Post office in Plains, Georgia, to be renamed to honor Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter
The post office in Plains, Georgia — home to just over 500 people — is set to be renamed in honor of the town's most famous residents: the late former President Jimmy Carter and First Lady Rosalynn Carter.
The Plains Post Office will be renamed the Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office on Wednesday after Congress passed a bill last year implementing the change. The post office's new name will be celebrated with a ceremony at the Plains Community Center.
"This dedication ceremony will celebrate the Carters' significant contributions to society, and the building will serve as a lasting symbol of their legacy and inspire future generations to engage in service and advocacy for those in need," the Post Office said in a statement, according to Fox 5 Atlanta.
The former president grew up in Plains and returned there after losing his reelection bid in 1980. The Carters are buried on the grounds of the former president's childhood home and farm, which has since been preserved as a national historical park.
The couple's son, James 'Chip' Carter III, is expected to attend the Wednesday celebration. Rosalynn Carter's sister, Lillian Allethea Smith Wall, is also set to make an appearance, according to local outlet 11Alive.
Georgia Representative Sanford Bishop introduced a bill to rename the post office in September. Georgia Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock seconded the bill.
"Renaming the post office in Plains, Georgia, in honor of President Jimmy Carter and First Lady Rosalynn Carter is a tribute to their lifelong service," Ossoff said at the time. "The Carters have left an indelible mark on our nation and the world. A post office named in their honor in Plains is a small but fitting tribute to their legacy."
The former president died at 100 in December 2024, one month before the bill was signed into law. The former first lady died at 96 in November 2023.
Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, served in the White House from 1977 to 1981. He is known for both his political career, and humanitarian service after leaving Washington, including building homes for Habitat for Humanity.
Former President Joe Biden hailed Jimmy Carter's 'strength of character' as he delivered his eulogy in January.
'A white southern Baptist who led us on civil rights, a decorated Navy veteran who brokered peace, a brilliant nuclear engineer who led on nuclear nonproliferation, a hard-working farmer who championed conservation and clean energy ... through it all, he showed us how character and faith start with ourselves and then flows to others,' Biden said of the former president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court to consider reviving lawsuit restricting evangelizing in small Mississippi town
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Thursday it will consider whether to revive a lawsuit from a man barred from evangelizing outside a small-town Mississippi amphitheater after authorities say he shouted insults at people over a loudspeaker. Gabriel Olivier, an evangelical Christian, says restricting him from public property violated his religious and free speech rights, but a legal Catch-22 has barred him from challenging the law in court. Lower courts found he couldn't file a civil-rights lawsuit because he'd been arrested, and instead needed to file under habeas corpus, a legal remedy open to prisoners. But because he was ticketed rather than imprisoned, his lawyers say that option wasn't open either, effectively denying him a day in court. The city of Brandon, Mississippi, on the other hand, says the restrictions aren't about religious speech, but rather about limiting disturbances caused when he and his group yelled insults like 'Jezebel,' 'nasty,' and 'drunkards" at people passing by. The ordinance restricts demonstrations near the amphitheater but does allow him to preach from a designated 'protest zone," and has already survived another lawsuit, the city said. The city says the case is about Olivier and his group's 'desire to have their preferred method of protest, without regard for the rights or interests of anyone else.' Olivier's attorneys say he was engaging in respectful and protected speech at the time of his arrest, and the case centers on a key legal issue affecting free speech across the political spectrum. 'Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court,' said Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO for First Liberty Institute, which is representing him along with attorney Allyson Ho of the firm Gibson Dunn. 'Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans.' The court is expected to hear arguments in the fall.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans give Trump a ‘Big Beautiful' July 4 by passing Medicaid-slashing megabill despite GOP rift
The House of Representatives on Thursday passed President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs, after a whirlwind 24 hours of last-minute arm twisting of holdout Republicans — and a record-breaking floor speech from Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. The final vote was a narrow margin of 218-214, with every Democrat and two Republicans —Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick — voting against the measure. After Jeffries wrapped his eight-hour and 44-minute delaying tactic — which surpassed former GOP Speaker Kevin McCarthy's 'magic minute' speech record of eight hours and 32 minutes, set in 2021 when the House passed President Joe Biden's 'Build Back Better Act' — the House finally commenced its vote on Trump's bill. The "magic minute" procedure grants members unlimited time to speak after debate on a bill has concluded. 'We have a big job to finish,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before.' The bill will now be sent to Trump by the July 4 deadline he'd insisted upon with congressional Republicans in the House and Senate. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters after its passage that Trump would be signing the legislation at 5 pm on Friday in what she described as 'a big, beautiful signing ceremony' at the White House.' Leavitt said the bill's passage marked a 'victorious day for the American people' and predicted that the legislation would 'create an economic boom for the United States of America.' 'We're going to continue to bring in revenue, drive down our deficit, and we'll have more money back into the pockets of the American people. And this bill is an encapsulation of all of the policies that the president campaigned on and the American people voted on on Nov. 5 and entrusted the president, and Republicans, to enact. She called it 'a great day for our country and for the American people.' A senior White House official who worked on pushing the bill through Congress called the tax cut and spending package 'a historic achievement for the Republican Party and for President Trump' because the voluminous bill 'satisfies virtually every major campaign promise that President Trump made' during his 2024 campaign. 'It represents his keeping of his commitments to the American people, everything that we talked about, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime pay, no tax on seniors' Social Security, to securing the border, rebuilding our military. It's all in this bill,' said the official, who added that the stock markets appeared to be 'loving' the legislation because they were closing at all-time highs ahead of the July 4 holiday. It all came to a head after a day of grumbling from a handful of conservative Republicans who criticized the Senate version of the bill that was handed back to the House for passage just in time to meet Trump's July 4 deadline. But after meeting with the president and receiving promises from the White House — and an all-caps threat from Trump on Truth Social overnight — members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, voted to push the bill through. Throughout the process, the group of rabble-rousers has often held out their votes, only to fold after speaking with Trump. Still, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, a member of the Freedom Caucus, insisted this was not a concession. 'The reason we have credibility, they know we'll vote 'no,'' Norman told The Independent. Norman said that he was disappointed that wind and solar tax credits or the $7,5000 tax credit for electric vehicles from the Inflation Reduction Act, the signature climate law signed by Joe Biden, were not completely phased out in the legislation. 'With that being said, we had enough assurance that the president was going to deal with them in his own way,' Norman said. 'I feel perfectly comfortable with that, which I wasn't before.' House members scrambled to make it to Washington after severe thunderstorms and inclement weather delayed travel for many from both parties. Some members drove to D.C. while Democrats held digital town halls to criticize the legislation. The vote came after the Senate spent a marathon 27 hours in the two days beforehand voting on amendments before the measure was tied at 50-50. Vice President JD Vance came in to cast the deciding tie-breaker. House Speaker Mike Johnson limited the number of amendments to get the bill to the president's desk. The bill's passage did not come easy, though. In the afternoon, the House held a vote to amend the rules for passage of the bill, which turned out to be the longest in the chamber's history. But Republicans soldiered on. Speaker Johnson called into Fox News in between whipping votes to reassure people the bill could pass by the July 4 deadline imposed by Trump. The rule vote finally passed at around 3.30am on Wednesday morning 219-213, with Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick the only member of the GOP to break ranks as the rest of the party's holdouts were persuaded to fall in line to set up a final floor vote. 'The bill is going to pass, they're going to vote for it, they're not opposed to the bill,' House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith told The Independent. 'Don't allow perfection to get in the way of greatness,' he said. 'And that is why they will vote for this bill, and that is why the president will be signed into law on July 4 and record that. See if I'm right.' The bill is one of the most sweeping pieces of Republican domestic policy legislation in history. Not only does it extend the 2017 tax cuts that Trump signed in his first presidency; it also includes money to hire 10,000 new agents for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and 3,000 Border Patrol agents, a core tenet of Trump's promise to conduct 'mass deportations' of undocumented immigrants. It also includes money to construct the barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. The legislation further allows for more oil exploration and a massive increase in military spending. At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. The bill would require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work for Medicaid benefits and, in the coming years, would cap the level at which states can tax medical providers such as hospitals and nursing homes. The American Hospital Association warned it could lead to the closing of rural hospitals, which serve many Republican congressional districts. The act also imposes work requirements for SNAP recipients for able-bodied adults without dependent children. But it lowers the age at which children are considered dependent to 14 years old and would require states with high rates of overpayment or underpayment to shoulder part of the cost of administering SNAP. The legislation remains wildly unpopular, with polling showing a large amount of Americans disapprove of it. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr., a Democrat who represents a district that also voted for Trump in 2024, said his district would be hit hard by the legislation. 'But I still feel, unfortunately, that people don't react until they feel the pain, and they're going to feel it pretty quick for this with this bill,' he told The Independent. Democrats will likely campaign against the bill in the coming months ahead of the midterm election, hoping to criticize the GOP for taking away healthcare benefits as a way to extend tax cuts. Republicans for their part already do not want to talk about the unpopular parts of the bill. When The Independent asked Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska about the side deal brokered by his Sen. Lisa Murkowski to shield the state from many of the provisions for SNAP and Medicaid during the rule vote, he did not speak and bolted onto the House floor. A second White House official credited Trump with being 'deeply involved' in both crafting the bill and helping move it through a narrowly-divided House and Senate along with help from his economic team. The official called Trump 'the motive force behind this legislation' based on his 'unique and powerful relationship with lawmakers' going back to the transition period after he won last year's election, during which he spent 'dinner after dinner' engaging with members. 'The President's focus on relationships carried us through in kind of a cascade here, when it came to be crunch time and the President was asking people to take tough votes, to come together, to unify, and ultimately, through late night phone calls,' they said. 'He is the omnipresent force behind this legislation, obviously.' The official added that Vice President JD Vance had been a 'key player' as well, including by 'working behind the scenes constantly in the Senate, hearing from senators, understanding their concerns, [and] making sure that the White House was responsive to them.'
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘If you want Medicaid, get a f***ing job!' Republicans take hard line in support of Trump bill despite constituent worries
Nancy Mace grabbed her team, hopped in a van and raced back to Washington in her pajamas Wednesday to vote on President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — driving through stormy weather after scores of flights into D.C. were canceled. Mace, who is currently weighing a run for governor of South Carolina, knows that she needs the president's endorsement to win in a state that overwhelmingly supported him in 2024. So the mad dash, and the show she put on social media about it all, makes sense politically. But while the audience of one in the White House will appreciate the effort, many constituents back home may be far less pleased. That's because the Trump megabill forces states to carry part of the cost of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, if they have high rates of overpaying or underpaying recipients. And Mace sounds ready to throw some pain in the direction of her home state in the name of fighting 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'So under some of the provisions, our state may have to pay fines of upwards of $300 million if we don't get the fraudulent payments for SNAP under control,' she told The Independent. The same goes for Medicaid. 'But if you're talking about able-bodied workers,' she continued, 'my policy is, if you're an able-bodied person and you want Medicaid? Get a f***ing job.' The Trump bill also puts rural hospitals at risk due to changes in how states can raise money for Medicaid. In Fiscal Year 2024, South Carolina had a 9.25 percent error rate for SNAP, according to statistics from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. According to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, 64.7 percent of families in South Carolina on Medicaid have a full-time worker in their family. 'We're gonna be fined $300 million a year if our government doesn't get its s*** together,' Mace said. 'If I run for governor, you can be damn sure that's No. 1 on my list.' Many Americans continue to feel ambivalent of the bill. Quinnipiac University released a poll last week showing that 55 percent of Americans oppose the bill based on what they have heard. Americans are about evenly split on the work requirements, with 47 percent supporting work requirements and 46 percent opposing them. That could complicate the prospects for ambitious Republicans. New York Republican Rep. Mike Lawler, who represents a district that Democratic former Vice President Kamala Harris won in last year's presidential election, echoed the sentiment. Like Mace, he is considering a run for governor and has long complained about the cap that the 2017 Trump tax cuts put on the State and Local Tax Deduction, commonly known as SALT But Lawler said that the goal of the Trump legislation is to get states to run their programs properly. 'That's the objective, to get the program fixed so they should be working towards it,' he told The Independent. New York has a 14.09 percent error rate for SNAP. Republicans have long called for work requirements for social safety net programs, with some policy successes. But the current bill's work and cost-sharing provisions became a sticking point during the Senate debate. In the Senate, Republicans cut a deal with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose state has an inordinately high error rate partially because of its rural population, to exempt it state from the cost-sharing part of the bill, which Democrats excoriated. But Rep. Buddy Carter, who is running for the Republican nomination to challenge Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia, defended the change in policy. 'We improved the program,' he told The Independent. 'We made sure that people who are on there should be on there, they're going to be off of that. Now we're going to make it better for those who truly need it.' Carter is running to represent a state with a large error rate of 15.65 percent. But Democrats say this will hurt states' ability to provide SNAP benefits. Rep. Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic nominee for governor in New Jersey, specifically said it was unfair, 'especially from a state that sends $70 billion more to the federal government than we get back. 'If they're not going to run their programs, why are we paying taxes?' Sherrill told The Independent.
