
Dr. Cory Franklin: Why the US is better than Europe at preventing heat deaths
But no less important are environmental deaths, specifically those related to hot and cold weather, which are rarely cited. The U.S. figures are far more impressive than those of the rest of the industrialized world, and it is inarguable that this country does a much better job of preventing heat and cold deaths than Europe does.
First, heat deaths: Comparisons of heat deaths between countries are limited because numbers vary according to how heat deaths are defined, the differences in weather and patient characteristics in various countries, and the sources of the data. The numbers here are a compendium from several sources including Lancet, Nature and several public health and weather websites; mileage may vary.
Taking all this into account, the difference in annual heat deaths between Europe and the U.S. is surprising: In the 21st century, European heat deaths on average range from 60 to 200 per 1 million people annually, while American heat deaths average about three to eight per million annually. This means, conservatively, each year, perhaps 20 times as many people die of the heat in Europe as in the U.S. A graphic example: During the recent European heat wave that began in May, one country, Spain, experienced 1,180 deaths in only two months.
The data from deaths due to cold weather are even more sobering. Even with a warming Earth, cold continues to kill more people than heat in most parts of the world where there is any kind of cold winter. In Europe, there are 300 to 500 deaths per million due to cold annually in the past three decades, while in the U.S., the number of deaths from cold is in the range of 10 per million. So a conservative estimate would be that for every person who dies as a result of cold weather in the U.S., at least 30 die in Europe.
When deaths from heat and cold are combined, Europe has close to 50 times as many deaths as the U.S. — as many as 250,000 to 500,000 more deaths every year. Over a decade, this means several million more people die from heat and cold in Europe than die in the U.S. from those causes. A comparison of the annual numbers shows that the difference in environmental deaths easily surpasses the much more widely reported firearm death comparison. The U.S. has nearly 50,000 firearm deaths annually, and Europe has under 10,000, so the difference in firearm deaths, roughly 40,000, is about 1/10th the difference in environmental deaths.
Why is there such a difference in environmental deaths between the U.S. and Europe? The consensus among experts regarding heat deaths is the ubiquity of air conditioning in the U.S. and the relative paucity in Europe. (The majority of deaths in Spain during the May-June heat wave were in the north of the country, where air conditioning is uncommon compared with in the south.) Besides providing comfort, air conditioning saves lives — often many — especially if air conditioning could be made more available in the Global South, where there are even more deaths due to hot weather.
Despite the consensus, some environmentalists want to limit air conditioning, citing increased electricity use and carbon dioxide production, which will aggravate greenhouse gas emissions. (In 2022, Spain was one of the countries that put restrictions on air conditioning.) The response to climate change must involve a combination of mitigation, such as reducing levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases and adaptation — that is, adapting to the consequences of a warming environment.
According to Hannah Ritchie, deputy editor of the Our World in Data website, air conditioning currently accounts for about 7% of global electricity use and 3% of carbon dioxide emissions — not negligible but certainly not exorbitant considering how many lives cooling technology saves. While worldwide air conditioning use is expected to increase in the next decade, so is the efficiency of air conditioning units. Air conditioning represents one of the most effective and lifesaving methods of adaptation to a changing climate.
The reasons for increased cold weather deaths in Europe relative to the U.S. are harder to divine, but likely include the ubiquity of older homes with poorer insulation throughout Europe. Outside of Scandinavia, there may be less preparedness and an aging population more vulnerable to cold weather snaps on the European continent.
Human-made efforts to reduce greenhouse gases are essential, but human-made efforts to adapt to weather extremes would have lifesaving consequences more immediately.
Dr. Cory Franklin is a retired intensive care physician and the author of 'The COVID Diaries 2020-2024: Anatomy of a Contagion as it Happened.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
More early stage colon cancers found due to more screenings, research shows
As more people aged 45-49 are getting screened for colon cancer, more early stage diagnoses are being made, according to new research from the American Cancer Society. The research, published in two studies Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, showed increases in screenings among those younger than 50 is linked to rises in earlier diagnosis. One study showed an annual increase of 1.1% from 2004 to 2019 jumped to 12% from 2019 to 2022 for colorectal cancer incidence among people aged 45 to 49, while another study showed screenings among U.S. adults aged 45 to 49 increase 62% from 2019 to 2023. The recommended age to begin colorectal screening was lowered from 50 to 45 by the ACS in 2018 and by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2021. In a news release Monday, Elizabeth Schafer, lead author and surveillance and health equity scientist, called the findings "promising news." "The uptick of cases is likely due to first-time screening in the wake of new recommendations for younger average-risk adults to begin testing for colorectal cancer earlier," Schafer explained. Another lead author, Jessica Star, who does cancer risk factors and screening surveillance research at the ACS, said it's "thrilling" to see increases in screening rates among younger adults as well as its likely ties into rises in earlier stage diagnosis. Still, she warned there's a long way to go. "Screening for colorectal caner in ages 45-49 remains suboptimal and has not increased equitably by both education attainment and insurance status," Star said in the release. Recently, medical associations expressed concern after a report that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy may remove all members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of independent medical experts whose recommendations help guide insurance companies and doctors' decisions about a range of preventive health measures, like cancer screenings. Dr. Thomas Lew, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and attending physician of hospital medicine at Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley, recently told CBS News that a change like this would "greatly damage all the work we've done in preventative care, making people sicker, and driving up costs and premiums." "To put it mildly, this is extremely concerning — and doing the opposite of making America healthy," Lew said. In a statement to CBS News at the time, an HHS spokesperson said, "No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again." How safe is our Social Security safety net? Russia downplays Trump's announcement about nuclear submarines Former Trump prosecutor under investigation for potential Hatch Act violations Solve the daily Crossword


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Saquon Barkley says he's not a member of President Trump's Council on Sports Nutrition
Eagles All-Pro RB says he is not joining Harrison Butker, Nick Bosa, Tony Romo, and Lawrence Taylor on President Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition.' In a move that will revive a standard from the Reagan, Clinton, and Bush era, Harrison Butker, Nick Bosa, Tony Romo, and Lawrence Taylor will join President Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition.' One athlete and sports star who won't be participating is Eagles' All-Pro running back Saquon Barkley. Following Monday's practice, Barkley disputed the initial press release, stating that he will not be a member of the presidential council. According to the Washington Post, President Trump on Thursday announced that the presidential fitness test, a hallmark of American physical education programs, will be making a comeback in public schools. The assessment was retired and replaced by a fitness program under the Obama administration. The presidential fitness test was initiated in the 1950s by a council established by President Dwight D. Eisenhower that was directed to improve the physical fitness of American youths, in response to fears they were falling behind their European counterparts when it came to athleticism. The project is an alternative way to get anti-obesity drugs to Medicare and Medicaid patients, after the administration said in April that neither program would cover GLP-1s for weight loss. In doing so, it scrapped a 2024 Biden administration proposal for the programs to start covering GLP-1s for patients with obesity. Several high-profile athletes — all of whom have existing ties to Trump — attended the ceremony and will serve on the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition. The attendees included professional golfer Bryson DeChambeau, who will chair the council; controversial National Football League kicker Harrison Butker; World Wrestling Entertainment mainstay Paul 'Triple H' Levesque; golfer Annika Sorenstam; and football Hall of Famer Lawrence Taylor. The Eagles running back wasn't in attendance and said he was shocked to hear his name mentioned. The list also includes NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, whom Trump repeatedly scrutinized during his first presidential term. Barkley was criticized during the off-season for spending time with President Trump on a golf outing prior to the Eagles' ring celebration.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
More early stage colon cancers found in people aged 45-49 due to more screenings, research shows
As more people aged 45-49 are getting screened for colon cancer, more early stage diagnoses are being made, according to new research from the American Cancer Society. The research, published in two studies Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, showed increases in screenings among those younger than 50 is linked to rises in earlier diagnosis. One study showed an annual increase of 1.1% from 2004 to 2019 jumped to 12% from 2019 to 2022 for colorectal cancer incidence among people aged 45 to 49, while another study showed screenings among U.S. adults aged 45 to 49 increase 62% from 2019 to 2023. The recommended age to begin colorectal screening was lowered from 50 to 45 by the ACS in 2018 and by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2021. In a news release Monday, Elizabeth Schafer, lead author and surveillance and health equity scientist, called the findings "promising news." "The uptick of cases is likely due to first-time screening in the wake of new recommendations for younger average-risk adults to begin testing for colorectal cancer earlier," Schafer explained. Another lead author, Jessica Star, who does cancer risk factors and screening surveillance research at the ACS, said it's "thrilling" to see increases in screening rates among younger adults as well as its likely ties into rises in earlier stage diagnosis. Still, she warned there's a long way to go. "Screening for colorectal caner in ages 45-49 remains suboptimal and has not increased equitably by both education attainment and insurance status," Star said in the release. Recently, medical associations expressed concern after a report that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy may remove all members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of independent medical experts whose recommendations help guide insurance companies and doctors' decisions about a range of preventive health measures, like cancer screenings. Dr. Thomas Lew, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and attending physician of hospital medicine at Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley, recently told CBS News that a change like this would "greatly damage all the work we've done in preventative care, making people sicker, and driving up costs and premiums." "To put it mildly, this is extremely concerning — and doing the opposite of making America healthy," Lew said. In a statement to CBS News at the time, an HHS spokesperson said, "No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again."