
My part in Britain's illegal immigration crisis
What is less often considered is how our personal spending decisions are driving that illegal immigration. It is all well and good to bemoan what is happening in the abstract, but we then spend our cash with the food delivery companies and at the barber shops and nail bars which pull undocumented, illegal workers to our shores.
This reality was brought home to me last weekend when I tried to do what I have done on countless occasions – order a beer at Royal China on Baker Street in London's West End. Royal China serves perhaps London's most sublime dim sum – not the most cuisine-y or original, but certainly leagues above most of the capital's establishments.
My opinion on this is not an esoteric one. At weekend lunchtimes, its entrance and the street outside is thronging with people waiting to be called when a table is ready. And, best of all, you can still have a lunch for four without drinks for around £100, something of a bargain in London.
I must have eaten at this restaurant, and the others in its group, hundreds of times over nearly 30 years and have a sentimental attachment to them.
When the first branch opened in Queensway in Bayswater (now closed) in the mid 1990s, I was in my early 20s and used to go on Sundays with my mother after walks in Hyde Park. She was in and out of hospital at the time with the cancer that went on to kill her.
When I was running a think tank and a magazine in Marylebone, I dragged our authors there – with little regard to whether they had a fondness for Chinese food. My two teenage sons have been going for longer than they can remember.
What was different this time is that I was informed that the restaurant no longer serves alcohol, but I was welcome to bring my own drink. Corkage is now charged which, on my visit, ranged from £3 for unlimited beers to £50 for a bottle of whisky.
Why the change? After a raid by immigration officials, the restaurant lost its alcohol licence last August when it was found to be employing nine members of staff who were here illegally.
It was also fined £360,000 by the Home Office. This was the third time the restaurant had fallen foul of the law, having already had to pay penalties totalling £110,000.
All the fines were swiftly paid, and other branches of the restaurant in Canary Wharf and Harrow, as well as its more upmarket Michelin-guide listed sibling, Royal China Club, a hundred yards or so further north on Baker Street, are not accused of similar breaches and are still merrily serving alcohol.
The output of council staff is not usually written to entertain, but the City of Westminster's submission on Royal China makes for quite some reading. Of their 2018 raid, the report states:
'Upon officers parking the vehicles, one worker at the rear of the restaurant ran inside and warned the other workers that immigration officers were present, officers… could see staff running through the restaurant and discarding their uniform.
'There were 28 staff members encountered in total, nine members of staff were found to be working illegally and arrested.
'During the visit the fire alarm was set off… In the commotion one Chinese female who had admitted to entering the United Kingdom illegally managed to escape. The fire brigade attended and informed the officer in charge that there had been no fire and that the fire alarm had been pressed by someone inside the restaurant.'
And the record of last year's raid is similar:
'Upon officers entering the front of the premises they were asked by the staff member behind the bar to wait for the manager to arrive.
'Whilst officers were waiting, eight staff members attempted to escape from the premises via a lift at the rear loading area, another two members of staff fled via a rear staircase. Nine members of staff were arrested by the officers positioned at the rear and one male escaped.
'There were 29 staff members encountered in total, this time nine more illegal workers were found. The illegal workers consisted of six Indonesian males who had overstayed their visas, two Malaysian males who had overstayed their visas and one Chinese female who was working in breach of her visit visa conditions. The workers were arrested and escorted off the premises.
'One worker reported that they worked washing dishes 11 hours per day, six days per week and earning £400 a week, (around £6 per hour compared to the minimum wage of £11.44 per hour).'
Royal China is not an obscure establishment on some backstreet. If somewhere so public-facing in so prominent a location has flagrantly abused its position, what is going on elsewhere? One must assume, after being fined a total of £470,000, it is now compliant with the law.
My attempt to satiate a lunchtime craving for a beer has caused me to ask: has my fondness for dim sum, in however small a way, contributed to Britain's illegal immigration crisis?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hamas lawyer called for ‘copycat' Palestine Action groups
A lawyer who represented Hamas called for 'copycat' direct action groups to spring up to replace the banned Palestine Action. Franck Magennis was one of three lawyers who worked on an unsuccessful application to remove Hamas from the Home Office's list of proscribed organisations. It has now emerged that Mr Magennis spoke at a conference in the days before Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group, and called for copycat groups to pick up the mantle. Mr Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, reposted a video of himself making the speech at the Socialist Workers' Party's Marxist Festival on the day the ban came into effect. In the video he calls for: 'Copycat direct action groups… to spring up everywhere… We mustn't let the British Empire, that is participating in this genocide, push us around. They do not have the power to stop us.' He also tells the audience Zionism is in a 'serious crisis' and encouraged supporters to 'kick it to death' He said: 'It [Zionism] is in a serious crisis; it looks like it is not long for the world, but that doesn't mean that we can be complacent. We must assure that we kick it to death. It must not be allowed to survive this crisis.' The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has made a complaint against Mr Magennis to the Bar Standards Board alleging that is conduct diminishes public trust in him as a barrister. The group alleges that posts on his social media amount to a criminal offence, namely the support of a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. In the complaint, they say: 'We take it as axiomatic that a barrister who commits criminal offences under the Terrorism Act 2000, which are potentially punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment, is not a fit and proper person to remain a barrister. 'It follows that it is your duty as his regulator to pursue this matter vigorously and without delay'. The complaint went on: 'He is experienced in the practice of criminal law, in addition to which the very words he used both in his offending posts and in the speech he gave at the Marxist meeting, a video of which he chose to embed and republish on X, prove that he knew exactly what he was doing. He acted flagrantly.' The organisation said that alongside the video calling for copycat groups to spring up, Mr Magennis also posted other inflammatory messages. On July 5, he posted 'Escalate!' in response to fellow lawyer Fahad Ansari, who posted: 'The organisation may be banned. The action isn't. Escalate.' Mr Ansari and Mr Magennis are behind a law firm that says it is 'dedicated to understanding and confronting the racist ideology of Zionism' through 'strategic litigation'. The name of the organisation, Riverway to the Sea, is a reference to the slogan 'from the River to the Sea, Palestine shall be free', which has been interpreted by some Jewish groups as a call for the elimination of Israel. That same weekend, Mr Magennis also posted : 'They're not powerful enough to stop us. Elbit Systems UK Limited, you'd better be terrified of what's coming. We're gonna fucking destroy you. We're only getting started. Tiocfaidh ár lá [Irish for 'Our day will come'], you Zionist scum.' A spokesman for Garden Court Chambers said: 'The barrister concerned made the statements and publicised them in their individual capacity. 'Those statements do not represent the views of Garden Court Chambers, and they should not be treated as reflecting any position held by Garden Court Chambers. Furthermore, Garden Court Chambers does not endorse the language and tone used to express them. 'We take this opportunity as a chambers to make clear that we unequivocally condemn racism and anti-Semitism in all its forms.'


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-semitism now rife in schools, with pupils chanting 'free Palestine' and 'f*** the Jews', teachers warn
Anti-semitism is now rife across schools in the UK, with teachers warning of pupils chanting 'free Palestine ' and 'f*** the Jews'. A new survey undertaken by the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) revealed that more than half (51 per cent) of Jewish teachers have experienced some form of anti-semitism since May 2023. Of the more than 300,000 members surveyed, 44 per cent also reported witnessing swastika graffiti at their schools, while 39 per cent have been subjected to Nazi-related comments. One Jewish teacher even reported having students shout 'free Palestine' at them 'on multiple occasions', while, in another instance, someone shouted 'f*** the Jews'. Meanwhile, members of teaching staff recalled instances where they had been told 'it's not racist to say Jews are rich - it's just a fact', while others said they had been assumed to be Israeli, rather than British. Now, the NASUWT are making an urgent plea for education secretary Bridget Phillipson to help tackle these 'unacceptable trends' and 'stamp out discrimination'. Matt Wrack, Acting General Secretary of NASUWT, said that members of the union believe the rise in anti-semitic abuse was due to 'misinformation on social media'. He added that this 'dangerous rhetoric from far-right movements and stereotyping of Jewish people' is helping to 'fuel a rise in anti-semitic and racist abuse in schools'. Mr Wrack, who said that several teachers were now 'fearful' of openly disclosing their religion while at work, said that 'this cannot be allowed to continue'. 'It is clear that schools need swift, strong support in tackling antisemitism so that Jewish teachers and pupils can feel safe', he said. Adding that there is an urgent need for 'visible leadership from the government', he said: Antisemitism does not happen in isolation. We know that many forms of racist abuse are occurring in education settings and will be looking at this closely.' It follows Hamas attacks on October 7 in response to the ongoing occupation of Palestinian land, with the onslaught killing around 1,200 Israeli people and over 250 being taken hostage. In November last year, Jewish children were left cowering after teenage thugs pelted their London bus with rocks and rubbish, before storming onto the vehicle and yelling 'f*** Israel', as police confirmed they are investigating a 'potential hate crime'. Students at Jews' Free School (JFS) in Kenton, north London, were travelling home on two buses, operated by Uno, when the incident occurred on Wednesday, November 25. As the buses made a stop in High Street, Edgware, a large group of teenagers from another school began throwing 'big heavy rocks' at one of the vehicles, one witness told Jewish Chronicle. Four teenagers then boarded one of the buses, swearing and making antisemitic remarks towards the Jewish students. A witness revealed: 'They were also swearing at us, saying, 'F*** Israel, nobody likes you. F*** off you b*****s.' Another youngster who was involved in the incident said some of the children ran off the bus to escape the attack, while others cowered under their seats. They were 'completely terrified', they said, adding that the thugs were seen filming the incident on their phones. Meanwhile in May, a rise in anti-Jewish narratives in university classrooms was also said to be 'flourishing unchecked'. Ongoing Israeli military action in Gaza since October 7 has reportedly led to a spike in 'disinformation' in lectures and seminars. A study by the Henry Jackson Society, a British national security think tank, indicated that more than 70 per cent of those polled thought non-factual narratives had directly shaped their peers' understanding of the conflict. Among the 'falsehoods' referenced were claims about the Israeli government and its stance on genocide. The nature of anti-Jewish hate crimes reported often focused on people appearing to express support for Hamas - a proscribed terrorist organisation in Britain. Hostility on campuses was also mentioned, amid reports students were afraid to walk around freely as they hid kippahs and Star of David necklaces. Lord Leigh of Hurley, a Conservative life peer, said: 'Members of the National Education Union undertake activities such as clearing Israeli-made food from supermarkets and film themselves doing it and circulate those films.' Baroness Deech, the former head of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education, even claimed that the root of the 'behaviour' is the 'religious teaching that Jews are inferior'. She described lecturers as the 'aggressors', adding: 'It demonstrates the failure of Holocaust education which focuses on dead Jews as a feature of the past and has nothing to say about the long history of antisemitism and the focus of antisemitism today, namely the state of Israel.' Regarding concerns around a rise in anti-Jewish hate amongst students, the Office for Students said: 'Universities will need to have effective policies to protect students from harassment, robust procedures to address it if it occurs, and support for students who experience it. '[We have] published a range of case studies and has shared resources to assist universities in their work to tackle antisemitism. 'This includes a guide to historical myths, persistent accusations and modern misconceptions about Jewish people and the truth behind them.' Meanwhile, a report commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews - the UK's largest Jewish community organisation - revealed that there had been an increase in anti-Jewish discrimination across the NHS, education, the arts and policing. Lord John Mann, who co-authored the review, said he had heard 'shocking experiences' from several Jewish individuals, describing a public 'onslaught' of anti-semitism since October 7 as 'unacceptable'. Speaking to the BBC's Today Programme, he added that several individuals have began to feel 'ostracised' in the workplace, with anti-semitism often failing to be adequately tackled in equality training. NHS employees also reported feeling that anti-semitism had been 'swept under the carpet'. In response, an NHS spokesperson told the BBC: 'It is completely unacceptable for anyone to experience racism, discrimination or prejudice in the health service, whether staff or patient, and the NHS takes any instance of antisemitism or discrimination extremely seriously. 'The NHS provides care and treatment for everyone regardless of race, faith, or background and all NHS healthcare providers should have policies in place to address issues like this in the workplace.' In 2024, there were 3,528 anti-Semitic incidents in the UK, the second-highest total ever recorded, a shocking new report reveals today. The year showed an 18 per cent fall on levels seen in 2023, which witnessed an orgy of vile anti-Semitism in the months after Hamas's October 7 assaults. There were also 201 assaults, 157 incidents of damage or desecration, 250 threats and 2,892 reports of abusive behaviour. The figures, compiled by charity the Community Security Trust (CST), said it showed the 'lasting impact' of the conflict in the Middle East/


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Law will change to stop attackers fixated on violence, says Home Secretary
Yvette Cooper has pledged to change the law to treat people fixated on violence as seriously as terrorists in the wake of last year's Southport attack. The Home Secretary said she would address a 'gap in the law' against planning mass casualty attacks that had no ideological basis, but could be 'just as serious' as terrorism in their impact. She said: 'We have to make sure that the system is able to respond to violent fixated individuals. We will tighten that legislation so that that is taken as seriously as terrorism.' Her commitment, first made in an interview with the BBC, would implement a recommendation from the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, who examined whether terror laws needed to be changed to deal with people such as Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana. The review was prompted by revelations that Rudakubana had been referred to the counter-extremism Prevent programme, but his case had not been followed up as he lacked an ideological motivation. He went on to murder three young girls and seriously wound 10 other people at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport last year and is currently serving a life sentence. Mr Hall's review recommended against widening the definition of terrorism to include individuals such as Rudakubana, but suggested creating a new offence to deal with people who plan mass casualty attacks motivated by personal grievance or an obsession with violence for its own sake. Ms Cooper said there was now a 'pattern' of teenagers being 'drawn into extreme violence and extreme ideologies' in their own bedrooms thanks to 'a really distorted and warped online world'. She said: 'The sorts of things that we're now increasingly seeing online with violent fixated individuals, where there may not be a clear ideology, it may be a fixation with violence, or they may switch between different ideologies.'