Bull escapes Colorado rodeo, still roaming mountain town
Snowmass Village Police Chief Brian Olson told the Aspen Times the bull was being unloaded in preparation for the Snowmass Rodeo. He speculated the animal found a gap in the fencing being used during the unloading and forced its way through it.
"We have stopped looking and will wait for a credible sighting before attempting to secure him," Olson told CBS Colorado on Thursday. "Probably out of nervousness and being unfamiliar with surroundings, he is remaining secluded intentionally. He has plenty to eat (grass/water) so we are not concerned with his welfare, for the moment."
The town issued a warning to citizens not to approach the bull if they see it, and to keep pets away from it as well.
A bull escaped from the Snowmass Rodeo yesterday afternoon and remains on the loose in Snowmass Village. Out of caution,... Posted by Town of Snowmass Village on Thursday, July 3, 2025
The bull is believed to be hiding out in the Horse Ranch subdivision on the north side of Snowmass Village and near the rodeo grounds. Cowboys on horseback searched the neighborhood immediately after the bull's escape but had to return in the evening to help with the rodeo, per the Aspen Times. Police also used drones to search for him.
The Snowmass Rodeo is held every Wednesday night from mid-June to mid-August. The event is celebrating its 51st year of operation.
An undated file photo of a bull at a rodeo.
Getty Images
Anyone who sees the bull is asked to notify police dispatch at (970) 920-5310.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
34 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal resources, cadaver dogs and receding water. What we know about the search for Travis Decker
CrimeFacebookTweetLink Follow People are starting to flock to the Cascades near Leavenworth, Washington, to enjoy the summer weather amid a backdrop of rugged mountains and scenic trails. And as water in Icicle Creek starts to recede, police are hoping it helps their search for a man accused of killing his daughters more than a month ago. Known as the American Alps, the Cascades is a popular tourist destination and offers many activities for outdoor enthusiasts like hiking and camping. It's also where 5-year-old Olivia, 8-year-old Evelyn and 9-year-old Paityn, were found suffocated to death at an abandoned campsite on June 2, launching an intense manhunt for their father, Travis Decker. The search has been complicated by treacherous terrain, and the fact that crews are looking for an Army veteran skilled in wilderness survival who had a three-day head start. But there's hope that the busy summer season will bring answers. 'It may work in our favor now that we have that many people out there just saturating that part of the county with camping, hiking and other recreating,' Chelan County Sheriff Mike Morrison told CNN. The search has now also expanded into areas where creek waters have started to subside and the flow has slowed, the sheriff said. Authorities are hoping to find Decker alive in the mountainous area, but recognize that he might not be there anymore or might turn up dead. 'We're not going to glorify his abilities. We don't think that he's some kind of special forces guru,' Morrison said. 'He could get lucky at times, and eventually luck runs out.' While drones, a swift water team, cadaver dogs and even GoPros have so far found nothing of evidentiary value – an effort the sheriff says has already cost millions – Morrison is confident these new factors will turn something up. 'The search is unmatched,' Morrison said. 'We've never had anything like this in Chelan County.' Here's what we know about the ongoing search for Decker: Decker was charged with murdering the three girls by suffocating them with plastic bags not long after he picked them up from their mother for what was supposed to be a three-hour joint custody visit on May 30. His truck was found abandoned in the area of Rock Island Campground on June 2. His daughters' bodies were nearly 100 yards away down a small embankment, along with zip ties and plastic bags found strewn throughout the area, according to a police affidavit. Authorities also found a bloody fingerprint – not a handprint as a police affidavit previously indicated – on the truck's tailgate, as well as Decker's dog. Blood found at the scene matched a DNA profile believed to be Decker's, though investigators do not think he has been seriously hurt, the sheriff said. The dog also had a minor injury but was otherwise OK. Decker leaving behind his truck likely means he is on foot, Morrison said, which slows down his mobility. He also left equipment behind, meaning he is unprepared unless he had stashed supplies out in the woods. 'That's a strange item to leave behind, and hopefully that leaves him less prepared to survive long term,' Morrison told CNN, adding that they still hope to find Decker alive. 'We'd rather have him give himself up. I guarantee that we're going to treat him with respect and dignity, but he is going to be pursued as a suspect, and we'll continue to do our job.' While drones and helicopters have searched Icicle Creek from above, safer conditions have now allowed swift water crews to go in for a closer look. Icicle Creek flows from Josephine Lake to the Wenatchee River near Leavenworth. Cloudy, rushing waters in the spring give way to calmer, clear flows in the summer. 'Because we've had spring runoff, it was not a safe environment to put our team into,' the sheriff said. 'Now that the water has started subside, the flow has slowed, we're going to put our teams in there and see what we can find.' The receding water is exposing more riverbank and fallen trees or other debris that could pin someone down, the sheriff said. It could also reveal potential hiding spots. Having more people in the area where Decker disappeared might also help the search. 'This is typically how cases like this are brought to an end – is that we have someone that remained observant, saw something, reported it,' Morrison said. Authorities have said that Decker should be considered dangerous. While they don't believe he is armed, the sheriff said they're trying to get the message out to residents to be cautious when in the area. But there's also a chance Decker has left the area. Decker had searched online for information about moving to Canada days before his children were killed, a deputy US Marshal said in a court affidavit. His truck and the children's remains were found less than a dozen miles from the Pacific Crest Trail, a 2,650-mile path that runs all the way to the Canadian border. Local authorities were in contact with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who 'were doing some follow-up on some leads we had up in Canada,' Morrison previously said. While Decker had survival training in the military, is familiar with the area and had a three-day head start, Morrison is confident in the abilities of the massive team of searchers looking for him. The sheriff said he has resources from the National Park Service, National Forest Service, US Customs and Border Protection, the FBI and the US Marshal Service, along with other area agencies. 'We feel that we have the right assets, resources and people on the ground that will match his abilities, if not surpass it,' the sheriff said. 'But we recognize that clearly, you never want to underestimate your opponent, and we do view Travis as an opponent at this time.' But what has proven challenging is the rugged terrain of the area. It's very mountainous, heavily wooded and includes mining shafts and caves. Morrison estimates that the search has cost 'well over' $6 million in the first month, and indicated that it would have cost him half his department's budget for the year had it not been for all the other agencies' help. 'I don't think that he's going to get any rest, because we're going to continue to cycle in fresh resources,' the sheriff said. Still, the search has been difficult for those involved and the community. 'It's frustrating that we haven't found him yet, but we'll continue to search,' he said. For Morrison, who is a father, this case is an emotional one. He wants to assure the victims' family that his team won't give up. 'We continue to be here, and we want to be the voice for Paityn, Evelyn and Olivia and make sure that justice is served,' he said. CNN's Andy Rose and Alaa Elassar contributed to this report.
Fox News
35 minutes ago
- Fox News
CBS parent company sparks massive outrage with Trump lawsuit settlement
Paramount Global and CBS' eight-figure settlement to President Donald Trump has caused widespread outrage across the legal and journalism communities. Paramount Global and CBS agreed on Tuesday to settle Trump's $20 billion election interference lawsuit against the network. The lawsuit alleged CBS News deceitfully edited a "60 Minutes" interview last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris in order to make her appear more articulate ahead of Election Day. Many legal experts and Paramount's own attorneys insisted the lawsuit was meritless, but CBS' parent company settled it anyway. It is widely believed that Paramount's controlling shareholder Shari Redstone pushed for the settlement in hopes of paving the way for Trump's FCC to approve a long-planned merger with David Ellison's Skydance Media. CBS staffers are furious and there has been extensive backlash from media watchdogs, journalism advocacy groups, liberal journalists and even Democratic lawmakers. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., issued a scathing statement that said the settlement sets an "extremely dangerous precedent in terms of both the First Amendment and government extortion," while Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., accused Paramount of taking a "bribe" and threatened future federal charges. Former CNN anchor Jim Acosta said Paramount "paid a shameful bribe to the President of the United States in order to grease the skids for a media deal that, and there really is no other way to put this, stinks to high heaven." The American Civil Liberties Union believes Paramount and CBS "disgraced themselves" with the decision. "President Trump's lawsuit was frivolous. Paramount's capitulation was craven. We've never been more in need of a free and independent press as a check on abuses of power. Instead, Paramount and CBS have disgraced themselves and betrayed the core values of journalism," ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project director Ben Wizner said in a statement. The Freedom of the Press Foundation called the settlement a "dark day" for press freedom. "Paramount's spineless decision to settle Trump's baseless and patently unconstitutional lawsuit is an insult to the journalists of '60 Minutes' and an invitation to Trump to continue targeting other news outlets. Each time a company cowers and surrenders to Trump's demands it only emboldens him to do it again," FPF director of advocacy Seth Stern wrote. "It will be remembered as one of the most shameful capitulations by the press to a president in history," Stern continued. "But we are not done fighting." The FPF is a Paramount Global shareholder, and Stern is ready to make his voice heard. "We've already filed a shareholder information demand and are sending a second demand today to uncover information about this decision. With that information, we will continue to pursue our legal options to stop this affront to Paramount shareholders, CBS journalists, and the First Amendment. Paramount directors should be held accountable and we will do all we can to make that happen," Stern wrote. Famed First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, who represented The New York Times during the Pentagon Papers case, told the FPF that Paramount's decision to settle "is an ominous blow to press freedom in our nation." The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment advocacy organization, isn't pleased with CBS News' parent company, either. "Paramount may have closed this case, but it opened the door to the idea that the government should be the media's editor-in-chief. Trump has a long history of filing frivolous lawsuits to intimidate critics, and his targets have a long history of capitulating to avoid legal headaches. And here, he had the added tactic of using the FCC and its review of the multi-billion-dollar Paramount-Skydance merger to bring added pressure to bear," FIRE Chief Counsel Bob Corn-Revere said. "Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated," Corn-Revere continued. "This settlement will only embolden the president to continue his flurry of baseless lawsuits against the press — and against the American people's ability to hear the news free from government intrusion." PEN America, a group that bills itself as standing "at the intersection of literature and human rights to protect free expression in the United States and worldwide," suggested CBS isn't protecting it's journalists. "Paramount's decision to settle a meritless lawsuit rather than stand behind its journalists at CBS News is a spineless capitulation," PEN America director Tim Richardson said. "This was a moment to defend press freedom and support reporters targeted by a frivolous legal attack," Richardson added. "Instead, Paramount chose appeasement to bolster its finances, sending a dangerous message that media outlets can be pressured into submission if corporate parents find their profits at risk from government action in unrelated areas." Richardson noted ABC also settled a defamation lawsuit in December with then-President-elect Trump for $15 million, after anchor George Stephanopoulos repeatedly and incorrectly asserted Trump had been found "liable for rape" in a civil trial last year. ABC additionally paid $1 million for President Trump's legal fees. "With two major network owners bowing to the president in quick succession, the danger is clear: emboldened politicians and powerful actors will feel more free than ever to weaponize lawsuits and bring regulatory pressure to bear to silence and censor independent journalism," Richardson said. Heritage Foundation Media Fellow Tim Young sees it differently and is "glad" they settled but doesn't feel it will change the way news organizations cover Trump and other public figures they don't align with. "This is one of the few times the media has been held accountable. They definitely wouldn't have settled had Trump not won the election, because Kamala, who they lied to make look good, would have protected them," Young told Fox News Digital. "I'd love to believe that this is a turning point in media accountability, but it won't be," Young continued. "When you see the dramatic differences in coverage and continuous lies, legacy media networks are showing that they will continue this dishonest behavior." Paramount has defended the settlement. "Companies often settle litigation to avoid the high and somewhat unpredictable costs of legal defense, the risk of an adverse judgment that could result in significant financial or reputational damage, and the disruption to business operations that prolonged legal battles can cause. Settlement offers a negotiated resolution that allows companies to focus on their core objectives rather than being mired in uncertainty and distraction," a Paramount spokesperson told Fox News Digital. Fox News Digital has learned that the sum being paid to Trump could reach north of $30 million, with $16 million being paid upfront for his future presidential library, in addition to another eight-figure allocation set aside for advertisements, public service announcements, or other similar transmissions, in support of conservative causes by the network in the future. Current Paramount management disputes the additional allocation, and a source familiar with Paramount's current leadership told Fox New Digital only $16 million was sanctioned by the official mediator, and they have no knowledge of any deal Trump made with incoming owner, Skydance Media. However, the incoming ownership will be responsible for the additional allocation. Redstone recused herself from settlement negotiations in February. As part of the agreement, CBS News did not admit to any wrongdoing nor issue an apology. The network did agree to update its editorial standards by mandating the release of full, unedited transcripts of interviews with future presidential candidates. Trump's legal team took a victory lap after the settlement was announced. "With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit. CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again," a spokesperson for Trump's legal team told Fox News Digital.
New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Blake Lively vs. the ‘Misogyny Slop Ecosystem'
Last month, a judge threw out the actor Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against his former co-star Blake Lively. From the way many online spectators have treated her, you'd think she was the one who was losing. The ruling was part of a legal saga that began when, just after the release of Ms. Lively and Mr. Baldoni's film, 'It Ends With Us,' in 2024, something odd happened: The typical junket interviews and online chatter about the film turned against Ms. Lively, casting her as bossy, flippant and difficult. In December, Ms. Lively filed a legal complaint against Mr. Baldoni and his team of hired publicists, claiming that the bad P.R. was, at least in part, coordinated by them after she spoke up about on-set sexual harassment. According to her complaint, they had orchestrated a smear campaign using tabloids and social media. (A lawyer for Wayfarer, the studio of Mr. Baldoni and his producer, has called Ms. Lively's claims 'completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious.') Mr. Baldoni, in turn, sued her and her husband, the actor Ryan Reynolds, for defamation and lost. (His suit against The New York Times for covering her complaint was also dismissed.) But the damage was already done. She has been caught in a storm of public discussion about her appearance, her personal relationships and whether she was acting mean during press junkets. Her experience is fast becoming a matter of course in high-profile cases involving accusations of sexual violence or harassment. Public figures who speak up now can face retaliation and recrimination not just from their alleged abusers, but from an online public that's thirsty to see them torn apart. We've seen this before. Remember how Amber Heard was treated during Johnny Depp's defamation case against her? Throughout Ms. Heard's trial, YouTube channels uploaded hundreds of videos that were eligible for hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising revenue; her lawyer argued that 'lopsided' social media coverage played a role in her eventual defeat. Now, what Ms. Lively's legal filings suggest is that at least some of the drama surrounding high-profile celebrity imbroglios can be essentially cooked up and then amped up. Drama is a calculated strategy, designed to cast public doubt on accusers' claims and tarnish their reputations, while also grabbing eyeballs. It seems inevitable that this environment will deter other women from coming forward. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
