Homeland Security stonewalling info on noncitizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges
The Trump administration has been turning to DNA technology to help find and arrest immigrants, including children, but immigration advocates say it has been slow to spell out how it's using and overseeing the genetic information.
Three groups sued the Department of Homeland Security on Monday after trying to get records about the data collection program since last summer, during the Biden administration.
The plaintiffs are the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, part of the Georgetown University Law School that focuses on privacy and surveillance law and policy; the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Americans for Immigrant Justice, both immigrant rights groups.
The groups describe in their lawsuit their back-and-forth with DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection since they originally requested information about their DNA collection from noncitizens on Aug. 1, 2024.
Since 2020, DHS has expanded its DNA collection program and increased DNA contributions to the FBI's database, CODIS, by 5,000%, becoming the largest contributor, according to the Georgetown center. The DNA database of the FBI can be accessed by police across the country for criminal investigations, the plaintiff groups said in a statement.
Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at the Georgetown center, said in a statement that DHS is expanding its database by "collecting DNA from people accused of no crime and while operating with none of the constraints that are supposed to be in place before the government compels someone to give over their most sensitive personal information."
He said Americans deserve more visibility on the program and said DHS's lack of transparency is unacceptable.
DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Daniel Melo, senior staff attorney with Amica's Immigration Impact Lab, told NBC News that previous administrations have also collected DNA. A 2005 law mandated federal agencies collect DNA from people in custody, including noncitizens.
Prior to 2020, the Justice Department had told DHS that its immigration enforcement and border agents did not have to routinely collect DNA from every noncitizen it detained, Melo said. The Biden administration adopted rules requiring full compliance with the 2005 law, but whistleblowers and a government watchdog complained compliance was uneven.
The "Securing Our Borders" executive order signed by President Donald Trump requires the attorney general and the DHS to fulfill requirements on DNA collection from noncitizens mandated in the 2005 law.
Privacy and civil rights groups have long had issues with the government's DNA collection program. Melo said the public should be concerned whether people are being advised of their rights and how the information is being collected and used.
"This information could tentatively be used in all sorts of ways to map full communities, to basically build a more intricate web of surveillance around noncitizen communities," Melo said.
He said if DHS can continue to collect the DNA of noncitizens, essentially "experimenting" on them, "then they are able to refine these technologies and deploy them in new and interesting and probably really dangerous and scary ways on the rest of us."
Emily Tucker, the Georgetown center's executive director, said in a statement that "it is a mistake to think of DHS' DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement.'"
"Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority," she said in a statement. "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Gen Z, millennials fall behind on this home essential
Forty-five percent of Gen Z and millennial Americans would feel embarrassed if someone saw the current state of their home. A new survey of 2,000 Gen Z and millennials showed that 31% of respondents admitted to having a room in their home that hasn't been cleaned in at least six months. Alarmingly, many participants spend more time procrastinating cleaning - nearly three hours - than actually cleaning their homes, which averages just under two hours. Conducted by Talker Research for Swiffer, the survey found that respondents expressed a strong dislike for cleaning certain surfaces. Floors were one of top three least favorite surfaces to clean for a quarter of Americans, with 37% of these respondents putting it in the No. 1 spot. Similarly, other dusty surfaces like ceiling fans (31%) and baseboards (28%) were also popular picks within the top three areas respondents dislike cleaning. The survey also found that 36% of participants only clean their homes when expecting visitors, with Gen Z respondents more likely to share this sentiment (39% compared to 33% of millennials). Notably, one in nine admitted that their home is not up to their usual standards. Finding the time to clean poses a significant challenge, as the average respondent estimates that cleaning takes about two hours, with 24% claiming it takes even longer. Over 70% would rather endure undesirable experiences - such as making small talk (19%), sitting in traffic (17%), or running into an ex-partner (9%) - than tackle cleaning their floors. The survey also revealed that some have procrastinated so long that the longest time without cleaning is estimated at 23 days, with 25 days going by without sweeping or mopping. "You might be surprised-some of the dirtiest spots in your home are hiding in plain sight, just waiting to be cleaned. These overlooked areas can harbor more dirt and grime than you think." said Arianna Castro, Swiffer Scientist. "According to the results, 52% of Americans surveyed shared that they only clean their floors when dirt is visible, however, many are unaware that floors can still harbor dust, grime, and other debris even when they appear clean. In fact, microscopic particles like allergens and fine dust can settle deep into floor surfaces and crevices, escaping the naked eye. Daily cleaning helps remove these hidden contaminants, creating a healthier environment for everyone in the home." Despite the challenges, 45% of respondents reported that they clean their home daily, with 74% indicating that floor cleaning is a daily or weekly priority. The kitchen (88%) and living area (85%) are the most frequently cleaned spaces, while closets often take a back seat at just 48% getting cleaned daily or weekly. The survey also examined cleaning habits based on residential areas. Urban dwellers were found to clean most frequently (50% daily) and were more likely to consider their homes "very clean" (44%) compared to rural residents (27%). However, those in rural areas spent the longest time cleaning, averaging two hours and 12 minutes, while suburban respondents procrastinated the longest (189 minutes). For many Americans, a clean home brings more satisfaction than working out or enjoying a hot cup of coffee (20% for each activity). Others find the satisfaction of a clean home surpasses checking off to-do lists (18%), finishing a book (17%) or taking a hot shower (15%). Notably, seven in 10 respondents (69%) expressed a desire to clean more frequently if they had access to versatile cleaning products that cleaned in multiple ways. "Daily cleaning can feel overwhelming, but using the right products makes the job easier by tackling dirt and grime that often go unnoticed." said Castro. "This helps provide peace of mind, giving people time back in their daily lives to enjoy doing things they love." Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Gen Z and millennials evenly split by living in urban, suburban and rural areas; the survey was commissioned by Swiffer and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 19 and May 26, 2025. We are sourcing from a non-probability frame and the two main sources we use are: Traditional online access panels - where respondents opt-in to take part in online market research for an incentiveProgrammatic - where respondents are online and are given the option to take part in a survey to receive a virtual incentive usually related to the online activity they are engaging in Those who did not fit the specified sample were terminated from the survey. As the survey is fielded, dynamic online sampling is used, adjusting targeting to achieve the quotas specified as part of the sampling plan. Regardless of which sources a respondent came from, they were directed to an Online Survey, where the survey was conducted in English; a link to the questionnaire can be shared upon request. Respondents were awarded points for completing the survey. These points have a small cash-equivalent monetary value. Cells are only reported on for analysis if they have a minimum of 80 respondents, and statistical significance is calculated at the 95% level. Data is not weighted, but quotas and other parameters are put in place to reach the desired sample. Interviews are excluded from the final analysis if they failed quality-checking measures. This includes: Speeders: Respondents who complete the survey in a time that is quicker than one-third of the median length of interview are disqualified as speedersOpen ends: All verbatim responses (full open-ended questions as well as other please specify options) are checked for inappropriate or irrelevant textBots: Captcha is enabled on surveys, which allows the research team to identify and disqualify botsDuplicates: Survey software has "deduping" based on digital fingerprinting, which ensures nobody is allowed to take the survey more than once It is worth noting that this survey was only available to individuals with internet access, and the results may not be generalizable to those without internet access. The post Gen Z, millennials fall behind on this home essential appeared first on Talker. Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
US Warns Iran-Tied Hackers Pose Ongoing Risk to American Firms
Iran-affiliated hackers remain a potential threat to critical sectors of the US economy, including defense contractors and other American organizations, according to a bulletin published Monday from the FBI, the National Security Agency, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Defense Cyber Crime Center. The bulletin warns that those with relationships with Israeli research and defense firms were particularly at risk. Hackers affiliated with the Iranian government and hacktivist organizations routinely target poorly secured US computer networks and internet-connected devices for disruptive cyberattacks, according to the report.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Tax Bill To Undergo Major Change: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida unveiled an amendment to President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act that would further shrink Medicaid spending. Roughly 71 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, a government health insurance program that provides free or low-cost coverage to eligible low-income individuals and families, including children, pregnant women, seniors and people with disabilities. Newsweek has contacted Scott's office for comment via email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters Republicans in Congress are seeking to cut Medicaid spending in order to pay for the extension of Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 2017, which is set to expire at the end of this year. A new analysis by the Congressional Budget Office found that the latest version of Trump's bill would result in 11.8 million more Americans being uninsured by 2034 and would cut more than $1.1 trillion from Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare—more than $1 trillion of which would come from Medicaid alone. Republicans have argued that their changes would incentivize work and prevent fraud. A Medicaid accepted here sign in Kokomo, Indiana, in September 2019. A Medicaid accepted here sign in Kokomo, Indiana, in September 2019. GETTY What To Know The amendment would block new enrollees in Medicaid expansion states from receiving the enhanced 9-to-1 Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) if they are able-bodied and have no dependent children. Current Medicaid enrollees in expansion states would retain the 9-to-1 rate, even if they leave the program temporarily to work. The lower FMAP rate for new enrollees would take effect in 2031. According to a report by The Hill, the amendment, if passed, would save an additional $313 billion in federal spending. It is co-sponsored by GOP Senators Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Mike Lee of Utah and Finance Chair Mike Crapo of Idaho. The amendment has also won the support of other Republicans, with Florida Representative Randy Fine saying on X, formerly Twitter, that he is "all in." I'm all in. Florida has proven Obamacare Medicaid Expansion is a scam. With th is amendment, Florida taxpayers will get less ripped off by Blue States handing out free healthcare to illegals and twenty-somethings too busy protesting to get jobs. Well done, @SenRickScott! — Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) June 29, 2025 What People Are Saying Senator Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, on X, formerly Twitter, on June 29: "My proposal to fix FMAP will make the Big Beautiful Bill even more aligned with President Trump's goal to balance the budget, grow the economy, and put Americans first. "We cannot allow Dem-led blue states to use YOUR tax dollars to give illegal aliens Medicaid benefits, exploit this safety net, and jeopardize help for those who truly need it." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters on Sunday, per Semafor: "We think it's a really good policy, and I think a lot of us are going to be supporting it. It's great policy and something that's there's a high level of interest in our conference of making it part of the final bill." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, on X: "Republicans are jamming an insane and destructive bill down the throats of the American people in the dead of night. It's the largest cut to Medicaid in American history. The massive tax breaks for billionaires will add trillions to our national debt. Keep the pressure on." What Happens Next The Senate voted 51-49 late Saturday to proceed with the bill, teeing off the next steps toward passing it, likely this week. It would then head back to the House for a final vote before being signed into law by the president.
