What to know about Ayman Soliman, the detained Muslim chaplain whose supporters were arrested
Video from the demonstration shows some protesters blocking the Roebling Bridge that carries traffic between Ohio and Kentucky, as well as one officer punching a protester while others wrestle him to the ground. At least 13 people were arrested, including two journalists.
The demonstrators were there to support Ayman Soliman, an Egyptian immigrant who has worked as a chaplain at Cincinnati Children's Hospital and was detained last week during a check-in with immigration officials.
Here's what to know about his case:
Who is Ayman Soliman?
Soliman, 51, served as an imam — a Muslim religious leader — in Egypt for 14 years before fleeing to the United States in 2014, according to the Initiative on Islam and Medicine, where he serves as a board member.
According to his lawyers, he was granted asylum in 2018 based on past persecution for his work as a journalist in Egypt during the Arab Spring uprising. His lawyers say he was jailed and tortured for reporting on the intense political conflict.
Soliman was hired as a prison chaplain in Oregon but soon lost that job after the FBI placed an unexplained 'flag' on his background profile. In a case that is still pending, he sued to get more information about the flag and to clear his name.
In 2021, Soliman began working at Cincinnati Children's Hospital, where his lawyers say he was 'beloved for his steady presence at the side of ill children, parents and other caregivers.'
He has a wife and child who remain in Egypt.
Why was he detained?
In late 2024, a U.S. asylum officer began proceedings to terminate Soliman's asylum status, according to his legal team. The officer cited Soliman's board membership of an organization called Al-Jameya al Shareya as 'material support for terrorism" given the group's links to the Muslim Brotherhood. The U.S. has not designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, though President Donald Trump considered it during his first term.
Soliman's lawyers say the Al-Jameya al Shareya is not a terrorist group but rather a nongovernmental organization that provides medical and charitable community services. They accuse the government, which knew about the board membership when it granted asylum, of reversing course in retaliation against his lawsuit.
'After Mr. Soliman stood up for his rights in court, an individual officer decided to take the extreme, unusual and incorrect decision of terminating his lawful status,' they wrote in an update shared by the Ohio Immigrant Alliance on Wednesday.
'What's more, Mr. Soliman's need for asylum has not changed,' they said. 'He faces death if forced to return to Egypt.'
Soliman's asylum status was reversed in early June. He was detained on July 9 during a check-in with immigration officials and has been held at the Butler County Jail.
The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on Soliman's case Friday. On the day of Soliman's arrest, the agency's assistant secretary for public affairs, Tricia McLaughlin, wrote on X that 'this Egyptian national was flagged on the FBI terror watchlist.'
'He had his asylum status revoked by the (asterisk)checks notes(asterisk) BIDEN Administration,' she wrote.
What happens next?
A federal court has granted a temporary restraining order preventing Soliman from being moved out of Ohio before Wednesday, the date of his bond hearing. He also is due to make an initial appearance in immigration court Tuesday, but will participate via video feed from the jail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Vance says Trump has been ‘incredibly transparent' on Epstein files: ‘We're not shielding anything'
Vice President Vance defended the Trump administration's handling of the files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a press conference in Canton, Ohio, after an appearance to promote the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The president has been very clear. We're not shielding anything,' Vance said in response to a question from a reporter. 'He's been incredibly transparent about that stuff, but some of that stuff takes time.' The furor from the MAGA base over Epstein put Vance, who has in the past entertained conspiracy theories about the convicted sex offender, in a tricky position after the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) released a memo maintaining that the disgraced financier died by suicide. Vance reportedly served as a mediator between Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino after Bongino aired quitting the week the memo was released. But he otherwise largely stayed quiet as the administration tried to contain the fallout. Now, several weeks later, the MAGA-verse's focus on the issue has abated, despite multiple reports from The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal about Trump's ties to Epstein — findings the president has strenuously denied. The president's attempt to have grand jury transcripts about Epstein unsealed was also defeated in Florida last week, although a ruling has yet to be made in Epstein's criminal case in New York. In Ohio, Vance attempted to pin blame on anyone but the president. 'For four years, under Joe Biden's Department of Justice, the media didn't give a damn about the Epstein files or about the Epstein case,' he said. He also blamed the Bush and Obama administrations for not 'fully' investigating the case. 'Donald J. Trump, I'm telling you, he's got nothing to hide,' he said.
New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Obama's bruised ego was behind the corrupt plot to bring down Trump
The Donald Trump-Russia collusion scandal that first broke in December 2016 and roared on until April 2019 has no parallel in our history — it's not even close. As president-elect and later as sitting president, Trump was accused by the country's intelligence and law-enforcement apparatus of conspiring with a hostile power to subvert the 2016 election and sneak a crooked path to the White House. Along the way, a damning Intelligence Community Assessment was issued, a major FBI investigation, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, targeted the president, and a special counsel, Robert Mueller, was granted a team of prosecutors and a budget of millions to bring the guilty to justice. Advertisement It was the most sensational news story in history. By one estimate, more than half a million articles were written about the collusion issue, the vast majority asserting or assuming criminality on Trump's part. A manic media competed fiercely to deliver the latest 'bombshell.' Advertisement For over two years, the first Trump administration was forced to conduct America's business while in the fetal position. How much truth, you ask, did the accusations of collusion with Russia contain? None. Zilch. Nada. The entire episode was concocted out of whole cloth by the Obama White House, with an assist from the Hilary Clinton campaign and the eager cooperation of the heads of the FBI (James Comey), the CIA (John Brennan), and NSA (James Clapper), plus various zealous underlings. Bam on a mission Advertisement Before asking the obvious questions, let's pause for a moment to absorb this astounding fact: There was zero evidence, classified or otherwise, to justify the fuss, distraction and cost of the whole clamorous affair. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents that show the intelligence agencies did not believe that 'Russian or criminal actors' impacted the 2016 presidential election. Eric Lee – Pool Via Cnp/CNP via ZUMA Press Wire Pro-Trump fake news, as independent studies have consistently shown, had no effect on the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Mueller, in his final report, rather grumpily admitted that the two-year-plus investigation he led 'did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.' Advertisement In fact, as of Dec. 8, 2016, the intelligence agencies believed that 'Russian or criminal actors did not impact recent US election results,' according to documents recently declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Yet on Dec. 9, President Obama, in essence, tasked the agencies to change their minds and come up with the opposite conclusion. They complied with a hastily-drafted ICA stating that 'Russian President Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,' and 'Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.' On Jan. 17, three days before Trump's swearing-in ceremony, an unclassified version of the ICA was made available to the public. The lack of evidence was obscured with a tactic familiar to those who have worked in intelligence: The proof, the authors claimed, was super-secret and hyper-classified. Gabbard's declassification campaign has exposed the naked falsehood of that claim. The Obama administration, Gabbard now maintains, was guilty of a 'treasonous conspiracy' to undermine Trump's 2016 election victory. Advertisement Now, 'treasonous' is a strong word — although, to be fair, former CIA chief Brennan applied the same word to Trump at the height of the collusion uproar. One thing is certain: The corpse of the Trump-Russia scandal has risen like a zombie and is now shambling towards its originators in the hope of eating their brains. I'm content to leave the legal and constitutional implications of this tawdry episode to the experts who can best explain them. My interest is in finding the answer to a basic question: What, in the end, was the point of the exercise? Out to sully '16 win Advertisement Evidently, the Obama White House, in its waning days, aimed to 'subvert President Trump's 2016 victory,' as Gabbard has said. In that, it succeeded brilliantly. Leaks to The New York Times and The Washington Post began as early as Dec. 9, before the intelligence people even had time to concoct their story. The bombardment continued for the duration, leaving the Trump administration bruised and battered under the shadow of the scandal. A chart shared by the White House on the creation of the 'Russia Hoax.' LENIN NOLLY/SIPA/Shutterstock Advertisement To this day, 60% of Democrats believe that Trump climbed to high office with a helpful push from his friend Vladimir. But the case against Trump was based on nothing. For all the bureaucratic grinding, leaking and noise-making, the investigation was bound sooner or later to arrive at that point: nothing. Trump would be exonerated. The probability was much higher than zero that he, or some future Republican president, would demand an accounting for the fraud. The Obama and Clinton people would then trade places with the Trumpists. Advertisement The prosecutors would be prosecuted. That, of course, is precisely what has happened. Again: What political advantage was worth taking that risk? One grateful beneficiary of the collusion story was Clinton, who could now answer, to everyone's satisfaction, the question that had been tormenting her since Election Day: 'How on earth could you possibly lose to that guy?' The election that ended with her defeat, Clinton happily proclaimed, 'was not on the level.' The scandal, however, was a wholly owned Obama operation. His tasking of the intel community, a month after the election had passed, fixated the government on the collusion question. The Dec. 9 meeting to which he abruptly invited the agency heads to reach a foregone conclusion included White House enforcers like Ben Rhodes. The rushed schedule ensured the ICA was completed on his watch and under his watchful eyes. Did Dems believe it? Barack Obama was deeply invested in discrediting Donald Trump, even before the latter assumed the presidency. No doubt there were partisan and personal reasons for the rancor. We may take it for granted that Obama loathed the sight of Trump. But by that point, he was the lamest of lame ducks. Only weeks remained of his time in office. Obama was already ascending majestically to the Olympus reserved for retired two-term presidents. The extraordinary activity of those last days requires an explanation. One possibility is that Obama and his people believed their own lies. They really thought Trump was a Russian operative, inserted into the Oval Office so he could destroy the country following the script of the 1962 movie, 'The Manchurian Candidate.' That's unlikely, for a couple of reasons. If President Obama truly imagined Trump to be a foreign agent, he had every incentive to raise the alarm — not in an obscure intelligence report, but in public, before a national audience. More to the point, when it came to American politics, Obama was a cold and calculating realist. He knew perfectly well when he was shading the truth to obtain a political advantage. As the bizarre drafting process of the ICA demonstrates, the same was true of top bureaucrats like Brennan and Comey. Everyone in this affair knew exactly what they were doing. My take is that the attempted smearing of Trump was literally a vanity project for Obama, a man with an exalted view of himself, his personal achievements and his place in history. His followers — a set that included pretty much all institutional elites — worshipped him. From the idealist perspective, he was seen as the embodiment of hope and change, humane policymaking and smart diplomacy. From a political angle, he was thought to be, like Franklin Roosevelt, a 'transformational' figure, as the coalition he assembled of college-educated, minority, and young voters would provide a permanent Democratic Party majority for decades, if not forever. That was the realistic position as the 2016 elections approached. It would take a man with a prodigious capacity for self-criticism not to believe such a flattering appraisal — and Obama, to put it mildly, was not that man. Trump's victory in 2016 shattered all of these illusions. Suddenly, Obama was no longer a political messiah ushering in a liberal golden age. He was a helpless failure and an object of repudiation. New level of deranged He understood, as a realist, that he had been the cause of which Trump was the effect. His vanity and self-image, I'm guessing, must have suffered a tremendous shock. Trump was a fluke, a hoax, an impossibility. He had to be exposed as both a monstrous aberration and a depraved departure from his predecessor's enlightened ways. President Obama wanted his mojo back. With the collusion scandal, he got it. On the day he left office, he was more popular with the public than he ever had been, while Trump's popularity plummeted. Was the elaborate charade worth it? Maybe so — only the former president is privy to his own internal states. But on July 23, Gabbard referred his case to the Department of Justice for potential criminal investigation. Call it tit for tat, with terrible repercussions all around — for himself, the country, even his antagonists. A Trump administration prosecution of Obama, I believe, would be a moral and political horror show. In these days of rage and riots, it would inaugurate a whole new level of derangement. At a time when we need forward progress, it would swivel our heads backwards the better to inspect minutely the sins of the past. There's a saner way to proceed. Find Robert Mueller's evil twin, appoint him special counsel, and let him loose for years to hound the paper trail of Barack Obama and the rest of the Trump-Russia crowd. That, in my humble opinion, would really be tit for tat . . .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ramaswamy speaks out on Cincinnati street brawl
Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy condemned a Cincinnati street brawl that garnered attention on social media over the weekend and used the altercation to bash public safety policies on the left in a Monday post on social platform X. In his post, Ramaswamy said he had spoken to one of the women assaulted in the fight, whose first name he said was Holly. 'It's unconscionable that there were no police present in that area of Cincinnati on a Friday night, or even an ambulance to take her to the hospital,' he wrote. 'Hard-working Americans shouldn't have to worry for their safety when they have a good time in our cities.' The brawl, video of which quickly spread online, was also condemned by several high-profile politicians Monday, including Vice President Vance, Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) and Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval. It occurred early Saturday morning in downtown Cincinnati. Pureval said in a statement he was 'confident' arrests from the incident would be forthcoming. Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge said the department has since identified and charged five people in connection with the brawl. On X, Ramaswamy pledged that law enforcement would 'have the green light to restore order—no apologies.' 'Leftists like to lecture about 'systemic injustice' while thugs turn our … cities into war zones. I'm done with their excuses,' he wrote. 'As governor, I'll make sure they're behind bars, not running wild.' 'Holly appreciates the kind words and prayers from patriots across the country, and hopes that the publicity around her story ensures that local & state leaders clean up our failing cities,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
