Canadians want to buy local this Canada Day, but rising prices are holding them back
As
Canada Day
approaches, Canadians are eager to support homegrown products, but many are still holding back at the checkout counter.
Canada
Day, celebrated every July 1, marks the anniversary of Confederation and is one of the country's most patriotic holidays.
A new
PwC Canada
survey finds that 75 percent of Canadians say they would pay more for premium or locally produced food. The report reflects a growing wave of
consumer patriotism
, boosted by tensions from the ongoing US-Canada trade war.
'Canadians value local products and want to support homegrown businesses,' said Elisa Swern, national retail and consumer leader at PwC Canada.
However, the enthusiasm for buying Canadian comes with limits. 76 percent of those surveyed say they're concerned about the overall cost of food, and many are cutting back on spending as inflation and tariffs take their toll.
A separate TD Bank Group study echoes that trend that Canadians are spending less across nearly every category, as economic uncertainty and US trade policy weigh heavily on household budgets.
Live Events
Still, the will to
support Canadian
goods is strong, especially when there's transparency. 63 percent of consumers say they'd pay more if they clearly understood where a product was from, and 58 percent actively seek sustainability information.
'Consumers told us they want to buy more local, more Canadian, more sustainable goods,' Swern said. 'They want to know the story behind what they're buying.'
To help close the gap between intent and affordability, retailers are stepping up efforts to label Canadian-made items both in-store and online, while producers work to scale operations and bring prices down.
The patriotic shift extends to travel, too. A TD tourism report shows 64 percent of Canadians plan to travel within the country this summer, avoiding trips to the U.S. as trade tensions rise.
The federal government's Canada Strong Pass, launched earlier this month, is designed to support
domestic tourism
. It offers free or discounted admission to national parks, museums, and galleries. In Prince Albert National Park, staff are already bracing for a surge in visitors.
'This summer, people want to reconnect with Canada not just as a place, but as a principle,' said visitor services lead Aimee Valmont.
But for many Canadians, it comes down to cost.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Trump says wealthy US group is ready to buy TikTok, but needs China's approval
US President Donald Trump has announced that a group of wealthy individuals is ready to purchase TikTok's US operations. In an interview aired on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, Trump said he plans to disclose the identities of the buyers within the next two weeks.'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way,' Trump stated. 'I think I'll probably need China's approval. I think President Xi will probably do it. It's a group of very wealthy people,' Trump reported by Reuters, Trump noted that the proposed sale may require the endorsement of Chinese authorities. ByteDance, TikTok's Beijing-based parent company, remains in control of the app's global operations. The US president said he believes Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely support the deal. A potential agreement to restructure TikTok's US business under American ownership was in development earlier this year. That plan involved converting TikTok into a US-based company controlled by domestic investors. However, the transaction was delayed when China signalled that it would not approve it, just days after Trump announced new tariffs on Chinese these hurdles, Trump extended the deadline for a sale multiple acknowledged TikTok's influence on young American voters, crediting the platform for increasing his appeal among youth during the 2024 presidential President has maintained a more positive stance towards the app, in contrast with his earlier efforts to ban or force its sale. More details on the potential buyers and the deal structure are expected to emerge in the coming weeks.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
A Quad Industrial Compact To Anchor US-India Economic Alignment
The Quad now faces a choice: continue with fragmented coordination, or build an architecture resilient enough to outlast politics, absorb shocks, and shape regional order Power doesn't always arrive with a bang. Sometimes, it hums quietly through the rhythm of assembly lines, the precision of a robotic arm, or the silent extraction of lithium from ancient rock. We often think of strategy in terms of diplomacy and deterrence, but the deeper architecture of power is economic, woven through trust, shared labour, and mutual capability. The philosopher Byung-Chul Han wrote that today's conflicts are no longer 'viral" but 'neural". They are less about overt aggression, more about systems of dependency. And in that sense, resilience is no longer a matter of who has the most firepower, but who controls the circuit boards, critical minerals, and production standards that make the firepower work. Real alliances are not built in summit rooms but in the subtle choreography between supply chains and shared intent. That's why a Quad Industrial Compact is necessary evolution. One that transforms alignment from a diplomatic gesture into an economic structure robust enough to anchor the future. On May 31 at the Shangri-La Dialogue, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth underscored the urgency of integrating industrial bases across allies, noting, 'It's one thing for an adversary to see multinational forces… It's another… to see an integrated defence industrial base supporting those forces." The US-led Partnership for Indo-Pacific Industrial Resilience (PIPIR) reflects that vision. The message to allies was clear. Symbolic alignment will not suffice. Partners must deliver shared capabilities. This doctrine reflects a drastic if not perilous situation. China reigns supreme in advanced manufacturing, controlling over 70 per cent of global critical minerals processing and 80 per cent of solar manufacturing. This creates economic dependence as a tool of coercion. Simultaneously, US policy volatility, from tariff swings to exclusionary subsidies further accentuates uncertainty for partners seeking long-term alignment. Even as the recent India-Pakistan conflict re-hyphenated India in Washington's imagination, now more than ever, it is important we keep our eye on the ball, that is ever so quickly approaching. A Quad Industrial Compact is necessary to deepen trade, investment, innovation, and supply chain linkages among the United States, India, Japan, and Australia. It would anchor multilateral cooperation in shared economic strength, reduce exposure to coercive dependencies, and transform diplomatic convergence into resilience. WHY A QUAD COMPACT NOW? Geopolitical threats are sharpening as economic coercion becomes a standard tool of statecraft. The Quad is already the Indo-Pacific's leading 'soft-security" framework, but the line between soft and hard power is blurring. Economic heft underwrites diplomatic influence. A formal industrial framework among the Quad countries would reinforce deterrence by embedding economic interdependence, making strategic decoupling costly and cooperation sticky. Macroeconomic trends reveal deep complementarities among Quad countries. India, with a median age of 29.8, contrasts with Japan's 49.9, the US's 38.9, and Australia's 38.1. India adds between 7-8 million workers annually, while Japan faces population decline and the US grapples with skilled labour shortages. India's projected 6.2 per cent GDP growth in 2025 dwarves forecasts for the U.S. (1.8 per cent), Japan (0.6 per cent), and Australia (1.6 per cent). Yet, its labour force participation lags at 55 per cent, with just 26 per cent for women, signalling vast untapped capacity for at scale manufacturing. Advertisement Scale also varies. India's $4 trillion economy serves 1.6 billion people; Australia's $1.7 trillion serves just 27 million. Despite employing 57 million, India's manufacturing sector contributes just 13-14 per cent to GDP, below its 25 per cent target. The potential for advanced manufacturing is immense. India's Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes have attracted $18.72 billion in investment across target sectors including electronics, automotive, and pharmaceuticals. For instance, since 2020, manufacturing in the EV sector has increased by 860 per cent, with the 2-wheeler EV sector recording a whopping 3,400 per cent growth. Despite momentum, there is a lack of cross-border industrial coordination. The Quad possesses complementary strengths across advanced sectors worth $340+ billion annually. Yet coordination gaps prevent these advantages from becoming strategic leverage against China. In battery materials, Australia mines 50 per cent of global lithium but processes only 3 per cent, exporting the rest to China. India holds significant graphite reserves with emerging anode manufacturing capabilities like Epsilon Advanced Materials. Together, the countries can create integrated anode-cathode supply chains for US battery manufacturing plans of 1 TWh capacity by 2030. advetisement In semiconductors, Japan holds one-third of global fabrication equipment market share while India has ambitious fab manufacturing goals, attracting proposals worth $21 billion already. The US leads in design and advanced manufacturing incentives. This creates a complete value chain from equipment to production to innovation—if coordinated. The innovation-manufacturing bridge reveals deeper synergy. The US leads in R&D ($900+ billion in 2023), private equity ($838 billion deal flow in 2024) and venture capital ($360 billion in 2024) but remains vulnerable in critical mineral inputs and midstream production. Australia provides raw materials, India offers cost-effective manufacturing scale, and Japan contributes technical expertise. Cross-border tax incentives and coordinated policy frameworks can transform individual national strengths into competitive advantages while reducing strategic dependencies. LEARNING FROM ASEAN IASEAN has shown how fragmented countries can build regional supply chains through regulatory harmonization. Rather than tariffs or FTA sprawl, ASEAN focused on behind-the-border coordination: common standards, certification reciprocity, and customs digitization. Electrical and automotive supply chains stretch from Thailand to Vietnam, enabled by mutual recognition of conformity assessments and data-sharing norms. advetisement The Quad should adapt this model. Shared industrial standards, synchronised subsidies, and interoperable certifications could ease trade frictions. Vietnam's entry into semiconductor chains without heavy onshoring, or Japan's Mekong investments, show how aligned priorities can yield structural benefits. ASEAN's success harmonising sanitary and phytosanitary measures and customs clearance, as in the ASEAN Single Window, offers a tested roadmap. A Quad Industrial Compact can work on three pillars: Pillar 1: Trade and Investment Partnership The Quad lacks a unified trade architecture. The U.S. has no FTAs with India or Japan. India's tariff regime remains opaque and protectionist in key sectors like semiconductors, solar, and agri-inputs. The disjointedness deters cross-border investment. A Quad Compact should harmonize regulations in strategic sectors and prioritize mutual recognition of testing, certification, and sustainability standards. Harmonized tariffs on critical goods like EV battery components, solar modules, and semiconductors would reduce the transactional costs of cross-border value chains. Customs platforms like India's ICEGATE or Australia's ICS could be integrated through a federated digital single-window system that allows seamless cargo movement across the four economies. In addition, a Quad Economic Framework could serve as the legal and institutional backbone. It could include a commercial arbitration mechanism, rotating jurisdiction among member countries, and a neutral secretariat. This body would adjudicate investment disputes, protect intellectual property rights, and facilitate enforcement of cross-border contracts. Over time, its authority could be broadened to issue compliance rulings and develop model commercial codes to ease legal fragmentation. Pillar 2: Industrial Strategy Council Each Quad country has launched major national industrial programs — India's $26 billion PLI, the U.S.'s $447 billion IRA and CHIPS Act, Japan's $68 billion semiconductor and AI package, Australia's $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund — yet these often operate in parallel rather than in sync. The Quad Industrial Strategy Council should serve as a central coordination mechanism to align initiatives, mapping production capacities, identifying supply chain gaps, and developing shared project pipelines. It could also fund feasibility studies and joint venture matchmaking. For example, a jointly subsidized lithium oxide facility could combine Australia's raw material advantage, Indian processing, Japanese tech, and U.S. demand. The Council should prioritize project co-location strategies. Semiconductor materials firms in Japan could be fast-tracked into India's emerging fabrication clusters under U.S. CHIPS Act support, while Australia offers green energy infrastructure. Joint industrial zones, backed by all four governments, should include coordinated permitting, cross-border equity ownership structures, and integrated logistics hubs. Pillar 3: Quad Innovation & Skills Platform High-tech collaboration within the Quad is hindered by fragmentation and duplication. The platform should aim to consolidate existing initiatives and create economies of scale in both talent and research funding. A shared Quad research fund should be launched, with mandates for multi-country consortia. Its grants could focus on mission-critical technologies such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, smart grid systems, and green hydrogen. Each grant should require participation from institutions in at least three-member countries, encouraging mobility, trust, and diffusion of results. Meanwhile, a Quad Skills Accord should standardize credential recognition and create fast-track pathways for technical professionals. For example, a mining engineer certified in Western Australia should be eligible to work on Indian rare earth projects without regulatory duplication. Similarly, Indian data scientists or Japanese robotics engineers should be able to participate in innovation programs without immigration friction. Short-term research visas and talent exchanges would accelerate this pipeline. The platform must also promote convergence in digital governance. As each Quad member debates AI regulation, data localization, and cybersecurity policy, a common minimum standard—aligned loosely with OECD or ASEAN frameworks—would provide legal predictability for startups and multinationals alike. Digital public goods such as interoperable identity systems, data protection protocols, and cybersecurity audits could be shared across borders. STRATEGIC DIVIDEND A Quad Industrial Compact would transform the Indo-Pacific's soft-security architecture into an economic coalition. For India, it offers a bridge from aspiration to execution. For the U.S., it provides industrial leverage to complement its military presence. For Japan and Australia, it offers a hedge against economic overreliance on China. More than a diplomatic arrangement, the Compact would be a shared industrial scaffolding, a one of a kind industrial compact preempted by security. top videos View All The Quad now faces a choice: continue with fragmented coordination, or build an architecture resilient enough to outlast politics, absorb shocks, and shape the regional order for decades to come. (Aditya Sinha writes on macroeconomic and geopolitical issues. Akshat Singh is an independent policy consultant and previously was an associate fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington DC. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views) Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 30, 2025, 00:45 IST News opinion Opinion | A Quad Industrial Compact To Anchor US-India Economic Alignment
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
India, US push for trade pact as deadline nears
India and the US are engaged in intense trade negotiations to finalize a pact before the July 9 deadline, addressing contentious issues like tariffs and market access. While progress has been made, disagreements persist on matters such as patent laws and agricultural imports. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Hectic discussions are ongoing between India and the US to clinch a trade pact ahead of the July 9 deadline when the 90-day pause period for Washington's retaliatory tariffs comes to an and American trade negotiators have managed to find closure on many issues, and Indian trade officials have extended their visit to the US to conclude the talks."Both sides were clear in this round and not yielding on certain issues but have achieved closure on many grounds," said a person aware of the Delhi has stated that section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act is non-negotiable and will not be reviewed. The section prohibits the grant of 'evergreening' patents, which are additional patents for a drug with no therapeutic benefit and are seen to increase the term of a patent wants the entire 26% tariff to be rolled back whereas the US wants to sell genetically modified crops to India, a sensitive area for New and dairy sectors are "difficult and challenging areas for India. And India has not opened up dairy in any of its free trade pacts," said the last round of talks would discuss both the interim and first tranche of the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) which is aimed to be concluded by week, US President Donald Trump said a big trade deal may be coming up with India and asserted that the US would "open up" the Trump administration had also indicated that the July 9 deadline could be extended but the final decision rests with the the deadline is not extended, the tariffs would come to the April 2 level of 26% in the case of it is not extended, India may gain in some areas and lose in some others compared to other countries, but the US will also get affected because of the high tariffs, another official had said experts expect a limited trade pact similar to the US-UK mini trade deal where India could cut tariffs on automobiles along with a limited market access through tariff reductions and tariff-rate quotas on American ethanol, almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits and wine."This would leave out the broader free trade agreement issues such as services trade, intellectual property rights, and digital regulations for future negotiations," said a Delhi-based trade expert.
