Patralekhaa plans to take ‘6-7 month' break; says Rajkummar Rao will be ‘amazing dad': 'He is a perfect partner'
and Patralekhaa are on cloud nine after sharing that they are expecting their first baby. The much-loved couple made the happy announcement with a sweet post on Instagram. Sharing a joint statement, they wrote, "Baby on the way - Patralekhaa and Rajkummar.
"
Now, Patralekhaa has opened up about this special time in her life, calling it one of the most beautiful phases she's ever experienced.
Taking a break to enjoy motherhood
Speaking about how she is preparing for the new arrival, she revealed she has decided to step away from work for a while. She told Hindustan Times, 'I'm not going to shoot for another 6-7 months now. I'm just going to be at home.'
Seeing Rajkummar as a caring dad
Rajkummar and Patralekhaa have been together for a long time.
They dated for over a decade before tying the knot on November 15, 2021. Their love story began back in 2014 when they met on the sets of 'CityLights'.
The 'Phule' actress recently spoke about how a recent trip gave her a glimpse of how Rajkummar will be as a father. She said, 'Every travel opens up another door for us as a couple, and we understand each other better. With New Zealand, I felt that Raj is going to be an amazing dad.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
One plan. Total peace of mind.
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
He really took care of me. In fact, he went out of his way to just figure out the food that I wanted to eat. He is a perfect partner, and that was reinforced during this trip.
'
New adventures with their baby
Even as they wait for their baby to arrive, the couple is already dreaming up exciting plans for the future. Patralekhaa revealed, 'Perhaps we can do some bungee jumping or something crazier with the baby."
Professional updates
While they wait for their bundle of joy, Rajkummar and Patralekhaa continue to stay busy with their careers. Rajkummar's latest film 'Maalik', a gangster drama where he stars alongside
Manushi Chhillar
, is currently playing in cinemas.
Patralekhaa was last seen in 'Phule', directed by Ananth Mahadevan, where she acted with Darsheel Safary,
Pratik Gandhi
, and Vinay Pathak.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amaal Mallik claims Anu Malik betrayed brother Daboo Malik, sabotaged his career: 'Every time my dad got a movie, he would go and snatch his work...'
Amaal Mallik reveals the intense professional rivalry between his father, Daboo Malik, and uncle, Anu Malik, alleging career sabotage driven by jealousy. He claims Anu undercut Daboo's opportunities, contributing to his depression and lack of recognition. Amaal also addresses his strained relationship with Anu and the MeToo allegations, emphasizing his commitment to ethical conduct in the industry. In an explosive revelation that lifts the lid on years of family tension and professional rivalry, composer Amaal Mallik has opened up about the struggles his father, Daboo Malik , faced within the music industry—allegedly at the hands of his own brother, Anu Malik . From claims of career sabotage and betrayal to deeply personal admissions about depression and strained family ties, Amaal's candid interview paints a raw and emotional portrait of ambition, legacy, and what it takes to rewrite a narrative built on years of professional hurt. In a candid chat with Siddharth Kannan, Amaal opened up about the complex relationship between his father Daboo Malik and uncle Anu Malik. While describing them as inseparable 'mad brothers' on a personal level, Amaal revealed a different story professionally. He claimed that Anu Malik's jealousy often turned intense, leading him to sabotage Daboo Malik's career. According to Amaal, Anu would undercut his father by offering to work on films for minimal fees—or even for free—just to prove he was the superior composer in the family. The composer further claimed that Anu Malik and even composer duo Sajid-Wajid played a role in sabotaging his father Daboo Malik's career. He said Daboo faced betrayal from within the family and the music industry, which deeply affected him and became the reason Amaal was determined to succeed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo He also revealed that filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt had almost finalised Daboo Malik for the music of Murder, but Anu Malik allegedly stepped in and took over the project—one of many instances, according to Amaal, where his father's work was undercut. These repeated professional setbacks deeply affected Daboo, pushing him into depression between the ages of 32 and 45. Amaal, who witnessed this as a child, said it became his driving force to succeed in music. He shared that despite working on over 70 films, Daboo was never given due credit and was often referred to merely as 'Anu Malik's brother. ' Amaal added that his mission has always been to change that narrative, so that people instead recognise Anu as the uncle of Armaan and Amaal Mallik. Amaal further alleged that Anu Malik didn't just interfere in his father Daboo Malik's career but has tried to undercut his work too. He claimed that Anu often inserts himself into projects Amaal is associated with, even after public announcements. Despite this, Amaal acknowledged that Anu has shown him respect and praised his achievements. The difficult history between Anu and Daboo deeply influenced Amaal's own approach to family ties—leading him and his brother, singer Armaan Malik , to make a conscious decision to never become professional rivals. Opening up about his equation with Anu Malik, he revealed that while he remains respectful in public settings, their relationship is strained due to past professional conflicts. He admitted he shares no personal bond with Anu's family and hasn't met them in years, even choosing to skip social gatherings. Though Anu Malik did attend Armaan's wedding, Amaal clarified that their dynamic is more of a professional rivalry than a personal one. The composer also addressed the sexual harassment allegations made against Anu Malik during the MeToo movement. He stated that he chose not to speak up or support Anu at the time, as he does not consider him family and was deeply embarrassed by the accusations. Emphasizing that they never shared a personal bond, Amaal said he believes there could be some truth to the claims, pointing out that multiple women coming forward likely indicates more than just coincidence. Mallik recalled a moment when his father asked if he feared being named in the MeToo movement. He assured him there was no reason to worry, stating he could never be the kind of person who demands physical favours in exchange for work. Amaal added that every female artist he has collaborated with has always felt safe around him.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Queen Elizabeth was deeply troubled by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's relationship in her final months, claims royal insider
Despite public displays of grace and familial warmth, Queen Elizabeth II was reportedly far less optimistic about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 's relationship behind closed doors. In the final months of her life, the Queen is said to have expressed serious concerns about the couple's marriage and its impact on the monarchy, according to a royal author and insider sources. Concerns Voiced in Private As per RadarOnline, although Harry and Meghan have often spoken fondly of their relationship with the late monarch, insiders now suggest that Queen Elizabeth had strong reservations about the couple. Royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith claimed the Queen spoke candidly about her misgivings in private, describing Harry meeting Meghan as a 'complete catastrophe.' These remarks reportedly came during an informal gathering at Balmoral Castle in Scotland, just weeks before her passing in September 2022. Guests present during one of the Queen's final social evenings said she was uncharacteristically blunt when discussing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. One source recalled her saying she felt the situation was deeply regrettable, especially given her declining health at the time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo Early Doubts Before the Wedding Doubts about the relationship allegedly began well before the couple's wedding in May 2018. The Queen is believed to have viewed Harry as emotionally vulnerable and overly influenced by Meghan. According to one of her close relatives, there was a general sense within the family that Meghan had orchestrated the relationship to suit her own ambitions. The Queen reportedly remarked that Harry was 'besotted and weak,' which fueled her concern that he had rushed into the marriage without full awareness of the consequences. The Megxit Fallout Tensions between the couple and the royal family only escalated in the years that followed. In 2020, Harry and Meghan announced their decision to step back from royal duties and relocate to California. Queen Elizabeth attempted to mediate the situation, hoping to find a solution that would keep the couple within the fold. However, Harry and Meghan chose to proceed with their departure, citing a desire for financial independence and relief from relentless media scrutiny. Their subsequent 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey further deepened the rift. In the interview, the couple shared allegations of racism within the royal family and spoke of Meghan's struggles with mental health — claims that reverberated around the world and put Buckingham Palace under significant pressure. In her final months, Queen Elizabeth is said to have reflected on how events had unfolded. While she publicly maintained a message of love and support — once stating that Harry, Meghan, and their son Archie would always remain beloved family members — those close to her say she was saddened by the fallout and the choices made by the couple.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively criticizes Justin Baldoni's legal team for creating a ‘public spectacle' amid court battle
Blake Lively is fighting back against Justin Baldoni's team. She alleges they are turning her lawsuit into a media circus. Lively wants her deposition private. Baldoni's lawyer suggested a public deposition at Madison Square Garden. Lively's team calls it a publicity stunt. They want to prevent harassment. A trial is scheduled for March 2026. The legal battle continues. Blake Lively is pushing back hard against what she describes as an attempt to turn a serious legal matter into a media circus. As her lawsuit against It Ends With Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni over sexual harassment and retaliation moves forward, the actress has filed a new motion accusing his legal team of deliberately courting publicity. In her latest filing, Lively has requested that her deposition be held on July 17 at a confidential location, with all attendees identified in advance—an effort to maintain privacy and prevent further media frenzy surrounding the case. The legal tension escalated after a lawyer for Justin —whose counterclaims against Blake Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for extortion and defamation were dismissed last month—previously insisted that Blake's deposition be conducted publicly, arguing that the public had a right to witness it. This move further fueled Blake's concerns about the case being turned into a media spectacle. In May, Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, stirred controversy by telling People magazine that Blake Lively's deposition should be held at Madison Square Garden, streamed or ticketed, and the proceeds donated to domestic abuse charities—further fueling Blake's accusation that the legal team was trying to turn the case into a 'public spectacle.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dubai's Next Icon: Experience Binghatti Aquarise Luxury Binghatti Developers FZE Learn More Undo Following the court filing, Lively's representatives strongly criticized Justin Baldoni's legal team for attempting to sensationalize a serious legal matter. In a statement to People magazine, they emphasized that Blake is ready for her upcoming deposition, but insisted it should be conducted like any other in the case—privately and with due decorum. They accused Baldoni's lawyer of repeatedly trying to turn the proceedings into a media spectacle, referencing the outrageous suggestion to televise the deposition at Madison Square Garden. 'This is a serious matter of sexual harassment and retaliation and it deserves to be treated as such,' they stated. In the latest court filing, Blake, 37, has urged the judge to prevent Justin and his legal team from choosing the location of her upcoming deposition. Her legal representatives argued that Baldoni's team appears intent on orchestrating a "harassing publicity stunt" by potentially exposing her to paparazzi and inviting media figures or social media influencers to attend. The filing further accused the defendants of exploiting even the mere anticipation of Blake's deposition to stir public and media interest from the very start of the legal battle. Blake's legal team also raised concerns about safety and privacy, citing the high-profile nature of the case and the sensitive nature of her retaliation claims. They argued that without a protective order, the deposition could devolve into a media spectacle, drawing individuals who may pose security risks and further compromising the integrity of the legal process. Lively's lawyers called the motion a 'reasonable request' aimed at preventing harassment, intimidation, and potential threats—both verbal and physical. They accused Justin Baldoni's team of attempting to stage another PR stunt by using the deposition as a spectacle, rather than respecting the serious nature of the ongoing legal proceedings. A trial is set to take place in March 2026.
