NBA Rumors: Damian Lillard Hated Bucks Tenure, Preferred Trade From Portland To Different Team
The future Hall of Famer hit free agency for the first time in his career this summer. While he likely will miss all of the 2025-26 NBA season, he had many suitors, including contenders, around the league. Yet, the nine-time All-Star stunned NBA observers when he chose to return to the franchise where he became a superstar, the Trail Blazers.
Damian Lillard stats (2024-25): 24.9 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 7.1 APG, 1.2 SPG, 38% 3PT
In a new edition of the Blazers Focused podcast, Trail Blazers insiders Aaron Fentress and Craig Birnbach explained that Lillard's deep love for his children played a massive role in his decision. Despite the Blazers being a team that will fight for a play-in spot in upcoming seasons, and other high-profile point guards like Jrue Holiday on the roster, Lillard preferred to be close to his children and back in a city he loves.
However, there was another interesting bit of intelligence that came out of the conversation. 'Also, he was not happy in Milwaukee,' Fentress said. 'He didn't want to go there in the first place; he wanted to go to Miami. He relented and went to Milwaukee because his agent talked him into it.'
Damian Lillard contract: Three years, $70 million
The NBA great hit the open market this offseason after Milwaukee shockingly bout out the rest of his contract. That decision was made so they could add Indiana Pacers star Myles Turner to the roster and not have a massive luxury tax bill. Lillard will be paid $22.6 million annually by the Bucks over the next five years.
He signed a three-year deal worth $70 million with Portland last week.
Also Read:: Updated 2025 NBA Power Rankings: Evaluating all 30 teams' offseason performance as of July
Related Headlines
5 NFL Offseason Moves That Teams Will Regret
NASCAR Xfinity results: BetRivers 200 winner, full NASCAR Xfinity Series stage results
Richard Jefferson Reveals Why It 'Sucks' to be Teammates with LeBron James
NBA Rumors: New York Knicks, Sacramento Kings Eyeing All-Star Guard
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
What happened to NBA logos?
What happened to NBA logos? Once upon a time, the graphic design of the league reflected the zeitgeist of the era, a window into the culture intertwined with the Association at any given time in the history of the league. But over time, a creeping ethos of the market began to take over, with financial concerns eventually supplanting the cultural aspect of the logos used by the teams and the NBA more generally. From the endless uniforms to the courts themselves, what once were a bit of an institution unto themselves have become something of a shell of themselves over time as capitalism and the almighty dollar began to dictate how logos would look more than anything else. The eponymous host behind the "Kofie" YouTube channel put together a clip taking a closer look at this trend. Check it out below!
Fast Company
a few seconds ago
- Fast Company
‘Customer satisfaction at the end of the day': TikTok users push Costco's return policy to the limit with wild refunds
Costco is well-known for its no-questions-asked return policy. Now some shoppers are taking it upon themselves to test the limits of that policy. 'Returning my slime stained carpet to Costco,' one TikTok user posted earlier this month. Costco offers customers an unlimited grace period to return most purchases for a full refund, earning the wholesaler a top-six spot among stores with exceptional return policies, according to a 2023 ranking by U.S. News and World Report. While the customer received a full refund for the ruined rug, the comments section on the TikTok video was divided. 'That's embarrassing for you,' one person wrote. 'This just seems wrong,' another added. For others, it's simply about getting their money's worth. 'I could be mad but in this economy . . . hell yeah,' one comment read. Even Costco employees chimed in. 'Our upper management has said Costco makes way too much money. [T]hey would rather take the hit than lose a member,' one wrote. 'Customer satisfaction at the end of the day.' What if the rug is in perfect condition but you just don't like it anymore? No problem. Another TikTok user returned a rug bought over a year ago because it no longer matched their aesthetic—and received a full refund. Costco's return policy is not only open-ended in terms of time frame, but it also doesn't clearly define the condition items must be in upon their return to the store. One person returned a broken couch four years after buying it. Another brought back a half-eaten chicken bake. Both were refunded in full. 'This is why we can't have nice things,' one person commented. This isn't the first time customers have pushed the policy's boundaries. One notable return made headlines in 2018 when a woman brought back her dried-up Christmas tree in January. Extreme as it may seem, the policy supports Costco's membership model. 'Kudos for Costco,' the couch-returner said at the end of his video. 'You've got me as a client for life now.' Research shows that restrictive return policies can cost retailers business, whereas positive return experiences often lead to more purchases. Still, that doesn't mean the customer is always right. Of the $685 billion in U.S. retail merchandise returned in 2024, $103 billion was attributed to return/claims fraud or abuse, according to a 2024 report from Appriss Retail and Deloitte.
Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi in May alleging that California Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff "has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, impacting payments from 2003-2019 for a Potomac, Maryland-based property." What is the gist of the complaint? That Schiff, while representing a California district in the House of Representatives, falsely listed his posh Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get more favorable loan terms when, in truth and in fact, his California condo, which he designated as his primary residence in order to qualify for a California homeowner's tax exemption, was his real primary residence. Even worse, according to the referral, Schiff claimed his Burbank condo as his primary/principal residence in California tax filings during the same years he listed his Maryland home as his primary/principal residence on loan applications to finance that home. Schiff's response to the criminal referral and to subsequent Truth Social posts by President Donald Trump was one we often see in white collar cases. Per the senator's office, "the lenders who provided the mortgages for both homes were well aware of then-Representative Schiff's Congressional service and of his intended year-round use of both homes, neither of which were vacation homes." That's not much of a denial, senator. The question is whether you lied on these forms or not. Were your answers accurate or not, and if they were inaccurate, were the answers a mistake or intentional? The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? The issue is whether Schiff intentionally lied on federal or state forms to gain a financial advantage. If he falsely listed his Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get a lower interest rate, that matters too. (After all, similar alleged falsehoods by Donald Trump were used by New York Attorney General Letitia James to go after Trump in her massive New York state civil action.) Did Schiff lie on California tax forms to gain an exemption he was not entitled to, and, if so, does it implicate any federal criminal statutes? This is what inquiring minds want to know, and we just don't have enough information at this stage to know all the answers. Based on what we do know, how likely is it that Schiff will be indicted for violating one of several federal bank fraud statutes that potentially cover his conduct? Not very likely. Here are several reasons why: The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? This leaves open the possibility of a state of California prosecution for filing false tax returns. Would you care to place any bets on that happening? The bottom line is this: Schiff's alleged conduct may be sleazy and his explanation shifty, but a criminal charge at the federal or state level does not seem to be in the offing.
