Lawsuit filed over Arkansas Ten Commandments in classrooms law
The plaintiffs come from diverse backgrounds, some of which are very religious, while others are not, but all argue that the law is unconstitutional.
Ten Commandments, 'In God We Trust' in classrooms is now Arkansas law
When school starts, the Ten Commandments are to be displayed in classrooms across the state. However, the lawsuit seeks to stop the law from taking effect.
John Williams, legal director for the ACLU of Arkansas, said the plaintiffs believe the law violates the U.S. Constitution.
'We think that by posting a religious document for students to view every day when they're in school, that that is an establishment of a preferred religion, and that's against the Establishment Clause,' Williams said.
Williams also said the law violates the free exercise of religion.
USDA approves Arkansas Gov. Sanders' waiver to ban soda, candy from SNAP
Jerry Cox, executive director of the conservative Family Council, supports the law.
'We think that this is a very good law; the purpose of school is to teach young people good values and to teach them about our history,' Cox said.
Cox says that the Ten Commandments are also historical and foundational to Western civilization.
'I think it's undeniable that the Ten Commandments formed the basis for all Western civilization, our laws, our morals, our society,' Cox said.
Williams disagreed, emphasizing the religious nature of the commandments.
'Ten Commandments are not really a basis for law in the United States,' he said.
Cox noted that the commandments are already displayed in various public places.
'We display the Ten Commandments in a lot of public places. They're over there on the grounds of the Capitol, you can find them at the U.S. Supreme Court,' he said.
Lawsuit filed to halt Arkansas law putting 10 Commandments in classrooms
The law is scheduled to take effect Aug. 5, before the new school year begins.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
In the wake of SNAP cuts, feeding hungry Illinoisans falls more than ever on food pantries
Natasha McClendon had $20 in her bank account and a bag of chicken in her fridge. It wasn't going to be enough to feed her three daughters, her husband and herself, which meant it was time to take her monthly visit to the St. Sabina parish food pantry. She took the bus to St. Sabina from her home on the South Side, a two-story duplex the McClendons share with a transition house. Her husband, Eric, suffers from Morquio syndrome — a birth defect that manifests like severe scoliosis — and is unable to work. Most of his disability check goes towards their $750 rent. Natasha McClendon is a substitute teacher at Chicago Public Schools. She makes around $211 a week during the school year. She hasn't had a paycheck since June. 'We barely get any help from anyone,' she said. In the last several months, the McClendons have watched their government food assistance shrink. In December, Natasha McClendon took to shopping once a month at her church's food pantry to keep her family fed, supplementing what she could afford from Food4Less and Jewel-Osco. But there are still days she worries her kids are hungry. Now, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, faces its largest cut in its history under President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' signed into law on Independence Day. By cutting $200 billion out of SNAP, the bill, officially called HR-1, pushes the burden to feed hungry Americans even further onto nonprofit food pantries, which could mean less food for people like the McClendons. As nonprofits reliant on donations, food banks and pantries were already stretched thin before the bill passed. Volunteers said they see more American families fall into food insecurity every day. As long as shoppers fit a certain criteria, pantries typically don't turn them away — but as demand grows, each family gets less to eat. Thousands of Illinoisans will be directly affected by Trump's SNAP cuts, which means thousands more people relying on food pantries, which means less food for everyone. Unless thousands more donations appear. 'We certainly need the support of the larger Chicago community to provide what we believe is going to be an exponential increase in need,' said Mitzi Baum, interim CEO at Chicago food nonprofit Nourishing Hope. A small, red-brick building, the St. Sabina parish pantry stands on West 79th Street, wedged in next to its partner church. The only clue of its existence is the small cluster of people holding shopping bags outside the door. Until recently, Natasha McClendon had never shopped at St. Sabina's — she visited the parish only as a churchgoer. Her $1,100 SNAP benefits had been enough to feed the family for the most part. She first visited St. Sabina parish food pantry on Dec. 10, the day she opened a letter from the Illinois Department of Human Services informing her that after IDHS did its routine reevaluation of her family's needs, it would limit their SNAP benefits to $660 a month. 'They're picking on us working people,' Natasha McClendon said. When the door swung open right at 9 a.m. on June 23, the line of South Side residents signed their names on a clipboard in the lobby area, a small space with white walls that resembles a doctor's office waiting room. Many of the shoppers seemed to know what they were doing, but others asked questions uncertainly as they navigated their first visit. Natasha McClendon shopped in a room set up like a U, where smiling volunteers handed Natasha her choices from each station. She could choose four vegetables, two fruits, two bread products, one meat and three miscellaneous items, but that was the daily limit. She took her time going through the options on each shelf, looking for the food items her kids would eat. Some sections were more empty than others; Nice! Fruit Circles crowded the cereal shelf, but the canned vegetable section only offered pumpkin and green beans. Her cart looked full when she had finished her lap, but she stared woefully down at her food. It would only feed her family for a couple of days, and she would have to wait until July to come back. Most Chicago food pantries can only afford to allow visits once a month. She has two grown children as well as her three young daughters who live at home. Natasha McClendon graduated from Kennedy-King College in 1999 with a baby and an associate's degree in preschool education. Although she's been applying to jobs, she is limited by various medical issues, including a tic disorder, Achilles tendonitis and other complications that make it difficult for her to work on her feet. 'I've had some battles, but I fought them,' she said. In March, IDHS budgeted each member of the McClendon family for less than $6 of food per day. St. Sabina is one of the 800 organizations served by the Greater Chicago Food Depository, which distributes food to pantries in communities all over the city. The Greater Chicago Food Depository and its sister organization, the Northern Illinois Food Bank, have felt the effects of rising grocery prices for months. The United States is still dealing with supply chain issues from COVID-19, unhelped by Trump's tariffs, climate change and even the war in Ukraine. 'This is a perfect storm,' said Lindsay Allen, a health economist and policy researcher at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine. 'It's the worst storm ever.' Eggs, dairy, meat and fresh produce: These words are motifs in conversations between pantry operators, experts and shoppers. Everybody is struggling to afford them; in fact, the Greater Chicago Food Depository stopped buying eggs for its partners. Food insecurity stretches into the suburbs and small towns across the state. John and Loretta Arient bear daily witness to rising food insecurity in their small Illinois community. The Arients named Stone Soup, their NIFB-affiliated pantry and soup kitchen in Marengo, after the children's tale about neighbors sharing food. When the Arients first moved to Marengo, there were a couple of grocery stores and a decent pharmacy. Now, they call Marengo a 'food desert' because it has only two places to buy groceries. Options in the town include a Sullivan's Foods, a Family Dollar and two pantries. When people can't afford food from the first two options, they turn to the latter. 'Small towns are taking a hit and small businesses are taking a hit and things are shutting down,' Loretta Arient said. The Arients helped found the Stone Soup kitchen in 2014. Every Tuesday between Memorial Day and early September, John Arient and three other volunteers cook four kinds of soup in the kitchen at Marengo United Methodist Church. In 2017, Stone Soup expanded to give out boxes of food on Mondays, which include produce, meat, bread, cereal and pasta. The boxes are supposed to provide three days' worth of food. Stone Soup does not have qualifying requirements; it feeds between 150 and 180 families every Monday. 'We take care of the needy and the greedy, and we let God sort them out,' John said. In the weeks leading up to Trump signing HR-1, Natasha McClendon was afraid that her SNAP benefits would be further diminished. She thought she would be subject to harsher work requirements. And like so many other SNAP recipients — and pantry owners, as well as the politicians writing the bill — Natasha McClendon was confused. She didn't know what was going to happen. Food banks and pantries were sure of one thing: Food insecurity was about to turn from bad to worse. On July 4, Congress voted to extend work requirements to adults aged 55-64 and parents of children older than 13. Natasha McClendon's two younger daughters are 9 and 12, so her status with work requirements will not change. Yet the McClendons will suffer from the strain on their neighborhood food pantry as it becomes the only institution left to feed people losing SNAP benefits. 'I don't want to have to put a 'No Food' sign on the door,' said Tim Allison, executive director of social services at St. Sabina. Allen, of Northwestern University, explained the inefficacy of work requirements for food assistance programs. To work, people need to eat. The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' threw hungry Americans into a catch-22: You can't afford to eat unless you work — but it's hard to work hungry. 'By taking away nutrition and by taking away health care from people, we are pretty much making it impossible for them to work,' Allen said. SNAP's purpose, she said, is to provide stability during times of economic instability. And the economy, right now, feels unstable to many, as grocery prices rise and the job market goes on a diet. As demand for food assistance rises — and it will — supplies diminish. Stone Soup has had to lower its quality standards in the wake of rising grocery prices. Its Monday food boxes, these days, have less fresh produce and more canned ingredients, according to Loretta Arient. Stone Soup could also use more storage and extra hands; as of now, the Arients, who are both retired, do most of the pantry's food pickups in their silver 2016 Honda Odyssey. 'I can see this almost taking us to a screeching halt,' John Arient said of HR-1. On top of needing more helping hands, food donations and money, food pantries will need more storage space and larger fridges and freezers to keep up with the thousands of people who will turn to them for nourishment. Julie Yukro, president and CEO of the Northern Illinois Food Bank, said she expects between 60,000 to 80,000 more Illinoisans in the region to start relying on her organization. One of those Illinoisans, Terry Roman, has a little gray card with purple and blue stripes tucked into his very old wallet. The small rectangle, more like a gift card than a credit card, carries the repercussions of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' At 59, Roman falls into the risky age group between 55 and 64 who are now subject to work requirements nationwide. He doesn't have a disability exemption so unless that changes or he miraculously finds 80 hours of work per month, his gray plastic card will stop feeding him. For the last year and a half, Roman has received $292 in SNAP benefits each month. He retired two years ago from driving a truck after working for more than 40 years, in part because of a bad knee. Roman doesn't get disability for the knee because the issue has yet to be diagnosed. He works odd jobs to make ends meet while living in interim housing in Downers Grove that doesn't charge him rent. Roman buys most of his groceries with his SNAP money — for now. When Trump signed HR-1, he put a timer on Roman's benefits. So far, experts don't know when the timer will hit zero. 'They got eggs today!' The tall woman in the red dress turned excitedly to share the news. Nourishing Hope's Sheridan Market location, a GCFD partner, hadn't had eggs the last several times Bridget Woods went shopping. That Thursday evening at Sheridan Market was loud. Families chattered in the waiting area, volunteers asked shoppers their preferences and Judy Freebus, speaking Russian, was engaged in a bilingual conversation with an elderly Ukrainian woman at the check-in station. The shelves at this location were full-to-bursting at 5 p.m., prepared to feed 318 neighbors with 15 days' worth of groceries for each household. Nourishing Hope is one of Chicago's most efficient food pantries. It provides groceries for more than 4.5 million meals a year, with two pantry sites as well as an online market that allows shoppers to pre-order groceries and pick them up in a car. GCFD provides 62% of groceries, but Nourishing Hope also gets substantial food donations from Sam's Club, Target and Trader Joe's. Woods has shopped at Nourishing Hope pantries for more than 10 years now. Her SNAP benefits amount to only $34 a month, which has never been enough. She wasn't sure if her access to SNAP would be affected by HR-1. 'If it (does get) affected, I won't miss nothing,' Woods said as she scrutinized a selection of cheese. 'Nope, not that,' she said as an eager volunteer proffered a ball of mozzarella. 'Put that back.' Nourishing Hope's lush shelves have been life-sustaining for many Chicagoans, and now they, too, are at risk. Angela Cimarusti-Clifford, Nourishing Hope's senior manager of pantry programs, said the pantry hasn't experienced immediate effects of HR-1 but is preparing for them to hit. When SNAP was cut in the past, the impact followed shortly after. Yet the July day Bridget Woods went shopping, for the first time in months, Sheridan Market had eggs. Just one carton per household — but eggs nonetheless. Woods didn't know where the eggs came from. Maybe a grocery donation. Maybe a generous neighbor. Perhaps the staff at Nourishing Hope bought the eggs themselves. Whoever it was — someone saw the need, and filled it. Nourishing Hope will keep feeding its neighbors, even as its burden becomes heavier than ever.
Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
GOP wants to cut waste. Critics say SNAP exemption could do opposite.
When passing their massive tax and immigration law, Republicans said they wanted to tackle instances of 'waste, fraud, and abuse' in federal programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. But, in a last-minute push to secure the vote of Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Senate Republicans included a provision that some critics say could encourage some states to maintain — or increase — the number of errors they make in processing critical food assistance benefits.
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Sends Message To Iran Over Nuclear Ambitions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has warned Iran not to attempt to rebuild their nuclear facilities, after he claimed recent U.S. military strikes in June "completely destroyed" Iran's sites. The President wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "All three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or OBLITERATED. It would take years to bring them back into service and, if Iran wanted to do so, they would be much better off starting anew, in three different locations, prior to those sites being obliterated, should they decide to do so. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Why it Matters The stakes surrounding Iran's nuclear program remain high for U.S. national security interests and for stability across the Middle East. President Trump's warning comes against a backdrop of ongoing debates about the effectiveness of U.S. strikes and the future of diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. What To Know On June 21, the U.S. military—under an operation code-named Midnight Hammer—conducted airstrikes against three of Iran's principal nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Trump and defense officials publicly claimed that all three sites were "completely destroyed," saying that Iran would require years to reconstitute its nuclear program if it tried to rebuild. Trump reiterated this with his message on Saturday. But some U.S. intelligence assessments have challenged the administration's narrative. Only one out of three of Iran's nuclear sites was destroyed with the other two surviving enough to be able to resume nuclear enrichment within several months if Tehran wants it, according to NBC News, which cited five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment. The Defense Department and the White House have pushed back, asserting that their own intelligence showed all three facilities were "completely and totally obliterated." Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Purnell said: "President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that." "The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover." Iran maintains that its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes, despite long-standing Western suspicions. Iranian diplomats are set to meet in Europe next week for discussions about a possible nuclear deal, according to the Institute for the Study of War. "Iran has not softened its position on its right to enrich uranium on Iranian soil, which makes it unlikely that Iran will accept a nuclear deal that includes a zero uranium enrichment demand," the Institute said in its most recent report. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in... U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a press briefing with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in Washington, D.C. on Friday, June 27, 2025—President Trump addressed Iran, the "Big, Beautiful Bill" and tariffs. More AP What People Are Saying Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell previously told reporters that American strikes had "degraded (Iran's) program by one to two years." He said: "We believe, and certainly, all of the intelligence that we've seen have led us to believe that Iran's—those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated." Trump said in an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures: "It was obliterating like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time." What Happens Next The debate over the true impact of the U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities is likely to persist, with calls for independent verification of the destroyed facilities. Iran's response to both the military strikes and diplomatic overtures remains uncertain, as tensions in the region continue to simmer.
