Counting cars and bikes: Unofficial survey of Halifax's morning commute
There is a debate underway in Halifax over bike lanes.
Mayor Andy Fillmore brought forward a motion which called for a pause on awarding any contracts for new bike lane designs or construction capital projects until a staff report on traffic capacity and congestion and 'feasibility of alternative network solutions' was completed.
After hours of debate and a rally that drew hundreds of bikers to Halifax City Hall on June 10, council voted down the motion.
CTV News Atlantic decided to conduct an unscientific survey of just how many bikes and scooters use bike lanes in the city centre.
With cameras set up at spots on the peninsula during the morning commute – one at South Park St, near Spring Garden Road, the second on Rainnie Drive which leads past Citadel Hill – we counted the number of vehicles, bikes, e-bikes and scooters over a two-hour period.
Rainnie Drive
On Rainnie Drive, between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m., 424 cars drove by and 113 bikes and e-bikes used the bike lane.
South Park Street
On South Park Street, 1,489 cars drove past and 90 bikes and e-devices used the bike lanes. CTV News observed there were periods when the bike lanes were empty, but other times when bike traffic was heavier.
Following the completion of the unofficial count, CTV News asked people what they think of the bike lane debate being waged at city hall.
Halifax resident Sheri Thomas says she doesn't really care for bike lanes and feels there should be fewer in the region.
'Not a lot of people I've seen using them and for me, I am visually impaired, so it's kinda a trip hazard,' said Thomas.
bike lane
A bike lane is pictured in Halifax, N.S., on June 17, 2025.
Adrienne Richy is an avid cyclist and says she wants to be separate from cars, explaining biking is her only mode of transportation.
'I want more. We tend to prioritize the convenience of drivers over the safety of cyclists and pedestrians,' she said.
Residents Sarah Fowler and David Blanchard both agree cyclists should have their own lane.
'I support them for the environment and people that enjoy biking it's wonderful but at the same time I am nervous around them when I am driving,' said Fowler.
'I find them safe as long as we understand where they belong as cars and we belong on the bike,' says Blanchard.
Last week, in a statement to CTV News Atlantic, Fillmore said too much money is being spent and congestion isn't getting better.
'I brought this motion forward because the cost of the bike lane project has quadrupled from its original estimate to nearly $100 million. I also had concerns that the current design and rollout could actually worsen congestion in parts of the municipality,' he said.
According to Fillmore, one area that residents and businesses have raised concerns about is Morris Street.
'I'm pleased that council did support an alternative motion I introduced, which directs staff to return with other options for Morris that would maintain two-way traffic and avoid making congestion worse; especially on Morris and Lower Water streets,' he said.
There are opposing views on this topic withing city council. Councillor Sam Austin says bike lanes aren't the cause of traffic congestion. He explains the population is up to half a million people and growing, increasing the need for other transportation options.
'We are an old city with limited road space, we cannot accommodate everybody driving in a car. We need to move the needle on public transit. We need to move the needle of active transportation. We need to provide these alternatives to people,' he says.
For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Should Canada scrap digital service tax amid U.S. negotiation break down?
Should Canada scrap digital service tax amid U.S. negotiation break down? Former New Brunswick premier Brian Gallant believes Prime Minister Carney has 'the right approach' so far in the stalled negotiations with the U.S.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Province's takeover of OCDSB, other school boards slammed as 'power grab'
Social Sharing When Education Minister Paul Calandra announced the province would be appointing supervisors to four Ontario school boards — including Ottawa's largest — on Friday, he said it was to ensure that "every decision made by the board prioritizes direct support for students in the classroom." But according to several critics in Ottawa, the appointments won't have that effect. The takeover came out of an investigation into several boards launched earlier in 2025 that projected a fifth straight year of financial deficits at the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (OCDSB). The province has now appointed consultant Robert Plamondon to oversee the board. In a press conference, Calandra said supervisors like Plamondon will look closely at how the boards are run, find savings and make changes needed to restore responsible management. While an initial assessment of the OCDSB's finances predicted another deficit for 2025-26, trustees did approve $18.1 million in cuts earlier this month in order to balance their budget. "The fact that we have passed this balanced budget and the ministry is still trying to take us over, I don't know where they're expecting to find additional savings," said board trustee Lyra Evans. 'Primary problem' is funding In a press release announcing the takeover, the ministry said the four school boards had exhibited "mismanagement and poor decision-making." It said the OCDSB had "completely depleted its reserves, incurred an accumulated deficit, and plans to use unsustainable proceeds from asset sales to balance its books." Calandra also spoke Friday about frustrated parents and noted the recent resignation of two OCDSB trustees. He also said the budgets for the next school year had yet to be reviewed by staff. According to Evans, the school board's "primary problem" is the funding it gets from the province. "There are huge deltas in things that the ministry has not adequately funded us for," she said, listing a gap between government funding and OCDSB spending on special education and on statutory entitlements like employment insurance and the Canadian Pension Plan. While the province continues to boast its "record funding" for education, Ottawa West-Nepean MPP Chandra Pasma says it's actually to blame for any deficits. One recent report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives pegged the provincial funding shortfall to the OCDSB over the last seven years at $338.4 million, while noting its per-student funding has dropped by $560 from the 2018-19 school year and the 2025-26 school year. "If funding had just kept pace since 2018, the Toronto District School Board, Toronto Catholic District School Board and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board would not have [been facing] a deficit this year," said Pasma, the Ontario NDP's education critic. Pasma acknowledged previous instances of financial mismanagement from Ontario school boards, but said there are other ways to deal with misuse of funds that don't amount to an "unmitigated power grab." Need for 'clear, concise rules' on spending Calandra said the appointments were also motivated by how the ministry has "decentralized" decision-making, giving trustees more leeway with budgeting and curriculum choices. "That is where the Ministry of Education has to come back in, to refocus centralized decision making and provide clear, concise rules on how money is to be spent, on what trustees are supposed to be doing, on what boards of education are supposed to be doing," he said. Evans disagreed, saying a supervisor may not understand the needs of different communities. "We have locally elected trustees because it allows us to advocate for our communities and to bring that voice to the district. If we don't have that local voice at the table, then what works in Toronto might not work here," she said. "It's very easy to move in and break things when you have no understanding of why things are the way they are." Plamondon, an author and academic who previously as the interim chair of the National Capital Commission, started in his role as supervisor on Friday.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
G7 agrees to exempt U.S. companies from higher taxes
The United States and the Group of Seven nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt U.S. companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday. The group has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the U.S. administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency. The G7 said the plan recognizes existing U.S. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. Opinion: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6 U.K. businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from Mr. Trump's tax and spending bill. Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed. 'Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns,' Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance. G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all.' In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the U.S., effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries. He had also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on U.S. firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the U.S.
