Coca-Cola ordered to pay €68,000 to marketing executive demoted on return from maternity leave
Coca-Cola
who said she was 'bullied' into taking a demotion from a management job to 'nearly a graduate position' when she got back to work after having a baby has won €68,000 for maternity discrimination.
Lisa Deveney told the
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC) at a hearing last winter that she thought she was going to return to her old job as premium spirits marketing manager, which she had held since 2018, at the end of maternity leave in January 2024.
She said she suffered an 'acute stress reaction' after her colleagues were told the employee brought in to cover her absence would be staying in her former role.
Coca-Cola HBC Ireland Ltd has now been found in breach of the Employment Equality Act 1998 on foot of a complaint by Ms Deveney.
READ MORE
The company had denied that complaint, along with a further complaint under the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994, which was not upheld by the tribunal.
Ms Deveney's evidence was that she had been absent for one year and 21 days on the day she was to go back to work on 22nd January this year, owing to pregnancy-related health issues. It was her second period of maternity leave, she told the WRC.
Bobby Healy on why Manna drone delivery could be the 'biggest technology company in the world for its space'
Listen |
67:08
She said the first she was told that she would not be going back in as premium spirits marketing manager was at the end of a call the Friday before the week she was due back.
'I was a bit nervous about going back. There hadn't been anything set up,' Ms Deveney said. She said a manager, Mr A, told her: 'You won't be returning to your role. We're looking for you to return to a new role.'
'He didn't know the [job] title at the time. I thought at the time it sounded like a demotion,' Ms Deveney said, referring to concerns about the fact she would no longer be reporting to a manager at director level.
'He said it would be good experience,' Ms Deveney said. Her response was: 'Listen I'm not going to throw my toys out of the pram,' and that she asked for the job specification. 'Obviously, I'm pretty sideballed. I thought I was getting my job back,' she said.
She said that Mr A told her they would sit down and discuss the position when she was back in the office on Monday, 22nd January. The complainant said she expected to see a job spec to review over the weekend, but that this was not forthcoming.
Ms Deveney said the next time she and the manager spoke was at a wider team meeting at 3.30pm that same day. '[He] started the call and said it was brilliant that I was back, that I was taking the premium spirits role and moving to [the other] team.'
'I assumed it was going to be a conversation, not a done deal – obviously it was,' she said.
'There's a vast difference in experience,' she said of the new role description. 'Three years' experience, that could be nearly a graduate position – for me that's quite a junior position,' Ms Deveney said.
She said she had to ask another colleague on the Tuesday to 'hold off' on sending an email to the new team, telling her that she was 'not accepting the position'. 'I felt I was bullied into taking a role,' she said.
Mr A's evidence to the WRC was that the role change was a process he and the complainant 'were working through' prior to a formal offer being made.
His evidence was that Ms Deveney was 'at no time ... asked to accept the position or to say that she wasn't interested'. He said she told him she would 'give it a go' and that he felt it was okay to move forward with it.
He explained that he planned to meet with Ms Deveney about the role prior to making a formal offer, but was 'incredibly busy' the day she returned to work on Monday 22nd January.
He said that he had outlined the role as a 'proposal' at the team meeting that day and that Ms Deveney had come to him afterwards stating that she was 'blindsided' and raising concerns about demotion.
Mr A said he only became aware the following evening that the arrangement was drawing 'an emotional response'.
Ms Deveney said she suffered a panic attack on the evening of Tuesday 23rd January and called in sick for the following day. She did not return to work prior to tendering her resignation in March, 2024, the tribunal was told.
Cillian McGovern BL, instructed by Aaron McKenna Solicitors for the complainant, said a worker hired in to cover his client's absence had been 'left in that position' when his client ought to have taken the job back.
Mary Fay BL, appearing for Coca-Cola instructed by Arthur Cox solicitors, told the WRC the job Ms Deveney previously occupied had 'just grown to such an extent it would not be reasonable to expect one person to do all the duties' and that the position had to be 'split'.
In her decision, adjudicator Patricia Owens examined the job descriptions for Ms Deveney's former job and the new position.
She noted that the grade and pay were the same for both jobs. However, the old role was described as a 'manager' position, reporting to director level, while the new role was described as a 'lead' position and did not involve managing a budget, the adjudicator noted.
The 'manager' position described responsibilities at a 'strategic level' while the new 'portfolio' lead had duties that were 'very much operational', she wrote.
She added that it was 'not difficult to imagine how offensive' the suggestion that 'a small portion' of the budget Ms Deveney once managed would be requested for her. Ms Owens concluded that the new post 'constituted a demotion for the complainant'.
Ms Owens also wrote that she was 'struck by the inconsistencies' in Mr A's account of his discussions with the complainant on the new role, while Ms Deveney had been 'consistent throughout'.
She concluded on the balance of probabilities that the employer had 'already decided that the complainant would move to the new role upon her return from maternity leave and that there was no intention to provide her with options'.
Ms Owens called it a 'fait accompli', and also rejected a further argument by the firm that the transfer was required because of organisational change.
She concluded that Ms Deveney had been discriminated against on the grounds of gender by not being returned to her former position after maternity leave.
The adjudicator awarded €68,000 in compensation for the breach, just short of a year's basic salary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, August 2nd: On Metro and St Stephen's Green, roads policing and Daniel O'Connell's stamp
Sir, – Following the recent refusal of planning permission for the redevelopment of St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre, now is an ideal moment for the Department of Transport, in partnership with Dublin City Council, to consider acquiring the site and repurposing it as the long-awaited Metro North station. Such a move would not only make strategic use of an already-developed site, but would also spare the iconic St Stephen's Green park from the disruption and long-term impact of major construction works. Preserving our precious green space while advancing public transport infrastructure is a win win for Dublin city. London has shown how infrastructure can enhance rather than damage a city's fabric. Stations like Canary Wharf or King's Cross have become architectural landmarks in their own right, modern, functional spaces that complement their urban surroundings. Dublin deserves nothing less. A metro station at the current shopping centre could serve as a fitting gateway to the city centre without compromising one of our most treasured parks. READ MORE Is it not time for some joined-up thinking? – Yours, etc, EOIN BLACKLOCK, CEO, Ekco, Malahide, Co Dublin. Sir, – Now that An Coimisiún Pleanála has turned down a plan to redevelop St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre perhaps the Government should acquire the site by way of compulsory purchase order for the proposed metro station and leave the Green undisturbed. Shops and restaurants could and should also be part of any new redevelopment. – Yours, etc, CIARAN CLANCY, Booterstown, Co Dublin. Trump and Rosie O'Donnell Sir, – Rosie O'Donnell's distaste and 'loathing' for Donal Trump as depicted in her show Common Knowledge elicits some sympathy for the US president in the letter of Paddy Fitzpatrick (July 31st) who advises 'always be kinder than is necessary'. For all we know, Rosie has already factored in this worthwhile advice before she each time fulminates against the man who has made denigrating his opponents into an art form. – Yours, etc, PJ McDERMOTT, Westport, Co Mayo. McDowell and Trump Sir, – Senator Michael McDowell writes that Donald Trump 'is right on migration'. He declares that asylum seeking is a 'racket'. (' Whatever about his tariffs, Trump's 'helpful advice' to the EU is on the money ,' July 30th). Praising Trump's ideas, which have led him to establish his ICE secret police, is a daring admission for Michael. Europe does have a lot to learn from Donald Trump, namely, that people who scapegoat migrants in defence of the wealthy are a threat to social cohesion, freedom and human empathy. – Yours, etc, PETER COUSINS, Skerries, Dublin. Childcare funding Sir, – Minister for Children Norma Foley, and her Department colleagues need to do more than simply label childcare providers' departure from core funding as 'regrettable.' (' Parents face fee rise after Dublin childcare provider pulls out of 'deeply flawed' core funding model ,' July 30th). They must actively listen to the urgent concerns of both providers and parents on this critical issue. As a parent whose children happily attend a wonderful crèche with dedicated staff, I fully support my childcare provider's difficult decision to opt out of core funding. Why would childcare providers turn down substantial funding unless the current system is fundamentally flawed? Core funding imposes an immense administrative burden on providers and fails to adequately cover rising operational costs, particularly staffing. Furthermore, it offers no increased funding for crèches supporting children with additional needs or those that have made significant capital investments in their facilities. I urge the Minister to prioritise quality childcare and reform core funding without delay. – Yours, etc, DR MELISSA O'NEILL, Glounthaune, Co Cork. Garda roads policing Sir – The Garda Commissioner has given a forthright and honest response to the problem of uninterested gardaí, but I wonder whether other organisations share the problem of dedicated and committed staff having to carry their disengaged peers? (' Shocking: Some roads policing gardaí 'openly hostile' towards doing their jobs, review finds ,' July 31st). Have other taxpayer-funded organisations implemented effective performance management? It would be interesting to know. – Yours etc. SEAN RYAN, Mountshannon, Co Clare. Sir, – Over the past few years I've noticed more and more cars with 'non standard' and 'decorative' (ie illegal) registration plates. These are clearly designed to be unreadable by speed and toll cameras, and yet they proliferate, which surely wouldn't happen if we had effective roads policing. While the recent Crowe report on challenges within the roads department of An Garda Siochána is alarming, it should be a spur to positive action. Surely one of the early signs of success will be a drop in the number of registration plates with tiny lettering and grey backgrounds? I live in hope. – Yours, etc, MICK FLYNN, Waterford. Planetary challenges Sir, – Minister for Public Expenditure Pascal Donohoe, recently shared his reflections on two books dealing, in different ways, with the planetary scale challenges currently facing global human civilisation (' Paschal Donohoe on books that advise how to run our economies and save the planet ,' July 26th). These challenges are triggered by a rapidly unfolding clash between the physical realities of a finite planet and political aspirations for unending growth in economic activity, with its seemingly insatiable appetite for more and more material and energy throughput. I'm no economist, but as a professional engineer, I know a thing or two about physics and chemistry: especially that they do not bend to wishful thinking. While apparently acknowledging these harsh realities, Minister Donohoe concludes that an agenda of stabilising (and then reducing) global economic activity is neither 'credible' nor 'achievable'. This is on the basis that – in his view – such a vision would be rejected by voters in any democratic society. Minister Donohoe is a highly experienced and respected politician, so his assessment of political feasibility must be taken seriously. But then we are between the proverbial rock and a hard place. Physics and chemistry will certainly not yield. To say that human societies, nonetheless, cannot learn to live good lives within planetary limits thus represents a counsel of despair. I, for one, refuse to accept that counsel. – Yours, etc, PROF BARRY McMULLIN, Dublin City University, Dublin Aerial views of Daniel O'Connell Sir, – The artist who inserted a television aerial in the design of the Daniel O'Connell stamp issued by an Post ( TV aerial in commemorative Daniel O'Connell stamp is 'visual signal' to modern age, not product of AI, says An Post ,' July 31st, states that it is a surreal reference to '…the impact the great communicator Daniel O'Connell's mass rallies would have had if they had been televised.' External television aerials are seldom used for television reception in 2025. Surely a more widely used communications technology that has more impact than television, such as, mobile phones would be more apt? – Yours, etc, AODÁN Ó CONCHÚIR, France. Sir, – I have tried to get AI to draw a picture for a stamp of Daniel O'Connell leaving the GPO in an elaborately gilded chariot. It's quite hard to get AI to put in a TV aerial, AI just isn't that stupid. So, it would seem that a human may have, actually, produced the official stamp. – Yours etc, JAMES O'RIORDAN, Stepaside, Dublin 18. Sir, –The artist's explanation as reported by your paper for the presence of an anachronistic tv aerial in one of An Post's recently released stamps commemorating Daniel O'Connell is the funniest piece of mylesnagcopaleenism I've read in a long time. He can not be serious! – Yours, etc, HUGH Mc DONNELL, Glasnevin, Dublin 9. Not happy with the headline Sir, – The headline ' Ceann Comhairle attends Swiss conference alongside sanctioned Russian politician, ' (July 30th) is a prime example of clickbait news reporting. In fact, it is more a case of distorting rather than reporting. I am surprised at this type of headline from your respected institution. Are politicians and representatives the world over to be denied free association and exchange of ideas every time a Russian representative appears at such venues? Are we to cancel the United Nations/Security Council meetings due to Russian involvement? I doubt that the representative speakers from all the other nations in attendance received such unfair reporting. –Yours, etc, PAUL GRAY, Dublin 9. Not happy with the photograph Sir, - What a bizarre image for the Dublin Horse Show 2025 on the cover of the sponsored supplement with yesterday's Irish Times. A woman draped across a bale of hay. Seriously? –Yours, etc, FINTAN LANE, Lucan, Co Dublin. Happy out Sir, - John Dunne's letter in yesterday's edition ( August 1st) about kids climbing trees put a broad smile on my face. Not exclusively because of the interesting content but also thanks to the epistle's humorously apt headline –Seldom seen kid – which suggests that the Letters Editor may very well be a fan of the Manchester band, Elbow. – Yours, etc, KIERAN FLYNN, Ballinasloe, Co Galway. Remembering Sean Rocks Sir, – I was deeply saddened to learn of the sudden passing of Sean Rocks, presenter of the RTÉ Radio 1 Arena programme, among many other career achievements. I listen to Arena on my long commute home every day and his engaging interviews with actors, playwrights, musicians and authors certainly gave me inspiration to check out the books, plays, films and music I may not have heard about elsewhere. A true public service broadcaster – may he rest in peace. – Yours, etc, COLETTE DAVIS, Dunsany, Co Meath. Sir, – It is with deep regret that we have heard of the death of RTÉ broadcaster Sean Rocks. Sean was a great friend of the arts and of artists across Ireland and abroad. Through his radio programme, he provided wonderful insights into the creative world. His compassion and warmth are legendary. It is hard to believe that he will no longer continue to light up our cultural realm in his unique self-effacing way which belied his enormous knowledge, both as an arts practitioner and a broadcaster. On behalf of Irish PEN/PEN na hÉireann we extend our deepest sympathy to Sean's wife Catherine and his two sons. Our sympathy too to his many friends in RTÉ and across the arts world. May he rest in peace. – Yours, etc, PÁDRAIG HANRATTY, LIZ McMANUS , Co Chairs, Irish PEN/PEN na hÉireann, Dundalk. Busy, busy, busy,even busier Sir, – On the matter of 'The look of looking busy': I recall the experience of Sam McAughtry. Many of your readers may remember Sam; writer, social commentator, humourist, trade unionist and one time civil servant. It was his first day in the Department of Agriculture in Stormont as a lowly clerical assistant. He was given an errand to go to the top floor of Dundonald House; the power centre for the most senior staff in that department. He walked briskly along the corridor, entered the lift and smiled broadly to the older gentleman also in the lift. He wanted to give a good impression. They both got out on the top floor. Sam held his head up and as he walked off speedily the older man called out to him: 'Young man, are you new?'' 'Yes,' he replied with a smile. ''Well,' said the Secretary of the Department, for it was he, 'take my advice. Never walk quickly; walk slowly. Don't smile, creates the wrong impression; bow your head and look as if you are in serious contemplation; oh, most important, carry a file'. Sam took this advice and had a very successful career in the Northern Ireland Civil Service.. He laughed when he told the story. – Yours, etc, GREG MAXWELL, Celbridge, Co Kildare. Taxing imported food Sir, – The Government should consider imposing a large tariff on unnecessary imported perishable foodstuffs. These air mile-laden, tasteless products are substantially contributing to climate change. Yesterday, in the supermarket there were french beans from Zimbabwe, mange tout peas from Ethiopia. Both products are growing abundantly in my garden in Cork. To top it off there were blackberries from the Netherlands in a year when the hedgerows are simply brimming with the fruit. – Yours, etc. TIM BRACKEN, Cork.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election winner in line for increased election expenses refund of up to €250,000
The winner of the presidential election will be entitled to reimbursement of election expenses by the State of an increased sum of up to €250,000 after this year's campaign. Unsuccessful candidates whose vote reaches a quarter of the quota are also in line for the same maximum level of refund. The sum is €50,000 more than the maximum reimbursement of €200,000 that was on offer after the 2018 election. The increase was approved by Minister for Local Government James Browne to reflect the increase in the consumer price index (CPI) – a measures of inflation – that has occurred since 2018. READ MORE On that occasion just two candidates qualified for reimbursement, President Michael D Higgins and Independent candidate Peter Casey . Mr Higgins's re-election campaign in 2018 had expenses of some €367,338, with €200,000 of this reimbursed. Mr Casey was repaid the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Others whose share of the vote did not meet the threshold for refunds were Independents Joan Freeman, whose campaign spent €253,194; Seán Gallagher , whose campaign had spending of €246,820; and Gavin Duffy, whose campaign cost €163,438. Sinn Féin spent €209,716 on the campaign for its 2018 candidate, Liadh Ní Riada, but also lost out on any reimbursement. The Department of Local Government on Friday said Mr Browne had signed an order increasing the maximum reimbursement amount from €200,000 to €250,000. 'Applying the CPI increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700 which has been rounded down to €250,000.' The overall spending limit for individual presidential campaigns will remain at €750,000 for the forthcoming election, expected to take place in October or November. This €750,000 spending limit is still well above even the most expensive election campaign of recent times. That was Fine Gael's unsuccessful bid to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011, which ran up election expenses of €527,152. Mr Mitchell's campaign did not qualify for any reimbursement. There are just two confirmed candidates in this year's presidential race so far: Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness – a former European Commissioner and MEP – and left-wing Galway West Independent TD Catherine Connolly . Ms McGuinness has the backing of a large party and its financial resources. Ms Connolly is seeking donations from supporters and is likely to get funding from the smaller parties that back her including Labour and the Social Democrats . The sums raised for Ms Connolly's campaign through online fundraising as of Thursday evening stood at some €28,500.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
OpenAI disables ChatGPT ‘experiment' that allowed users make exchanges available on search engines
OpenAI has pulled the plug on a short-lived change to the configuration of the ChatGPT app that allowed users to make their conversations accessible to search engines after it became apparent that some private or commercially sensitive material was inadvertently being made accessible on the internet. Barry Scannell, an AI law and policy partner at William Fry and a member of the Government appointed AI Advisory Council, said his 'jaw hit the floor' when he saw some of the material made accessible to routine Google searches on Thursday. Open AI's chief information security officer later said the feature that allowed users to make their conversations accessible for indexing by search engines would be disabled by Friday, with Dane Stuckey describing the original move as 'a short-lived experiment'. He said the company was working to ensure that all information that had been indexed was entirely removed. READ MORE Mr Scannell said there had been widespread confusion initially as to how the information was becoming publicly accessible and whether all prompts to ChatGPT were impacted. It appears users were clicking a check-box that had the effect of making shared chats discoverable by search engines without them realising the consequences. He said it was clear from much of the information that became accessible from the user prompts that this was being done unintentionally. 'Based on what I've seen, some of the stuff was so personally sensitive and commercially sensitive that people clearly didn't realise a random person could come along and do a simple search on Google and be able to find the chats.' He said the issue did not appear to be a technical issue but rather highlighted the need for greater AI literacy on the part of users to better understand the tech they are using. 'People seem to have clicked a box to make their chats discoverable on a search engine, or make them indexable, apparently without understanding what that meant. It's just people doing this without realising it. 'What this shows, I think, is just how important it is to have critical thinking and AI literacy as a really key component of any national strategy dealing with it.' He said the incident should also serve as a warning to those working business about the potential risks involved in using AI as there was the potential to expose commercially sensitive material. An extension of legal confidentiality protections might also be required, he suggested. Online, there was considerable discussion too of the potential for deeply personal information to be made available, including the contents of chats in which individuals were using ChatGPT for the purposes of therapy.
