logo
Rory McIlroy eyes overdue win after moving into share of lead at Scottish Open

Rory McIlroy eyes overdue win after moving into share of lead at Scottish Open

Independent13 hours ago
Rory McIlroy put himself in pole position to win the Scottish Open after he carded a fine four-under par 66 at the Renaissance Club.
The world number two landed five birdies, and just one bogey, to leave him on 11-under par for the tournament, and a share of the overnight lead with American Chris Gotterup.
England's Matt Fitzpatrick and Marco Penge are two shots back following rounds of 69, tied for third with Americans Wyndham Clark and Jake Knapp.
McIlroy landed his first birdie at the par-five third before dropping a shot at the seventh. However, he bounced back by picking up a shot on the next hole before further birdies at the 10th and par-three 14th.
The Northern Irishman appeared in slight trouble on the par-five 16th after a wayward drive ended in the deep rough. But a beautiful approach allowed him to roll in a straight uphill birdie putt.
He set himself up with another birdie chance at the following par three only to see his putt sail agonisingly wide.
A perfect 340-yard tee shot at the concluding hole put him in the driving seat once more, but again his birdie attempt rolled narrowly past the hole.
However, McIlroy's encouraging performance – with clear signs of him being back at his best – comes at a crucial time with The Open at Royal Portrush to follow next week.
It also marks a significant improvement on McIlroy's form since he won the Masters in April to complete the Grand Slam.
And he said on Sky Sports: 'It is my first realistic chance to win after the Masters.
'I have had a great season but yes, and I have said this before, when you do something you that have dreamt of for your whole life, and then do it, it was a huge moment in my life and career.
'I just need that little bit of time, and to be back here for the last couple of weeks and digest all of it, I feel like I came here for this tournament with renewed enthusiasm and excitement for the rest of the year.'
World number 158 Gotterup equalled the course record with nine birdies in a bogey-free 61 on Friday to start the third day two shots clear.
However, he will start the final day on level terms with McIlroy following a level-par round featuring two birdies and the same number of bogeys.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wimbledon final ends with 6-0, 6-0 for the first time since 1911
Wimbledon final ends with 6-0, 6-0 for the first time since 1911

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Wimbledon final ends with 6-0, 6-0 for the first time since 1911

Iga Swiatek secured her first Wimbledon title with a dominant 6-0, 6-0 victory over Amanda Anisimova on Centre Court. The decisive scoreline marked the first 6-0, 6-0 women's final at Wimbledon since 1911, highlighting the one-sided nature of the match. This win makes Swiatek a six-time Grand Slam champion, having now won major titles on all three surfaces at just 24 years old. Despite the challenging defeat, Amanda Anisimova, playing in her first Grand Slam final, handled the loss with grace, acknowledging her struggles and future aspirations. Swiatek's triumph follows a period of challenges, including a one-month ban for a contaminated substance, from which she has recovered to reclaim her top form.

Football governance bill's passage can create a fairer game at every level
Football governance bill's passage can create a fairer game at every level

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Football governance bill's passage can create a fairer game at every level

It seems like a lifetime ago that the fan-led review into football governance emerged from the wreckage of the failed European Super League. The ideas that underpin the independent regulator were born out of that crisis: an attempt to stop the drift of our national game toward private greed, corporate overreach and ownership disconnect from local communities. Years later, we are probably on the verge of finally seeing those ideas enshrined in law. Tuesday's resounding 415 to 98 vote on the football governance bill. in the House of Commons means the process should come to a resolution with royal assent in the coming days. Although that may feel inevitable given the overwhelming cross-party support in the Commons, anyone who has worked in politics knows better than to celebrate before the final whistle. But we are, at last, in what looks like the final minutes of the game. I have always been an advocate for reform, and Grimsby Town were one of the founding members of Fair Game – an alliance of clubs and campaigners determined to build a fairer, more sustainable future for football. Under the tireless leadership of Niall Couper, Fair Game has kept the spirit of the fan-led review alive: challenging, proposing, organising. The football community owes him a debt of gratitude. He should never have to buy a pie or a pint at any ground in England again, though he may find himself less welcome at venues where quiche and chablis are more the order of the day. The Premier League's main objection to reform has been that any interference with its structure may jeopardise its market-leading status. The Premier League is a global phenomenon. Its broadcasting revenue is greater than the combined total of the top European leagues. That is a remarkable achievement and a real soft-power asset for the UK, and nobody in this debate wants to dismantle or devalue the Premier League as a product or as a representation of the English game at its finest. That has never been the intention of the independent regulator. It has never been about meddling with the quality of football on the pitch. It is about redistribution, about recognising the historical and current contribution of all professional clubs in English football, from the Premier League to the National League. The ecosystem relies on a delicate balance, built since the Football League was created in 1888, and the game is only as strong as its foundations. Yes, the clubs who formed the breakaway in 1992 and turned it into the global success it is today deserve their rewards. But every club, big or small, has contributed to that history. Their continued survival is not a romantic ideal, it is a necessity. One of the recurring concerns is that any extra money trickling down will be funnelled into inflated player wages. That is a risk, and it is right that we legislate for it. No one is arguing that players should not be well paid, but the reality is that when some owners are willing to absorb significant losses through equity injections, it distorts the market. In the past couple of years, we have seen wage inflation of more than 30% in some cases, driven by newly acquired clubs such as Wrexham, Carlisle and Birmingham. In the absence of safeguards, that sort of escalation becomes the new norm that most clubs have to adapt to in order to remain vaguely competitive. It is not only unsustainable, it is impossible to maintain over the long term without more clubs going bust. We undoubtedly need better cost controls on salaries, ideally through a league-specific cap on each squad, but I would also like a requirement that at least 50% of any redistributed funds go towards the women's game, infrastructure, academies and community-led initiatives. These are the investments that build clubs for the long term: developing homegrown talent, improving local facilities and embedding football clubs deeper into their communities. It is about legacy, not just liquidity. Of course, not everyone agrees. Some early drafts and media coverage painted the independent regulator as a Trojan horse for 'mission creep' – the start of a faceless body that could end up interfering in everything from shirt sponsors to starting XIs. That was never not the intention, nor will it become the reality. The bill as drafted focuses on three core areas: redistribution, ownership and directors' tests, and fan engagement. Get these right, and the game will be in a far better place. Whatever your politics, this should be regarded as a proud moment. It is an example of what politics can do at its best – listening, responding and building something in the public interest. Credit must go to the previous Conservative government, and particularly Tracey Crouch, whose leadership and integrity helped get the ball rolling after the Super League fiasco. And it is to the credit of Lisa Nandy and the Labour government that they have kept the momentum and got the bill through in a substantive and meaningful way. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Now the clock starts ticking. Within 18 months of royal assent, the independent regulator must produce a state of the game report, and the Premier League is required to put forward a serious offer to the EFL on revenue sharing. There is little incentive for the Premier League to act swiftly; the longer it delays, the later the money flows. It seems likely that the regulator, under the leadership of David Kogan, will have to invoke backstop powers to force a settlement. Even then, we are probably two years away from clubs such as ours seeing any financial benefit. But the vote in parliament is a significant milestone and an inflection point for all of us. Football has always reflected the society around it, its values, its inequalities, its triumphs and its failings. But unlike other industries, football has an unusual emotional gravity. It binds generations. It builds identity. It belongs, at least in spirit, to the people. We are not asking for nostalgia, we are asking for a renewed commitment to stewardship. And while there is still plenty of work to do, the fact that the independent regulator has moved from concept to near reality is a powerful reminder that change is possible even in football. Even in politics. Jason Stockwood is the co-owner of Grimsby Town

Jannik Sinner faces Carlos Alcaraz at Wimbledon in a rematch of their epic French Open final
Jannik Sinner faces Carlos Alcaraz at Wimbledon in a rematch of their epic French Open final

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Jannik Sinner faces Carlos Alcaraz at Wimbledon in a rematch of their epic French Open final

Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are meeting to decide the Wimbledon championship just five weeks after they played each other in an epic French Open final. Sunday's matchup at Centre Court between the No. 1-ranked Sinner and No. 2 Alcaraz marks the first time the same two men faced off in the title matches on the clay at Roland-Garros and the grass at the All England Club in the same year since Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal did it in 2006, 2007 and 2008. Alcaraz, a 22-year-old from Spain, defeated Sinner, a 22-year-old from Italy, in five sets spread over 5 hours, 29 minutes in Paris on June 8, coming back from a two-set deficit and saving three match points along the way. That made Alcaraz 5-0 in Grand Slam finals, including victories in 2023 and 2024 at Wimbledon. He also carries a career-best 24-match winning streak into Sunday and has beaten Sinner five times in a row. Sinner owns three major trophies and will be playing in his fourth consecutive Slam final — but first at the All England Club. He won the U.S. Open last September and the Australian Open this January. Sinner has been wearing tape and an arm sleeve to protect his right elbow since falling in the opening game of his fourth-round win on Monday. After eliminating 24-time major champion Novak Djokovic in the semifinals, Sinner said he doesn't think his elbow will be an issue on Sunday. Play is scheduled to begin Sunday at 4 p.m. local time, which is 11 a.m. ET. Sinner was listed Saturday as the slight money-line favorite at -110 by BetMGM Sportsbook, with Alcaraz at -105. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store