Idaho man hits pro-Tesla demonstrator with car after he exited his truck that had Trump flags: police
Christopher Talbot of Meridian is now facing an aggravated battery charge following the incident Saturday outside of Boise.
"At the time of the incident, a protest was taking place at [a] Tesla dealership, with approximately 30 protesters and an estimated 200 counter-protesters in attendance. The victim was identified as a counter-protester at the event," the Meridian Police Department said in a statement.
"The preliminary investigation determined that 70-year-old Christopher Talbot of Meridian made an obscene gesture toward a 49-year-old victim before hitting him with his car. Reports indicate the victim had been driving a truck with pro-Trump flags and had just parked and exited his vehicle when Talbot stuck him with his car," police added.
Investigators said the victim managed to drive himself to a local hospital where he received treatment for non-life-threatening injuries.
Talbot reportedly was arrested after the victim provided police with his license plate, which led officers to Talbot's home in Meridian.
"The Meridian Police Department reminds people to respect everyone's right to protest and express their 1st Amendment Rights without resorting to violence," it said.
Demonstrators around the U.S. held protests at Tesla dealerships on Saturday in what was billed as a "Tesla Takedown Global Day of Action."
From Oregon to Massachusetts, Tesla cars and facilities have been vandalized in at least 10 locations this year.
What began as protests against Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have escalated into violent incidents against the Trump ally's company, including shots fired at a building, destroyed dealership windows and charging stations set on fire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
GOP push behind Trump agenda has Congress in an uproar
Advertisement And that was just last week. Veteran lawmakers said that the level of vitriol and dysfunction in the Capitol had reached a fever pitch. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It is bad — really bad,' Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, said when asked to assess the mood on Capitol Hill. 'There's a level of frustration. How do we get back to doing our jobs?' Republicans have achieved hard-won legislative victories, but those have come at a cost, setting the stage for a meltdown that has, among other things, raised the prospects of a government shutdown this fall. Some GOP lawmakers are feeling squeezed, while Democrats, outraged that the White House is shredding funding agreements and doling out money however it wants, are threatening to abandon a tradition of bipartisan spending deals. Advertisement 'I want to warn my colleagues once again: If you keep going down this path, you are going to further undermine our bipartisan process,' said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. 'The more bridges you burn, the fewer paths you leave to get things done.' Her comments came as all but two Republicans banded together to push through legislation around 1 a.m. Friday allowing the Trump administration to cancel $9 billion in previously approved spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting. Murkowski, one of the two opponents in her party, said the measure was an unacceptable breach of congressional spending power. It was not just the spending divide that was inciting tumult on Capitol Hill. In a lengthy session Thursday evening, Democrats and Republicans on the powerful House Rules Committee engaged in nasty back-and-forth over the rising clamor for Congress to vote on releasing criminal files in the investigation of Epstein, who died by suicide in a federal jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. That morning, Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee had stormed out of a meeting in protest after Senator Chuck Grassley, the Iowa Republican who leads the panel, cut off debate and forced a committee vote on the disputed judicial nomination of Emil Bove. Bove, a Justice Department official and former defense attorney for Trump, is up for an influential post on a federal appeals court that encompasses Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. He has been accused by a former Justice Department colleague of declaring a willingness to defy court orders on immigration, a charge Bove has disputed. Advertisement Democrats wanted more time to examine the nomination. But Grassley forged ahead despite those demands, ramming the approval through in one of a series of Republican-only votes. Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, implored him to stop, accusing the chair of 'an abuse of power.' The two had worked closely in the past on criminal justice issues. 'To me, it is a president who has such a thrall over the Republicans in the Senate that he could get them to surrender not just their power, but their constitutional obligations,' Booker said after the blowup, adding that Republicans were relinquishing their ability to provide a check on White House nominees. Grassley dismissed the complaints, claiming Democrats had executed 'a political hit job' on Bove. He said Democrats had shut down Republican members of the committee in the past, when they held the gavel in the majority. 'This is not unprecedented — either the walking away or what we did as a majority,' Grassley said. 'It has happened before, and we have to move things along.' Russell T. Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and the chief architect of a campaign to pry spending power away from Congress, exacerbated tensions on Capitol Hill. He told reporters at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast that there needed to be less bipartisanship around federal spending — not a sentiment typically heard on Capitol Hill. He also reiterated his contention that spending levels set by Congress were an advisory ceiling, not a floor. His commentary infuriated Democrats already bristling at the $9 billion in added cuts — the first approved by Congress in decades under a special procedure that allows the president to cancel spending. Advertisement 'He wants to destroy,' Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, the minority leader, said as he called for Trump to fire Vought. 'Destroy the way that Congress works, destroy the balance of power and upend our entire Constitution. Russell Vought doesn't believe in this democracy.' Vought's comments could complicate efforts by Republicans and Democrats to work out spending levels for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Democrats said that his argument destroyed any incentive for them to strike deals, since he made clear the White House would seek to unravel them later with an assist from Senate Republicans. A test vote in the Senate on the first of the annual spending bills is scheduled for Tuesday. 'That just profoundly undermined the stability and purpose of a bipartisan appropriations process,' Senator Chris Coons, Democrat of Delaware, a member of the Appropriations Committee, said of Vought's comments. Some lawmakers attributed the congressional edginess to lawmakers being wrung out from repeated all-night sessions to push through the Republican tax cut and domestic policy bill, and from late-night Senate debate over the additional cuts sought by the administration. 'A lot of this is people are just tired,' said Senator John Boozman, Republican of Arkansas. 'Hopefully this all blows over soon.' Some of the fights have occurred within Republican ranks. On Wednesday, an internal House Republican dispute over cryptocurrency legislation led to a usually routine process vote being held open for more than nine hours as leaders toiled to secure the necessary support. It was just the latest in a series of congressional records being set with extended floor fights and speeches. 'I am tired of making history,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Wednesday night. 'I just want a normal Congress.' Advertisement Given the intensity of the divisions so far and the potential momentous clashes ahead, normal seems out of the question. This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Jasmine Crockett: ‘Wannabe Hitler' Trump Is Demanding GOP ‘Loyalty' Over Epstein Files
Donald Trump's demands for loyalty are so extreme, he comes off as a 'wannabe Hitler,' said Rep. Jasmine Crockett. The congresswoman made the remarks when discussing Republican efforts to stop the Jeffrey Epstein files from being released, per Trump's wishes. '[Republican lawmakers] want to show they're loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him,' Crockett told Alex Witt on MSNBC Sunday. 'I've called him so many things, but wannabe Hitler for sure.' Jasmine Crockett calls Trump a 'wannabe Hitler' #Trump #Hitler — Liam Jones (@hynpower) July 20, 2025 Last week, House Republicans repeatedly blocked a Democratic amendment that would have pushed forward a bipartisan bill that would force the Department of Justice to put the contents of the Epstein files on a public website within 30 days. The uproar over the contents of the files comes after a DOJ and FBI memo stated that the billionaire financier and sex trafficker died by suicide and did not keep a so-called 'client list,' essentially closing the case on Epstein and his wrongdoing. A contingent of Trump supporters subscribe to the theory that Epstein was involved in an international child sex trafficking ring that wields control over the government. They believe that Epstein's death in prison was part of a cover-up to protect wealthy elites who were part of the ring — and allegedly on Epstein's 'client list.' Trump played into these theories during the 2024 campaign by saying he would have 'no problem' releasing the case files. After the election, he was asked if he would 'declassify' the files, and he said, 'Yeah, yeah, I would.' 'It's not that they care about Epstein personally,' far-right influencer Jack Posobiec said recently on a podcast hosted by Breitbart News editor Alex Marlow, talking about the MAGA base who wants the files released. 'It's that they care that there's this optic that Epstein was somehow involved with a shadowy system that actually has control over our government, control over our institutions, control of our lives, and really is a ruling power over us.' A small contingent of the part, however, is attempting to release the files. GOP Rep. Thomas Massie introduced a similar bill demanding the Epstein documents be made public, co-sponsored by almost a dozen House Republicans, on Friday. In an attempt to appease both sides, House Speaker Mike Johnson asked the House Rules Committee to write up a nonbinding resolution asking the DOJ to release all information related to Epstein. This would allow Republicans to vote for the measure without forcing Trump's DOJ to release the files, angering the president. However, Johnson has not agreed to bring the resolution to a vote. 'We'll determine what happens with all that,' Johnson told reporters, per Axios. 'There's a lot developing.' 'I think [Republican lawmakers] also are concerned about the damage that it may do,' Crockett said of what would happen if the documents were made publicly available. 'If [Trump is] trying to hide it, they understand that it is most likely problematic for him as well as the MAGA brand, as well as the Republicans.' Crockett continued, 'I don't anticipate that they will be on board for doing anything that may harm them or their fearless leader.' According to a recent poll, a strong majority of respondents — 89 percent — support the public release of documents in the Epstein files. More from Rolling Stone Trump Demands Sports Teams Make Their Names Racist Again Poll: Most Americans Know Trump Isn't Targeting 'Worst of the Worst' for Deportation as He Claims Trump and the Catholic Church Fight a Law Requiring Clergy to Report Child Abuse Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Off-duty border agent shot in a Manhattan park in apparent botched robbery, police say
NEW YORK — An off-duty U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer was shot in a Manhattan park after an apparent robbery gone wrong, New York City police and federal officials said Sunday. The 42-year-old officer was in stable condition after the Saturday attack and is expected to survive. A spokesperson for the New York Police Department said there was no indication the shooting was politically motivated. The agent, who was not in uniform, was sitting in a park beneath the George Washington Bridge when he was approached by a man riding on the back of a moped, who shot him in the face and arm, police said. The off-duty officer returned fire as the moped sped off. No arrests had been made as of Sunday afternoon, according to a police spokesperson. The Department of Homeland Security shared video online of the two men on a moped, alleging the shooter was caught entering the country illegally in 2023 but released. The NYPD spokesperson said they had no information about the source of that claim. In a social media post Sunday afternoon, President Trump seized on the shooting, alleging it was evidence of Democrats' failures to secure the border. 'The CBP Officer bravely fought off his attacker, despite his wounds, demonstrating enormous Skill and Courage,' he wrote. The shooting comes as federal officials say there has been a surge of attacks on agents carrying out Trump's mass deportation agenda. Enforcement officers involved in the crackdown often cover their faces, which critics say spreads fear and panic across communities and imperils citizens as well as immigrants without legal status. The Trump administration defends masking, which it says is needed to avoid harassment of agents in public and online. On Sunday, the acting director of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Todd Lyons, said he would allow agents to continue covering their faces, which he called a safety measure 'If that's a tool that the men and women of ICE that keeps themselves and their families safe, then I will allow it,' he said.
