
Fires drove record loss of world's forests last year, ‘frightening' data shows
The destruction of the world's forests reached the highest level ever recorded in 2024, driven by a surge in fires caused by global heating, according to 'frightening' new data.
From the Brazilian Amazon to the Siberian taiga, Earth's forests disappeared at a record rate last year, losing an area the size of Italy to agriculture, fires, logging and mining, according to analysis from the University of Maryland hosted on Global Forest Watch.
In tropical regions, home to the most biodiverse and carbon-dense forests on the planet, fire became the leading driver of loss for the first time since global records began. However, fire is not a natural part of tropical ecosystems. Boreal forests in Canada and Siberia continued to burn last year.
Prof Matt Hansen, co-director at the University of Maryland's Glad Lab, who led the analysis, described the new figures as 'frightening', while Elizabeth Goldman, co-director of Global Forest Watch, said the update was 'unlike anything we've seen in over 20 years of data'.
In 2024, forest loss in Brazil reached rates far above any level recorded under the far-right president Jair Bolsonaro, fuelled by fire and the worst drought on record in the Amazon. The country accounted for 42% of all primary rainforest loss in the tropics, losing more than 25,000 sq km (10,000 sq miles). The data differs from Brazil's official statistics, which uses a different definition of deforestation that does not include fire.
In Bolivia, the loss of previously untouched forest continued to rise, ranking second behind Brazil in overall loss for the first time, driven by drought, fire and government policies promoting agricultural expansion for soya, cattle and sugar cane. The loss of Bolivia's primary forest has increased nearly fivefold since 2020, reaching more than 14,000 sq km (1.4m hectares).
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Congo-Brazzaville, loss of pristine rainforests reached the highest levels recorded. The countries are home to the Congo basin rainforest, the world's second largest after the Amazon.
At the Cop26 climate conference in Glasgow, more than 140 world leaders pledged to halt deforestation by the end of the decade, but less than four years later countries are way off track: forest loss must fall by 20% a year from 2024 levels to meet the target by 2030.
'The signal in these data is particularly frightening,' said Hansen 'Rising global temperatures are making forests hotter and drier, and as a result, more likely to burn. Given human ignition, even remote rainforests can burn uncontrolled.
'We have a lot of work to do to confront such a widespread, destructive and increasing fire dynamic.'
Goldman called the record-breaking losses 'a global red alert'.
She said: '[It is] a collective call to action for every country, every business and every person who cares about a livable planet. Our economies, our communities, our health – none of it can survive without forests.'
Of the 20 countries with the largest areas of pristine forest, 17 are now losing trees at a faster rate than when the 2021 Glasgow deal was signed.
But despite the record loss, there were areas of hope. The loss of primary forest in Indonesia and Malaysia remained relatively low, with the latter dropping out of the top 10 for the first time.
Prof Peter Potapov, co-director of Maryland's Glad Lab, said the world risked entering a dangerous new cycle.
'2024 was the worst year on record for fire-driven forest loss, breaking the record set just last year. If this trend continues, it could permanently transform critical natural areas and unleash large amounts of carbon – intensifying climate change and fuelling even more extreme fires.
'This is a dangerous feedback loop we cannot afford to trigger further,' he said.
Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
S&P 500, Nasdaq futures climb to record highs on trade optimism
June 30 (Reuters) - Futures tracking the S&P 500 and Nasdaq touched record highs on Monday, as optimism over U.S. trade negotiations with its key partners helped support upward momentum in markets. Shares of technology heavyweights rose premarket after Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. tech firms, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. Shares of Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab edged up in the range of 0.6% and 1.7%. The benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC), opens new tab rose to all-time highs on Friday, as bets of deeper U.S. interest rate cuts and renewed optimism around AI helped markets rebound from the months-long tumult sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies and geopolitical tensions. Focus now shifts to a July 9 deadline for countries to reach deals with the United States or see tariffs spike higher, but Trump has said he could extend the tariff deadline or "make it shorter". Investors are also looking into economic data and fiscal policy developments to see if the latest bull run in U.S. stocks can continue. U.S. Senate Republicans pushed President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill forward in a marathon weekend session. Senators are scheduled to start voting on a potentially long list of amendments to the bill beginning at 9 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT) Monday. Key economic data releases this week include monthly non-farm payrolls and the Institute for Supply Management's survey on manufacturing and services sectors for June. Several U.S. central bank officials including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell are scheduled to speak later this week. A raft of soft economic data and expectations that Trump will replace Powell with someone dovish have pushed up bets of rate cuts from the Fed this year. By 5:48 a.m. ET (0948 GMT), S&P 500 e-minis were up 24.5 points, or 0.39%. Nasdaq 100 e-minis climbed 137 points, or 0.6% and Dow e-minis added 205 points, or 0.46%. Despite record highs for U.S. stocks, the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow are set for their weakest first-half performances since 2022. Among other movers, shares of big U.S. banks rose after the Federal Reserve's annual "stress test" found twenty-two of the largest U.S. banks are well-positioned to weather a hypothetical severe economic downturn and continue lending. The optimistic showing could lead to banks upping how much excess capital they plan to distribute to shareholders via dividends or stock buybacks. Shares of JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab, Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab, Citigroup (C.N), opens new tab and Wells Fargo (WFC.N), opens new tab rose in the range of 0.4% and 1.9%. Juniper Networks (JNPR.N), opens new tab rose 8.4% after the U.S. Justice Department settled its lawsuit challenging server maker Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE.N), opens new tab all-cash acquisition of the networking gear maker for $14 billion. Hewlett Packard Enterprise shares rose 5.6%.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Disabled Amazon workers in corporate jobs allege ‘systemic discrimination'
Disabled corporate workers at Amazon have accused the company of engaging in 'systemic discrimination', aggressively quashing their attempts to organize, and using artificial intelligence systems that they allege do not comply with US disability laws. At the center of the Amazon workers' complaints are allegations that the company has denied requests for accommodations for disabled staff in an 'automated' or 'semi automated' way and have allegedly repeatedly removed messages and a petition from an employee Slack channel. Amazon disputes allegations that it discriminates against disabled workers. A 31 May letter sent on behalf of a group of more than 200 disabled workers to top executives, including Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy, claimed the company was fundamentally out of step with federal requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the 1990 civil rights law that protects people against discrimination based on disabilities. The letter cited policies related to return-to-office mandates, which the letter said were being pushed on disabled workers who previously were allowed to work from home based on medical recommendations, accommodation procedures and accessibility. Among other issues, it raised concerns that employee decisions around accommodation were being driven by AI processes that – one source claimed – do not necessarily follow ADA rules. One disabled corporate employee who had feared retribution for coming forward about workplace complaints told the Guardian they had been fired without explanation over the course of being interviewed for this story. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity while they were in the process of seeking new employment. 'After the removal of the messages on Slack and my firing, others are now afraid. I talk with them and they are terrified about Amazon doing this,' the person said. The employee who was fired was one of the leaders of a campaign to organize disabled workers. An email the person sent to senior Amazon managers on 6 June, which was seen by the Guardian, accused the company of violating federal labor rules that ensure rights to collective bargaining and disability-related rights to share information with others who have a disability. 'My Slack access was removed preventing me from sending updates, coordinating and engaging in [National Labor Relations Act] protected activities,' the person said. The Guardian was also provided screenshots of Slack messages and a petition that appears to have been removed from an Amazon employee Slack channel on disability and accessibility issues. Amazon did not dispute claims that the messages had been removed. The company said the messages were a violation of company policy to use Amazon's electronic systems for solicitation purposes. Amazon did dispute claims that it had retaliated against employees for seeking to organize on labor issues. A spokesperson said: 'Amazon respects employees' rights to organize and doesn't interfere with these rights. We don't discriminate or retaliate against employees for engaging in organizing activities.' In the 33-page letter to Jassy and other senior Amazon executives, the disabled workers said: 'The systemic discrimination, retaliation, and policy failures documented here not only violate the ADA but also erode trust, harm individual health, and compromise the company's integrity. We demand immediate action to reform these policies, foster a truly inclusive workplace, and uphold the rights of all employees.' The letter cited internal polls conducted by the group of Amazon employees, with 93% of respondents with disabilities claiming that current policies have harmed them. Another 71% of respondents claimed that more than half of their job accommodation requests had been denied or were unmet, and 92% reported a lack of an accessible job accommodation process. 'Employees requesting accommodations often encounter a lack of meaningful dialogue – requests are ignored, denied without explanation, or dismissed via automated systems,' the letter stated. The workers made a public petition to Amazon executives to address their concerns shortly after the email, earlier this month. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion In response to a request for comment, Amazon said an external survey of what it called a small number of unverified employees was not reflective of the opinions of everyone with a disability and that it was inaccurate to suggest otherwise. The company also said its disability and leave services team ensured that employees had access to accommodations and adjustments and that the decisions were driven by empathy. The process was not automated or semi-automated, Amazon said, and it denied that AI had been used for case processing or decision-making in the accommodation process. The disabled Amazon workers are overwhelmingly corporate, not warehouse, workers. People who spoke to the Guardian on the condition of anonymity were particularly angry about their claims that efforts to organize on Slack – which they said was a modern-day version of the office water cooler – were being denied and suppressed, including by the company allegedly removing posts that sought out workers' opinions. 'The company is cracking down, and they're very concerned, and many people are being told not to post here,' claimed one Amazon employee. Another employee who no longer works at Amazon claimed management had dismissed disabled workers' complaints as being 'disruptive and unproductive', and had undermined the first-ever corporate union collective bargaining group. The National Labor Relations Board, the federal agency that is meant to protect federal worker rights, has recently weighed in on employers suppressing workers' organizing efforts on workplace Slack accounts: in October 2024, the NLRB issued a complaint against Apple, alleging the company was interfering with workers' rights to collectively advocate for improved working conditions on Slack. In a statement at the time, Apple said it disagreed with the claims. The case was indefinitely postponed by the NLRB in March 2025; the reasons for that move are unclear. In 2023, Amazon touted a ranking of 'best place to work for disability inclusion' from a non-profit it funds. But the company has also faced a handful of legal challenges related to its treatment of disabled workers. A 2023 report by United for Respect alleged Amazon's warehouse workers face systemic barriers in obtaining reasonable job accommodations for their disabilities or workplace injuries at the company. A 2024 lawsuit was filed against Amazon for allegedly failing to provide a sign language interpreter to a deaf employee at a warehouse in California. Amazon has denied the claim and the case in still being litigated. Pamela Hayter, a former Amazon employee, accused Amazon in 2023 of retaliating against her for advocating for remote work in response to Amazon's return-to-office mandate. Amazon has claimed she had performance issues.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Canada drops digital services tax to help restart US trade talks
Canada has scrapped a tax on big US technology firms, just hours before it was due to come into force, to allow trade talks between the two countries to Friday, US President Donald Trump called off negotiations over a trade deal, describing the tax as a "blatant attack", and threatened higher tariffs on imports from response, Canada has said it is removing the tax, which should have come into effect on digital services tax (DST) would have meant US tech giants including Amazon, Meta, Google and Apple, facing a 3% charge on Canadian revenue above $20m. Canada's finance minister François-Philippe Champagne issued a statement saying the tax would be rescinded."The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," it said."Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation," the statement countries, including the UK, are changing how they tax large multinational technology firms, which have millions of customers and advertisers around the world, but high corporation tax bills due to the way their businesses are was estimated that Canada's tax would cost the tech giants more than $2bn a year in who has forged a close relationship with tech company owners in his second term in office, has pushed back against such described Canada's policy as "egregious" adding "economically we have such power over Canada".Three quarters of Canada's goods exports go to the US, worth more than $400bn a year, while Canada takes just 17% of US climbdown comes after a rollercoaster few months for US-Canada after taking office Trump threatened to impose sweeping new tariffs and even to annex the US's northern neighbour. The antagonism helped propel Canada's Liberal Party, led by former central banker, Mark Carney, back into power. Since then there appeared to be a rapprochement, with Canada and the US saying they aimed to agree new trade terms by 21 July.