logo
Federal workers see parking price increase as they return to office

Federal workers see parking price increase as they return to office

Yahoo20-03-2025
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — As local federal employees step back into the office, some are already met with a challenge before they get into the door: parking.
The White House issued a Presidential Action for 'Return to In-Person Work' towards the end of January.
The action from the White House reads:
'Heads of all departments and agencies in the executive branch of Government shall, as soon as practicable, take all necessary steps to terminate remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work in-person at their respective duty stations on a full-time basis, provided that the department and agency heads shall make exemptions they deem necessary.'
Kelly Education hosts substitute teacher pre-hiring event in River Market
The challenge starts with where to park, then how much it'll cost, Kansas City-based federal employee, Tammy Spires says.
'To our understanding, the administration felt that it would serve the public better if we were in the building five days a week,' Spires shared.
As some federal workers get into the routine of returning to work in office every day of the week, some shared parking spots around Kansas City area federal buildings are limited.
'There's no parking. We've been requested to come back into the office full-time five days a week and it's the entire federal workforce that's doing this. There are not enough parking spaces in and around the area of the building.'
Spires says parking has always been an issue. She says it's also something she's always had to pay for.
'Parking has always been an issue for us. We've always had to pay for parking but here recently, and I don't understand why, because pre-COVID, we had these same parking places, but for whatever reason now, we just don't have them.'
She works in the Richard Bolling Federal Building. She's been a federal worker for over 20 years.
Since 2021, she'd been working from home, except for one day a week. Starting this week, she's required to be back in the office full-time.
'I've parked in this lot for years, (it) used to be six dollars before COVID and then after COVID when we came in for one day a week, it went up to nine dollars and then last week it went up to ten dollars. Tuesday, it went up to twelve dollars.'
The lot, Spires is referring to, is on located near 12th and Cherry. It's one operated by Mid-Con Management in KCMO.
'How can you go from ten dollars to twelve overnight and what's the justification for that?' Spires asked.
Former student sentenced in 2022 Olathe East High School shooting
She also said that's not the only lot she says has increased prices recently.
Mid-Con Management said there has only been one increase in the last year. That increase came this week. The company wouldn't expand on why the price changed over the last few days. The timeline is also when Spires and so many others went back to work.
'The Richard Bolling Federal Building houses probably, I would say, easily 6,000 employees. The parking lot that they have for the federal building is very limited. They do subsidies for bus, but even the bus routes are being cut, so I mean that's just going to put more and more people in here, in this area.'
Spires says there are some exceptions on if you can park at the building (Richard Bolling Federal Building) itself, but you have to qualify. She says you may park at or within the building if you are carpooling or in a management position. However, not everyone qualifies.
'Whether we are in the building or in our house, we are dedicated to our jobs, and we do work. We work very hard to make sure that your checks are there on time, that your housing vouchers are available for you. These are things that we do and dedicate a lot to that job,' Spires added.
'A lot of us feel villainized. People get into this work to help people. We don't get these big salaries. Our benefits, we pay a lot for our benefits. You do this because you want to help your fellow people. So, some of the things that have been said about us is really unfair,' she says as it relates to being a federal worker over the last few months.
Drexel firefighter killed after truck crashes into Louisburg hair salon
Spires also commented on the appearance of the lot, which Mid-Con Management says there are plans to address and ownership is aware and is making arrangements.
Mid-Con Management says it encourages patrons to apply for monthly arrangements, but not all lots offer that option.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump birthright citizenship order "unconstitutional," appeals court rules
Trump birthright citizenship order "unconstitutional," appeals court rules

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump birthright citizenship order "unconstitutional," appeals court rules

President Trump's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship in the U.S. is "unconstitutional," a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday. Why it matters: The 2-1 ruling upholds a nationwide pause on enforcement of the policy, which is likely headed for the Supreme Court. It's the first time an appeals court has weighed in on the matter since the Supreme Court last month limited lower courts ' ability to freeze federal policies — specifically, Trump's effort to eliminate U.S. birthright citizenship. Driving the news: "We conclude that the Executive Order is invalid because it contradicts the plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship to 'all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'" per the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' majority ruling. Context: Although the Supreme Court limited lower courts' powers, it left room for broader relief through the filing of class-action lawsuits. The Trump administration has since faced fresh challenges to the policy. For the record: Democratic attorneys general in Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon brought the case against President Trump and agencies including the State Department, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security. Administration officials named in the suit include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

South Korea's Finance Ministry May Lose Budget Power in Reform
South Korea's Finance Ministry May Lose Budget Power in Reform

Bloomberg

time18 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

South Korea's Finance Ministry May Lose Budget Power in Reform

By and Heesu Lee Save South Korea's Ministry of Economy and Finance may lose its authority to draft budgets as part of reforms planned by the Lee Jae Myung government that look to overhaul a range of financial and regulatory bodies. Lee Han-joo, a key ally of the president who is tasked with setting policy priorities for the new government, said the ministry has become too powerful, prompting calls for separating its budgeting and planning functions.

U.S. appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship
U.S. appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

U.S. appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order curtailing automatic birthright citizenship is unconstitutional and blocked its enforcement nationwide. The 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marked the first time an appeals court has assessed the legality of Trump's order since the U.S. Supreme Court in June curbed the power of lower court judges to enjoin that and other federal policies on a nationwide basis. The Supreme Court's June 27 ruling in litigation over Trump's birthright citizenship order limited the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directed lower courts that had blocked the Republican president's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions allowing courts to potentially still block it nationally again. That has already allowed a judge in New Hampshire to once again halt Trump's order from taking effect by issuing an injunction in a nationwide class action of children who would be denied citizenship under the policy. The 9th Circuit's majority in Wednesday's ruling said the Democratic-led states that had sued to block the policy - Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon - likewise still were entitled to a nationwide injunction as a more narrow order would not provide them "complete relief." "The court agrees that the president cannot redefine what it means to be American with the stroke of a pen," Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. The Trump administration could either ask a wider panel of 9th Circuit judges to hear the case or appeal directly to the Supreme Court, which is expected to have the final word in the litigation. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump signed the order on Jan. 20, his first day back in office, as part of his hardline approach toward immigration. Trump's order directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. The Constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship clause states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." The first judge to block Trump's directive was Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, who called it "blatantly unconstitutional." The 9th Circuit's ruling upheld his decision. U.S. Circuit Judge Ronald Gould, writing for Wednesday's majority, said Coughenour rightly concluded that Trump's executive order violated the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment by denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States. Gould said a geographically limited injunction would harm the four states by forcing them to overhaul their government benefits programs to account for how people denied citizenship under Trump's order might move into them. "It is impossible to avoid this harm absent a uniform application of the citizenship clause throughout the United States," Gould wrote. His opinion was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Michael Hawkins, a fellow appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton. U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee, dissented, saying in his view the Democratic-led states lacked standing to challenge Trump's order, as he warned of the risks of "judicial overreach."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store