Helios Secures $4M Seed Round to Build First AI-Native Operating System for Public Policy Professionals
NEW YORK CITY, NY / ACCESS Newswire / July 11, 2025 / Helios, a technology company building the first AI-native operating system for public policy professionals, today announced that it has raised $4 million in seed funding led by Unusual Ventures, with participation from Founders Inc., Alumni Ventures and a select group of strategic angel investors. The company is gaining early traction in a U.S. market with $10B+ in annual software & lobbying spend. It is working to reshape how private entities and government agencies navigate policy and regulatory challenges, with billions already under management by early adopters.
"Policy, compliance, and regulatory affairs professionals shouldn't be stuck playing defense - constantly reacting to changes they didn't see coming," said Joe Scheidler, CEO & Co-Founder. "We built Proxi to change that. In a world where one missed signal can cost millions or derail strategy, Proxi gives public policy and compliance intelligence teams the clarity, speed, and leverage to shape outcomes instead of getting blindsided by them."
Proxi is the first AI-native OS purpose-built for public policy, regulatory affairs, legal, compliance, and government teams. It replaces the patchwork of tools these professionals rely on to navigate legislative change, manage public-private relationships, and respond to shifting regulatory demands. Whether in the private sector or across federal, state, and local governments - Proxi enables faster, more strategic decision-making in environments where the cost of delay or misalignment is measured in lost contract opportunities, failed policy, or reputational risk. The consequences aren't just regulatory-they're existential.
The Proxi platform: (i) delivers instant answers and strategic recommendations based on live federal and subnational legislative and regulatory activity, (ii) drafts memos, filings, and policy documents with built-in editing and team collaboration, (iii) parses long-form bills, reports, and filings into structured insights and risk alerts, (iv) centralizes all relevant policy and regulatory data for team-wide access and historical context, and (v) tracks government relationships, meeting notes, and stakeholder engagement-all in a secure, AI-powered workspace. By integrating these core functions in a single secure system, Proxi replaces manual, fragmented processes with the speed, foresight, and precision modern institutions demand.
Helios's founding team - Joe Scheidler (CEO), Joseph Farsakh (President), and Brandon Smith (CTO) - brings together experience from the White House, State Department, Microsoft, USAID, Datadog, and King & Spalding, bridging deep public sector insight with world-class technical execution.
"We are excited to back the talented founding team at Helios as they leverage AI to reshape how policy professionals drive critical strategy and growth within their organizations," said Lars Albright, General Partner at Unusual Ventures. "As regulations continue to evolve rapidly and grow increasingly complex, modern tools that enable enterprises not only to stay informed, but also to respond swiftly and strategically, are more essential than ever."
More than 100 public policy professionals, including Fortune 500 companies; federal, state, and local regulatory bodies; consultancies; and top lobbying firms have joined Helios' rapidly growing waitlist. The funding will accelerate product development, team expansion, and go-to-market efforts. To learn more, visit https://heliosintel.ai.
ABOUT HELIOS:
Helios is building the first AI-native operating system for government interaction, empowering public policy, legal, and compliance professionals with end-to-end automation, secure AI agents, and precision tooling. Headquartered in New York City with a presence in Washington, D.C. and California, Helios is on a mission to modernize how institutions engage with government at every level. Learn more at https://heliosintel.ai/.
MEDIA CONTACT: Nina Pfister, MAG PR at nina@mooringadvisorygroup.com.
###
SOURCE: Helios
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Stock Is Way Cheaper Than You Think. Here's 1 Reason Why.
Nvidia's profits will grow for years to come. Factoring this growth into Nvidia's forward price-to-earnings multiple makes this stock look very cheap. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is one of the hottest stocks on the market today. Over the past five years, Nvidia shares have soared in value by nearly 1,500%, including another 20% in the last 12 months. Think the run is over? Think again. Nvidia stock remains far cheaper than most investors realize due to one critical factor. The artificial intelligence (AI) revolution is in full swing. But we're still in the early innings. In 2023, the United Nations estimated the global artificial intelligence market to be worth roughly $190 billion. By 2033, the organization believes the AI market's value will soar to nearly $5 trillion. That's a compound annual growth rate of more than 30%. Thus far, Nvidia's growth rates have exceeded the AI market's growth rate. Last year, Nvidia's sales more than doubled. This year, analysts expect sales to jump again by more than 50%. Why is Nvidia growing faster than the market overall? Because it rapidly gained market share due to its superior hardware and software offerings. Right now, Nvidia is estimated to have more than 90% of the AI GPU market. Its new Blackwell chips were at one time sold out for more than 12 months. Essentially every cloud computing infrastructure business on the planet is racing to buy more Nvidia products. Nvidia's CUDA developer platform, meanwhile, keeps customers locked in to its hardware and software ecosystem. In summary, through early investment, Nvidia has the best AI GPUs on the market from a performance standpoint. Its software integration, meanwhile, ensures developers are locked in to their products for the long haul. All of this has allowed Nvidia to post an industry-leading gross margin -- more than double that of competitors like Intel. While competition will emerge, Nvidia has gained a critical capital and reputational advantage -- an advantage that should persist for years to come, allowing it to charge more for its products than the competition. Trading at 27 times sales, Nvidia stock looks incredibly pricey for a $4 trillion business. On an earnings basis, shares trade at 53 times trailing earnings. Again, this looks expensive at first glance. But sales have a strong potential to grow by more than 30% per year for a decade or more. And given Nvidia's competitive advantages, profits should closely track this growth, even if margins do compress somewhat due to rising competition. On a forward earnings basis -- that is, based on what analysts expect Nvidia to earn next year -- shares trade at just 38 times 2026 earnings. That's already a much more palatable valuation. Add another two years of 30% profit growth and shares suddenly trade at just 22 times 2028 earnings. And remember, Nvidia could continue to grow at this rate through 2033 and beyond. So yes, Nvidia stock is expensive up front. But for long-term investors willing to spread that upfront premium over a long holding period, shares are surprisingly cheap. But only if you're willing to stay patient for years, or even decades at a time. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Intel and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia Stock Is Way Cheaper Than You Think. Here's 1 Reason Why. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 things driving the AI trade
The AI trade has played a big role in driving the market's gains over the last couple of years. In the video above, J.P. Morgan Asset Management Global Market Strategist Stephanie Aliaga shares three things that are driving the overall AI theme for the markets. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Yeah, there's three key things going for the AI theme at large right now, is that we've had significant advances in the capability of these models, another one this week. Um, also, the capability from enterprises now that they're investing in their own, um, niche use cases and agents. Um, beyond that, we also have the cost curve, right? Costs are coming down, hardware is getting more efficient. And then adoption is really picking up. And so, what does this mean? Well, as adoption is widening, you have more potentially buyers for AI services and AI infrastructure. That gets to that timeline of profitability, maybe it's, uh, quite quicker for these far quicker for these companies relative to prior tech waves. And we've definitely seen that. Um, and beyond that, I think it also suggests that the beneficiaries of AI are also broadening out. So we see the narrowness in the public equity market, but we have to think about what are the other players in this space, maybe on the receiving end of all of this capital spending from the hyperscalers, maybe they're in private markets, you know, the AI coding boom went from generating 300 billion dollars in revenue last year to now 1.6 trillion largely led by a lot of private companies. So what are some of those opportunities? So for us, it all comes down to you need diversification, not just for risk management, but also if you're trying to really take advantage of the emerging, uh, winners here in AI. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
43 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Bernie Sanders Reveals the AI ‘Doomsday Scenario' That Worries Top Experts
Artificial intelligence promises a future of unprecedented productivity and wealth, but for Senator Bernie Sanders, the crucial question isn't if the technology will change the world, but who will benefit from that change. As a lifelong champion for workers' rights, Sanders sees the rapid advancement of AI not just as a technological revolution, but as the next major battleground in the fight against corporate greed and inequality. In a conversation with Gizmodo, the Vermont senator, who revealed he had just spoken with one of the world's leading AI experts, laid out his fears that the technology will be used to suppress wages, break unions, and further enrich the billionaire class. He also shared his concerns about AI's impact on our collective mental health and discussed the 'doomsday scenario' that has some top minds in the industry worried that humanity could lose control of its own creation. The conversation has been edited for clarity and formatted as a Q&A. All quotes are verbatim and unaltered. Gizmodo: Senator, you've long fought for worker dignity. In an economy increasingly shaped by AI, what do you believe should be the new definition of meaningful work? Sen. Sanders: Well, that is a very good question, and I don't know that I can give you an intelligent answer to it right now, but this is what I will say. What I think is being lost in the discussion over AI is what we have seen over the last 50 years: a huge increase in worker productivity. Almost all of the benefits of that productivity have gone to the corporations and to the companies that developed that technology. In fact, workers today, in real inflation-accounted-for wages, are earning less, and I fear very much that almost all the new benefits of worker productivity will go to the people on top at the expense of working people. That is something that concerns me very much. So, the first point to be made: Technology and AI is neither good nor bad. It depends on how it is used, and it depends upon who benefits from it. Unless we change the political dynamics, the benefits are going to accrue to the people on top at the expense of working people. That to me is the most important issue. I want workers to benefit from this new technology, not just the people on top. Historically, I mean forever—in human existence—people have had to struggle to put food on the table, to farm, to grow food, just to survive. And AI is going to change all that, and we want to make sure that this creates a better, wealthier future for ordinary people, not just the people on top. Gizmodo: In terms of protection, what protections are needed for American workers to avoid being left behind in this transition? Sen. Sanders: I think we have got to make it clear in some formulation or another, and some of the unions are beginning to negotiate for this. That if worker productivity, if you, the job you are doing right now becomes more productive with AI, I want the benefits to accrue to you. What does that mean? It could mean a shorter work week, a 32-hour work week, which is what we're fighting for, with no loss of pay. Again, the main point is workers have got to benefit from increased productivity, not just CEOs. Right now, that is not the case, so that is what we have got to change. Gizmodo: If a CEO says, 'I've automated these tasks and I need fewer workers,' what should the response be? Sen. Sanders: Exactly. Look, we have got to see that this technology benefits workers rather than just CEOs. So if a company develops AI that allows workers to be more productive, what we would like to see is a shorter work week with no loss in pay. The other things that I worry about, which goes beyond economics and the potential of massive job loss, are two very important issues: mental health and the well-being of human beings. Gizmodo: What do you mean by that, Senator? Sen. Sanders: People interact more every day with artificial intelligence, with robotics. What is the impact on the mental health and the well-being of human beings? If you spend your entire day interacting with a chatbot rather than talking to friends or family, what happens to you? What kind of problems develop? We know that in America right now, a lot of young people are having a hard time interacting with other human beings because they spend so much time on the internet. And there are people out there, literally, people in the technology world, who are saying, 'Look, if you can't make any friends, if you're very lonely, go to a chatbot and you can develop a friend right there.' I'm not sure that this is good for human beings. Gizmodo: There's a sense that people are lost, that AI is erasing our identity, our role in society… Sen. Sanders: Well, do you know the expression, 'The operation was a success, unfortunately the patient died'? In this context, the system is working well. We're developing all kinds of technology: you're going to be able to do this, you're going to be able to do that. Unfortunately, human beings are going to get lost in that development. And they will become more and more unhappy, more and more mentally unstable, more and more lonely. So, we want to make sure the technology benefits human beings, economically as well as emotionally. That has got to be the driving force. Gizmodo: Have you spoken to tech CEOs or experts about this? Sen. Sanders: I have talked to CEOs. Funny that you mention it. I won't mention his name, but I've just gotten off the phone with one of the leading experts in the world on artificial intelligence, two hours ago. Gizmodo: Did they share your concern? Did they offer any solutions? Sen. Sanders: They're all different. He did. Somebody I talked to yesterday, not so much. There are differences of opinion. On several major issues. Number one: What impact will AI have on the economy? Some people say there will be massive job losses. I tend to agree with them. Other people say not so much, new jobs will be created. It will be like every other technological revolution. Jobs lost, jobs created, not such a big deal. So people disagree. I happen to believe this is not like the Industrial Revolution. I think this could be a lot more severe. Second point: This is not science fiction. There are very, very knowledgeable people—and I just talked to one today—who worry very much that human beings will not be able to control the technology, and that artificial intelligence will in fact dominate our society. We will not be able to control it. It may be able to control us. That's kind of the doomsday scenario—and there is some concern about that among very knowledgeable people in the industry. Gizmodo: Are you personally optimistic or pessimistic about AI, for workers, for society? Sen. Sanders: That's a broader question. We have the worst president in the history of the United States in office right now. We're seeing, all over the world, democracy itself being threatened. We see a terrible war in Ukraine, a terrible war in Gaza. So I think this is not a great moment for humanity. I would hope, however—there are ups and downs—that we can turn this around. And among many other things, use the benefits of artificial intelligence and robotics to improve human life. To make sure we can wipe out poverty. That all of our people can have a decent standard of living. This is doable. The greed of billionaires controls the process. But ordinary people must control the future. Gizmodo: One final question: Do you believe AI could in any fashion be used to strengthen unions and worker rights, or is it inherently a threat to organized labor? Sen. Sanders: I think at this moment it is more of a threat. And I think in some ways it is being used the way bad trade policies in the United States were used in the 70s. In other words, what employers will say is: 'Look, I want you to take a cut in pay. Or I want you to pay more for healthcare. And if you don't do that, by the way, we've got machines. We've got robots that can replace you. We've got artificial intelligence that can replace you. It's your choice. Take a cut or we replace you as human workers. So I think we've got to mobilize the trade union movement to be militant in standing up against the dangers of AI to workers' rights.
