Review: In Lifeline Theatre's ‘War of the Worlds,' comedy wins out over human drama
Hildreth's loose adaptation changes the setting from southern England to northern Illinois, name-checking a litany of familiar cities, suburbs and rural townships throughout the play. The scientists who first discovered unusual activity happening on Mars work at 'the renowned Illinois Technological Institute, outside of Skokie, Illinois,' a fictional locale that is repeatedly introduced with the exact same wording until it becomes a mantra of sorts. This setting makes sense for a Chicago production, more so than English towns such as Woking and Weybridge, but the hyperlocal references sometimes feel a bit too cute.
Professor Wittington (Mark Mendelsohn) narrates much of the action, and the dialogue is interspersed with clips of fictional TV news broadcasts — a nod to the format of Orson Welles' infamous 1938 radio adaptation, which reportedly convinced some listeners that aliens were actually attacking the United States. The professor and a small crew of scientists from the Institute, including an artificially intelligent humanoid called Assistant Professor Whitehurst (Amanda Link), investigate a series of strange explosions on the surface of Mars. Months later, the mystery is solved when cylindrical space capsules begin to crash on Earth, letting loose an army of giant metallic tripods wielding weapons that blast deadly heat rays.
With Illinois at the epicenter of a national and potentially global crisis, the play satirizes a range of all-American ideologues: conspiracy theorists, doomsday preachers, isolationists and jingoistic military types. Even J.B. Pritzker gets a sendup with Anthony Kayer's performance as the fictional governor of Illinois. Reading 'The War of the Worlds' as a satire is not a novel interpretation; Wells himself acknowledged that the book's anti-imperial themes were inspired by the brutality of European colonialism. But at Lifeline, the comedic tone is dialed up so high that the social commentary loses some of its bite.
The production team augments the cast's over-the-top performances with floor-to-ceiling tentacles (set designer Lindsay Mummert), bursts of green light from the heat rays (lighting designer Sarah Riffle) and warbling sound effects that evoke a 1950s sci-fi film (sound designer Joe Griffin). The onstage violence is occasionally macabre but never gruesome; when Whitehurst, the android, loses both arms in battle, their silver-tipped severed limbs go flying (props designer Jenny Pinson), but none of the human characters shed visible blood. Later, during the dissection of a captured Martian, the creature's blue and orange color scheme mimics the Illini jacket that the governor previously appeared in (costume designer Aly Amidei).
What gets lost in this inventive production are the human relationships that could give it more heart. For most of the play, Professor Wittington thinks that his wife, Dr. Wittington (Jocelyn Maher), has been killed by the Martians, but this emotional arc is overshadowed by the narrative weight his character bears. Since Lifeline can't recreate an alien invasion onstage any more realistically than Shakespeare could cram armies into his 'wooden O,' audience members must exercise their imaginations to picture the battles that Professor Wittington describes. There's little room for character development amid the action sequences, so the play doesn't have much of an emotional impact despite its high stakes for humankind.
The inhabitants of Earth never get answers to the question of what they've done to deserve this catastrophe, but the play points the finger back at humanity by claiming that war is our greatest export and that the militaristic Martians offer a glimpse into our collective future. Toward the end, Whitehurst has a crisis of faith, revealing that the scientists have programmed the android with some sense of belief in god and an afterlife. It's a strange interlude that hints at the often-fraught relationship between science and religion.
While hardcore sci-fi fans may be disappointed by this 'War of the Worlds,' those who appreciate the genre's more irreverent side will likely enjoy it. Lifeline never shies away from scaling epic stories to fit onto its small stage, and the company's gutsy creativity is evident in this latest world premiere.Review: 'War of the Worlds' (2.5 stars)
When: Through July 13
Where: Lifeline Theatre, 6912 N. Glenwood Ave.
Running time: 1 hour, 35 minutes
Tickets: $20-$45 at 773-761-4477 and lifelinetheatre.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
American Eagle's ‘good jeans' ads with Sydney Sweeney spark debate
American Eagle Outfitters wanted to make a splash with its new ads starring actor Sydney Sweeney. The campaign has sparked a debate about race, Western beauty standards, and the backlash to 'woke' American politics and culture. Is the mixed reaction what the brand intended? (July 31)
4 hours ago
Government to keep sharing key satellite data for hurricane forecasting despite planned cutoff
The U.S. Department of Defense will now continue sharing key data collected by three weather satellites that help forecasters track hurricanes. Meteorologists and scientists had warned of risks to accurate and timely storm tracking without the information when officials made plans to stop providing it beyond the end of this month. Defense officials had planned to cut off distribution of microwave data from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, jointly run with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, by the end of June. At the time, NOAA said the cutoff was said 'to mitigate a significant cybersecurity risk" while the U.S. Navy said the program didn't meet "information technology modernization requirements.' The discontinuation was postponed for one month. In a notice on Wednesday, officials said there would be no interruption at all. The Navy said in a statement that its Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center 'had planned to phase out the data' as part of modernization efforts. "But after feedback from government partners, officials found a way to meet modernization goals while keeping the data flowing until the sensor fails or the program formally ends in September 2026.' The data is used by scientists, researchers and forecasters, including meteorologists at the National Hurricane Center. It gives crucial information about storms that can't be gleaned from conventional visible or infrared satellites. 'This satellite data enables hurricane forecasters and their computer models to peer inside a hurricane's structure, offering vital insight," said Union of Concerned Scientists science fellow Marc Alessi. "Make no mistake: this data not only improves hurricane forecasting accuracy, but could make the difference between whether communities evacuate or not ahead of an approaching hurricane.' Other microwave data would have been available with this cutoff, but only about half as much, experts said — increasing the chance that forecasters would miss certain aspects of storms. A spokesperson for NOAA said the agency will continue to have access to the data for the program's lifespan and noted that it is just one data set 'in a robust suite of hurricane forecasting and modeling tools" that the National Weather Service has at its disposal to 'ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve.' The news had initially raised scientific eyebrows amid hurricane season, which usually peaks from mid-August to mid-October. Climate change, worsened by the burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal, have driven storms to become more frequent, severe and deadly. 'The last-minute reprieve has hurricane forecasters breathing a sigh of relief,' said Jeff Masters, a meteorologist for Yale Climate Connections. 'Loss of the microwave satellite data would have made it far more likely that timely warnings of dangerous and potentially deadly episodes of hurricane rapid intensification events being delayed by up to 12 hours.' He added the restoration of the data is also good news for scientists tracking Arctic sea ice loss. Images and microwave satellite data can estimate how much of the ocean is covered by ice, according to NOAA. NOAA and the NWS have been the subject of several cuts throughout President Donald Trump's second term. ___ Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ___ ___
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Study Confirms What We've Known About Eggs' Health Impacts All Along
We've known for a while that the idea that eggs are full of "bad" cholesterol isn't exactly accurate. A new study confirms these findings, showing that you should really focus on how much saturated fat you're consuming alongside your morning eggs. And as it turns out, it's often the foods you eat with eggs that are high in saturated fats, thus raise the "bad" cholesterol content in your body, not the eggs themselves. Eggs' reputation have certainly been through the wringer over the past two decades. For years, there were concerns that a regular egg habit would raise your cholesterol, prompting a wave of egg white recipes. But the nutritional community has largely started to change its tune on these great little sources of protein, stating that the cholesterol concerns might have been a tad overblown. Now, new research published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is providing scientific evidence that supports the idea that you don't need to stress about eggs' cholesterol content. Instead, you should be concerned about the saturated fat that's often present in high quantities in foods that usually go with eggs, according to the findings. It's important to point out that the study was funded by the Egg Nutrition Center, which is a division of the American Egg Board. However, the study notes that the board didn't have a role in the study's design, analysis, or interpretation of the data. Here's what experts make of the new findings, and what they mean for your egg habit. Meet the experts: Sonya Angelone, RDN, is a nutritionist and registered dietitian based in San Francisco, California; Scott Keatley, RD, is co-owner of Keatley Medical Nutrition Therapy; Matthew Black, RDN, LD, is a dietitian at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center What did the study find? The randomized controlled study followed 61 adults and assigned them one of three diets to follow for five weeks. One group had diet that was high in cholesterol, low in saturated fat, and involved eating two eggs a day. Another had people eat an egg-free diet that was low in cholesterol and high in saturated fat. The final group followed a diet that was high in cholesterol, high in saturated fat, and involved eating one egg per week. (This was the control group.) The researchers discovered that people who ate two eggs a day lowered their LDL ('bad') cholesterol compared to the control group. The egg-free group didn't have the same results. The researchers also found that it seems to be the saturated fats that are found in foods like bacon and sausage that are usually eaten with eggs that actually raise LDL cholesterol levels—not the eggs themselves. 'Saturated fat, not dietary cholesterol, elevates LDL cholesterol,' the researchers wrote. 'Compared with consuming a high-saturated fat diet with only one egg a week, consuming two eggs daily as part of a low-saturated fat diet lowers LDL concentrations, which may reduce cardiovascular disease risk.' 'This study's core claim does track with what we've been seeing over the past decade: Saturated fat has a stronger impact on LDL cholesterol than dietary cholesterol,' says Scott Keatley, RD, co-owner of Keatley Medical Nutrition Therapy. 'This is backed by multiple meta-analyses and guidelines have been shifting away from blaming eggs alone and more toward the dietary context in which eggs are eaten.' Why is cholesterol content not actually something to worry about? While people love to hate on cholesterol, it actually has a role in the body. 'Cholesterol is an essential nutrient that has many roles, including functioning as a precursor to hormones and contributing to the integrity of cellular membranes,' says Sonya Angelone, RDN, a nutritionist and registered dietitian based in San Francisco, California. 'This is why your liver produces cholesterol.' Eggs are the primary source of dietary cholesterol, but when you consume more and more cholesterol in your diet, your liver produces less to compensate for the higher amount you're consuming, Angelone explains. 'If you eat less cholesterol, your liver tends to produce more cholesterol,' she says. 'Research has not provided strong evidence that dietary cholesterol, especially from eggs, increases blood levels of cholesterol or increases risk for heart disease.' Consuming dietary cholesterol from eggs as part of a low saturated fat diet does not seem to raise LDL cholesterol levels, according to the study findings. 'The risk for heart disease comes mainly from the other foods on the breakfast plate, like sausage or bacon,' Angelone says. Keatley points this out, too: 'When we're talking about fat and cholesterol, we're only talking about the yolk. Egg whites can and should be on the menu now.' Why should you focus on lowering the amount of saturated fats you're consuming? Scientific data increasing show that saturated fat can be an issue when it comes to your LDL cholesterol levels. 'Current research suggests that saturated fat is the primary component in one's diet that raises 'bad' LDL cholesterol,' says Matthew Black, RDN, LD, a dietitian at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. 'Additional research also indicates that diets too high in saturated fats can contribute towards developing cellular inflammation and insulin resistance, which is a metabolic condition in which your body's cells do not respond to insulin as efficiently as they should, leading to possible health problems including type 2 diabetes and difficulty losing or maintaining a healthy weight.' Saturated fats also tend to be found in highly processed foods, which are also known to raise LDL cholesterol, Angelone says. Why are eggs so healthy for your diet? Eggs pack a pretty good health punch, and are great for a variety of reasons. 'Containing about 6.5 grams of protein each, eggs are not only considered a complete protein, containing all nine essential amino acids, but they are also regarded as having high bioavailability [the extent to which the nutrients in food are absorbed and utilized by the body], due to their ease of digestibility and absorption,' Black says. Whole eggs, i.e. the yolk and egg white, also contain include essential vitamins and minerals like vitamins A,D,E, and K, B12, iron, and selenium, Black adds. And according to Angelone, the yolks are a good source of iron, containing carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin, which promote eye health. That's not all! Eggs are also a rich source of choline, a nutrient that supports brain health and isn't found in large amounts in other foods, Angelone says. Dietitians just recommend being mindful of what you're serving up alongside those eggs. 'Overall, if you're healthy and eating eggs as part of a diet that's otherwise low in saturated fat, you're probably just fine,' Keatley says. 'But if those eggs are served with buttered toast, bacon, and sausage, then the eggs alone aren't the issue, but they're not a health halo either. Context is everything.' You Might Also Like Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals Solve the daily Crossword
