logo
GNU gets B+ for reforms, but posturing must stop

GNU gets B+ for reforms, but posturing must stop

News2401-07-2025
The GNU delivered some big wins in its first year, but political maturity is needed. South Africans didn't vote for this coalition to watch it tear itself apart over political positioning, writes Busisiwe Mavuso.
A year ago, few would have predicted that South Africa's government of national unity would still be standing today, let alone delivering meaningful reforms. Yet here we are – with visa backlogs cleared, private partnerships finally emerging at Transnet and government departments contracting with world-class IT suppliers to advance digitisation.
The relationship between business and government under the GNU has been unlike anything we've experienced in recent memory. Through Business for South Africa, we've moved beyond the familiar dance of complaints and promises to genuine collaboration. Quarterly meetings with the president have produced tangible outcomes, not just photo opportunities.
The wins have been substantial.
The Department of Home Affairs has eliminated the crippling visa backlog that cost us countless tourists and skilled workers. Processing times that once stretched for months now take weeks. Transnet has begun inviting private operators to run port and rail concessions – a breakthrough that seemed impossible just two years ago.
Government's IT procurement has been modernised, allowing departments to work with best-in-class suppliers rather than being trapped by outdated tender processes.
These aren't small administrative tweaks. They represent fundamental shifts in how government operates, creating the foundation for the digital-first public service that Home Affairs is now pioneering.
But let's be honest about where we're falling short.
GNU's Achilles heel
Eskom's restructuring has hit unexpected delays in key areas, and our logistics corridors still aren't receiving the focused attention they desperately need. Government and business have committed to short-term reform 'sprints' to address these bottlenecks, though the proof will be in execution.
More troubling is the broader economic picture. Earlier this year, confidence was building—you could feel it in boardrooms and investment committee meetings. Then the global trade environment shifted dramatically. The looming expiration of the current 10% tariff arrangement on 9 July could see South African exports to the US facing 30% tariffs, fundamentally altering trade flows and forcing rapid strategic adjustments.
Business and government have been working overtime to navigate these international headwinds, engaging directly with American counterparts as rules change seemingly overnight. But we require a stable coalition that can help us deliver even more.
Which brings us to the GNU's Achilles heel: political uncertainty. The coalition partners haven't established robust protocols for managing their inevitable disagreements without threatening the entire arrangement. The recent tensions have been particularly concerning, with threats of walkouts and the decision to boycott the national dialogue creating exactly the kind of instability that makes investors nervous. It is undermining the capacity to formulate and implement the urgently required policies that address our many challenges, and will undoubtably continue to delay our ambitions for a capable state.
This fragility is having real consequences. Business confidence, which had been steadily improving, is now tempered by questions about policy continuity and reform momentum. When political survival takes precedence over governance, everyone loses.
The business-government partnership remains energised and focused on accelerating reforms. Operation Vulindlela's second phase – including an ambitious programme to improve local government performance – launches with our full support. The challenges at municipal level are enormous, but business stands ready to contribute expertise and facilitate private investment in critical infrastructure.
What we need now is political maturity from the GNU partners. South Africans didn't vote for this coalition to watch it tear itself apart over political positioning. They voted for stability and progress. The economic partnership we've built proves that collaboration works – but it requires a government confident enough in its own longevity to make bold decisions.
The GNU's first year report card shows solid B+ performance on structural reforms, but an incomplete grade on political stability. Business will continue doing its part. The question is whether our political leaders will choose partnership over posturing.
The next twelve months will determine whether this government becomes a footnote in political history or the foundation for South Africa's economic recovery.
Our economic trajectory is our most urgent priority. We must lift growth to the 3%-plus level that we aspired to at the beginning of the year, and political stability is a necessary ingredient. But then we have to knuckle down and change how this economy works, from the network industries to skills development. Organised business is committed to help make bold decisions and implement the changes needed. I hope we continue to be able to partner with a government with similar energy and focus.
Busisiwe Mavuso is the CEO Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Namibia's Oil Riches May Finally Start to Flow
Namibia's Oil Riches May Finally Start to Flow

Bloomberg

time25 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Namibia's Oil Riches May Finally Start to Flow

The world's hottest postcode for oil exploration is Namibia, attracting a who's who of the petroleum industry. So far, the African nation has generated lots of promise, but little in barrels or dollars. That's beginning to change: The contours of its prize are now taking shape. To understand the excitement, let's start on the other side of the Atlantic. Back in 2015, the country attracting everyone's attention was Guyana. Within a few short years, the Latin American nation delivered a gusher for Exxon Mobil Corp. and its partners: Oil production climbed from almost zero in 2019 to 700,000 barrels a day this year. By 2027, Guyana is expected to surpass 1 million barrels a day, putting it on a par with OPEC+ member countries such as Libya.

How Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace deal
How Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace deal

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How Trump wants the US to cash in on mineral-rich DR Congo's peace deal

The Trump administration is spearheading an ambitious, but controversial, peace initiative aimed at ending the long-running conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo that has also drawn in neighbouring Rwanda. Its mediation efforts come as no surprise, as DR Congo - a nation in the heart of Africa - is endowed with the mineral wealth that the US requires to power the IT, and now AI, revolutions, much of which is currently going to China. US President Donald Trump is expected to host the leaders of DR Congo and Rwanda - Félix Tshisekedi and Paul Kagame - in the coming weeks to seal a peace agreement that he has hailed as a "glorious triumph", hoping to back it up with deals that will boost US investment in the region. US-based World Peace Foundation executive director Prof Alex de Waal told the BBC that the Trump administration was promoting "a new model of peace-making, combining a populist performance with commercial deal-making". "Trump has done this in Ukraine also. He wants to get the glory to boost his own political standing, and to secure minerals that are in America's interests," Prof De Waal said. However, he noted that "in DR Congo, China has already snapped up many of the minerals so the US is playing catch-up". He said that up to now US companies had been cautious about investing in DR Congo because of safety concerns and the "moral hazard" of dealing in so-called "blood minerals" - minerals financing rebellions - but this could change as the Trump administration implemented its peace model. Prof De Waal said this could also happen in other conflict-hit states like Sudan, where the Trump administration - along with Arab nations such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt - was expected to get involved in mediation efforts after previous initiatives failed. He added that the Trump administration's peace model could not be dismissed out of hand, especially if it stops fighting that has killed thousands of people and displaced millions of others in conflicts that have raged for more than 30 years in eastern DR Congo. "Trump can get the different sides to talk, and shake things up," Prof De Waal said. But Prof Hanri Mostert, an academic on mineral law at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, told the BBC that DR Congo "risked compromising sovereignty over its minerals". DR Congo could find itself locked into deals for years, in exchange for vague guarantees of security, she said. This was reminiscent of the "resource-bartering" deals pursued by China and Russia in numerous African states, Prof Mostert added. She cited as an example Angola, where China built infrastructure in exchange for oil. "Even when oil prices went up, Angola couldn't get more value for it," Prof Mostert said. The US State Department said in 2023 that DR Congo had an estimated $25trn (£21.2trn) in mineral reserves. This included cobalt, copper, lithium, manganese and tantalum - needed to make the electronic components used in computers, electric vehicles, mobile phones, wind turbines and military hardware. "For how long will DR Congo have to give its cobalt to US investors? Will it be 20 years or 50 years? What is the price for peace?" Prof Mostert asked. DR Congo government spokesman Patrick Muyaya confirmed to the BBC's Newsday programme in March that his country wanted to supply the US with "some critical minerals" in exchange for a security deal. The M23 rebel group launched a major offensive early this year, seizing huge areas of eastern DR Congo and smuggling minerals across the border to Rwanda, UN experts said in a report earlier this month. The minerals were then mixed with Rwandan production, and "their subsequent export to downstream actors reached unprecedented levels", the UN experts added. Rwanda denies accusations that it backs the M23, even though the UN has provided evidence it has thousands of soldiers in DR Congo. Your phone, a rare metal and the war in DR Congo What's the fighting in DR Congo all about? The evidence that shows Rwanda is backing rebels in DR Congo In what appears to be an attempt to address the issue of mineral smuggling, the US-brokered peace deal between DR Congo and Rwanda provides for a still-to-be negotiated "regional economic integration framework" between the two rival states. This would "ensure illicit economic pathways are blocked" and "mutually beneficial partnerships and investment opportunities" created for "greater prosperity - especially for the region's population". "We're getting, for the United States, a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo as part of it," Trump said, ahead of the peace deal signed by representatives of the two governments on 27 June in Washington. A DR Congo researcher with the South Africa-based Institute for Security Studies think-tank, Bram Verelst, told the BBC that the US initiative was running in tandem with another one being led by Qatar, a close US ally. Mr Verelst said the US's focus was mainly on the regional dimension, while Qatar's was on domestic issues between DR Congo's government and the M23 rebel group that has set up its own administration in the east after capturing the regional capital, Goma. Prof Jason Stearns, a Canada-based political scientist who specialises in the region, told the BBC that Qatar, like other oil-rich Gulf states, was expanding into Africa "to project power, influence, but also to seek economic opportunities". He added that it became involved in mediation efforts at the request of Rwanda, which perceived the US as being in favour of DR Congo, something Washington denies. Prof Stearns said Qatar had "massive" economic interests in Rwanda, pointing out that the Gulf state was building a new multi-billion dollar airport in Kigali and was in talks to acquire a 49% stake in the national airline. He explained that the US and Qatar were working closely together, but it was less than ideal to have two processes because "you don't want to end up in a situation where there is a peace deal between DR Congo and Rwanda, but Rwanda then says: 'We don't control the M23', and the M23 continues escalating [the conflict] in eastern DR Congo". "So it's very important that the two processes are tightly tied to each other since the actors are so closely linked," Prof Stearns added. Under the peace deal, DR Congo and Rwanda agreed to launch a "security co-ordination mechanism" within 30 days of the 27 June deal. Mr Verelst said that a ceasefire was expected to take effect on Tuesday, followed by the DR Congo government and the M23 signing a comprehensive peace agreement by 18 August, building on the "declaration of principles" they had already negotiated. DR Congo-based International Crisis Group (ICG) think-tank analyst Onesphore Sematumba said the US and Qatar were getting deals struck in "record time" since Trump's rise to the US presidency in January. Mr Sematumba said their intervention came after various Africa-led mediation efforts had "failed to get the parties to sign even a single document" since 2022. "Regional players do not have the same leverage to influence Kigali and Kinshasa," he added. "But between the signing of an agreement and the achievement of peace, the road can be long, and it will be long in this case," Mr Sematumba warned. One key question is whether the M23 will give up the territory under its control, as demanded by Tshisekedi's government. Mr Sematumba said the M23 had agreed to "state authority" being established across DR Congo, however, the rebels have also said they would not give up a "single centimetre" of land. "Personally, I think the transition should be gradual, and for certain areas there should be some kind of co-management. But everything will depend on the tact of the mediators, and their ability to break the ice," Mr Sematumba added. He said the success of the peace initiative also hinged on what the agreement called the "lifting of defensive measures" by Rwanda, widely interpreted to mean the withdrawal of its troops from eastern DR Congo. While Rwanda denies backing the M23, it says it wants to wipe out the FDLR, a militia born from those who carried out the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and then fled into DR Congo. Rwanda has accused the Congolese army of working with the FDLR. The peace deal spells out that the FDLR should be "neutralised", however this has been attempted several times over the past three decades. "For Rwanda, the neutralisation of the FDLR is a precondition for the withdrawal of its forces, while DR Congo says the two must be achieved simultaneously," Mr Sematumba pointed out, saying that mediators would have to find a solution as these issues had led to the failure of previous peace initiatives. "Just by following the different interpretations given by the parties to the texts signed, you can sense all the difficulties that lie ahead," Mr Sematumba said. Prof Mostert agreed that diplomacy on its own could not achieve peace, and a broader initiative was needed. "You build peace by transforming pain. That takes more than diplomacy. It takes dialogue, decentralised participation and dignifying people's experiences," she said. "That's why I believe it is important that the dealmakers and the lawmakers remain aware of historical traumas, including decades of resource exploitation," Prof Mostert added. So if he wants the peace to hold for long enough for US companies to profit, Donald Trump may have to keep the pressure on for some time to come. More BBC stories on DR Congo-Rwanda peace deal: Inside the Congolese mine vital to mobile phones, as rebels give BBC rare access DR Congo-Rwanda peace deal met with scepticism in rebel-held city 'They killed all these young people' - BBC investigates alleged massacre in rebel-held Congolese city Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica BBC Africa podcasts Focus on Africa This Is Africa Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store