
Gulf countries may explore income tax plans after Oman lays out 'roadmap'
Following Oman's decision to impose income tax in 2028, other Gulf countries can also explore income tax to diversify their revenues, say experts.
As reported by Khaleej Times on Sunday, Oman will implement five per cent income tax from January 2028 on residents earning 42,000 Omani riyals (Dh400,000) annually.
'While other Gulf states currently have no plans to levy personal taxes, we anticipate that some form of income taxation — whether targeting higher earners, expatriates, or remittances — will be explored as an income stream in the medium term.
"As governments across the region continue seeking to diversify their tax bases away from oil dependency, Oman's approach may well provide a roadmap for similar reforms elsewhere in the Gulf,' said Scott Livermore, ICAEW economic advisor, chief economist and managing director, Oxford Economics Middle East.
He added that Oman's decision to levy income tax 'could serve as a testing ground, with the potential for expanded coverage in the coming years depending on its economic and social impact.'
Oman is the first country in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region to levy personal income tax, positioning it as a fiscal policy pioneer among its GCC peers, he added.
'Oman's introduction of a five per cent personal income tax represents an initial but significant step in the Gulf state's fiscal diversification strategy. While the move has limited coverage and revenue-raising potential in its current form – affecting only the top 1 per cent of earners – it demonstrates that Oman's authorities are willing to pursue policies that might still be considered radical elsewhere in the region,' said Livermore.
Rachel Fox, partner of taxation at Al Tamimi & Co., said details on precisely what sources of income would be considered as taxable for the purposes of the income tax, as well as which deductions may be permitted will only become clear once the legislation is published.
'However, it is anticipated that deductions will be permitted for education and healthcare expenses, zakat contributions and charitable donations, among other items,' she said in a statement to Khaleej Times.
Fox added that the income aims to strengthen the public finances of Oman, while aligning with the broader goals of Oman Vision 2040. 'Revenues generated from the tax will be used to fund Oman's social protection system and diversify its economy,' she said.
'As the first Gulf state to impose personal income tax, this marks a significant development in the region. It remains to be seen whether any of the other states will follow suit. At present, no other Gulf state has signalled an intention to introduce personal income tax.
"However, tax policy in the region is clearly evolving and the impact of this new tax is likely to be watched carefully by other states,' he said.
Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer at Century Financial, said exemptions and deductions will be allowed for significant costs, including zakat, education, healthcare and endowment.
He added that other exemptions include initial one-time exemption from income earned outside Oman for two years; one-time exemption for income from the sale of a secondary residence; inherited income and gifts.
Deduction will also be allowed for interest in financing the construction of primary residence (one-time effect only); the taxable income thus will be the gross income minus all the exemptions, deductible expenses, and losses.
' GCC nations have already enacted indirect taxation reforms … Looking at the initial guidelines of the proposed taxation rules, the overall structure looks more progressive, with only the top 1 per cent of the working class getting taxed. Furthermore, the provisions for the number of deductions and exemptions provide a proper way of tax planning for the taxpayers,' added Valecha.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Are Iran and Israel already getting started on the next phase of their conflict?
US President Donald Trump has only himself to blame for the consequences of his rush to declare military victory over Iran, and his hasty announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel before verifying and conclusively assessing the results of Washington's military operations against Tehran's nuclear programme. It appears that Mr Trump has backed himself into a corner and took on the burden of proof, whereas that burden should have remained on Iran to demonstrate the fate of its nuclear programme. The Islamic Republic has moved to suspend co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the only body capable of assessing the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities, the state of its centrifuges, and the possible location of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. In this way, Tehran has turned the tables, and Mr Trump has found himself caught in a spiral of justification, battling the media and the Democrats, while supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei re-emerged to deliver a triumphant speech, exuding defiance and confidence, and dismissing the US President's actions as a failure. Part of the problem for Mr Trump is that he personalises politics and reduces strategic issues to political tactics. He refuses to concede his mistakes and instead elevates himself above acknowledging them, even when they come at a high cost. Some might say Mr Trump did well to declare a ceasefire after damaging Iran's nuclear facilities. Others could argue that he spared the region a prolonged and potentially escalating war. All this could be true if both sides, Iranian and Israeli, had signed a formal truce and a roadmap to end the conflict, not just a temporary de-escalation. But there is an inherent flaw in the Trump administration's approach of patchwork fixes and interim arrangements across a number of files. There is a tendency to claim achievements before they are actually secured. The US President's envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, appears to be a sharp and adept dealmaker, and perhaps genuinely averse to war. But he doesn't appear to understand the history of the conflicts he is trying to end, nor does he have the heft that his negotiating counterparts possess. With regard to Iran, he seemingly hasn't grasped the extent to which its rulers are entrenched in their nuclear, ballistic and expansionist doctrines – or, for that matter, their patience and their ability to prevaricate. To be clear, this isn't just about the war but also about the US-Iran talks that preceded Israel's strikes. This also reveals the extent to which Mr Witkoff has misjudged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ruthless political tactics. Behind closed doors and in public, Tehran's rulers are adamant that they will not abandon the nuclear programme, no matter the incentives Mr Witkoff offers, whether it is sanctions relief or the offer to join an international nuclear consortium. Nonetheless, the Trump administration continues to talk up a grand bargain with it. Meanwhile, Tehran insists on excluding from negotiations the issues of Iran's ballistic missiles programme and its use of armed proxies across the region. The Trump team, therefore, risks falling into the same trap that was laid for the administration of former US president Barack Obama in the run-up to the 2015 nuclear deal. The Trump-Witkoff duo speaks of returning to negotiations with the Islamic Republic, while Mr Khamenei has made it clear that the US President must first express regret for having used the demeaning term 'surrender' in reference to the Iranian state. He also warned Mr Trump against contemplating another military adventure. Indeed, Iran's supreme leader has scored a major win by securing American guarantees that his establishment wouldn't be touched. This was embedded in Iran's carefully staged retaliatory strikes on a US base in Qatar in a way that ensured no American personnel was harmed. Arguably, Iran could be in a better negotiating position than before, despite the considerable damage to its nuclear facilities. It seems to have smuggled out highly enriched uranium to unknown locations within the country, and moved to suspend co-operation with the IAEA, freeing itself from external oversight. IAEA director general Rafael Grossi, meanwhile, has said Tehran is just months away from nuclear enrichment necessary for a bomb. Moreover, it's worth asking whether Mr Trump would venture to strike Iran again in the future. First, this would amount to an admission on Mr Trump's part that his strikes this month failed to achieve their objective. Second, the US President might well worry about a domestic political backlash. With that being said, a resumption of the Israeli-Iranian military confrontation is on the cards once Mr Trump calms down. Indeed, Mr Netanyahu now finds himself at the mercy of the US President's wrath and is likely to calculate each move with great caution. However, neither Israel nor Iran is likely to back down from their respective objectives. Thus, the ceasefire is fragile, and with the outcome of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities still contested, a renewed confrontation is likely. After all. a clash suits the ruling class in both Israel and Iran. Mr Trump now faces a deeper problem. Both Iran and Israel feel the US President has betrayed them. Israel in particular is under pressure from Mr Trump, yet it will feel the need to take additional steps regarding Iran's nuclear programme, missiles and regional proxies. All this means Mr Witkoff's talk of a 'comprehensive' agreement with Iran belongs to the realm of wishful thinking, and contradicts the mood music coming out of Tehran. Iran is willing to talk in order to stall, not to make concessions for the sake of a grand bargain. A close reading of Iran's statements, including those from Mr Khamenei, reveals that its overriding priority remains the preservation of its rule, anchored in its nuclear, ballistic and expansionist doctrines. Everything else is just rhetoric.


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israeli fire kills five Palestinians waiting for aid in Rafah
US embassy in Bahrain returns to normal operations Iran has 'serious' doubts Israel will adhere to ceasefire Germany backs Israel after Iran war in first high-level visit


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran could start making enriched uranium within months, IAEA head warns
It could only be a matter of months until Iran starts producing enriched uranium again, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has warned. Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS News that the three Iranian nuclear sites the US bombed on June 21 had sustained a 'very serious level of damage'. But he said Iran could quickly resume uranium-enrichment capabilities. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that,' he said in an interview recorded on Friday and broadcast on Sunday. 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there.' US President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have repeatedly claimed the nuclear sites were 'obliterated' and have reacted with fury when challenged on this assessment. The US bombed the three nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – last weekend, joining Israel's air war against Iran, which lasted 12 days. Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only. Western powers stress that Iran's nuclear advances provide it with an irreversible knowledge gain, suggesting that while losing experts or facilities may slow progress, the advances are permanent. 'Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology,' Mr Grossi told CBS. 'So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have.' Mr Grossi said that Iran might have moved some of its highly enriched uranium in the run-up to the US attacks.