocating for change and raising suggestions on how businesses could survive while also balancing public health goals. She said that while the government's intention might have been to protect public health, the reality felt like a one-size-fits-all approach. "We did a significant amount of work around the ways to make, like contactless deliveries available at, say, alert level three. Feedback like this, at the time, was ignored, whereas if that would have been taken on board, businesses could have been operating sooner." Marisa Bidois said the last couple of years have been particularly tough on the hospitality industry. Photo: Supplied The Restaurant Association submitted its feedback in writing and is not currently scheduled to appear at the hearings. Still, Bidois is welcoming the chance for reflection. "It's such a critical opportunity to ensure that we learn lessons from that pandemic response so that we can be better prepared, better informed for anything that may come about in the future," she said. Phase one was originally announced in 2022 by then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern; it aimed to examine the lessons learned and help the country better prepare for future pandemics. The second phase was borne from National's coalition agreements with both ACT and NZ First. It will cover vaccine approval, safety, monitoring, and mandates; the imposition and maintenance of national and regional lockdowns; The procurement, development, and distribution of testing and tracing technologies and non-pharmaceutical public health material. Inquiry chair Grant Illingworth said this process was not about placing blame, but instead about learning. "We are instructed in our terms of reference to avoid legalistic and adversarial processes. We are instructed to try to achieve the purpose of the inquiry, which is not to judge people or to hold them up to public scorn." In 2022 hundreds of cars and a few thousand people descended on central Wellington and Parliament to protest against the Government's Covid-19 vaccine mandates. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith Covid-19 lockdowns and vaccines have been the subject of misinformation and controversy in the last few years. Illingworth explained that the hearings will be live-streamed on the Royal Commission's website, improving accessibility and transparency. "Obviously we are not in a position to wave a magic wand and ensure that New Zealand is united over this whole issue. But it is, of course, important for us to try to help New Zealand to come together so that we do have an united ability to stand up to any crises in the future." Part two of the public hearings will take place at the end of August in Wellington and will hear from those who were key decision makers during the pandemic. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
