Closing arguments heard in Janelle Fletcher child abuse trial
Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting allegations that she groomed and sexually abused the underage girl some years ago and appeared again on Monday at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller.
The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity.
Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair.
She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other.
That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area.
The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car.
Janelle Fletcher is contesting the allegation that she sexually abused a teen girl. Picture: NewsWire
Alongside oral evidence from the alleged victims, the prosecution presented a series of texts, emails and photographs to support its case, including a photo of Ms Fletcher and the girl kissing at a cinema photo booth.
In his closing address, Mr Allen said the 'objective evidence' of the photo booth kiss showed an 'unlawful sexual act'.
He argued further that the 'sheer volume' of photos of Ms Fletcher and the girl together suggested a sexual relationship.
'They look like girlfriends (in the photographs) … in a relationship between girlfriends,' Mr Allen said.
In her testimony from last week, Ms Fletcher said the photo booth kiss was a 'pretend kiss' she did not want or mean to happen.
'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said.
There is dispute between the defence and prosecution about the correct sequence order of photos from the booth.
The prosecution says the correct sequence runs from top to bottom in the order of one, two, three and then four.
In 'photo 4', Ms Fletcher appears happy and the prosecution argues this shows she was happy to kiss the girl and not shocked or upset by it.
Ms Fletcher and her defence team, led by Andrew Culshaw, claim that photo was taken before the kiss and should not be seen as approval of the act, with the correct sequence of photos running one, two, four and then three.
Mr Culshaw also argued the photo did not show child sexual abuse because the girl had turned 17 at the time of the photo, and so she was therefore not a child when the kiss happened.
Further, Ms Fletcher was also no longer in a position of authority at the time of the kiss, the defence said.
'What Your Honour has, in my submission, is evidence of a kiss at a time when it was legal,' Mr Culshaw said.
The prosecution argued that a series of emotionally expressive emails from Ms Fletcher to the girl revealed the 'true nature' of the relationship between them.
In one email, Ms Fletcher told the girl 'I want something serious not something short term'.
In others, she said 'my feelings for you are not lust but love' and 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret …'
Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. Picture: NewsWire
Ms Fletcher had earlier argued the emails showed non-sexual 'love' for the girl, but Mr Allen dismissed that argument on Monday as 'absurd'.
'This is not 'I love you' in some sort of Catholic way,' Mr Allen said.
Mr Culshaw, in his closing address, acknowledged under questioning from Judge Fuller that the emails appeared 'terrible' on a first or literal reading in that they seemed to suggest the pair had been in a sexual relationship.
But he argued a deeper reading of the emails fit with Ms Fletcher's testimony.
She claimed last week that they were written to keep the girl happy and guide her away to a more age-appropriate relationship.
'These emails are consistent with a relatively young teacher, in her early 30s, who had got herself in too deep … and so was trying to deal with the situation and extricate herself from it,' Mr Culshaw said.
Mr Culshaw said the only part of the emails that might be read as 'overtly' sexual was the line on 'lust', but he argued her denial of lust reaffirmed her evidence.
'Denial can't be then tortured into an admission,' he said.
Further, he stressed Ms Fletcher was not being 'charged' with the content of the emails.
In his afternoon address, Mr Culshaw invited Judge Fuller to look with scepticism on the credibility of the oral evidence presented at trial, drilling into what he called 'catastrophic inconsistencies' in the claims against Ms Fletcher.
In one instance, he cast doubt on witness testimony to the 'truth or dare' game.
The two girls spoke together about the alleged event after it had happened, he claimed, and there was a risk their evidence had been 'contaminated'.
'There is a risk here that these two witnesses have contaminated one another ... and the recollection, to the extent that it was consistent between the two of them, there is a risk that what Your Honour is getting is a single collective version of history rather than two separate and independent versions of history.
'They have both given evidence that there was a game of truth or dare, but neither of them could really say what the truths were, what the dares were, beyond the big headline matters.'
Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education.
She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith.
She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court.
Judge Fuller will deliver her verdict on August 20.
Duncan Evans
Reporter
Duncan Evans is a reporter for News Corp's NewsWire service, based in Adelaide. Before NewsWire, he worked as a resources and politics reporter for The Daily Mercury in Mackay, Queensland and as a reporter at CQ Today, an independent newspaper based in Rockhampton. He was raised in Emerald and Brisbane and studied English Literature and American Studies at the University of Sydney. He began his career in journalism working for the Jakarta Post in Indonesia for over two years as an editor, translator and writer. He is fluent in Indonesian.
@Duncanevans01
Duncan Evans
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Former SBS newsreader wants parts of lawsuit over Hezbollah tweets to be struck out
A legal row between a former SBS television newsreader and a prominent Israeli Australian over tweets during the Israel–Gaza war has been described by one camp as a case of free speech, and the other as a case of hate speech. The lawsuit against Mary Kostakidis was launched earlier this year by Alon Cassuto, chief executive of the Zionist Federation of Australia, over comments and posts Ms Kostakidis shared on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. The matter returned to the Federal Court in Adelaide today, where Ms Kostakidis's legal team sought to have elements of the case struck out — a move that was strongly opposed by lawyers for Mr Cassuto, an Australian-Israeli dual citizen. In the legal application that triggered the action earlier this year, Mr Cassuto alleged that posts from Ms Kostakidis featuring comments from Hassan Nasrallah — the now deceased leader of Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group designated by the Australian, the US, the UK and other governments as a terrorist organisation — on January 4 and 13 in 2024 breached the Racial Discrimination Act. According to Mr Cassuto's application, the posts were in breach of the act because they were "reasonably likely in all the circumstances to offend, insult, humiliate and/or intimidate Australian Jews and/or Israelis in Australia". The application noted the lawsuit was launched because, after a complaint was made to the Australian Human Rights Commission, the commission subsequently determined there "was no reasonable prospect of the matter being settled by conciliation". Screenshots contained in the statement of claim show the posts in question, including one from January 4 where Ms Kostakidis added comments while reposting another tweet. That post featured a video of Nasrallah, and a caption reporting that the Hezbollah leader had told the Israelis they will never be welcome in the region. Ms Kostakidis's legal team including Stephen Keim SC applied to have elements of the case struck out, describing the posts as falling within the bounds of journalism. "We argue that the reporting of statements by a well-known spokesperson for a party in a major regional conflict is an essential part of news reporting," Mr Keim said. "This may involve reporting offensive statements, for example the widely-reported Access Hollywood tape of the current president of the United States, but no ordinary and reasonable person would be offended by such news reports. "The speech reported in the subject posts were widely regarded as newsworthy … and in reporting the speech, the respondent was acting in accord with orthodox judgements and actions concerning publication." Mr Heim argued that the extracts from Nasrallah's speeches singled out by Mr Cassuto's legal team were not anti-Semitic and were "incapable" of meeting legal definitions of anti-Semitism. "Comment on the direction of the conflict is not a criticism of Jews or Israelis generally," he said. Mr Heim said Ms Kostakidis's comment was similarly "directed to the Israeli government and the state of Israel, and not a criticism of Jewish people in any way", and later drew the following analogy: "At Bledisloe Cup time, strong feelings arise between Australians and New Zealanders, and to criticise the rugby team of New Zealand is not a criticism of New Zealanders completely." But barrister Michael Borsky KC, for Mr Cassuto, argued that sharing the posts did not amount to "a straightforward news report", which would make the defence of a "fair and accurate report" hard to prove. "Our case is that although Mr Kostakidis used to be a newsreader, it's not a straightforward news report, her sharing these posts — particularly with the commentary which we allege is a form of endorsement," he said. Mr Borsky argued against the case being struck out, arguing that it should proceed to trial. He said while he accepted that "to criticise Israel or the Israeli government is not necessarily anti-Semitic", criticism could sometimes still amount to anti-Semitism. "There is the potential for an act or a statement to be both a criticism of Israel and anti-Semitic," he said. "Where that line is drawn in relation to a particular statement or a particular act is a difficult and important question, which would be determined following consideration of evidence." Mr Borsky further argued that other posts by Ms Kostakidis included equations of Zionism with Nazism, accusations that Israel is a "supremacist apartheid state" and "anti-Semitic conspiracy theories". "Zionism is the support for Jewish people having a home in the community of their ancestral homeland," he said. "Equating Zionism with Nazism is a particularly offensive charge, deliberately selected by many anti-Semites for that very reason, for the very reason that it accuses the victims of the holocaust with committing that crime." Federal Court justice Stephen McDonald reserved his judgement, and said it would not "necessarily be a quick turnaround". Before the hearing on Tuesday, Ms Kostakidis said the case "raises important questions about the limits on free speech". "I'm a strong believer in freedom of the press and the freedom of political expression," she said. "I will defend my right to report news and the right of every journalist to do so and the right of every Australian to engage in public debate." Outside court on Tuesday, Mr Cassuto said the case "is not about free speech, it is about hate speech". "It's deeply offensive and irresponsible when someone with a platform and a following like Mary Kostakidis shares hate speech and shares the calls of a prescribed terrorist organisation," he said. "We've all seen how hatred starts with words and ends with violence. "For the sake of every Australian we have to stand up against racial hatred no matter who is being targeted and no matter who is spreading it."

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Teen charged with manslaughter over Edgewater electric motorbike death remanded in custody
A teenage boy charged with killing a Perth woman while riding an allegedly unlicensed high-powered electric motorbike will spend another seven days in juvenile detention, as the court considers how he could be safely granted bail. The 17-year-old appeared in the Perth Children's Court via video link from the centre, as two extra charges were read out against him in relation to the death of a 59-year-old woman in Picnic Cove Park in Edgewater on Saturday. Police allege he unlawfully killed the woman as he was riding through the park, also charging him with riding an unregistered battery-powered motorcycle without a license. In court today, Magistrate Alana Padmanabham told the teen two new charges had now been added — failing to comply with a direction to stop and reckless driving to escape pursuit. The youth said little, except to acknowledge his name and that he understood the charges. His lawyer Simon Watters said his client was "not coping well" in Perth's Banksia Hill Detention Centre. Magistrate Padmanabham said the teen had a qualified right to bail, but wanted to be sure he could be safely released and ordered a bail suitability report. It came after prosecutor James Nicholls listed several concerns with bail, namely a complicated family situation. He said the 17-year-old's parents had separated and lived fairly far from each other, while there had previously been a "number of stressors" in the family home related to the boy's behaviour. Mr Nicholls said the teen's father "had no control over him" and there had been reports of physical violence in the home related to his behaviour. He said there were some concerns from police that if the teen was released to his parents, that may "set him up to fail" any bail conditions because of the "volatile situation at home". "[He] doesn't listen to his father," the prosecutor said. While the teen does not have a prior criminal record, Mr Nicholls said he had been cautioned in 2023 over an alleged assault on another child in another e-motorbike incident. But Magistrate Padmanabham quickly shut that down, saying it was unfair to include this matter in bail deliberations given it was a caution only and nothing had been proven. Magistrate Padmanabham wanted the bail report to look at how he could be suitably supervised, especially if he were to split his time between his two parents' home, as proposed by Mr Watters. She also said any bail conditions would have to be tight enough to ensure he was not a flight risk. Mr Watters said the 17-year-old had an NDIS plan which included an extensive sub plan to address his behaviours. His parents, who had sat at the back of the court, said nothing as they left. He is due back in court on August 5.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Agent cops industry fury after rival exposes fake sales, reviews
A prominent real estate agent has been accused of posting fake sales and reviews of rival agents on her website, sparking a turf war. Byrony O'Neill of Byrony O'Neill Estate Agents is at the centre of an online storm whipped up by a rival agent accusing her of posting false information about her competitors to win clients and gain search traffic. But Ms O'Neill, who sells multi-million dollar properties in Brisbane's inner west, says the content was posted without her knowledge, and it has since been removed. Fancy a luxury home with a tennis court? That'll be $18m, thanks Brett Andreassen of Plum Property has posted a YouTube video and social media post claiming Ms O'Neill is providing disinformation to the public for personal gain in a move labelled as 'the scandal of the industry'. 'It was brought to our attention that a prominent agent in Toowong has been creating pages on their website about their competitors — not just me, complete with fake sales, fake reviews, fake testimonials,' Mr Andreassen says in the video. 'This is not about competition; this is about transparency. This is calling out blatant lies when an agent creates pages on their website with fake sales, fake reviews about their competitors to try and trick clients and customers... that agent has done the wrong thing by their clients and elevate their own reputation in the community — this needs to be called out.' Plum Property real estate agent Brett Andreassen speaking on a YouTube video about what he claims is disinformation on Byrony O'Neill's website. Image: YouTube. Mr Andreassen provided screenshots of information from what he claims were 18 pages containing fake sales, reviews, and testimonials on Byrony O'Neill's website. The pages have since been removed from the website, but links to archives of each page are in the description of Mr Andreassen's video. One testimonial states; ''Brett's negotiation skills and proactive communication made the process easy,' says one client. Another review notes, 'Great result, but Byrony O'Neill is highly recommended by many locals.'' 'That's a strange quote from a client who used my services then said we're going to use someone else. I can look back through my career and say that's never happened,' Mr Andreassen said. MORE: How sleepy Aussie suburbs were jolted to life after the Covid-19 pandemic Under that testimonial are a number of addresses of properties purported to have been sold by Mr Andreassen, including 3/22 Jephson St, Toowong in April 2025. 'I didn't sell that property, particularly in April 2025. Then I looked it up. There is no 3/22 Jephson St, Toowong,' he said. 'Can you see what's happening here? Fake sales are being put under my name.' He then noted similar fake testimonials and sales were listed for 18 other agents in the area also listed on Ms O'Neill's website, including identical 'complaints' sections and unverified quotes from clients who are quoted as promoting Byrony. Each agent also has a small group of fake sales, either for properties that do not exist, are in different suburbs, are units instead of houses, were not sold, or were sold at a different time for a different price. Mr Andreassen said he stumbled across the findings when he googled his name and the word 'reviews'. The video is creating quite a stir in the real estate community. One commented: 'Has she called you yet to say sorry? You know, picking up the phone. Maybe we should all call her today to let her know we aren't very happy with this conduct.' Another says: 'Office of Fair Trading needs to hear about this.' And another: 'This is the scandal of the industry for sure!' 'This is disgusting! Good work uncovering this!!' Alex Frew, the founder of 3P Digital, took to Mr Andreassen's Instagram post to respond to the allegations, claiming full responsibility in a comment. 'We're reaching out regarding recent concerns about inaccurate content that appeared on Byrony O'Neill's website. These pages were created and published by one of our team members at 3P Digital as part of a programmatic SEO initiative. Byrony had given us full autonomy to manage this process, and she was not consulted on or made aware of the specific suburb sales or complaint data that was included. She did not give permission for this content to be published.' 'Byrony only became aware of the issue after receiving a phone call from an agent who had seen a public post about it around 7 pm on 27 July. She notified us immediately, and by 3 am on 28 July, all pages in question had been taken down. 'We take full responsibility for this error. The data used in the SEO strategy was incorrect and its inclusion was a mistake. The staff member responsible is being managed internally, and we've since updated our internal checks to prevent this from happening again.' Ms O'Neill has since released a statement apologising to those impacted. 'I unreservedly apologise to anyone this has impacted,' it states. 'I've been in real estate for more than 21 years, and this is not who I am or how my company operates. 'I engaged a third party to manage all my IT requirements, and this content was created without my knowledge or my approval. The IT company has confirmed this in their public statements. 'I was furious when I was informed, and the pages were taken down immediately.' Mr Andreassen said he had been contacted by the Office of Fair Trading and had approached the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), as well as informing other affected agents about the matter. His concern is that the information on Ms O'Neill's website could dissuade clients from using one of the agents mentioned, which could constitute a loss of business for that agent. He also claims the incorrect sale prices listed could result in agents being accused of underselling. Real Estate Institute of Queensland (REIQ) CEO Antonia Mercorella saidthe REIQ recommended agents lodge complaints to the industry regulator, the Office of Fair Trading, if they believed competitors were acting in a potentially unlawful manner. 'Real estate is an extremely competitive industry, particularly between businesses that specialise in the same practice or local areas,' Ms Mercorella said. 'Significant amounts of money, time and resources are invested in building a brand and reputation in the real estate industry, and many consumers do consider and place trust in reviews when selecting a real estate professional to act on their behalf.' Ms Mercorella said there were strict laws governing real estate in Queensland, as well as federal consumer laws, and it was important real estate professionals were cautious when it came to their own promotional activities, reviews, and representations. 'We understand in this increasingly digital world, online marketing tactics such as search engine optimisation are vital in keeping ahead of the pack, and we support agents promoting their own achievements,' she said. 'In doing so, integrity and honesty must remain at the core of all professional conduct.'