No-fault law sees tenant facing eviction after major knee surgery
A painter by trade, years of physical labour have taken a toll on the 52-year-old Hamiltonian.
Scans in April 2024 revealed fractures in both knees, with overgrown bone that needed to be shaved. The bone was pressing into a tendon on his left side which needed to be cut and repaired.
"My knees were poking out like nobody's business," Adams said.
Post-operation, doctors told him to expect crutches for three weeks, a minimal amount of walking and no driving for at least six weeks. Full recovery was expected to take four to five months.
ADVERTISEMENT
Knowing how limiting this would be, he made sure to notify his landlord through his property manager well in advance, saying he notified them first in June last year and reminded them at every three-monthly inspection after that.
"At my last inspection in March, I had also reminded them about my surgery," he said. "She said to me, 'Yes, you have mentioned that a lot, and we hope everything goes well'."
Desmond's flat in Whitiora, Hamilton. (Source: Supplied)
Just days on from that inspection, a letter arrived. Adams had been served a 90-day notice to vacate his Whitiora home.
"I felt really gutted, angry, and frustrated. It was like, what's going on here? You guys have known about my surgery for a while, and now you're serving me with this?
"How the heck do you expect me to look for a house in 90 days when I've got surgery, and then about four to five months in healing? I can't actually get out to look for houses in that time."
He says he asked for an extension on the notice to give him more time to heal before trying to move. But he claims that wasn't granted.
ADVERTISEMENT
Recovery on pause
The surgery went ahead as planned but with limited mobility and no ability to drive, Adams had to put his recovery on pause to begin house hunting.
Desmond had to have overgrown bone shaved on both knees. (Source: Desmond Adams)
He has had to rely on Driving Miss Daisy, the ACC-funded companion driving service, to attend property viewings. He's been to 15 so far.
"It's a slow process," he said. "I've got 16 stairs to walk down, and then get into the car, go look at the house and then have to climb those 16 stairs again back to the house with two crutches."
The house hunt has already come at a cost to his recovery and Adams said he "got a growling" from doctors when he went to his three-week check-up after the surgery.
"They saw my knees were bruised, not just from the operation, but they could tell I'd been doing some walking on it. They said 'you're supposed to be resting', and I said 'I can't, I need to find a house'."
ADVERTISEMENT
Adams considered taking the matter to the Tenancy Tribunal to delay or set aside the eviction notice due to the severe hardship it would cause, but he abandoned this bid as under the legislation an eviction notice can only be challenged if it's deemed to be retaliatory. A landlord can serve an eviction with 90 days' notice without giving a reason.
The property manager declined to comment when contacted by 1News.
No-cause evictions
Renters United president Zac Thomas blamed the reintroduction of no-cause evictions by the coalition Government in February.
"When life knocks you down, the law now lets someone take the roof off too. This is exactly the kind of harm the government was told would happen."
Renters United president Zac Thomas. (Source: Supplied)
He described Desmond's situation as "crazy".
ADVERTISEMENT
"I think any New Zealander with half a heart would look at this and say 'this is not the society that we want to live in'."
In a statement late last year, Housing Minister Chris Bishop said the reintroduction of no-cause evictions would "give landlords more confidence to offer homes to tenants who may otherwise have been considered too risky".
"We've heard from many landlords that, without the backstop of 90-day 'no cause' terminations, they were unwilling to take a chance on a tenant who may, for example, not have perfect references or a steady 9-5 job."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Mark your own homework': Healthy Homes checks under fire
By Bella Craig of RNZ Like drivers issuing their own warrants of fitness - that's how building experts and renter advocates describe the new Healthy Homes Standards. Since July 1, all rental properties across the motu have been required to comply with the new standards, which set minimum requirements for heating, insulation, ventilation, moisture ingress and drainage. But who gets to say whether a property is up to scratch? Well, with no certification required in order to complete an assessment, the role could technically be filled by anyone. This has prompted calls for an independent certification system. Ideally, under the new standards, damp and draughty rentals should now be a thing of the past. But the New Zealand Institute of Building Inspectors isn't convinced. Chief executive Graeme Blissett, said the standards contain several loopholes. Not least, that anyone can label themselves a healthy homes assessor. "It's a huge problem, because there's no one looking at what they're actually inspecting and writing reports on is actually correct. "There are no guarantees because no one's double-checking what they're doing, and I believe that if you're charging $150, $200 to do a healthy homes inspection on a house, you're not doing it correctly." It doesn't take long to find companies offering Healthy Homes assessments - a business was found online, offering to carry out a certification for around $200. But Blissett fears that without certification, many of these businesses will prioritise "quantity over quality". He said he's seen several certificates that ticked off each of the standards, despite the properties falling short. "The tenants [are] usually up to speed with these sorts of regulations and rules, so if the landlords do it on their own property and they get it incorrect, and the tenant finds out about it or talks to someone, and they've got a little bit of knowledge on it. There is a chance for them to be taken [to] the Tenancy Tribunal. "I believe there's fines of like $5000 or something like that for non-compliance." Renters United President, Zac Thomas, said the Healthy Homes Standards are a positive step towards a warmer and drier housing stock. But he's also concerned about the assessment process. "There is a mark your own homework situation where landlords don't even need to use an independent assessor in the first place. They can say that they are healthy homes compliant, that's the first thing. "But then the second thing is they can get this assessment from an agency that in many cases won't actually be complying or assessing to the standards as they should be." Thomas said that if the checks were completed by qualified assessors, it would give peace of mind to both landlords and tenants. "A renter might go, 'hey, please show me your healthy homes compliance.' They might be worried that the house is not compliant, and the landlord will probably show this, and then they might go, 'Oh well, I guess I have nothing to complain about'. "In reality, if there was a consistent standard, tenants would have the confidence to say, 'Okay, like this does meet standard, therefore I don't need to worry about going to the Tenancy Tribunal." University of Otago Professor, Lucy Telfer Barnard, said that as winter rolls around, if houses aren't up to standard, it's the tenants who face the consequences. "The tenants may not necessarily initially know that's why they're feeling unwell, but then if they do start to wonder, there's whole process that they can then have to go through to get those standards met. "To have that after the fact when they've moved in, in good faith, thinking that the property meets the standards, really isn't fair and puts a whole burden onto people." Landlords who fail to meet the Healthy Homes standards can face fines of up to $7200. Owners of six or more rentals that do not comply could be hit with $50,000 fines. A statement from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development said they don't assess how landlords achieve compliance, and there is no licensing requirement to undertake Healthy Homes Standards assessments. Moving to this sort of "WOF" scheme would be a big undertaking with significant costs and impacts. It said landlords need to satisfy themselves that the person they hire is suitably experienced and can undertake the required inspection or work to an acceptable standard. If a tenant thinks the property they are renting is not up to standard, they can make a complaint on the Tenancy Services website or apply for a work order from the Tenancy Tribunal.
Otago Daily Times
24-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
A difficult balancing act for flamingos, ministers
Balance is often on my mind now I am in my eighth decade. As ACC tells us, about 30% of people aged 65 and over who live in the community will fall at least once a year and 10% to 20% will need hospitalisation. We old people are bombarded with information about improving our balance. I have become adept at standing on one foot in the shower like a misshapen flamingo in a deluge. Mr Google tells me this behaviour in flamingos is believed to help them conserve body heat and energy, particularly when it is cold. Also, this posture can form part of a courtship display. Please do not regurgitate your porridge imagining such scenes in my bathroom. They are not a happening thing. There is already enough of a risk of an ACC claim when I try the creme-de-la-creme of this exercise, standing on one leg with your eyes shut. My pathetic attempts at this prove I am not a flamingo, misshapen or otherwise. Those fine birds happily sleep while maintaining their unipedal posture. I cannot do that exercise where you cross your ankles, drop to the floor and get up again without using your arms or knees either, flopping about with all the elegance of an albatross walking. If that condemns me to an earlier-than-expected grave, as some commentators on the importance of this seem to be suggesting, so be it. I could be following the ACC Nymbl programme, designed to help the over-50s stay on their feet. It combines body movements and brain games, but it is an app only downloadable to a smartphone or a tablet. I have neither. And no ACC, please do not suggest joining an exercise group. It would be irresponsible of you to have me reliving the traumatic days of unco-ordinated blundering about in physical education in my straining-at-the seams rompers. All is not lost though. I can do more sit-to-stand repeats (where you sit on a chair with your arms crossed on your chest and see how many times you can stand up and sit down in 30 seconds) than the average for a person my age, according to the United States public health agency the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Almost twice as many. Not that I am skiting. I am, after all, the woman who broke her wrist after slipping on bedding when I was changing the sheets a few years back. While I may be inconsistent about exercising, and a little confused about balance requirements, that's nothing compared with the baffling use of the balance buzz word from government ministers. Among them was Environment Minister Penny Simmonds telling us the balance had swung too far towards environmental protection at the cost of not being able to get things done. "We consider there does need to be a rebalancing," she said. "Not a disregard of the environment, but a rebalancing." But when a public health researcher and freshwater advocate wondered on what basis Ms Simmonds had made this statement, she was advised the minister had not been provided with any specific advice or evidence from any agency. Accordingly, the Official Information Act request from the researcher was refused because the requested information did not exist. More recently, in the same vein, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay told us the government wants to restore "balance in how fresh water is managed across the country and ensuring the interests of all water users, including farmers ... are properly reflected". It's all part of the planned overhaul of resource management which we are assured will continue to protect the environment even as regulation is reduced. Are we expected to believe the balance has swung too far towards environmental protection when so many of our waterways are unswimmable, undrinkable and too murky to properly reflect much? If current regulations for managing freshwater have not made the improvement we would like yet, and they are supposedly too stringent, how will weaker rules work? Last week Associate Education Minister David Seymour announced a review of early childhood education (ECE) funding aimed at ensuring it is simple, fair and gets value for money. Great. But hard on the heels of the pay equity debacle, many in the sector will be feeling uneasy the review group's brief includes advising on "the balance between quality and affordability for services and parents/caregivers reflected in the funding system, including its contribution to an appropriate mix of minimum standards and quality inputs, such as adult-to-child ratios or proportions of qualified teachers". Should quality really be battling it out with cost, and if it loses, who will be advantaged? Not our tamariki. Have our government ministers been spending too much time playing ostriches in ECE sandpits, reinforcing the myth about the birds' behaviour? That's what I call unbalanced. • Elspeth McLean is a Dunedin writer.
Otago Daily Times
22-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Accident numbers putting pressure on ACC
Nearly half the population of Otago had active Accident Compensation Corporation injury claims last year, prompting the government agency to raise concerns about the financial pressure it was putting on the sustainability of the scheme. In 2024, there were 100,336 new injury claims and 124,269 active injury claims made to ACC from people in the Otago region, costing the taxpayer more than $312 million to help them recover. Otago's total population in 2024 was 251,300. ACC injury prevention leader James Whitaker said the number of injury claims and associated costs were the highest in the Otago region for the past five years, and the numbers reflected a nationwide trend. "In 2020, ACC accepted 90,375 injury claims from the Otago region at a cost of $189m. "To put it simply, more people are getting injured, and it is taking longer and costing more for them to recover." He said the data had showed ACC needed to look more seriously at raising collective awareness of the need to prevent injuries. In 2024, ACC accepted two million injury claims from 1.6 million New Zealanders, and it cost nearly $7b to help people recover from these injuries and to maintain some form of income (weekly compensation). A total of $4.4b of these costs went towards rehabilitation expenses. He said over the past 20 years, the costs of supporting New Zealanders with injuries had climbed from just under $1b in 2004, to nearly $4.4b in 2024. Mr Whitaker said the high number of injury claims and costs was putting pressure on the sustainability of the ACC scheme. "We want all New Zealanders to get the help and support they need when they're injured now and for many generations to come. "What we all need to do is be more mindful and present when there is injury risk present. If I get hurt, what is the impact on those people who I care about?" The most common injuries occurred at home or in the community (61,920 costing $167m); sport/recreation (26,660 costing $58m); and work (10,346 costing $66m). ACC Minister Scott Simpson said a report titled "Injuries in New Zealand" would be released annually to help raise the collective awareness and promote injury prevention. "ACC is a unique and world-leading scheme and one that we cannot afford to take for granted. "Injuries cause harm to the person injured, but they also put pressure on business productivity and on the financial position of the ACC scheme. "We need to safeguard ACC, so it is there to help and support our future generations. "One of the key areas [in which] we need to improve is reducing injuries." Whether it was at home and in our communities, at work, in sport and recreation or on our roads, the number of people getting injured was too high — especially considering most injuries were preventable, he said. Mr Whitaker said independent research indicated more New Zealanders were now taking actions to prevent injuries to themselves and other people. "By being present in the moments when there is injury risk, we can get the job done and continue to do the things we love. "This is far better than experiencing pain, creating flow-on effects for friends and family, and facing a long rehabilitation."
