Solidarity, equality, sustainability: School's campaign inspired by SA's G20 theme
South Africa is the current holder of the G20 presidency under the theme 'solidarity, equality, sustainability'. Our country has been in charge of the international forum of both developing and developed countries since 1 December 2024 with its tenure ending on 30 November 2025.
The country's approach to the presidency is aligned to the African philosophy of ubuntu, that 'motho ke motho ka batho', in Sesotho, or 'I am because you are', in English. Significantly,
One could ask if there is enough awareness of South Africa's G20 presidency at grassroots level, especially in the rural areas. Using the ubuntu approach, which is similar to the G20 theme, Dr MJ Madiba Secondary School alumni have joined hands to assist their alma mater in rolling out various interventions towards improving teaching and learning and infrastructure and acquiring equipment for the benefit of future generations.
The quintile 3 public school, in Ga-Madiba Village, outside Polokwane in Limpopo, was named after linguist, author, educationist and community leader, Dr Moses Josiah Madiba, who died 40 years ago. In 1973, Unisa's Faculty of Education conferred on Madiba an honorary doctorate in education.
The Dr MJ Madiba Secondary School
With a wall built at the school's entrance with the proceeds of last year's fundraising gala, reaching the R20 000 target set for the campaign will enable the completion of the facelift project, as the school still requires infrastructure such as a new gate and safety information boards.
In his
In respect of access to education, the youths of today are facing a different liberation struggle from the one which was confronted by the June 16 1976 generation. The #50ToFifty campaign is therefore a notable intervention in creating a sustainable future, especially in light of the UN sustainable development goal 4 on quality education overview: 'Low-and lower-middle-income countries face a nearly $100 billion annual financing gap to reach their education targets.'
Furthermore, through the #50ToFifty campaign, alumni are joining efforts by many stakeholders, including the government and corporates, to plug the financial gap, thus creating a conducive environment for education.
The bigger picture, besides restoring academic excellence at the school, is also to see it once again flourish in extramural activities such as choral music, softball, athletics, soccer, netball and volleyball.
Dr MJ Madiba alumni occupy various sectors in and outside South Africa. A fellow alumnus and manager of the Monotwane Village-based, Naledi Spiders Softball Club, Peter 'Kelly' Sekhaolelo, is at the forefront of ensuring that youth from Ga-Mashashane can compete on an equal footing in the softball sporting code. After all, equality is another element of the South African G20 presidency's theme.
It is commendable that, although a teacher at a different school in the Mashashane area, Sekhaolelo is working closely with our alma mater in finding athletics and softball talent in the locality. Moreover, Naledi Spiders has contributed to the development of 'diamond ball' in South Africa, with some of its players having received
Dr MJ Madiba had a formidable softball team in the 1980s and, by Sekhaolelo's own admission, he was a fringe player until he matriculated in 1988. Even though some of the school's 1980s 'kitten ball' team members have since died, the line-up at any time brimmed with talent such as City Ledwaba, Jazzino Kola, Klaatjie Lediga, Tebogo Maleka, George Mohlabeng, Marks 'Mongauzi' Ledwaba, Zakes Boroto, Pretty 'Bricks' Magongwa, Levy Mokonyama and Aaron 'Mawethu' Manyelo, thus it was not an easy task breaking into the squad.
Through the #50ToFifty campaign, the school's alumni are striving to bring hope and regeneration to their alma mater and the Mashashane community, embodied by the king protea, South Africa's national flower.
Protea cynaroides
is one of the main elements of the logo for the country's G20 presidency.
Dr MJ Madiba was also a community leader and thus it is appropriate that the campaign resonates with the motto he lived by, 'Service to one's people is the rent you pay for your stay on Earth.'
To ensure solidarity, equality and sustainability in support of the school's restoration agenda beyond the golden jubilee celebrations, the establishment of a governance structure, specifically an alumni foundation, is in the pipeline.
It is therefore an honour to join a cohort of volunteers comprising Robert Setshedi, Dr Nell Ledwaba, Phinah Shadung, Joey Kganyago and Motshelo Boroto, learners from the 1991 to 2004 period, in coordinating the conceptualisation of the #50ToFifty campaign. The team will also lead the implementation of the golden jubilee project and the establishment of a formal alumni governance structure.
Malesela Maubane was born in Mohlonong village, Ga-Mashashane, and is a Dr MJ Madiba Secondary School alumnus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
15 minutes ago
- The Herald
Oscar Mbo weighs in on Ramaphosa's address: 'Remember this when you vote'
Musician and DJ Oscar Mbo didn't hold back after President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent national address, using his platform to urge South Africans to think carefully about their votes in the upcoming elections. Shortly after the president's briefing, Mbo took to social media to share his frustrations, writing: 'Remember this when you vote in 2026 and 2029, respectively.' While his comment struck a chord with many followers who echoed similar sentiments of disillusionment, not everyone was impressed. A social media user, Chauke Solly, took a swipe at the DJ, questioning his patriotism and suggesting that speaking out might put his international bookings at risk. 'So you want to kiss your international gigs goodbye?' Solly asked. Mbo didn't mince his words in response, telling Solly exactly where to get off. He made it clear that his livelihood doesn't solely depend on music. 'I don't make all my money from music,' he replied, adding that artists, like all citizens, have the right — and the responsibility — to speak out against leadership failures. He further stressed the importance of raising awareness, saying: 'We must speak on these things. Leaders who can't protect normal citizens create a bleak future for our children.' Mbo's comments have since sparked wide debate online, with many applauding him for using his voice to highlight ongoing issues in the country.
The Herald
15 minutes ago
- The Herald
Mkhwanazi's allegations must be given unwavering attention
Opinion Premium 15 July 2025 Just more than a week ago, KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi dropped a bombshell when he alleged that police minister Senzo Mchunu, who has since been placed on leave by President Cyril Ramaphosa, was involved in criminality. According to Mkhwanazi, Mchunu is doing the bidding of a criminal syndicate which has infiltrated democratic institutions of our country, including the judiciary and other agencies of the criminal justice system...
Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
When the algorithm becomes the jury — how influencers police public opinion
Graphic: John McCann Social media was supposed to be a place where everyone could finally have a voice. For years, we heard that platforms like Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok would open up public conversation. No more gatekeepers in newsrooms deciding whose views mattered and no more barriers to ordinary people being heard. That was exciting. Imagine a digital square where the kid in Mthatha and the student in Bloemfontein could all debate big ideas as equals. A space where different experiences could meet without fear or favour. But, if you spend any time online, you will know it didn't really turn out that way. Instead of becoming a free marketplace of ideas, social media has evolved into a space where a small group of influencers and big accounts set the agenda. These are the people who decide which opinions are 'right', which are 'dangerous' and which deserve to be ridiculed. The irony is that many of these influencers built their brands on the idea of challenging old power structures. They spoke up when the mainstream media ignored certain issues. They fought for visibility, and that work mattered, and still does, but somewhere along the way, the line between calling out injustice and policing all disagreement got blurred. Now, it sometimes feels like social media has simply replaced one set of gatekeepers with another. It happens repeatedly. A controversial issue breaks out, perhaps about a politically charged subject such as race, feminism or the management of the economy, and within hours, the largest accounts with the most reach have declared which perspective is acceptable. Those who hold a different view quickly learn that it's safer to say nothing. This isn't just about social disapproval. On platforms that thrive on engagement — any post that doesn't fit the popular narrative risks being buried by the algorithms or swarmed by abusive replies. The cost of speaking up can be high; it can sometimes cost you your reputation, mental health and even your job. Hence, most decide to remain quiet. However, this doesn't mean they agree. It means they've seen what happens to others who speak out and decided it's not worth it. The German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory fundamentally posits that individuals have an instinctive fear of isolation. This compels them to monitor their environment, particularly opinions voiced in public, to assess which views are dominant. When people perceive that their opinions are unpopular, they are more likely to remain silent, preferring the safety of conformity over the risk of ostracism. Over time, this process amplifies the dominance of one view, not necessarily because it is intrinsically correct, but because dissent is suppressed through social pressure, so it looks as if everyone agrees even when they don't. That's how a small group ends up controlling the conversation on social media. Take a look at any trending topic on X or Facebook and you'll see this dynamic in action. A few large accounts decide that a certain view is unacceptable. They post their verdict, sometimes in mocking tones or with hashtags demanding accountability, then their followers pile in to amplify the message. If you've ever watched someone get dogpiled, you know how nasty it can get. Strangers will flood their replies with insults, demands for apologies and calls for punishment. Screenshots of the offending opinion will be shared in group chats and private forums, often stripped of context. Sometimes the target did say something reckless or offensive, other times they simply voiced a perspective that wasn't popular with the influencers in charge and, in the background, thousands of users read the exchange and quietly take note — this is the price of disagreeing. It's not surprising that most people choose self-censorship over open discussion. This culture doesn't just happen by accident. It thrives because social media platforms are designed to reward outrage and conformity. Algorithms push content that gets engagement, likes, shares, comments — even angry reactions. The more dramatic or polarising the post, the further it spreads. That's why influencers so often lean into profanity, invasion of privacy and any kind of sensationalism. It's a guaranteed way to grow their reach and, while it works for them, it damages the rest of us. Complex and multilayered issues are reduced to black-and-white takes, nuance disappears, anyone who asks a genuine question gets treated like an enemy. It's also worth saying that this isn't only about opinions, it's about finance. On Facebook, monetisation tools have turned big pages into income streams. Influencers can earn real money from in-stream ads, stars and subscriptions. The bigger your following, the bigger your payout and that creates an extra incentive to protect your turf. It's not surprising that many influencers act like gatekeepers — when you challenge their narrative, you're not just disagreeing, you're threatening their income. This new power dynamic is rarely acknowledged. Most people still talk about social media as if it's a level playing field, but it's not. A handful of personalities effectively decide what's acceptable to say and, if you have a smaller audience, your opinions are easier to ignore or attack. Over time, this creates a closed ecosystem. If you want to grow your following, you're better off repeating whatever the big voices are saying. You learn to avoid certain topics and watch your words. While this might feel like a personal problem, just individuals adapting to the platform, it adds up to something bigger. It creates a culture where real debate is replaced by a performance of agreement. The saddest part is that it didn't have to be this way. Social media could still be a space where unpopular views get tested, challenged and sometimes even changed. But, instead, we've normalised a culture where punishment comes before understanding. If you're someone who has ever hesitated before posting, you already know what this feels like. The calculation happens in your head: 'Is it worth it?' and most of the time, the answer is 'No.' It's tempting to think that silence means consensus, that if nobody is speaking up, it must be because everyone agrees, but that's rarely true. More often, it's a sign that people have weighed the risks and decided they'd rather say nothing than deal with the consequences. We should worry about what this does to freedom of speech and tolerance. When influencers alone control the narrative, we miss out on opportunities to find common ground. This results in an illusion of unity, an illusion that breaks down the moment we step offline and realise how much resentment and frustration has been building online. You don't have to be a public relations professional to see why this is a problem. In PR, we learn that perception matters just as much as reality. If people feel as if they can't speak out, it doesn't matter how many times you tell them the platform is 'open to all'. The reality is that it's open only to those who agree with the prevailing sentiment. That perception is shaping the behaviour of millions of South Africans and it's the reason people retreat into private groups and encrypted chats and stop engaging with public posts. It's the reason many of us feel like we're living in two worlds: the world of performative agreement online and the world of honest disagreement offline. Next time you see someone speaking up, even if you don't agree, ask yourself whether they really deserve to be humiliated or erased and the next time you feel that familiar fear in your gut before posting, remind yourself that your voice matters too. If we all keep quiet, the conversation belongs only to the people willing to weaponise their influence and that's not the kind of public square any of us signed up for. Lindokuhle Tonono is an honours student at Unisa.
