Labour's welfare reform bill passes Commons despite 47-strong rebellion
The Universal Credit Bill cleared the Commons at third reading this evening after it received MPs backing by 336 votes to 242, a majority of 94.
The changes to the welfare system initially involved cutting Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP).
But faced with a rebellion, Starmer softened the bill by promising the changes would only apply to future applicants.
He also conceded by agreeing to only introduce the PIP changes after a review.
Rebel MPs like Rachael Maskell, for York Central, said: 'No matter what spin, to pass the Bill tonight, this will leave such a stain on our great party, founded on values of equality and justice.'
She warned making the changes to universal credit before a wider look at reform was putting 'the cart before the horse, the vote before the review', and branded the government's decision-making an 'omnishambles'.
After the vote, a new Living Standards group of 104 Labour MPs said the government also had to change the way it related to voters, speaking less about growth in the G7 and more about the cost of food.
In their letter to Starmer, the new group said there should now be a big effort towards lowering everyday costs.
'Our constituents will ask one question at the next election: did this Labour government make me better off?' it said.
The government will not try and introduce any more reforms to PIP until the Timms Review into the topic has been finished.
Minister Sir Stephen Timms said he wants to get his investigation finished by next autumn.
He said the government will not agree to limit it to 12 months as some MPs wanted.
He added that the government wanted to 'get on and tackle the disability employment gap' and said that the Bill 'addresses the severe work disincentives in universal credit, it protects those we don't ever expect to work from universal credit reassessment'. More Trending
New claimants who sign up for the 'limited capability for work and work-related activity' payment would receive a lower rate than existing claimants after April 2026.
This is unless they meet a set of severe conditions criteria or are terminally ill, which the same rebels also opposed.
Minister Stephen Timms did accept more safeguards for disabled people after Labour MP Marie Tidball's amendment to increase protections for PIP claimants was accepted.
The Bill will now undergo further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Date revealed when every phone in the UK is going to get an emergency alert
MORE: SEND parents are worried after more government chaos
MORE: I had a miscarriage – no one should be forced to work through it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
3 minutes ago
- Economist
British stocks and bonds look like a bargain
Putting money into an emerging market always carries a frisson of danger. Governments might make sudden, erratic decisions, sending investments plummeting. That risk also makes those assets cheaper, to draw in willing buyers. British assets, too, have started to look cheap in recent years, at least compared with those of other rich countries. Last week's spectacle in the House of Commons, where the Labour government was cowed by its own backbenchers into withdrawing a fairly minor cut to disability benefits, then briefly pummelled by the bond market as a result, helps explain why.
Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Spectator
It's crunch time for Starmer's ‘one in, one out' migrant deal
The entente is still very much cordiale. Talks between Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron are ongoing on the third day of the Anglo-French summit. The key issue is migration: how best to stop the constant flow of Channel crossings that have seen 20,000 arrive here this year already? Like Rwanda, this deal faces numerous practical and political hurdles Both, publicly, are singing from the same hymn sheet, with lashings of Gallic sweetness. In remarks this morning, the French President praised the relationship between London and Paris. Both nations, he insisted, share 'the same resolve to fight' people smugglers. The Prime Minister spoke, again, of 'new tactics' and a 'new intent to tackle illegal migration and break the business model of the criminal gangs'. The big solution, expected to be unveiled later today, is a 'one-in, one-out' deal. For each individual taken back, France would transfer one asylum seeker to the UK, who would likely be someone with a family connection or genuine reason to seek sanctuary here. British officials are, understandably, pushing for a high number; the French are believed to be more resistant. The hope is that if a return deal works, it would deter future crossings, allowing Starmer to claim that he, finally, has 'stopped the boats'. Of course, like Rwanda, this deal faces numerous practical and political hurdles. Who decides who comes in and out? What does the deal mean for the EU and the Dublin Convention? Is such a deal even legal under the UN Refugee Convention? Expect those questions and more to be put to Starmer and Macron when they appear at a joint press conference later today.
North Wales Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK Government must explain how it aims to cut energy bills, says minister
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband announced on Thursday that the Government would not segment the UK into zones where bills would depend on local supply and demand. Such an initiative was expected to benefit Scots due to the high level of power generation in the country. Instead, Mr Miliband promised a 'reformed system of national pricing', which he said was 'the best way to deliver an electricity system that is fairer, more affordable, and more secure, at less risk to vital investment in clean energy than other alternatives'. Zonal pricing had been opposed by major energy firms – excluding Octopus Energy, whose boss was in favour of the move – which raised concerns about the impact on investment in renewable energy. Responding to the announcement, Scotland's Energy Secretary, Gillian Martin, urged the UK Government to urgently lay out plans to cut bills, citing a Labour manifesto pledge from last year's general election. 'The UK Government promised to cut bills – instead, they have increased,' she said. 'They need to set out immediately how they will sort out the high energy bills faced by the people of Scotland – in an energy-rich country like Scotland, people should not be struggling to pay their bills. 'They promised that bills would fall by £300, but bills are higher than they were this time last year. 'The UK Government have set out what they will not do; they now need to set out what they will do to bring bills down. 'Given the significance of Scotland's renewables sector, the Scottish Government must be fully involved in decisions on reforming the national energy market in a way that brings down bills and delivers a level playing field for renewables in Scotland.' But Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the announcement was 'great news' for Scottish jobs. 'We have listened to Scottish industry and made a positive decision to reform our energy market, ensuring consumers feel the benefit of our clean energy mission,' he said. 'Bills are already falling in Scotland and we'll bring them down for good by getting off the rollercoaster of foreign gas, and winning the race to clean power. 'This decision will safeguard the investment required to win that race and secure thousands of good Scottish jobs for decades to come. 'This package of measures will create a predictable climate for Scottish industry and ensure the whole of Scotland benefits from our clean energy future.'
