Tuberville's proposal for academy athletes to go pro undermines duty
'When appropriate, these cadets and midshipmen should graduate and commission with their classes, then defer their service obligation until their professional sports-playing careers are complete,' Tuberville said in a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last week.
Tuberville, a former football coach, claims it would enhance recruitment and raise the academies' national profile. As of this writing, Tuberville has not released a formal proposal. Nevertheless, on the surface, such a proposal may appear to be a creative recruiting tool. In reality, it represents a fundamental erosion of the principles upon which our service academies were built: duty, honor and service to the country. Tuberville's proposal doesn't strengthen the academies; it undermines their very reason for existence.
A taxpayer-funded academy education comes at a steep cost — over $400,000 per graduate for the U.S. Naval Academy and U.S. Air Force Academy in 2015, according to a 2018 Congressional Research Service report. But the real investment isn't just financial. It's the four or more years spent cultivating officers through education and training. That investment is made with a singular expectation: service. When that commitment is broken, it's not just money lost — it's leadership, readiness and the very purpose of the academies.
Tuberville's proposal also sends a troubling message that a sworn obligation can be postponed, not for hardship or higher service, but for personal gain and public attention. This opens the door to a dangerous precedent, not just for athletes but for any cadet with a lucrative offer in hand.
Would we allow a tech prodigy to break their commitment to join Google or Apple? Would we let an aspiring actor, model or influencer delay their service to chase those pursuits? If not, then why carve out special treatment for athletes? The cadet who studies day and night to become a brilliant engineer or cyber expert doesn't get to leave early for Silicon Valley. Why should a quarterback or power forward get a pass?
Supporters often point to exceptions made for Rhodes Scholars or Olympic athletes, but these scenarios are fundamentally different. Olympians compete on behalf of their country, while Rhodes Scholars study to better serve it. In both cases, the mission remains aligned with national service. Professional athletes, on the other hand, are entertainers. They don't wear a uniform to represent the nation, they wear a jersey to represent a brand.
Still, some argue that allowing academy athletes to go pro could boost recruiting and raise the military's public profile. But that claim doesn't hold up under scrutiny. We've seen similar promises before with NASCAR sponsorships, drag racing teams, esports and soldiers participating on the television program 'America's Got Talent.' These flashy efforts consistently lack clear measures of effectiveness, often turning into expensive gimmicks rather than genuine recruiting tools. Many of these programs have been criticized for poor oversight and unclear results.
Even if these athletes were placed in the reserves to 'serve,' what would that service look like? Will they be missing games to attend monthly drills or two-week annual training? Would games and brand appearances count as recruiting duty? That's not military service. The notion that high-paid athletes can fulfill a military obligation by simply being visible is an insult to those who actually wear the uniform.
And let's be honest: What credibility would they have as recruiters? Is a second lieutenant or ensign who deferred their active duty service the right voice to inspire prospective recruits? Imagine the message: 'You should totally sign up. The military is great — just not great enough for me to follow through on my commitment.' Contrast that with someone like David Robinson, a Naval Academy graduate who completed his active duty service before going pro, or Alejandro Villanueva, an ROTC graduate who deployed to Afghanistan before joining the NFL. Both men served with distinction before stepping into the spotlight. Their credibility as public figures and potential recruiters was earned through experience, not handed to them through legislative exceptions.
If we want athletes who serve, then let them serve. Let them commission, lead troops and earn credibility through experience — not exceptions. That credibility is exactly what made Robinson and Villanueva effective ambassadors for military service. They honored their commitments — and that's the model we should champion: service first, without shortcuts or exemptions.
The integrity of our commissioning process, the example we set for future leaders and the core value of service before self are all at stake. This isn't about punishing athletes. It's about protecting the institution, the investment and the promise every cadet makes when they raise their right hand. These commitments are not placeholders — they are sacred, and they must be honored.
Ken Segelhorst is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and former assistant professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, where he directed MX400: Officership, the superintendent's capstone course. He is also a fellow at the Simons Center for Ethical Leadership and Interagency Cooperation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Transgender Women Banned from Women's Olympic Sports
Good morning, it's Aug. 1. How are you surviving the East Coast rain? Reach out to us: ecordover@ and klong@ As of today, transgender women will no longer be allowed to compete in U.S. women's Olympic sport competitions. The United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee changed its policy Monday to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order, 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports.' The policy change, which goes into effect today, takes the decision to include trans women away from the national governing bodies of each sport. USOPC is the latest organization to change its policies this year in the wake of Trump's executive order. The Education Department changed its Title IX enforcement policy to exclude discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation in January, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association banned trans women from playing women's collegiate sports in February. The move has prompted both intense criticism and fervent support from women's rights groups. The news came as a 'relief' to Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a three-time Olympic gold medalist, lawyer, founder of Champion Women and co-founder of the Women's Sports Policy Working Group, nonprofit legal advocacy groups for women in sports. She tells Women Rule that 'as a longstanding Democrat, I am appalled at other women's organizations that don't' support this change. As Hogshead sees it, transgender women competing in women's sports is unfair and threatens important all-women spaces like 'women's changing spaces, bathrooms, rape crisis centers, homeless shelters, prison cells, because of male violence, which is literally 50 times that of female violence.' On the other hand, Shiwali Patel, senior director of safe and inclusive schools at the National Women's Law Center, says the development 'was very alarming and shameful.' 'The USOPC is capitulating to the Trump administration's unlawful demands,' Patel continues. 'We are a women's rights organization. … We know there are very real issues to address when it comes to protecting the rights of women and girls in sports, and that banning trans women from women's sports doesn't do that. In fact, it also leaves women vulnerable to humiliating and invasive sex testing practices.' Hogshead shares that she was sex-tested herself while qualifying for the Olympics and says the experience is invasive and uncomfortable — but one she ultimately welcomed. 'It is as invasive as you can imagine, and who wants it the most? Who wants that kind of invasive testing? Athletes. They're the ones that call for it, the administrators don't want it … But the athletes, they want clean competition.' 'Boys before puberty still have a significant advantage over girls,' Hogshead says, an advantage of up to 10 percent. 'To somehow imply that women working harder can close a 10 percent gap is just so insulting to women.' Patel disagrees. Trans women and girls, she says, have been competing in women's and girls' sports for years, with no evidence of them having an unfair advantage on the playing field. 'Trans women are not dominating women's sports,' Patel says. 'So all of this is just a false distraction. It's a false narrative.' Last year, the United Nations published a study that found that 'transgender athletes competing in women's athletic events have won nearly 900 medals over their competitors.' But another 2024 study by the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that transgender women athletes may actually have several disadvantages when competing with cisgender women, such as weaker lower-body strength and lung function. Given 'the educational benefits and emotional benefits, the academic benefits' from playing sports, Patel says, 'no students should be denied that opportunity just because of who they are.' USOPC responded to a request for comment by pointing to its online statement: 'Preserving and expanding opportunity across all sports is essential to maintaining our competitive edge and inspiring the next generation.' POLITICO Special Report 'She Had Reasonable Doubt': Why Kamala Harris Isn't Running for Governor by Melanie Mason for POLITICO: 'Six months ago, Kamala Harris took a break from packing up the vice president's residence to attend a quiet meeting on Capitol Hill with a group of Black congresswomen. She had advice for them on how to steel themselves for a second Trump administration. But since that meeting on the Hill, a Harris gubernatorial bid had become almost a foregone conclusion in California political circles. Her deliberations froze the 2026 contest to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom in a state of paralysis. Public polling consistently showed Harris would start the race as the prohibitive favorite. Ultimately, however, Harris' heart wasn't in it.' Democrats Sue Over Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood by Rachel Bluth for POLITICO: 'Attorney General Rob Bonta and 22 other Democratic attorneys general and governors are suing the Trump administration over a bid to strip federal funds from Planned Parenthood clinics. 'We need to just call it what it is: punishment for Planned Parenthood's constitutionally protected advocacy for abortion,' Bonta said at a press conference Tuesday morning. 'The hypocrisy is really hard to ignore: a party that claims to be defenders of free speech only seem to care about it when it aligns with their own agenda.'' McBride Blames Netanyahu for Gaza Famine by Cheyanne M. Daniels for POLITICO: 'Rep. Sarah McBride blamed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, saying his government has a responsibility for 'facilitating the conditions.' In an interview with POLITICO's Dasha Burns for 'The Conversation' podcast, McBride (D-Del.) condemned Israel's blockade policies as the driving force behind the famine unfolding in the Middle East.' Number of the Week Read more here. MUST READS South Asian Women Will Be Hurt by the Trade War by The Economist: 'The participation rate of women in the labour markets of South Asia is in general woefully low. The region's garment factories, however, are exceptions. In Bangladesh and Sri Lanka around two-thirds of those behind the sewing machines are women. The industry has pulled millions of them into the workforce while spearheading the countries' economic growth since the 1980s. But much hinges on selling cheap t-shirts and shoes to a country whose president's favourite word is tariffs.' Republican States Press Congress to Ban Abortion Shield Laws by Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech for The Hill: 'More than a dozen Republican-led states are urging Congress to ban abortion shield laws, pieces of legislation passed in states where abortion is legal that protect abortion providers from liability for violating anti-abortion laws in other states. A total of 15 GOP attorneys general signed and sent a letter to congressional leadership this week requesting federal action be taken to preempt abortion shield laws, arguing they interfere with states' ability to enforce criminal laws.' Virginia Giuffre's Family Responds to Trump's Claim That Epstein 'Stole' Her by Alan Feuer and Matthew Goldstein for the New York Times: 'The family of Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing her as a teenager, released a statement on Wednesday night expressing outrage about President Trump's recent remarks about her, in which he confirmed an account that Mr. Epstein had hired her away from her job in the spa at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump's private club in Florida. On Tuesday, while answering questions from reporters, Mr. Trump said that Mr. Epstein 'stole' Ms. Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago while she was working there as a spa attendant. Ms. Giuffre has long maintained that Ghislaine Maxwell, Mr. Epstein's longtime associate, met her at the club and recruited her to serve as a masseuse for Mr. Epstein, but Mr. Trump's comments on Air Force One appeared to be the first time he had personally confirmed her story.' QUOTE OF THE WEEK Read the full story here. on the move The Treasury Department is adding Alley Adcock as deputy assistant secretary for legislative affairs, appropriations and management. She most recently was a professional staff member on the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee. (h/t POLITICO Playbook) Ellen Murray has joined Simon & Co. as of counsel. She was most recently Democratic staff director of the Senate Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee. (h/t POLITICO Influence) Rachel Chiu is now a member of the government relations team at the LA28 Olympic & Paralympic Games. She previously was special assistant to the president and chief of staff of the Biden White House's Office of Political Strategy and Outreach and is a Kamala Harris presidential campaign alum. (h/t POLITICO Influence)


The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Top Senate Democrat presses Pentagon over Microsoft use of China-based engineers
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) pressed the Pentagon on Monday for answers about its guardrails on contractors following revelations that Microsoft was using China-based engineers to maintain the agency's computer systems. Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, raised questions in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the Pentagon's implementation of a 2018 provision requiring defense contractors to disclose when a country considered a cyber threat has asked them to share their source code. The provision passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act in 2018. However, the Defense Department did not propose rulemaking until last November. '[I]t unfortunately took the Department six years to take this initial step,' Shaheen wrote. 'Meanwhile, PRC engineers were engaged in providing support to the DOD that could have exposed the Department to serious vulnerabilities.' In mid-July, ProPublica reported that Microsoft was relying on China-based engineers, overseen by U.S. citizens with security clearances known as 'digital escorts,' to maintain Defense Department systems. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) raised concerns about the practice to Hegseth. He noted in a letter that even though the practice technically met security requirements, the digital escorts 'often do not have the technical training or expertise needed to catch malicious code or suspicious behavior.' Shortly after, Microsoft announced it was making changes to ensure no China-based engineering teams were providing technical assistance for Defense Department cloud services. Hegseth also announced a two-week review to 'make sure that what we uncovered isn't happening anywhere else' across the Defense Department. 'While I am encouraged that Microsoft has announced that it will end this arrangement, this incident raises serious questions about whether the DOD is fully implementing U.S. laws that require guardrails around the procurement of information technology (IT) systems,' Shaheen added in Monday's letter. The New Hampshire Democrat requested information about the timeline for implementation of the 2018 provision and why it took so long to propose rulemaking. She also pressed the Pentagon for details about its Microsoft contract, how it aims to mitigate similar risks going forward and the scope of its two-week review. 'As cybersecurity risks stemming from the PRC compound, the United States government should not be proactively opening the door to its critically sensitive IT systems due to a lack of U.S. government oversight,' she said.

Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
Trump, in another break from the norm, interviews 4-star general candidates
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a break with past practice, President Donald Trump now meets with candidates for promotion to the rank of four-star general, the White House has acknowledged. The Republican president has the meetings because he wants to make sure the U.S. military retains its superiority and its leaders focus on fighting wars, a White House spokesperson said. 'President Trump wants to ensure our military is the greatest and most lethal fighting force in history, which is why he meets with four-star-general nominees directly to ensure they are war fighters first — not bureaucrats,' assistant press secretary Anna Kelly said. The meetings, however, are a departure from past practice, and knowledge of them has raised concerns about politicization of the military's top ranks. Trump has not always respected the long-standing tradition of walling off the military from partisan politics. Trump followed up with a campaign-style rally at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, where uniformed soldiers cheered as he criticized former President Joe Biden, Newsom and other Democrats — raising concerns that Trump was using the military as a political prop. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., an Army veteran and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the meetings 'very welcome reform.' 'I've long advocated for presidents to meet with 4-star nominees. President Trump's most important responsibility is commander-in-chief,' Cotton wrote in a post on X. 'The military-service chiefs and combatant commanders are hugely consequential jobs' and 'I commend President Trump and Secretary Hegseth for treating these jobs with the seriousness they deserve.'