&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When the whistleblower behind the Watergate scandal exposed himself. Who was 'Deep Throat'?
More than 30 years after the Watergate scandal rocked the United States, W Mark Felt, once the Associate Director of the US intelligence agency FBI, publicly revealed in 2005 that he had been the mysterious source known as 'Deep Throat.' AP
May 31 is remembered as a turning point in American political history, especially for those who remember the political storm that was Watergate.
In 2005, more than three decades after the Watergate scandal shook the foundations of the White House and led to President Richard Nixon's resignation, the secret source behind the exposé known only as 'Deep Throat' finally revealed his identity.
Meanwhile, back in 1962, Adolf Eichmann, a key architect of Adolf Hitler's Holocaust, was executed in Israel following his conviction for crimes against humanity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
If you are a history geek who loves to learn about important events from the past, Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today will be your one-stop destination to explore key events.
Here's a look at what made headlines on May 31.
When former FBI Assistant Director revealed himself as 'Deep Throat'
More than 30 years after the Watergate scandal rocked the United States, W Mark Felt, once the Associate Director of the US intelligence agency FBI , publicly revealed in 2005 that he had been the mysterious source known as 'Deep Throat.'
It was Felt's secret cooperation with Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein that played a vital role in exposing the Watergate scandal, which eventually led to President Richard Nixon 's resignation in 1974.
The Watergate scandal eventually led to President Richard Nixon's resignation in 1974. AP
Although there had long been speculation about his identity, Felt had always denied any involvement.
'I never leaked information to Woodward and Bernstein or to anyone else,' he wrote in his 1979 memoir.
Even as late as 1999, just six years before his confession, a then 91-year-old Felt told reporters, 'It would be contrary to my responsibility as a loyal employee of the FBI to leak information.'
Felt's motivation to leak secret info was rooted in his frustration. After the death of longtime FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, Felt had hoped to be named as Hoover's successor. But Nixon passed him over, and tensions escalated as the White House attempted to interfere with the FBI's Watergate investigation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
When Bob Woodward reached out to Felt for help, the veteran FBI official agreed, but only under strict conditions.
Felt wouldn't be quoted, not even anonymously. He refused to offer any new information and only confirmed what the reporters already knew. And above all, his identity had to remain under wraps. Woodward and Bernstein only contacted him for matters they deemed absolutely essential.
Washington Post reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward at work in 1973. AP
At first, they spoke over the phone. But as concerns about tapped lines grew, the pair came up with a system of signals and began meeting secretly in a parking garage in the dead of night.
Felt's eventual reveal came via an article in Vanity Fair, much to the surprise of Woodward and Bernstein, who had vowed to protect his identity until his death.
He died on December 18, 2008, at the age of 95.
When the architect of Holocaust was executed in Israel
On this day in 1962, Adolf Eichmann , a high-ranking Nazi official and one of the principal organisers of Adolf Hitler's Holocaust, was executed for his crimes against humanity in Israel.
Eichmann played a key role in implementing the so-called 'Final Solution,' the Nazis' plan to systematically exterminate the Jewish population.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He was tasked with coordinating the identification, rounding up, and deportation of millions of Jews from Nazi-occupied Europe to death camps. There, they were either gassed or worked until they died.
Eichmann performed his duties with chilling efficiency. Between three to four million Jews died in the extermination camps under his direction, and an additional two million were killed elsewhere.
Adolf Eichmann, a high-ranking Nazi official and one of the principal organisers of Adolf Hitler's Holocaust, was executed for his crimes against humanity in Israel. Image courtesy: The National World War II Mueseum
After the war, Eichmann was captured by American troops. But he managed to escape custody, moving secretly through Europe and eventually the Middle East.
By 1950, he had slipped into Argentina, then known for its relaxed immigration policies and reputation as a haven for former Nazi officials, where he assumed the false identity of Ricardo Klement.
In 1957, a German prosecutor passed a tip to Israeli authorities that Eichmann was alive and hiding in Argentina. Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, launched a covert mission.
On May 11, they made their move. As Eichmann walked home from a bus stop along Garibaldi Street, Mossad agents snatched him and took him to a safe house.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Nine days later, he was smuggled out of Argentina, heavily sedated and disguised as a crew member of an Israeli airline who had supposedly suffered a head injury. On May 23, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion went public with the shocking news: Eichmann was in Israeli custody.
Argentina protested, demanding his return. But Israel insisted that Eichmann's role as a war criminal gave them every right to put him on trial.
The proceedings began on April 11, 1961, in Jerusalem, marking the first time a trial was broadcast on television.
Eichmann faced 15 charges, including war crimes, crimes against the Jewish people, and crimes against humanity. He claimed he was merely following orders, but the court didn't buy it.
He was executed by hanging near Tel Aviv. His remains were cremated, and his ashes were scattered at sea.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
36 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
AP Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal is back in news. Mount Rushmore with the four presidents' faces is the center of new political debate over potential expansion. Then-President Donald Trump stands at Mount Rushmore National Memorial on July 3, 2020, near Keystone, S.D. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts. Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history. Also Read: Big Beautiful Bill Passed: What's in Trump's megabill and when will it go into effect? These Republicans voted against it The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response. In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage. Also Read: Michael Madsen Net Worth: Actor's cause of death, financial success, movies list, iconic roles and career Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on. What are the main reasons experts oppose adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe. Has anyone else supported adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.


India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Delhi Court orders complaint against woman who filed false rape case to extort money
New Delhi [India], July 4 (ANI): Delhi's Tis Hazari court has ordered to file a complaint against the woman who lodged a false rape case to extort the money from the accused. While acquitting the accused, the court noted that the woman met the man on a matrimonial website. She framed the accused on the pretext of a marital alliance. The court referred to the lines of American criminal defense attorney F. Lee Bailey, 'In court, the truth is often lost in the process. The oath is meant to protect it, but men lie, even under God.' 'The above adage squarely applies to the case herein, as we would see while I pen out this judgment,' the court said at the outset. Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Anuj Agrawal acquitted the accused and ordered a complaint against the woman for perjury for making false statements before the court. The court said, ' An acquittal would not serve the interest of justice, as the law must not only punish the guilty but also protect the dignity of an innocent.' ' It is evident from the record that the prosecutrix lied under oath, destroying the trust on which justice stands,' ASJ Agarwal pointed out in the judgment passed on July 2. He directed to send a complaint against her for offences of perjury be sent to the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (Central). As per the prosecution, the woman and the accused met on a matrimonial website in 2021. The accused started chatting with her. It was alleged that the accused met her first time in September 2021 and sexually molested her in his car. He allegedly took her nude pics with his mobile. Upon her protest, the accused promised to marry her and also promised to delete her photographs in the next meeting. It was also alleged that accused met her on her flat in October 14, 2021 where he committed forced vaginal and anal intercourse with her. He again took pics of her. Ironically, these photos were not recovered during forensic examination from the mobile phone of the accused. The court observed that her testimony is not only marred by contradictions but is inherently inconsistent, tainted, and full of concoctions. ' False rape accusations not only put unnecessary load on the overflowing dockets but also cause grave injustice to actual rape victims,' ASJ said in the judgement. After investigation police filed a charge sheet and stated that the woman had filed 4 cases of rape against other persons also. The judge said that an acquittal simpliciter would not subserve the interest of justice as the Law must not only punish the guilty- it must also protect the dignity of an innocent. ' The gravel has fallen in favour of the accused, but the echo of accusation lingers for society remembers the charge and not the verdict as in our social milieu, a false accusation of rape/sexual assault, leaves an indelible impression upon the social psyche which no judicial imprimatur can remove,' the court said. The court also noted that the accused was arrested even before registration of the FIR. A police official and investigation officer were in regular contact with the prosecutrix even before the registration of the FIR. ' It is clear that the personal liberty of the accused was curtailed (amounting to arrest in the eyes of law) the moment he was detained from his house by police officials,' the judge said. The judge pointed out that a police official had telephonic conversations with her 16-17 times between September 18 to October 24, 2021. The court said that the contention of the defence that concerned police officials were in 'cahoots'' with the prosecutrix so that they could extort money from the accused, cannot be brushed aside lightly. However, any action on this count is left to the Administrative discretion of a worthy Commissioner of Delhi Police who may, in his wisdom, look into the matter and take appropriate remedial action so that the cherished motto of Delhi Police Force 'shanti, seva, nyay' does not get belied, the court said in the judgement. (ANI)


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
From 1776 to 2025: US Prepares for 250th Independence anniversary
The United States marks its 249th anniversary of independence on July 4, 2025, commemorating the nation's official break from British rule in a federal holiday in 1941, Independence Day remains one of the most important national observances, honoring the adoption of the Declaration of Independence by the Continental New York to Los Angeles, Americans celebrate with fireworks, parades, concerts, and classic backyard barbecues. Towns and cities are adorned in red, white, and blue reflecting pride in American heritage and Washington, D.C. hosts the annual National Independence Day Parade, while local events across all 50 states bring communities OF JULY 4, 1776On July 4, 1776, the final draft of the Declaration of Independence — primarily authored by Thomas Jefferson — was formally adopted, though the decision to declare independence had been approved two days earlier, on July document's assertion that 'all men are created equal' laid the foundation for a republic built on freedom, self-determination, and individual the nation approaches its 250th birthday in 2026, the America250 initiative is planning a historic semi-quincentennial celebration. Preparations are underway for national events, historical exhibitions, and educational programs to mark this once-in-a-generation moment.- Ends