The linguistic landscape of Tamil Nadu
According to the Language Atlas, the State had a total population of 7,21,47,030 that spread across an area of 1,30,060 square kilometres in 32 districts (based on Census 2011). Of this, 7,20,98,315 people (99.93%) reported speaking one of the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India, while only 48,715 people (0.07%) spoke other languages. A total of 96 languages were identified within the administrative boundaries of Tamil Nadu during the 2011 Census.
In the Language Atlas, the term 'speakers' referred only to individuals who reported a particular language as their mother tongue during the Census enumeration. This count excluded those who may have spoken the language but did not declare it as their mother tongue in the Census.
Among the scheduled languages in Tamil Nadu, Tamil had a total of 6,37,53,997 speakers. This included 6,37,43,847 people who reported Tamil as their mother tongue in the Census schedules, along with 10,150 individuals whose mother tongues were classified under the Tamil language group.
This was followed by Telugu with 42,34,302 speakers, Kannada with 12,86,175, Urdu with 12,64,537, Malayalam with 7,26,096, Hindi with 3,93,380, Gujarati with 2,75,023 and Marathi with 85,454 speakers. Among the non-scheduled languages, English had the highest number of speakers at 24,495, followed by Tulu with 2,636, Bhili/Bhilodi with 1,405, Arabic/Arbi with 1,119 and Kurukh/Oraon with 817.
District-wise distribution of languages Tamil
Being the official language, Tamil was the most widely spoken language in the State. Tamil Nadu had a total of 6,37,53,997 speakers, making up 88.37% of the State's population. The Tamil-speaking population was concentrated in Chennai (5.71%), Kancheepuram (5.65%), and Villupuram (5.24%), Vellore (4.96%), Tiruvallur (4.88%), Salem (4.83%), Tirunelveli (4.76%), Madurai (4.41%), and Tiruchirappalli (4.09%). Telugu
Telugu was the second most spoken language in Tamil Nadu, with 42,34,302 speakers, comprising 5.87% of the total population. The Telugu-speaking population was concentrated in Coimbatore (13.32%), Chennai (10.21%), Tiruvallur (9.80%), Krishnagiri (9.57%), and Vellore (7.53%). Some of the other district that also had significant shares of Telugu speakers were Tiruppur (6.47%), Erode (5.49%), Salem (5.00%), Kancheepuram (4.77%), Virudhunagar (4.07%), and Theni (3.75%). Kannada
Kannada speakers in the State numbered 12,86,175, accounting for 1.78% of the population. Their presence was most prominent in Coimbatore (18.73%), Krishnagiri (18.57%), The Nilgiris (13.98%), Erode (9.75%), Theni (7.62%), Salem (6.73%), and Tiruppur (4.41%). Malayalam
Malayalam was spoken by 7,26,096 people, representing 1.01%of Tamil Nadu's population. The Malayalam-speaking community was primarily concentrated in Coimbatore (23.34%), The Nilgiris (18.16%), Kanniyakumari (14.75%), and Chennai (14.46%), Tiruvallur (8.28%) and Kancheepuram (5.99%). Urdu
Urdu were 12,64,537 in numbers, making up 1.75% of the population. Vellore district had the highest concentration, accounting for 30.21% of the State's Urdu-speaking population. It was followed by Chennai (15.70%), Krishnagiri (8.73%), Villupuram (5.34%), Tiruvannamalai (5.19%), Kancheepuram (4.91%), and Tiruvallur (4.83%). Hindi
Hindi was spoken by 3,93,380 people, forming 0.55% of the State's population. The largest share resided in Chennai (40.54%), followed by Tiruvallur (10.80%), Kancheepuram (10.06%), Coimbatore (7.13%), and Vellore (4.42%). Gujarati
Gujarati speakers numbered 2,75,023, comprising 0.38% of the total population. Madurai had the largest share at 35.67%, followed by Chennai (11.63%), Thanjavur (9.35%), Salem (7.81%), and Ramanathapuram (7.51%), Dindigul (5.89%), Kancheepuram (3.71%), and Coimbatore (2.92%) Marathi
Marathi was spoken by 85,454 persons, making up 0.12% of Tamil Nadu's population. The community was primarily concentrated in Chennai (20.94%), Vellore (13.51%), Krishnagiri (10.44%), Kancheepuram (9.68%), Tiruvallur (7.90%), Coimbatore (6.31%), and Thanjavur (4.30%). English
English was spoken by 24,495 individuals, accounting for 0.03% of the total population. The majority of English speakers were concentrated in Chennai, which accounted for 41.98% of the State's total English-speaking population. Other notable districts included Tiruvallur (11.57%), Kancheepuram (10.96%), Coimbatore (7.56%), Tiruchirappalli (5.72%), and The Nilgiris (3.27%). Tulu
Tulu speakers in Tamil Nadu numbered 2,636. Their presence was primarily concentrated in Chennai, which accounted for 39.87% of the total Tulu-speaking population in the State, followed by Coimbatore (11.99%) and Kancheepuram (10.74%). Smaller shares were found in Tiruvallur (8.84%), The Nilgiris (7.17%), and Krishnagiri (4.93%).
Bilingualism and Trilingualism
Tamil Nadu remained predominantly a monolingual State in terms of linguistic ability. According to the 2011 Census, 5,17,30,760 people (71.70%) spoke only one language. The number of bilingual speakers, excluding those who were trilingual, was 1,79,69,107 (24.90%), while 24,47,163 individuals (3.39%) reported speaking three languages.
The Language Atlas also recorded the number of individuals who reported that they could speak various languages, irrespective of whether it was their mother tongue or not. In Tamil Nadu, a total of 6,94,04,292 people reported that they could speak Tamil (96.20%), followed by 1,33,37,789 people who reported that they could speak English (18.49%). A total of 58,04,634 individuals said they could speak Telugu (8.05%), 18,70,602 Kannada (2.59%), 15,24,049 Hindi (2.11%), and 10,08,468 reported that they could speak Malayalam (1.40%).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Kamal, three DMK MPs take oath in RS
Chennai: Makkal Needhi Maiam president Kamal Haasan made his maiden entry into Parliament on Friday as a Rajya Sabha MP. He took oath in Tamil promising to do his duty, bound by moral and ethical values, which was received by table thumping from other MPs. Kamal was elected unopposed on June 12 with DMK's backing, marking a shift in his political career from aspiring for a seat in state legislature to a stint in Parliament. Other DMK MPs P Wilson, poet Salma and S R Sivalingam were also sworn in. This is the debut of Salma and Sivalingam as well. In a statement on social media with the tag 'A new chapter unfolds', Kamal posted that he has arrived in Parliament not as a mere critic but as a committed contributor to the idea of India. "Where I must oppose, I will do so with reason. Where I must support, I will do so with conviction. And, where I must advise, I will do so constructively, not to score points, but to build consensus," he said. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai Kamal said he would strive to be the voice of Tamil Nadu in Delhi – "clear, compassionate and committed". He said he would neither speak for one particular community nor for narrow gain, but for common good and national growth. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Born 1945-1985 With No Life Insurance Could Be Eligible For This yourseniorsaving Undo Several leaders cutting across the political spectrum including chief minister M K Stalin, Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu and former Bihar chief minister Naveen Patnaik extended wishes to Kamal. In the message wishing Kamal and the DMK MPs, Stalin lauded MDMK general secretary Vaiko, saying he was moved by the final speech made by the veteran in Parliament on Thursday. He also congratulated former DMK MPs M M Abdullah and Shanmugam who completed their term on Thursday.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
CAs make valuable contributions to economic development : Horatti
Hubballi: Chartered Accountants (CAs) are involved in the fair presentation management of taxpayers' accounts and advise them to pay correct taxes to the govt's exchequer. They played a key role in systematic revenue collection by providing appropriate guidance on the tax payments that should be made to the treasury, said Karnataka legislative council chairman Basavaraj Horatti. Inaugurating the 38th Auditors' Conference here on Friday, Horatti explained how the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) played a vital role in maintaining the country's financial discipline over the past 75 years. "No businessman can be successful without proper accounting," he opined. Madhukar Hiregange, member, ICAI New Delhi, focused on the poor condition of Kannada primary and secondary schools in Karnataka. "It is not known how the funds announced in the budget by the govt to provide good primary education to children are being spent," he added. Aniket Talati, a CA from Mumbai, said that the ICAI incorporated digital technologies into the CA curriculum and is providing guidance on how to implement artificial intelligence in business enterprises successfully. Central Council member CA Purushottam Lal Khandelwala stressed the need for a peer review of the audit work and a comprehensive review of documents and collection of evidence. CAs Akshaykumar Singhi, Manjunath Meti, Pramod Hegde, SB Shetty, K Raghu, Rishabh Upadhyay, Subhas Patil, and others were present on the occasion.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
SC rejects plea on delimitation exercise in AP and Telangana
Vijayawada: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition challenging the notification issued for delimitation of constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir without including Andhra Pradesh and Telangana . The apex court observed that the rule of parity does not apply equally to states and union territories, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be invoked as an enforceable right when there is an express constitutional limitation. The SC further noted that the delimitation of constituencies in AP and Telangana can only be taken up based on the data from the first census conducted after 2026. Prof K Purushottam Reddy moved the Supreme Court, contending the non-inclusion of AP and Telangana in the notification issued for the delimitation of assembly and parliament constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir. He contended that, according to section 26 of AP Reorganisation Act, assembly constituencies in the two Telugu states should be increased from 175 and 119 to 225 and 153, respectively. Arguing on behalf of the petitioner, Rao Ranjit told the apex court that the exclusion of AP and Telangana from the scope of the delimitation exercise, as contemplated in the notification, suffers from the vice of intelligible differentia. The delimitation commission appointed pursuant to the issuance of the notification was the first after the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, and the electorate in both AP and Telangana have a legitimate expectation about a similar exercise, which is the constitutional responsibility of the Union govt as per AP Reorganisation Act, he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now The power under the Delimitation Act must be exercised uniformly by the Union govt, and there could be no plausible justification for omitting the two Telugu states from the delimitation exercise, he argued. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta and additional solicitor general KM Natraj, arguing on behalf of the Union govt, submitted that the petition is devoid of merits as there was an express bar on the delimitation of constituencies in the states governed by Article 170. They argued that the Jammu and Kashmir comes under Article 239A of the Constitution, not Article 170. As states and union territories are governed by different constitutional schemes of arrangements, there can be no claim of parity, they argued. Considering the arguments, the Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh upheld the arguments of the Union govt. Noting that states and union territories are governed by different constitutional principles and there is an express bar on the delimitation of constituencies in states, the bench observed that if the petition is entertained, it will open flood gates with similar demands from other states. The bench also held that the doctrine of legitimate expectation and parity cannot be invoked in view of express constitutional provisions and dismissed the petition.
