
2,400 grocery workers to decide whether Tony's Fresh Market will go union
Tony's workers from Joliet to Waukegan will cast their votes Tuesday through Thursday in an election held by the National Labor Relations Board. The union that hopes to represent the workers is the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 881, which already represents thousands of grocery workers at Mariano's and Jewel-Osco grocery stores throughout the Chicago area.
A majority of workers at Tony's 21 supermarkets must vote 'yes' to secure a win for the union. The union election will be among the largest held in the American private sector so far this year. If the Tony's workers vote to unionize, their fledgling bargaining unit could be the largest certified by the labor board this year, according to agency records.
Tony's workers who support the union have said they hope it could help them secure higher pay and better benefits.
Maria Molina, who works in the floral shop and as a cashier at Tony's in suburban Prospect Heights, said she makes $18.70 an hour after nine years with the company.
'We're doing all of this to have a better standard of living,' said Molina, who supports the union, in an interview with the Tribune in Spanish.
Before working at Tony's, Molina had a union job at Dominick's, where, she said, she had benefits such as sick days, time and a half pay for working Sundays and affordable insurance, which she attributes to saving her a lot of money when she was hospitalized for an infection.
And around the time Dominick's shuttered in 2013, Molina said, she was making $15.25 an hour — the equivalent of $20.88 in today's dollars, and more than she makes at Tony's now.
Most of her colleagues, she said, don't have health insurance through Tony's because it's too expensive. For now, she has insurance through her husband, but is expecting to go without it once he stops working in May because his company is moving out of state.
In a statement, Tony's said the company 'take(s) great pride in fostering a supportive environment where our team members can thrive, with competitive wages, strong benefits packages, and direct and open communication at the core of our efforts.'
The company did not respond to a question about specific starting and average wages for grocery workers. It said it offered benefits including health care, 401(k) plans and paid vacation time, and said it provided premium pay for work during the holiday season.
Tony's, which was founded by Tony Ingraffia and Domenico Gambino in 1979, was acquired by funds managed by New York based private equity giant Apollo Global Management three years ago.
In the leadup to the election, UFCW has accused Tony's of trying to bust the union vote, including by firing a union supporter, interrogating workers about their support for the union, and threatening workers by telling them that the union will ask for their immigration documents. The union filed charges with the NLRB alleging the company has violated federal labor law, which the company denies.
'Suddenly,' the union said in a news release last week, 'the Company has been hosting pizza parties, offering coupons, and special discounts to workers in an obvious last-ditch effort to buy loyalty before the election.'
In a statement, Tony's said it 'values its team members and respects their right to consider union representation, and any claims suggesting otherwise are false.'
The company said it follows the law, saying specifically that it had not fired any workers because of their union activity. Tony's said that company leaders and store managers receive training to ensure they comply with labor laws and regulations.
If the Tony's workers vote to join UFCW, their union would be among the largest new bargaining units the Chicago area has seen in recent years.
Most union elections are measured 'in the tens or hundreds of workers, not thousands,' said Johnnie Kallas, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois School of Labor and Employment Relations. 'This is a very important election,' he said.
Though the Chicago area, like much of the rest of the country, has seen an increase in new unions over the last several years, some of that organizing has taken place in smaller shops, such as cafes that sometimes have fewer than two dozen workers. UFCW itself has taken to organizing smaller units, including some local cannabis dispensaries.
But even a large bid like the Tony's election — if the union can notch a win — would not be enough to make a dent in the country's overall union membership rate, which hit a record low of just under 10% last year, despite high profile union wins and strong public support for unions. The issue of how to reverse a union membership rate that has fallen precipitously since a high of 20% in the early 1980s, when the government first started keeping track, has long vexed labor leaders and organizers.
To Tony's and its workers, of course, the results of the week's election matter a great deal.
At the Tony's in Prospect Heights, Molina does all the work to keep the flower shop running, she said, from the dirtiest work to the most pleasant. She does inventory, takes out the trash and creates the floral arrangements that Tony's sells.
This week, Molina has another task to add to her list: casting a vote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
Pro-Trump group says Cracker Barrel's DEI programs violate federal, state civil rights laws
Conservative pro-Trump law group America First Legal (AFL) filed complaints Monday with the Tennessee Attorney General and the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC), alleging Cracker Barrel is maintaining discriminatory employment practices stemming from its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. The complaints point to public documents, internal reports, and Cracker Barrel's own language to allege the company maintains illegal DEI frameworks, such as race- and gender-conscious hiring, leadership and promotion pipelines, which provide benefits to employees on the basis of protected characteristics. AFL also slammed Cracker Barrel for rebranding its dedicated DEI website to 'Culture and Belonging,' arguing that the name change did not halt Cracker Barrel from using 'diversity' as a proxy for race or sex. Advertisement 'Americans are fed up with major American corporations serving up DEI as if it is entirely okay,' said AFL legal counsel, Will Scolinos. 'Treating people differently because of the color of their skin or their sex is not only wrong, it is illegal. AFL has fought DEI since the Biden Administration spent four years celebrating and encouraging its wholesale implementation across the country. Now, companies are retreating from the term 'DEI' but retaining their discriminatory policies. Cracker Barrel and other American corporations must take discrimination by any name off the menu once and for all.' 4 The complaints point to public documents, internal reports, and Cracker Barrel's own language to allege the company maintains illegal DEI frameworks. Christopher Sadowski AFL's complaint points to Cracker Barrel's Business Resource Groups (BRGs) as one example of alleged discrimination, outlined in public Securities and Exchange Commission documents, Cracker Barrel's website and other places. According to AFL, these groups offer employment benefits only available to employees belonging to certain races or sexes. Advertisement The 'Be Bold' BRG helps 'cultivate and develop Black Leaders within the Cracker Barrel organization utilizing allyship, mentorship, and education to create a path to continued excellence,' Cracker Barrel's website states. Meanwhile, the HOLA BRG 'promote[s] Hispanic and Latino culture through hiring, developing, and retaining talent within Cracker Barrel.' Other BRGs revolve around LGBT folks, 'neurodiversity,' and women's issues, among others. 4 According to AFL, these groups offer employment benefits only available to employees belonging to certain races or sexes. AP Another part of Cracker Barrel's alleged promotion of discriminatory DEI practices cited by AFL includes the company's focus on 'attract[ing], develop[ing] and retain[ing] high performing talent with diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives,' which is laid out on Cracker Barrel's 'Culture, Belonging and Inclusion' website underneath the heading 'STRATEGY TURNS INTO ACTION.' This focus on promoting and hiring based on 'diverse' characteristics can be seen in action via Cracker Barrel's categorization in internal company reports of board members as 'Diverse' or 'Not-Diverse,' AFL points out. Advertisement Per a public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cracker Barrel notes that when 'evaluating potential candidates for Board membership' the nominating committee 'considers, among other things … diversity of age, gender, race, and ethnic background.' 4 This focus on promoting and hiring based on 'diverse' characteristics can be seen in action via Cracker Barrel's categorization in internal company reports. Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images Cracker Barrel also proudly touts its Diverse Employee Leadership Talent Advancement (DELTA) program in public filings, which the company describes as an effort meant to identify 'diverse managers who have exhibited all the skills we value in our top-performing managers' and position them 'to advance to their next role.' 'Our new, robust diversity training includes education throughout all levels of the Company about unconscious and implicit bias and focuses on creating an inclusive culture and fostering a sense of belonging for all,' a Securities and Exchange Commission filing discussing the DELTA program also adds. Advertisement AFL argues that, in practice, these policies from Cracker Barrel appear to have achieved their intended effect, with the company's representation of women and ethnic minorities among Cracker Barrel professional staff, store level management and hourly workers, having each increased by at least 3% since fiscal year 2022. AFL said only women hourly staff remained constant across the same period, though Cracker Barrel touts in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings that 70% of its employee population is female. 4 Cracker Barrel also proudly touts its Diverse Employee Leadership Talent Advancement (DELTA) program in public filings. AP 'Cracker Barrel's policies openly discriminate against heterosexual, white, and male employees in favor of diverse employees,' AFL's complaint, which asserts the policies violate Tennessee's Human Rights Act and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, argues. 'Discrimination advocates — under the guise of 'diversity' and 'equity' — have for years claimed that straight white men must be treated differently than diverse individuals by holding them to a higher evidentiary standard; however, the Supreme Court has directly addressed this claim, holding that 'Title VII does not impose such a heightened standard on majority-group plaintiffs,'' the complaint continues. 'Decades of case law hold that — no matter how well-intentioned — policies that seek to impose racial balancing are prohibited by Title VII.' Through its complaint, AFL is calling for Cracker Barrel and the EEOC to launch investigations into the matter, including a review of internal communications and a probe into whether the company used contractors with 'reckless disregard' to circumvent civil rights laws. AFL is also requesting the Tennessee Attorney General and EEOC enforce state and federal laws that would compel the company to halt its allegedly discriminatory DEI practices. Cracker Barrel did not respond to repeated requests for comment in time for publication.


Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
What if the Parties Struck a Truce on Self-Destructive Gerrymandering?
America's two major political parties are about to exchange the next salvos in a decades-long battle where—as is typical of trench warfare—they both stand to lose. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is under severe pressure from President Donald Trump to restart one of the most craven and self-destructive practices of American politics in the 21st century: predatory gerrymandering. California Governor Gavin Newsom has made clear that, if Abbott goes through with it, he stands ready to retaliate. If you're thinking "gee, this sounds like a boring, technical issue for government nerds to fuss over," it's not. It's been a poison that's seeped further into our political life than most realize. Here's what happened. Partisan gerrymandering—drawing legislative and congressional districts to maximize your party's power—goes back literally to the birth of the republic. But for most of the 20th century, state political leanings were so stable that parties kept their maps in place. Even after Supreme Court rulings in the mid-1960s forced change, the parties settled into a fairly anodyne process, forming districts once every ten years after the new national census with only minor angling for political advantage. In 2003, then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay broke the tacit truce. After Texas drew its districts following the 2000 census, he waited for Republicans to gain complete control of Texas government, and then maneuvered an ambush: a sudden redraw that gave Republicans six more congressional seats. Once DeLay started this new predatory approach—grabbing for power at any opportunity—others followed. Republican-dominated states started to copycat Texas, and Republicans saw an opportunity if they were really willing to push the envelope. Political strategist Karl Rove crafted a project called REDMAP to win key state legislative seats all over the country in order to drive an even more aggressive round of congressional redistricting. It worked: in 2012, Democrats won 1.4 million more votes for the U.S. House than Republicans, but Republicans won the chamber 234-201. In the Wisconsin legislature, as just one state example, Republicans won less than half of the statewide vote but took 61 percent of the legislative seats. These outrageous power tilts still exist around the country. US President Donald Trump (L) listens to Texas Governor Greg Abbott speak during a meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025, following devastating flooding that occurred in the... US President Donald Trump (L) listens to Texas Governor Greg Abbott speak during a meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025, following devastating flooding that occurred in the area over the July 4 weekend. More BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images Most Americans might dismiss all this as another instance of all's-fair-in-love-and-war political skullduggery. Why was it actually so bad? For Republicans, gerrymandering helped drive the MAGA-fication of the party. To achieve the 2010 backlash that would fuel their predatory gerrymandering scheme, Republican leaders engineered an angry populist movement—the Tea Party. That Frankenstein's monster came alive and helped Republicans shellack Democrats in the 2010 midterms, but then escaped lab containment. Feuds between Tea Party-aligned activists and establishment Republicans roiled the party in 2012 and sank them in 2014, leaving the party rudderless, confused, and ripe for Trump's takeover. Then the Trump faction became a force inside America's gerrymandered districts. Since his endorsement was seen as the critical factor in winning Republican primaries, and with almost all Republicans districts being "ultra-safe," the majority of state and U.S. House elected officials became Trump acolytes. Democrats in turn became both politically neutered and schizophrenic: in a few places successfully depoliticizing redistricting through independent commissions, in other places trying (unsuccessfully) to even the score after the 2020 census with their own aggressive gerrymanders. So they remain boxed out of power in most states, still trying to land a feeble counterpunch. It's left them with a severe case of "don't wrestle a pig in the mud; you get dirty and he has fun." And we Americans ended up with a mess. Trump's gerrymandering-enabled leveraged buyout of the Republican Party—and now the U.S. government—means his faction of MAGA Republicans (which represents only 16 percent of Americans) gets to drive a radical agenda that the majority of us oppose. So everyone has lost—Republicans as much as anyone, as their party has been coopted and as their ultra-aggressive tactics have sometimes backfired. But, addicted to a toxic formula that has worked out well for him so far, Trump is now looking for even more aggressive gerrymandering, and California Governor Gavin Newsom is threatening to retaliate with some partisan redistricting of his own. So the cycle will restart, and the screws will continue to tighten. But what if the few remaining adults in American politics said, "enough?" There's actually a model in 20th century political history for one way it could work. In 1940s and 1950s, it was common for U.S. senators of opposing parties to form a "voting pair" on a bill. Since their votes would cancel each other out, they would skip the vote together. Greg Abbott could call Gavin Newsom and say "hey, we're a couple of Washington outsiders with national ambitions—let's pair up on a ceasefire. I'll carve out a little space from Trump, you'll show that you can work with Republicans. Our parties will breathe a sigh of relief, and we'll do our country a lot of good. We could even start a trend for other states to follow." Likely? No. But possible? Absolutely. It wouldn't undo the damage that's been done. But the first rule when you're in a hole is to stop digging. Matt Robison is a writer, podcast host, and former congressional staffer. The views in this article are the writer's own.


Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Senators Demand Answers as Delta Plans to Price More Tickets Based on What AI Thinks You'll Pay
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Three U.S. senators are demanding answers over Delta Air Lines' planned expansion to use artificial intelligence to set individualized fares — insisting the strategy is fraught with privacy concerns. Sens. Ruben Gallego, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner, all Democrats, sent a letter Monday to the Atlanta-based airline seeking additional details of plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20 percent of its domestic network in a matter of months. "Individualized pricing, or surveillance-based price setting, eliminates a fixed or static price in favor of prices that are tailored to an individual consumer's willingness to pay," the senators wrote to Delta in a letter obtained by Newsweek. "Delta's current and planned individualized pricing practices not only present data privacy concerns, but will also likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point' at a time when American families are already struggling with rising costs." A Delta Air Lines plane at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on April 9, 2025. A Delta Air Lines plane at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on April 9, Air Lines President Glen William Hauenstein told reporters during a July 10 earnings call that roughly 3 percent of the airline's domestic ticket prices are already set using AI, with hopes to reach 20 percent by the end of 2025. "So, we're in heavy testing phase," Hauenstein said. "We like what we see. We like it a lot and we're continuing to roll it out. But we're going to take our time and make sure that the rollout is successful, as opposed to trying to rush it and risk that there are unwanted answers in there." Hauenstein also praised Delta's partnership with Fetcherr, an Israel-based tech company that employs AI to process "millions of data points instantly," according to its website. "The convergence of AI, machine learning and real-time data processing completely transforms how airlines approach pricing strategy," a post on dynamic pricing in aviation reads. "Gone are the days of rigid pricing rules and manual adjustments. Welcome to the era of true dynamic pricing, where artificial intelligence can process millions of data points instantly to set the perfect price every time. Welcome to the modern age of AI dynamic pricing." But the approach is problematic, according to Gallego and his Democratic colleagues. Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., arrives for a vote in the Capitol on May 13, 2025. Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., arrives for a vote in the Capitol on May 13, 2025. Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images "The implications for individual consumer privacy are severe on their own," they wrote Delta. "Surveillance pricing has been shown to utilize extensive personal information obtained through a variety of third-party channels, including data about a passenger's purchase history, web browsing behavior, geolocation, social media activity, biometric data, and financial status." Customers also have no way of knowing what data and personal information will be collected by Delta and Fetcherr, or how the airfare algorithm will be trained, according to the senators. "Prices could be dictated not by supply and demand, but by individual need," the letter continued. "While Delta has stated that the airline will 'maintain strict safeguards to ensure compliance with federal law,' your company has not shared what those safeguards are or how you plan to protect American families against pricing discrimination in the evolving AI landscape." The senators want a response by August 4, including details about the data Delta uses to train its revenue management system algorithm for setting customized prices for fares or other products, as well as how many passengers per day are currently purchasing fares set or informed by the customized model. Chelsea Wollerson, a Delta spokesperson, said the company had no immediate response to the letter early Tuesday. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing, or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise," the airline told Newsweek in a statement late Monday. "A variety of market forces drive the dynamic pricing model that's been used in the global industry for decades, with new tech simply streamlining this process. Delta always complies with regulations around pricing and disclosures."