Polytech bail-outs lie ahead, Te Pūkenga warns
Te Pūkenga's managers have warned MPs the government will have to bail out struggling polytechnics despite its reforms.
Meanwhile, Nelson's mayor Nick Smith appealed to the government to save the region's polytechnic from inclusion in a federation of weak institutions.
Appearing before the Education and Workforce Select Committee the mega-institute's chief financial officer James Smith said the changes, which included disestablishing Te Pūkenga, would leave in place a volume-based funding system.
He said that would lead to the institutes making the same poor investment decisions that prompted the creation of Te Pūkenga as a means of ensuring their long-term viability.
"The system remains a simplistic, inefficient volumetric system with no ability to adjust price based on scale. We expect that these issues will persist under the structural changes enabled under the bill. We also expect because of this that the government will be relied upon for further ad hoc financial support for ITPs (Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics) in the future," he said.
Smith said "unhealthy race to the bottom behaviour" was likely to re-emerge and polytechnics needed stronger incentives to collaborate with one another.
He said the government's Education and Training (Vocational Education and Training System) Amendment Bill also watered down institutions' obligations to underserved learners such as Māori and Pacific communities.
"This tempering of obligations, along with reductions in targeted funding for these learner groups from 2026 will maintain or worsen the current education disparities that exist in the tertiary education system," he said.
Drew Mayhem from the Tertiary Education Union also cast doubt on the long-term viability of the government's plan.
"Splitting out the work-based learning component and putting it in direct competition with the polytechnics that you're trying to stand alone, that's not sustainable," he said.
Nelson mayor Nick Smith told the committee the creation of Te Pūkenga had been bad for the region's local polytechnic, the Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (NMIT).
He said his greatest fear was that NMIT would be among the former polytechnics placed into a federation rather than being allowed to stand-alone after Te Pūkenga was disestablished.
Smith said he had heard that NMIT was "on the margins" of inclusion in the federation and wanted government to consult with mayors and iwi before making that decision.
He said he was not expecting NMIT would emerge with all of the $20 million in cash reserves that it took into Te Pūkenga, but understood about $9m remained.
Smith said that money should be transferred to the re-established institution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mayor slams councillor's 'attack' on Tory Whanau
By Nick James and Ellen O'Dwyer of RNZ Porirua's mayor says an "attack" on Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau by mayoral hopeful Ray Chung is disgraceful and not the type of behaviour expected of a councillor. Chung sent an email, seen by RNZ, to three fellow councillors in early 2023 recounting a story he had been told about Whanau by his neighbour about the neighbour's son. Whanau has declined to be interviewed, but in a statement said the claims were a "malicious and sexist rumour". "What's deeply concerning is that some of the individuals spreading these harmful falsehoods are now standing for election," she said. "Ray Chung has circulated a malicious and sexist rumour - a tactic designed to dehumanise, wear people down, and discourage good people from standing for public office." She said she was seeking legal advice. Ray Chung told Morning Report in hindsight sending the email might not have been the best idea. Chung said he had experienced abusive emails, text messages and calls for the last six months. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker has made public comments in the past about her experience of having received death threats and abuse online. Baker told RNZ that Ray Chung's actions were almost slanderous. "You don't attack someone's integrity, especially another mayor or a councillor and someone you work with closely over three years, I think it is absolutely disgraceful. "Whether it's true or not has nothing to do with it." She said that local body politics had never been as dirty as it was now -- especially online. "I've taken myself off social media and I do post but I don't read anything, it's become so vile." Baker said she would not expect behaviour like that demonstrated by Ray Chung around her council table. She believed that there was an increase in misogynistic abuse against female elected representatives. Victoria University associate professor in politics Lara Greaves told RNZ even just taking the politics out of the actions it was quite a gross situation. "I think if any of us think if we are in our work environment if such an email was sent about us how we would feel or feel about that going on for a woman in their life." Greaves said she thought there was more "heat" in local politics with topics such as the Māori wards, rates and three waters. She said that the spotlight was now being put on local government but through "dirty politics" rather than substantive discussion on issues. Last month Local Government New Zealand announced that it would provide a $4500 allowance for the home security of elected members following the upcoming 2025 elections. Anecdotal reports of abuse and the fact the security allowance had been established showed that it was a problem for mayors and councillors, Greaves said. She said that there was a high level of threat for local government while not seeing the same investment. Greaves said that fundamentally people should not talk about sex and colleagues and that the email was not something people would expect to see in New Zealand politics.
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ's Pacific peoples minister speaks on census changes
Pacific Peoples and Statistics Minister Dr Shane Reti has recently announced an overhaul of the five-yearly census. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
‘Not just about cost': Why Ruapehu voted against bigger water model
'I have no qualms or ifs or buts,' Deputy Mayor Viv Hoeta said. 'I heard exactly what my community wanted. It was not just about cost, it was also about local voice and relationships with a council we know and trust and share the same values with.' Hoeta said community feedback called for a standalone water entity, 'and if we couldn't go it alone, they didn't want to go big'. The council's acting team leader of policy, strategy and sustainability told councillors larger groupings were the most affordable options because of additional scale. Aggregated water services with up to four neighbouring local authorities were projected to save users $38.7m through cost efficiencies in the first seven years when compared with the two-council model, Todd Livingstone said. Councillor Lyn Neeson, who is standing against Kirton for the mayoralty in October, lives rurally. She is not connected to reticulated water and therefore does not pay council water charges. 'I've invested $50,000 to get my water systems – rural people and small communities have to do that.' She did not believe cost savings would be as high as projected. 'I will be fighting really hard to ensure higher costs don't happen.' Neeson said savings expected from procurement bargaining could be achieved through collective council buying power, regardless of whether Ruapehu was part of a larger council-controlled organisation (CCO). 'A two-council CCO fully intends to make those procurement connections. It doesn't close down any of the opportunities for cost efficiencies.' She said being a 50% partner in a smaller CCO was more palatable for the community and she was proud of the debate and its outcome. 'This was democracy in action. It was a fundamental, directional shift from chasing potential savings to listening to our community, following the awa, following the community of interest and following our relationships to Whanganui.' Fiona Kahukura Hadley-Chase, who is also running for mayor, said pricing alone was not reason enough to choose a bigger entity. More important was a strong relationship with a council that was bound by obligations to Te Waiū-o-te-Ika and Te Awa Tupua (the catchments of the Whangaehu and Whanganui rivers) as well as agreements with each other. Her vote against the proposed four-council grouping was based on 'the weight of public opinion', including from iwi leaders. 'I would rather wager on creating and keeping good relationships with people who are interested in the Whanganui River and its tributaries and people.' Councillor Rabbit Nottage said two-thirds of the council voted against the four-council proposal, including the three Māori ward councillors. 'I was comforted by that. They are the voice of Māori and iwi.' Nottage said his decision took into account all submissions because there were concerns that consultation questions were skewed towards the four-council option. 'In my opinion, we made the best decision for the Ruapehu community. If people think otherwise, the elections are coming up in a few months.' Councillors Korty Wilson and Channey Iwikau also voted against a four-council entity. In a report to the council, an analysis of submissions during consultation showed 36 supported a larger water entity if it helped reduce long-term costs, with 16 opposed and eight undecided. Kirton said he was 'pretty gutted' at losing the vote. 'I thought we'd be able to get a bigger entity over the line, based on evidence that the bigger the number of councils, the greater the efficiency gains and flow-on benefits for pricing. 'The rationale of elected members suggesting that relationships and not pricing are more important is foolish if not irresponsible.' Kirton said the district's affiliation with the awa would not be compromised by a four or five-council model. Te Awa Tupua legislation would remain a cornerstone for council values. 'The relationship would continue regardless and probably get stronger.' Kirton said price did matter, particularly for water users and ratepayers who were struggling, including pensioners and people on benefits. In his report to the council, Livingstone said the difference between the two-council and four-council models in the first year was $4m, with savings of $14.5m across the first three years of a new entity, and $38.7m across the first seven years through till the end of the Long-Term Plan. A five-council model would result in costs in 2027 of $1488 per water connection. 'The four-council model is 8% more expensive ($123 increase) in the first year, while the two-council model is 67% more expensive ($996 increase), with standalone being nearly three times as expensive ($2589 increase),' Livingstone said. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
