Saint Albans property values soar in city-wide reappraisal, leaving some locals stunned
Chip Sawyer, the city's Director of Planning and Development, says the reappraisal, which was mandated by the state, will now be matching property values from sales data from the current market— which may explain the financial hike. The city's last reappraisal was in 2011, and it has been using that data set up until this year.
'If you look at what houses are selling for in the city, they're selling for at least twice as much as they might have in 2011. And that's what we expected would happen with the reappraisal, is that homes are now more valuable than they were back then and so the Grand List would reflect that,' he said.
Some locals have been taking to Facebook to express their concerns, with one post getting roughly 190 responses as of Friday. Sawyer says, while he understands the concerns, he wants people to know that an increase does not necessarily mean people will be paying twice as much in taxes.
'As the Grand List goes up the tax rates go down. So, your property value might be doubling on the Grand List, but your taxes won't be doubling because the tax rate is going down.'
James Levy, a Saint Albans resident and business owner, says while he wishes the value increases were less 'traumatic,' they make sense given the current real estate market.
'Would I have been happier if it were a bit lower, certainly… but I believe the process was a fair one and that's what counts. This one was probably the best I've experienced in the last 40 or 50 years,' he said.
Sawyer says people can reach out to the city to file an official grievance or can contact its partner Tyler Technologies for a property data follow-up.
You can find contact information and more resources here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
Silicon Valley Is Nearing A Breaking Point
American comedian Gallagher (born Leo Gallagher Jr) moving fast and breaking things at the Rosemont ... More Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, July 10, 1981. (Photo by) The current mood in Silicon Valley seems to be dominated by this sentiment, originally popularized by Facebook. And for many leaders in the tech center of the universe, Silicon Valley, it has spread beyond just information technology innovation and into a sense of how to reinvent all walks of life, all industries, and even politics. For many of the giants in today's tech and innovation sector, technology is by itself the solution to everything. It is Schumpeterian thinking dialed up to eleven. It is quasi-religious, in that there is a sense that a great technology flood will wash over the economy and society and wash clean the ills, leaving behind efficient, reinvented new industries, regulations (if even needed at all) and personal behavior. Some of this is a byproduct of ideology and an independent streak – an understandable frustration that today's systems are antiquated and in many cases broken, giving the idea of starting from scratch a romantic appeal. These are brilliant people who think big and so aren't tethered to old 'this is how it's done because this is how it's always been done' thinking. Some of this is a byproduct of naivety and not ideology – I once sat in a meeting while a very successful individual from Silicon Valley lamented how hard it was to change Sacramento… and concluded that his next step was therefore to go fix Washington, DC. Because of course changing Washington DC would be easier than changing a state government. Sure. This combination of ideology and naivety has recently impacted how some of the most powerful in Silicon Valley view the climate change challenge, among other 'non-tech' issues. For some of these titans, there is a sense that the people most in need of innovative solutions around issues like climate have rejected them personally, so the heck with those issues, no need to care about all that fluffery anymore. For others, there is a sense that what is needed isn't to try to improve the current infrastructure over time, but simply to effectively start over. For example: Working with today's utilities on energy efficiency is a waste of time, go invent commercially-viable fusion-based nuclear power and the rest (ie, who will finance those plants, who will build those plants, who will maintain those plants, who will distribute the power from those plants) will simply sort itself out. These sentiments may seem in opposition to each other, but in reality they are simply two sides of the same techno-superiority coin. So, moving fast and breaking things (either ignoring petty issues like a rapidly degrading global climate or undermined political-economic foundations, or assuming they'll be addressed by unnamed others because, you know, 'Innovation') is pretty much how many of the leaders in Silicon Valley are setting their agendas these days. But here's the thing – they would never think to do this with data center construction. Nor with IT networks or microchips or any of the other hardware and infrastructure that they know they fully depend upon for their own innovations to work. These giants of the tech industry know full well that they can't 'move fast and break things' when it comes to building out and maintaining the infrastructure that is core to their own operations. They employ huge teams of project developers who are tasked with definitely not being sloppy and letting things break. They pay for the careful maintenance of decades-old communications infrastructure. Unlike fuzzy concepts like climate change and politics, these are very concrete systems that must be built the right way, not just assumed to be built by someone else unnamed, and (of course!) incorporating a lot of 'old tech' alongside innovations rather than replacing it. This infrastructure is very real to these tech leaders, and thus given the respect and investment it deserves. As a rapidly degrading global climate and increasingly undermined political-economic foundations come to the fore, they will also start to become very real to these same leaders. Natural disasters are already affecting the tech sector's customers, workforces, and infrastructure. Political-economic uncertainty will begin impacting revenues and costs (see Exhibit A: Tariff uncertainty, and Exhibit B: Unforecasted and significant costs recently incurred by various universities, law firms and media companies – will the tech industry be next?). As these risks start to directly impact the day to day business of these tech leaders, they will no longer be able to consider them some distant concepts to be treated academically. They will have to invest into clean energy, climate adaptation and resiliency, clean water, and stable politics. Or their companies, industries and personal wealth will suddenly start to directly suffer the consequences. The good news is that Silicon Valley has a long and proven history of building great infrastructure. When push comes to shove, 'move fast and break things' quickly gets put aside in favor of professional, thorough, critical infrastructure investments. All that needs to happen is for their definition of 'critical infrastructure' to be broadened to include the planet they live on and the social and economic foundations that they depend upon. Silicon Valley may soon be at this breaking point, if not already there. Not abandoning techno-centric viewpoints and big bold ideas. Just no longer naively leaving these other crucial underpinnings like the environment, the economy and society to someone else to deal with. And when that happens, when the technology Great Flood assumption is abandoned and these brilliant minds are put to work actually pragmatically addressing this 'infrastructure' broadly defined… we will see an amazing resurgence of actual investments and scalable solutions for these mounting challenges. The innovative power of Silicon Valley is one of the most powerful forces humanity has ever built, and harnessed correctly accomplishes amazing things. Just as when a fever breaks, when Silicon Valley finally reaches this breaking point it will be a very good thing.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
AI-fueled crypto scams are booming, up 456% — and no one is safe, expert warns
Crypto crooks are getting bolder — and now, they sound just like your mom. Global crypto scams soared 456% between May 2024 and April 2025 — becoming increasingly reliant on AI-generated voices, deepfake videos and phony credentials to fleece unsuspecting victims, blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs' Ari Redbord told The Post after testifying before Congress last Tuesday. 'These scams are highly effective, as the technology feels incredibly real and familiar to the victim,' Redbord said. Advertisement 4 TRM Labs' Ari Redbord, who testified before Congress last week, says scammers are now using AI-generated voices and deepfake credentials to mimic loved ones and steal crypto. Igor Faun – 'We've seen cases where scammers use AI to replicate the voice of a loved one, tricking the victim into transferring money under the guise of an urgent request.' And the threat is exploding — especially in high-density cities like New York, Miami and Los Angeles, he added. In June, New York officials froze $300,000 in stolen cryptocurrency and seized more than 100 scam websites linked to a Vietnam-based ring that targeted Russian-speaking Brooklynites with fake Facebook investment ads. Advertisement Meta shut down over 700 Facebook accounts tied to the scam. Investigators say the group used deepfake BitLicense certificates and moved victims onto encrypted apps like Telegram before draining their wallets. 4 Even crypto pros aren't safe — MoonPay's CEO and CFO were conned into wiring $250,000 to a scammer pretending to be a Trump inauguration insider. Igor Faun – Advertisement Some New Yorkers lost hundreds of thousands of dollars — and it's not just everyday joes getting targeted. Even crypto insiders are falling for it. Florida-based crypto firm MoonPay saw its CEO Ivan Soto-Wright and CFO Mouna Ammari Siala duped into wiring $250,000 in crypto to a scammer posing as Trump inauguration co-chair Steve Witkoff, according to a recent Department of Justice complaint. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Globally, fraudsters swiped more than $10.7 billion in 2024 through crypto cons — including romance scams, fake trading platforms and 'pig-butchering,' where scammers build fake relationships before draining victims' accounts, Redbord said. Advertisement In the US, Americans filed nearly 150,000 crypto-related fraud complaints in 2024, with losses topping $3.9 billion, according to the FBI. But the real number is likely much higher. 4 A Vietnam-based ring targeted Brooklyn's Russian-speaking community with fake BitLicenses and phony Facebook accounts before vanishing with hundreds of thousands. Igor Faun – 'Only around 15% of victims actually report these crimes,' Redbord said, citing shame, fear and distrust in law enforcement — particularly among older adults and immigrant communities. One of these scammers go-to tools? Crypto ATMs — especially those tucked inside New York delis and convenience stores. Illicit use at these kiosks is more than twice as high as in the broader crypto market, Redbord said. Victims are often directed to scan a QR code and deposit cash, instantly converting it to crypto before the funds disappear. As the scams rage on, Washington is starting to bring order to the Wild West of crypto. 4 Officials say the real number of crypto scam victims is far higher than reported, as shame and fear keep many from coming forward. Igor Faun – House lawmakers wrapped up 'Crypto Week' last Thursday by passing the first-ever comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation — a trio of bills focused on regulating stablecoins, trading platforms and digital asset infrastructure. Advertisement Even so, Redbord advised, common sense is the best defense. 'If something feels too good to be true — especially unsolicited investment advice — it almost always is,' he said. 'Verify the platform. Confirm identities. And when in doubt, report it — whether to IC3, Chainabuse or your local authorities.'
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
If NFL, ESPN deal is done soon, it will have an immediate impact on how fans consume the most popular sport in the US
Per CNBC, the league is expected to take a 10 percent stake in Disney-owned ESPN, while ESPN would have ownership of NFL Network — including its seven live games per season — and Red Zone. Some other NFL Media properties also may be part of the package, though NFL Films is not expected to be one. The benefits for ESPN are obvious and enormous. ESPN is launching a much-anticipated standalone app in the fall, with the hopes it will revive the network's pre-streaming status as 'The Worldwide Leader in Sports.' Having more NFL content will be nothing short of a gold mine for the direct-to-consumer app, which will cost $29.99 per month. And with the NFL holding a stake in ESPN, it essentially makes the network, as Puck's John Ourand put it, 'a forever partner' with the league, and legitimate security when broadcast and streaming rights are up for bid again. Advertisement The benefits for the NFL? The league has been looking for years to find a way to offload or share its in-house media properties, and there's no better partner than ESPN and its parent company, Disney. From a journalistic standpoint, it's fair to wonder whether the NFL believes there is a side benefit to the deal — the possibility of limiting certain critical reporting on the league, which ESPN has done exceptionally well. Advertisement How this partnership would fully affect you and me won't be totally clear until the deal is complete and the parameters are revealed. But the baseline is this: Much of what you currently enjoy watching on the NFL Network — which will still exist in 24/7 form — will be under the purview of ESPN. And you're probably going to have to pony up for one more pricey streaming service if you want to keep watching all of it. This really is fake news One of the many, many, many scourges of social media — particularly the swamplands of Facebook — is AI-generated content. The vast majority of posts about a pop-culture or sports topic or personality is AI-generated at this point. Some of it seems real. All of it is trash. A more recent trend is phony but believable stories about an athlete doing an extremely good deed. The Sports Hub's Scott Zolak got duped by one recently, passing along on his afternoon show that Patriots quarterback Drake Maye and his wife donated all of the gifts from their recent wedding to local homeless shelters and children's charities. It was the kind of story you want to believe, and plausible to some degree. It also wasn't true. It was a lie concocted and spread by a social media content farm. Advertisement Zolak isn't alone. On Thursday, I noticed a longtime prominent NBA media member share a post on the social media platform Threads that Lions quarterback Jared Goff donated — let's get this concoction right — 'his entire $15.9 million bonus and sponsorship earns to a homeless shelter in Detroit to help fund 150 units [of] housing with 300 shelter beds.' That was followed by a fake Goff quote about seeing homelessness firsthand growing up. Listen, if actual media people can't spot a phony story, it's understandable — if disheartening beyond belief — why so much of this sludge is treated as truth by so many. A word of advice: if a story that seems too good to be true (or, on the opposite end, too scandalous), it probably is. Always check to make sure it is something that has been initially reported by a credible journalist. Preferably with a link to an actual story. Please don't tell me that's too much to ask. Boring or a booming British? Reader Pete G. reached out this week to ask whether Scottie Scheffler's systematic dominance on the PGA Tour, combined with a nature that is somewhat less charismatic than Tiger Woods's in his heyday, has led to a decrease in viewership in the anti-climactic final rounds. 'Watching the 4th round [of the British Open] was so boring and uninteresting,' he wrote. 'He is annoyingly steady and he never ( gives up a lead when he is in the driver's seat.' All true. But golf viewers seem to be digging it, at least according to the viewership numbers from Sunday's final round on NBC. Nielsen reported 4.1 million viewers for the fourth round, which was up 21 percent from the final round of Xander Schauffele's victory a year ago. Even without much suspense — Scheffler finished at 17 under par to win by four strokes — golf fans stuck around to watch him complete his fourth major victory and second this year. Advertisement McAfee apologizes — five months later Sentient monster truck Pat McAfee apologized Wednesday on his eponymous ESPN show to a female Ole Miss student, a mere five months after carelessly amplifying a false rumor that sent her life into chaos. McAfee being McAfee, he did it in the most self-aggrandizing way possible, including deploying the phrase/shield, 'As a girl dad,'' which is almost always followed by an apology for some behavior that humiliated a woman. 'Girl dads' fear lawsuits too, I'd imagine. "As a Girl Dad, I was very thankful for the opportunity to let Mr. Cornett know that I was wildly regretful for the part that our show played in his daughter, Mary Kate's, pain." - Pat McAfee apologizing for sharing a false rumor about an 18-year-old Ole Miss student on his show. — Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) Chad Finn can be reached at
