
'Do the most amount of good': Emergency services keep eye on what FEMA revisions could mean
SOMERSET, Pa. – In the coming months, a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency ordered by President Donald Trump should bring a streamlining of the organization amid ongoing federal downsizing and cost-cutting measures.
That may lead to greater responsibility for disaster response transferring to the state and local levels, area leaders said.
Joel Landis, Somerset County Emergency Management Agency director, has paid close attention to this process to prepare for any potential adjustments.
In his opinion, he said, FEMA does need to be revamped, and there could be a benefit to removing layers of response. Landis noted a variety of concerns regarding the agency's efficiency and effectiveness, but added that diminishing response capacity will not help.
'What we don't want to see is a reduction of capabilities on the local level,' Landis said.
Joel Landis | Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director
Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director Joel Landis stands Thursday, May 22, 2025, near North Street Bridge, where a debris pile had gathered after flooding from a May 13 storm in Meyersdale Borough.
A review of FEMA operations was launched in January when Trump issued an executive order creating a review council to assess the agency.
According to that order, the federal responses to storms such as Hurricane Helene and other recent disasters demonstrate 'the need to drastically improve the Federal Emergency Management Agency's efficacy, priorities and competence, including evaluating whether FEMA's bureaucracy in disaster response ultimately harms the agency's ability to successfully respond.'
The order claimed that, despite having a $30 billion annual budget, the agency has 'managed to leave vulnerable Americans without the resources or support they need when they need it most.'
It also alleges FEMA may foster political bias against Trump and his supporters, citing an incident in Florida during Hurricane Milton last October in which a FEMA responder allegedly told workers not to assist homes that displayed flags or yard signs for Trump, who was the Republican presidential candidate at the time.
The responder has since claimed the organization had hostile encounters with residents at those homes, and a report released in April said there was no evidence that FEMA employees skipped Trump-supporting homes.
Federal Fallout logo
Throughout the 2024 hurricane season, baseless rumors about FEMA also circulated on social media, such as claims of unequal aid distribution and the agency seizing evacuated people's property.
The purpose of the council is to review FEMA's disaster response throughout the past four years; compare that to how local, state and private-sector teams handled disasters; gather information from stakeholders; and advise the president.
It was written that the council had to hold its first public meeting 90 days from the order's publication Jan. 24, submit a report to Trump 180 days after that and be disbanded one year later. The team met for the first time Tuesday.
Since January, Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have called for FEMA's termination, and around 2,000 of 6,000 full-time emergency management workers have left the agency or plan to leave through early retirement and waves of terminations, according to published reports.
'Impact on response'
The potential changes to the federal response are concerning for Cambria County Department of Emergency Services and Emergency Management Agency Executive Director Thomas Davis.
'The lack of assistance from federal – I believe it would be a major impact on response and for the people,' he said.
Davis has served with the 911 emergency communications system for 32 years, and has spent decades as a firefighter.
He said moving more disaster responsibilities to the state and local levels would put a burden on those capabilities. It could be possible, he added, but federal assistance is 'absolutely huge' to achieve that.
Trump wrote in a March executive order that empowering local and state authorities is part of his goal.
'Federal policy must rightly recognize that preparedness is most effectively owned and managed at the state, local and even individual levels,' he wrote, 'supported by a competent, accessible and efficient federal government.'
In response to requests for input by the review council, the international nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council has responded to the president's actions and comments.
'Much has changed with regards to FEMA staffing, operations and capacity since the start of this administration,' the group wrote. 'Most of those changes are to the detriment of the nation's ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. As climate-influenced disasters continue to increase in frequency and severity, the administration has hobbled federal, state, and local efforts to prepare for and address the growing risks and vulnerabilities we now face.'
'Layers don't work'
Landis said if FEMA is downsized or eliminated and the responsibilities and funding are turned over to the states, that could be a benefit. He added that his salary as EMA director is paid for through a FEMA Emergency Management Performance Grant.
Joel Landis | Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director
Somerset County Emergency Management Agency Director Joel Landis carries a box of supplies on Thursday, May 22, 2025, at Meyersdale Volunteer Fire Department as disaster relief efforts continue after flooding from a May 13 storm hit Meyersdale Borough.
Landis has been a Somerset County employee for 26 years, in public safety for 28 years, and was on the third ambulance to respond to the tornado that tore through Salisbury in 1998.
He said multi-agency approaches to disasters, especially when it comes to recovery funding, are slow and tedious.
'Layers don't work when you're the disaster victim,' he said.
He provided the example of flooding May 13 in southern Somerset County that hit eight communities, including Meyersdale and Garrett.
On that night, which brought evacuations in some of those communities, Landis said his team began requesting damage assessments because he knows how slow the process can be.
A week later, representatives from the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and the federal Small Business Administration toured the communities, surveying the damage to homes and businesses.
'It's always a race to get the amount of damages submitted up so we can do the most amount of good,' he said.
'Do this together'
Despite that effort, Landis doesn't expect FEMA assistance will be triggered due to the large thresholds weather events have to reach. The agency annually sets dollar figures for the thresholds that are multiplied by the impacted population to determine if federal intervention is warranted.
For example, the statewide indicator for 2025 is $1.89, meaning the Pennsylvania threshold is around $25 million. The county threshold for 2025 is $4.72, which would mean Somerset County's triggering point exceeds $330,000.
Davis said Pennsylvania's threshold is so high that it's difficult to achieve even in devastating storms, such as those the region has experienced this spring. He and Landis also acknowledged a growing trend of severe storms impacting the two counties over the past few years.
Unlocking funding was partly why the Small Business Administration was in Somerset County following the flooding.
Landis said if the SBA provides a disaster declaration, that will be open funding that can help county flood victims.
Gov. Josh Shapiro announced Wednesday his administration would support a declaration.
Looking ahead, Davis said if the federal element is downsized or removed, that will lead to expanded cooperation on the local level.
'One thing we have to start looking at to prepare for changes is relationships with volunteer and community-based groups,' he said. 'We're going to have to do this together.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump says Beyoncé should be 'prosecuted' for alleged Harris endorsement payment
Donald Trump still has a political bone to pick with Queen Bey. The president, who has previously voiced criticism of celebrities who showed support for his election counterpart, Kamala Harris, took to social media on Saturday, July 26, to renew his unfounded claim that pop star Beyoncé was allegedly paid $11 million to endorse Harris' presidential bid. In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, the "Cowboy Carter" songstress made her endorsement of Harris official when she appeared at the former vice president's abortion rights rally in her hometown of Houston in October. She also cleared the usage of her 2016 song "Freedom" for Harris, and the tune became the Democratic nominee's official campaign song. "I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats after the presidential election and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, $11 million dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note...)," wrote Trump in a fiery Truth Social post, also citing alleged endorsement payments to media mogul Oprah Winfrey and civil rights activist Al Sharpton. USA TODAY has reached out to a representative for Beyoncé for comment. "Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out!" Trump concluded. "Kamala and all of those that received endorsement money BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter." Trump's digital tirade comes just two months after he accused the Grammy-winning singer and other celebrities of being paid to publicly support Harris' candidacy. In a May Truth Social post, the GOP president announced plans for a "major investigation" into the Harris campaign's celebrity endorsements. Catch up: Trump calls Beyoncé's endorsement of Kamala Harris 'illegal' Did Beyoncé receive payment for Kamala Harris endorsement? At the time of Trump's original allegations in May, the Federal Election Commission had no record of an $11 million payment to Beyoncé from Harris' presidential campaign. Additionally, the agency does not have rules explicitly prohibiting candidates from paying for endorsements. It is unclear where Trump got the unsubstantiated $11 million figure. The Harris campaign last year rejected a rumor that it paid Beyoncé $10 million for her endorsement that spread on social media shortly after the music star's October 2024 appearance with Harris. Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, also pushed back at the $10 million rumor in a November 2024 Instagram post, calling it "false information" and a "lie." She added that the singer "actually paid for her own flights for her and her team." Oprah Winfrey says she was not paid a 'personal fee' for Kamala Harris rally What has Beyoncé said about Kamala Harris campaign? During her October 2024 appearance at Harris' rally, Beyoncé, who was joined by fellow singer and Destiny's Child alum Kelly Rowland, said "It's time for America to sing a new song" when describing Harris' presidential bid. "I'm not here as a celebrity. I'm not here as a politician. I'm here as a mother," the pop star added. "Your freedom is your God-given right, your human right." Harris has long been a fan of Beyoncé. The California-born politician attended the singer's Renaissance World Tour in 2023 just outside of Washington, D.C., after she gifted Harris tickets. Contributing: Caché McClay, Joey Garrison and Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, USA TODAY


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ohio State University president: Ivy League presidents ‘in survival mode, quite frankly'
The Ohio State University (OSU) President Ted Carter said on Sunday that he thinks Ivy League schools are in 'survival mode,' when asked about Columbia University's settlement with the Trump administration. In an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' moderator Margaret Brennan asked Carter whether he's troubled by the 'precedent' that the settlement sets and whether he would have agreed to a similar deal to resolve a hypothetical dispute with the administration. 'I can't speak to those institutions because I'm not leading them,' Carter responded. 'I know both President Shipman and some of the other Ivy League presidents are colleagues, and they're having to do, I think, what I would call, be in survival mode, quite frankly,' he said, referring to acting Columbia University President Claire Shipman. 'We're not going through any of that here at Ohio State, and nor do I think that we will,' Carter added. Columbia agreed to pay $221 million to restore the more than $400 million in federal funding that was blocked by the administration, according to the settlement announced July 21. In cutting off Columbia's funding, the Trump administration originally cited alleged inaction on antisemitism, though Education Secretary Linda McMahon pointed to more ideological motives in an interview after the settlement was announced. 'This is a monumental victory for conservatives who wanted to do things on these elite campuses for a long time because we had such far left-leaning professors,' McMahon said on Fox Business Network. The university, which saw some of the nation's most active pro-Palestinian campus demonstrations amid the war in Gaza, did not have to admit to wrongdoing as part of the deal.


CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
Maryland governor, representative respond after denied FEMA aid request for historic flooding
Maryland lawmakers called it an insult after the state was denied federal disaster assistance for the damages caused by the historic flooding in Western Maryland in May. Heavy rain caused significant flooding damage in Allegany and Garrett counties, with residents still recovering. Gov. Wes Moore requested a Presidential Disaster Declaration in June to aid in the recovery effort after the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Maryland Department of Emergency Management (MDEM) found that it could cost nearly $15.8 million. The flooding damaged more than 200 homes, some businesses, roads, and utilities. People were rescued from flooded schools, and some were trapped overnight during power outages. The White House rejected the Presidential Disaster Declaration, which would have allowed Maryland to receive help from FEMA and access funding to repair broken infrastructure. In the rejection letter, FEMA called the aid "not warranted," according to the governor's office. "The day before they denied Maryland, they actually accepted and gave West Virginia over $10 million in support for a storm that had about the same amount of damage," Gov Moore said. "This is petty, it is partisan, and it is punishing." Gov. Moore said in a social media video that the denial of federal assistance funding is "an insult to Maryland and the community still suffering in the aftermath of the storm." U.S. Congresswoman April McClain Delaney, from Maryland, told WJZ that while progress has been made, more work needs to be done Delaney said many residents are frustrated with the president, after he received overwhelming support in Western Maryland in the 2024 election. "We just have to, you know, push back and say, these are the reasons why people pay taxes," Rep. Delaney said. "No matter what your zip code, you should be able to rely on our federal government to deliver when there's an emergency or tragedy." Gov. Wes Moore said the damage and recovery efforts in Western Maryland were catastrophic, and it would need support from the federal government. "After a thorough assessment of the damage, it's clear that additional support is necessary," Gov. Moore said. A Presidential Disaster Declaration would have given Maryland financial assistance from FEMA to help repair infrastructure damage caused by the massive flooding, and provide for those still impacted. "The addition of much-needed federal assistance is necessary to get those affected back to their regular lives and to allow those communities to fully recover in months instead of years," MDEM Secretary Russ Strickland said. According to the governor's office, the estimated $15.8 million cost for recovery surpasses FEMA's threshold for disaster assistance, which in Allegany County is $321,460. In Maryland, that threshold is $11.6 million. "Historically, if the joint damage assessment process demonstrates eligible costs over and above the county and state indicator, disaster assistance has been awarded by the President," Gov. Moore said. President Trump argues that FEMA is unsuccessful and has suggested changes to the agency. He signed an executive order that he said would "begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA, or maybe getting rid of FEMA," though that action would need approval from Congress. In June, the administration said it wanted to "wean" states off of FEMA aid after the 2025 hurricane season. The administration indicated that governors would be in a better position to respond to disasters in their states. "We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level — a little bit like education, we're moving it back to the states," Mr. Trump said. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said in a social media video that the state is going to appeal the state is going to appeal FEMA's decision to reject federal financial aid for Allegany and Garrett counties. "To our neighbors in Western Maryland, while the federal government is saying, 'You are on your own,' here in Maryland, we are saying, 'We are leaving no one behind,'" Gov. Moore said. Gov. Wes Moore on Sunday visited areas in Western Maryland that are still recovering from the flooding, including Westernport. According to the governor's office, Moore visited the Port West Restaurant, which was directly impacted by and temporarily closed due to flood damage. He met with other state leaders and residents to talk about the ongoing recovery efforts and his administration's plan to fight back for federal disaster assistance. "Today, I once again saw the strength of Western Maryland—a community that mobilized in the wake of disaster," Gov. Moore said. "Our resolve hasn't wavered, and there is no question that our recovery requires more time and resources." Moore continued, "The Trump administration denied our request for federal disaster assistance, even though Maryland met long-standing criteria for FEMA support. This cruel choice by the federal government won't stop us from moving forward. We will appeal their decision and continue fighting for the people of Allegany and Garrett counties."