Martin Lewis demands 'critical' action as LISA savers face losing thousands
The Money Saving Expert warns that thousands of first-time buyers are being unfairly penalised by outdated rules. He says that action is 'critical' and must be taken.
LISAs were first launched by the Conservative Government in 2017 to help under-40s save for a retirement or first home. You can open one at 18 and put in up to £4,000 a year. The government adds 25% on top — so essentially, it's 'free' money.
Since its launch, more than one million people have opened a LISA. If you opened one in 2017, and deposited the maximum £4,000 a year, you'd already have £32,000 of your own savings. The government's extra 25% brings you to £40,000.
But despite their popularity, Martin says the scheme is now actively discouraging people from saving. This is due to the fact that the maximum property you can buy with a LISA is £450,000 — a threshold which hasn't budged since it launched nearly a decade ago.
If someone then needed to withdraw their LISA money to buy a property over this cap, they'd lose the government bonus completely, and face a 6.25% penalty on their own savings.
Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here.
On the maximum £40,000 saved, that's a £2,500 penalty. This money is taken from the saver's own contributions.
With house prices soaring, particularly in the south east of England, the Money Saving Expert says more and more people are exceeding the limit. And when that happens, the cost is steep.
'No first-time buyer should be penalised for accessing their LISA savings to buy their first property – as that's what the state, and the marketing, encourages them to do,' Lewis said.
'It's understandable that they don't get the 25% bonus, but they're effectively fined £625 for every £10,000 they've saved. It's unfair, it's unjust, and the rules need changing.'
The Money Saving Expert claimed that the current system is putting off a whole generation of hopeful savers.
'This flaw doesn't just hurt those with LISAs,' he said. 'It puts off many young people, especially from lower-income backgrounds, who tend to be more risk-averse, from opening LISAs in the first place.'
MPS on the Treasury Committee have been investigating whether LISAs remain fit for purpose. In their new report, they argue that the dual purpose of helping savers prepare for both home ownership and retirement 'makes it more likely consumers will choose unsuitable investment strategies'.
'Cash LISAs may suit those saving for a first home but may not achieve the best outcome for those using it as a retirement savings product,' the report reads.
'As they are unable to invest in higher-risk but potentially higher-return products such as bonds and equities.'
Martin, who has highlighted the issue previously, welcomed the report's findings.
He said: 'This is something we've banged the drum about for years. So, I'm glad it appears in the Treasury Committee report. More Trending
Martin Lewis has campaigned for a reduction in the withdrawal charge to 20%. He said: 'I have no problem with the withdrawal penalty in its own right. I have a problem with it for first-time buyers buying a house.
'We have a succession of young people who are saving in the vehicle they have been encouraged to save in by the state, who are then trying to use their savings to buy a first-time property, but due to house price inflation their property has just tripped above the £450,000 level.
'Then not only do they not get the £1,000 a year bonus they were intended to get, which I understand is legitimate as a threshold, but they are fined by the state effectively 6.25% of their own money in order to withdraw that money to get the cash out.'
Martin describes the removal of the charge as a 'small fix', that would have very little cost to the state. He adds that it would encourage many young feel to feel confident about LISAs and that it's 'critical it's dressed'.
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: Council tax is set to rise – here's how to save money
MORE: How to get money off your supermarket shop at Aldi and Iceland this summer
MORE: The Booking.com holiday scam that could rob you of thousands of pounds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
How to cut your childcare bill as nursery fees top £1,000
Data from UK Debt Expert reveals families are now spending more than ever on childcare - with London parents paying as much as £1,431.96 a month. For lower-income households, a single day of childcare can cost over seven hours of work, meaning many are essentially paying to work. Even in less expensive areas like the North East, parents are still looking at around £945.50 per month for childcare. For information see the link below 📷 For information on how to book Kids Clubs & Wraparound Care please use this link - The financial reality is pushing many parents, particularly mothers, to their limits – and for single parents, the situation is even more extreme. When other living expenses are factored in, the financial picture becomes even more daunting. For a family of four: Add to this the average monthly mortgage repayments, which range from £1,565 in Manchester to £2,227 in Bristol for a semi-detached house, and it's clear why many couples are delaying or deciding against having children. While both parents feel the financial strain, it's women who often bear the brunt of the career impact. Women are more likely to take extended time off work or reduce their hours to care for children, leading to what's often referred to as the "motherhood penalty" in their career progression and earning potential. If you pay for childcare, whether just for the summer or all year round, watch this quick video briefing on the help that's available. Huge numbers are missing out. Courtesy of ITV The Martin Lewis Money Show, watch the full summer special back at In fact, research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows that by the time a woman's first child turns 12, her hourly wage is typically 33% lower than that of a man. Maxine McCreadie, a personal finance expert at UK Debt Expert, says: "The data paints an even more worrying picture for single parents, who are often facing the brunt of the financial burden. "Unlike co-parents, single parents don't have the luxury of splitting costs, meaning they are often forced to take on the full financial load for housing, childcare, and everyday living expenses. With 9 out of 10 single parents being women, it's no wonder more women are deciding not to have children, and it's essential that more support is provided, particularly as these families are more vulnerable to falling into debt." Further data from UK Debt Expert highlighted that for parents earning £16,000 per year, a single day of childcare requires over seven hours of work, compared to just 3.3 hours for someone earning the national average of £2,397 a month. This stark disparity highlights the heavier burden on lower-income parents, who must juggle childcare expenses with other essential costs, often leaving little time or money for social activities. Read Martin Lewis's open letter to the new Chancellor to fix unfair systems... on Child Benefit, Carer's Allowance, LISA fines, Tax-Free Childcare and morehttps:// Maxine explains: "The high cost of childcare not only limits a parent's financial flexibility but also their ability to maintain a social life. For lower-income families, the pressure to prioritise work and childcare leaves little room for social engagement, which can lead to feelings of isolation, especially for single parents or those in lower-paid jobs." This comes as Bridget Phillipson has called on Brits to consider having more children and have them sooner, warning of the 'worrying repercussions' posed by a decline in birth rates. The Education Secretary told the Daily Telegraph falling birth rates were not only a concerning trend but one which 'tells a story, heartbreakingly, about the dashed dreams of many families'. Official data from the Office for National Statistics shows fertility rates in England and Wales dropped to 1.44 children per woman in 2023, the lowest level since records began in 1938. Ms Phillipson said people were scared off having children due to the high costs, and wanted 'more young people to have children, if they so choose'. 'A generation of young people have been thinking twice about starting a family, worried not only about rising mortgage and rent repayments, wary not only of the price of fuel and food but also put off by a childcare system simultaneously lacking in places and ruinously expensive,' she said. Ms Phillipson's comments come months after she told the Daily Mail young women had been given added 'freedom' to have more children by expanded government-funded childcare. For information see the link below 📷 For information on how to book Kids Clubs & Wraparound Care please use this link - Since May, working parents of children who turn nine months old before September 1 have been able to apply to access up to 30 hours of free childcare per week, until their child is old enough to start school. 'They will be able to make choices about the career that's right for them, the hours that they want, but also [have] the freedom to think about family size and how many children they want to have, with support from the Government around childcare hours,' she said in May. Recommended reading: The expansion of funded childcare began being rolled out in England in April last year for working parents of two-year-olds. Working parents of children older than nine months are currently able to access 15 hours of funded childcare a week, before the full rollout of 30 hours a week to all eligible families in September. The Labour Government announced that up to 4,000 childcare places are set to be rolled out at new or expanded school-based nurseries in England from September.
Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
Martin Lewis urges people to lock in energy fix to avoid overpaying on new price cap
The consumer champion warns two-thirds of homes in Scotland, England and Wales are on the 'Pants Cap'. Martin Lewis is urging people on the price cap to switch to a fixed tariff as they will probably be overpaying on energy bills this summer, despite the seven per cent drop in gas and electricity prices. Writing in the latest edition of the MoneySavingExpert ( newsletter this week, the consumer champion shared a comprehensive guide to lowering your energy bills by a further 10 per cent. He explained that some two-thirds of homes in Scotland, England and Wales are on their energy supplier's 'bog-standard default tariff, which means its price is dictated by the regulator, Ofgem's Price Cap'. Along with comparable fixed tariff deals, the financial guru answers the most common questions and concerns people have about moving off the price cap, something he has dubbed the 'Pants Cap'. Martin wrote: 'The good news is that the Price Cap has been cut by 7 per cent today, meaning for every £100 you were paying, for the same energy use you'll now roughly pay £93. 'Yet that's still 10 per ecnt higher than this time last year, and the current prediction is it won't get much cheaper. So, frankly, the Price Cap still looks like a Pants Cap - if you're on it, you're likely overpaying.' You can work your way through Martin's full step-by-step guide to lowering your energy bills and locking in the best deal on here. Energy bills have fallen for households as latest forecasts predict a further on eper cent drop in October due to easing Middle East tensions. Analyst Cornwall Insight expects the cap to fall to £1,698 a year from the current £1,720 for a typical dual fuel consumer, but stressed 'significant uncertainty' remained with two months until the final figure is announced. The price cap sets the limit on how much firms can charge customers per unit of energy, but does not limit total bills because householders still pay for the amount of energy they consume. The latest cap is £660 (28%) lower than at the height of the energy crisis at the start of 2023 when the UK Government implemented the energy price guarantee. However, prices remain elevated at £152 or 10 per cent higher than the same period last year. Cornwall Insight said its latest forecast reflected wholesale prices falling as military tensions in the Middle East had eased. But it said the cap still remained hundreds of pounds above pre-pandemic prices, even when adjusting for inflation. Furthermore, there was little indication that prices would reduce substantially over the next few years, it warned. It is predicting a further small fall in January, with prices rising slightly in April, but said market volatility, geopolitical risks and potential changes - and additions - to the non-wholesale components of bills meant forecasts remained changeable. Cornwall Insight principal consultant Craig Lowrey said: 'While any reduction in energy bills is welcome, we must not let small fluctuations in the price cap mask the bigger picture. 'Households are still paying far more for their energy than they were before the pandemic, with the current outlook showing little prospect of a meaningful drop over the next few years. 'Our reliance on international energy markets means that while we have a range of supply sources, this brings with it a vulnerability to global events and price shocks – something that was evident in June. If we want to bring real stability and affordability to the energy system, we need to continue, and speed up, our transition to homegrown, renewable power. 'This transition will not happen overnight, and there will be short-term costs along the way. However, in the long-term, building a more self-sufficient energy system is the only way to help shield consumers from international volatility and put us on a more secure and sustainable path for the future.'
Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Martin Lewis 'disappointed' at reports of cash ISA limit cuts
The Money Saving Expert founder posted on X: "Reports Rachel Reeves will announce a cut to the cash ISA limit at her 15 July Mansion House speech. If true, I think it's a mistake. "I doubt it'll substantially nudge people to invest not save; said to be the aim. This isn't nudge economics, its p*** people off economics. Currently you can put £20,000 in tax-free ISAs, whether cash (savings) ISAs, shares (investments) ISAs or the smaller types. Its said the reduction would only be for cash ISAs, so people can still invest the same tax free. "At this point I should note, it is v likely to only impact future ISA limits (though whether the cut would start this tax year is a big question) so those with money already in cash ISAs shouldn't panic My suspicion is that for many who use cash ISAs, it will just result in many having to pay more tax on their relatively paltry savings interest, not have an epiphany and think "oooh I'll just fill up the remainder of my ISA allowance with investments instead". "Now I should note, I am in favour of encouraging people to invest in the UK. It's good for individuals over the longer term and for the economy, especially if a way is found to encourage people to invest in UK firms. Yet this isn't the route to do that. "I'll be disappointed if the Chancellor chose to listen to the big investment firms in the City, and shut down many building societies and consumer groups who've said its not a good route. Instead lets start a conversation about how we encourage investments - even possible intervention when people save to explain other options. "We need to educate, provide better 1-on-1 easy guidance, and start to change the way people think about risk. But lets use the carrot not a stick." Reports @RachelReevesMP will announce a cut to the cash ISA limit at her 15 July Mansion House speech. If true, I think it's a mistake. I doubt it'll substantially nudge people to invest not save; said to be the aim. This isn't nudge economics, its piss people off economics.… — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 30, 2025 Could it be a good thing for savers? Some experts say that Rachel Reeves should cut the limit, including Michael Healy, UK MD of IG, who says: 'The Chancellor is fighting the good fight with her ambition to get some of the £300bn sat in cash ISAs working harder for British savers and the economy. But fiddling with the tax-free allowance simply doesn't go far enough. "This is because the cash ISA is fundamentally broken - most people aren't saving enough to pay tax on their money, and aren't getting the returns they need to grow their pots. 'We're calling for the cash ISA to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. "Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact - if just a fifth of the money put into cash ISAs in 2022–23 had been invested in stocks and shares ISAs instead – and half of that into UK equities - this could have generated a £4bn annual boost to UK-listed companies. That means more jobs, higher wages, and better pension returns for British people.' What is a Cash ISA? Cash ISAs are typically offered by banks and building societies and there are a few different types, from instant access ISAs through to junior ISAs. They allow you to save money tax-free, and while there is no limit on how much money you can have in an ISA, there is a limit on how much you can save each tax year. What are the advantages of cash ISAs? "We all have a Personal Savings Allowance which allows us to earn interest on our savings without paying tax," says Chris Henderson, Save and Pay Director at Tesco Bank. "This limit depends on how much you earn, but for people earning around the national average it is £1,000. If the interest you make on your savings is more than £1,000 you might be liable to pay tax. "However, any interest you earn on money saved in an ISA doesn't contribute to your Personal Savings Allowance. This is generally the main benefit of ISAs." Cash ISAs, in particular, can offer instant access to your money which means they are flexible and can be used to save towards short or long-term goals. Some providers will also let you withdraw and replace money without it impacting your overall allowance in the tax year. What are the limits? Adult ISAs have a £20,000 allowance. This means you can contribute up to £20,000 each tax year, but it's important to remember that this limit covers all the ISAs you hold. It's slightly different for a Lifetime ISA which has a £4,000 limit. If you have children or grandchildren, you can also save up to £9,000 into a junior ISA each year on their behalf. How is the interest paid? Interest is paid either monthly or annually so check with your provider to find out when the payments are made. What are the different types? Cash ISAs usually fall into one of two types - an instant access ISA or a fixed rate ISA. "An instant access ISA usually allows you to make withdrawals and has an interest rate that can go up or down," says Chris. "If the ISA is flexible, you can take money out and replace it during the same tax year without re-counting towards your ISA limit. "A fixed-rate ISA has a fixed interest rate that won't change for the duration of the fixed term. If you know you don't need immediate access to your savings, or if your savings goal is more long-term, you can consider a fixed rate ISA. This will lock in a savings rate for a set amount of time." It's important to remember that a fixed rate means you won't see any rises or falls in your returns if the Bank of England makes changes to its base rate. However, a fixed rate can give you peace of mind with a consistent return on your savings. If you wish to take money out, you typically have to withdraw the full balance and close the account, and it's worth being aware that this usually comes with a fee. "Our latest research showed that 19% of people in the UK hold a cash ISA because they are easier to understand than a stocks and shares ISA, but do your research on the different types and what will suit your financial goals," says Chris. What about transferring one ISA into another? You can transfer funds saved in other ISAs between providers. Funds moved from previous tax years won't contribute to your ISA limit for the current tax year, as long as you use the ISA Transfer Process. Some providers limit how much you can take out, depending on the type of ISA you have, so you'll need to consider these limits before moving money between your cash ISA accounts. Recommended reading: Three common myths about cash ISAs 1: You need to deposit a certain amount of money to open a cash ISA Wrong, says Chris: "Our research revealed that nearly a third (29%) of people don't have a Cash ISA because they don't think they've enough money to put in one. However, for some products you can start by depositing as little as £1 and start building from there." 2: Your money isn't protected That's also wrong, Chris explains: "The savings protection works the same for cash ISAs as it does for normal savings. So, under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, as long as your money is in a UK-regulated bank or building society account you are protected up to £85,000 in total across all accounts you hold." 3: You have to max out your allowance every year And again, that's wrong, says Chris: "You're under no obligation to use your full ISA allowance of £20,000 each tax year. Be aware though that if you're not using your full allowance, you could be forfeiting the potential tax benefits for any savings that are currently not in an ISA. "The ISA allowance of £20,000 is the maximum amount you can save in an ISA (or combination of ISAs) and benefit from tax-free interest or investment returns."
