
As South Korea becomes a key arms supplier to US allies, its best customer is on the edge of a warzone
The deal underlines Poland's emergence as a substantial European military force, as well as South Korea's status as a major arms supplier – especially to US allies as wars around the world exhaust American stockpiles.
It comes as Russia ramps up attacks on Ukraine, some of which have come within 100 miles of Polish territory on Ukraine's western border.
Warsaw has been increasing defense spending since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, acquiring new weaponry while also helping Kyiv with its defense.
As a NATO member bordering Ukraine, it is seen part of the alliance's first line of defense should Russian leader Vladimir Putin decide to expand his aggression beyond Ukraine.
Poland's Defense Ministry announced the tank deal, which still needs to be formally signed, in a post on social media platform X earlier this month.
It put the price tag at $6.7 billion and said that includes 80 support vehicles, ammunition, and logistics and training packages for the Polish Army.
The deal for the K2 main battle tanks, regarded as among the world's most powerful, includes units to be made in South Korea by defense giant Hyundai Rotem and the establishment of a production line in Poland for a Polish variant, the K2PL, according to South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA), which oversees Seoul's foreign military sales.
Sixty of the batch of 180 tanks will be built in Poland, the Polish Defense Ministry's post on X said. The first 30 of the South Korea-made tanks included in the new contract are expected to arrive in Poland next year, it said.
In 2022, the two countries signed a deal for Poland to get 180 K2s. All but about 45 of those have been delivered, with the remainder expected to arrive in Poland by the end of the year, Hyundai Rotem said.
That framework was considered South Korea's biggest overseas defense deal ever. It included a total of 980 K2s, 648 self-propelled K9 armored howitzers, and 48 FA-50 fighter jets, the Polish Defense Ministry said at the time.
The ministry said the armored vehicles would, in part, replace Soviet-era tanks that Poland has donated to Ukraine to use in its fight against Russia.
A March report from the Wilson Center based in Washington, DC, said Poland has given Ukraine more than 300 tanks and more than 350 infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers.
Poland has been on edge in recent days after Russia ramped up drone attacks on Ukraine.
A Russian drone barrage against the northwestern Ukrainian city of Lutsk was so intense it caused Warsaw to scramble fighter jets as a precaution. Lutsk is about 50 miles from the Polish border.
A NATO report from April cited Polish efforts to dramatically increase defense spending in the face of the Russian threat. Warsaw's defense spending has grown from 2.7% of GDP in 2022 to an expected 4.7% in 2025, according to the report.
'Of all NATO allies, it spends the highest percentage of its GDP on defense,' the NATO report said.
It noted Poland's purchase of South Korean arms to quickly fill gaps left by donations to Ukraine.
The Wilson Center report said Poland has 'arguably emerged as Europe's most capable military power.'
But a May report from the RAND Corp think tank expressed caution over the financing of Poland's arms buildup.
Many of its purchases are 'financed through direct loans from countries supplying equipment,' RAND said, adding: 'If securing such loans proves impossible, market financing might be too expensive to turn framework agreements into binding contracts.'
RAND also said Poland faces recruitment challenges, needing to increase troop strength by almost 50% in the next 10 years.
Meanwhile, South Korea has emerged as the world's 10th-largest arms exporter over the past five years, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Over that span, Poland has received 46% of South Korean military exports, followed by the Philippines at 14% and India at 7%, according to the SIPRI's Trends in International Arms Transfers 2024 report.
As the war in Ukraine has dragged on, as well as Israel's war in Gaza, US military aid for Ukraine and Israel has drained its arms stockpiles. South Korea is therefore increasingly seen as an option for US allies in need of weapons, according to a 2024 report from the DC-based Stimson Center.
And Seoul's arms industry may become important to Washington in the future, the report said.
'Increased South Korean defense industrial base capacity, particularly in arms and shipbuilding, has the potential to directly support the United States,' the report said.
Shipbuilding is seen as a particular area of South Korean military industrial strength, and Washington has already seen contracts for maintenance of US Navy supply ships go to South Korean yards as the Navy grapples with a backlog in US shipyards.
Along with the K2 tanks, South Korea has sent 174 K9 howitzers to Poland under the 2022 framework, with 38 remaining to be delivered, according to contractor Hanwha Aerospace.
A second tranche of 152 K9s is in the works, Hanwha said.
Of the 48 FA-50 jets ordered, only 12 have been sent so far, according to manufacturer Korean Aerospace Industries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Millions may rule football, but strategy still wins
Money talks in modern football - that's no secret. Clubs like Chelsea and PSG sit firmly at the top of the financial food chain, but as the last few years have proven, throwing cash at a problem doesn't always bring silverware. Despite their deep pockets, both clubs have had to go back to the drawing board in recent seasons. Now, with both sides set to clash in the Club World Cup final, there's a sense that their rebuilds are finally bearing fruit. Advertisement PSG: the relentless chase for European glory Back in 2011, PSG underwent a seismic shift when Nasser Al-Khelaïfi took over as president, backed by the might of Qatar Sports Investments. At that point, the Parisian club had 12 Ligue 1 titles to its name - fast-forward to today and they've added another 13, plus a string of domestic cups. Still, their obsession with conquering Europe remained unfulfilled. In pursuit of the elusive Champions League trophy, PSG splashed out in spectacular fashion. Neymar arrived from Barcelona in 2017 for a record-breaking €222 million, and a year later, they secured Kylian Mbappé from Monaco for €180 million. Other big-money signings followed: Hakimi, Di María, Gonçalo Ramos, and Randal Kolo Muani - all brought in to build a team capable of ruling the continent. But year after year, PSG came up short. Advertisement Their closest call came during the Covid-affected 2019/20 season, where they reached the final but lost 1-0 to Bayern Munich, thanks to a Kingsley Coman goal - a former PSG player, just to twist the knife. Enter Luis Enrique: A new era Change finally came in 2023, when Luis Enrique took over from Christophe Galtier. The Spanish coach was tasked with bringing a more balanced, cohesive approach to a club long defined by individual stars. Even after Kylian Mbappé's high-profile exit to Real Madrid in the summer of 2024, PSG didn't crumble. Instead, they regrouped. New faces like João Neves, Willian Pacho, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, and Désiré Doué were brought in to fit the team-first philosophy. Advertisement After a rocky group stage in the Champions League, PSG roared through the knockout rounds - brushing aside Brest, surviving a dramatic penalty shootout against Liverpool, and powering past Aston Villa and Arsenal to book a spot in the final. In that final, played at the Allianz Arena, they dominated Inter Milan from the first whistle. Goals from Hakimi, Doué (twice), Kvaratskhelia, and Mayulu secured a 5-0 thrashing and PSG's long-awaited European crown. The quadruple was theirs and they weren't finished yet. Chelsea: The Boehly revolution Over in West London, Chelsea were undergoing their own upheaval. Roman Abramovich's reign ended abruptly in 2022 amid sanctions linked to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In stepped Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital, taking over a club already in flux. Advertisement What followed was a radical reset. Around 20 players were offloaded, while the club spent over €280 million on fresh, young talent - including Wesley Fofana and Carney Chukwuemeka. But the plan to inject youth and potential didn't deliver instant results. Neither Thomas Tuchel, Graham Potter, nor Frank Lampard managed to steady the ship. Chelsea slumped to a 12th-place finish in the Premier League in 2022/23 - their worst in years - and crashed out early in other competitions. Maresca's new Blueprint: structure and simplicity The tide began to turn in June 2024, when Enzo Maresca was appointed as head coach, replacing Mauricio Pochettino. Fresh from his success with Leicester, Maresca introduced clarity and structure - trimming the squad and focusing on a more balanced approach. Advertisement Slowly but surely, things began to click. Big-money signings like Enzo Fernández and Moisés Caicedo, who had struggled to impress, started showing their true worth. But the real breakout star was Cole Palmer. Signed from Manchester City, the young attacker lit up the 2024/25 campaign with 25 goals and 15 assists - instantly becoming a fan favourite at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea finished the Premier League season in 5th place with 69 points, marking a major step forward. But the real highlight came in Europe. Conference League glory: a new start Chelsea's European journey saw them reach the final of the UEFA Conference League, dispatching FC Copenhagen, Legia Warsaw, and Djurgarden along the way. Advertisement In the final against Real Betis, the Blues went behind early to a goal from Abde Ezzalzouli, but they responded brilliantly. Goals from Enzo Fernández, Nicolas Jackson, Jadon Sancho, and Moisés Caicedo turned the game on its head, and Chelsea lifted the trophy in Poland. It was a much-needed piece of silverware, signalling a shift in mindset: fewer impulsive signings, more focus on building a team and not just a squad of expensive individuals. Club World Cup Final: another title within reach With European glory now under their belts, both PSG and Chelsea turn their attention to the Club World Cup. The final will be played at MetLife Stadium this Sunday - a fitting stage for two teams who've redefined themselves over the past year. Advertisement PSG topped their group with ease, brushing past Inter Miami, Bayern Munich, and Real Madrid in the knockout rounds. Chelsea, meanwhile, recovered from a group-stage slip-up against Flamengo and went on to beat Benfica, Palmeiras, and Fluminense in convincing fashion. Whatever the result in New York, both clubs have proven a vital point this season: success isn't just about spending big - it's about smart planning, a clear identity, and trusting in the project. The final awaits. One more chapter to write.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Army and Navy want the ‘right to repair' their own equipment
A fundamental value of life at sea is 'Don't give up the ship,' an axiom ingrained in sailors that all damage and problems aboard a vessel fall to the crew to fix. But under modern contracting rules, some of the most critical systems on U.S. Navy ships, as well as major systems used by the Army, can only be fixed by defense contractors. When one of these systems breaks — whether a vital weapon or the machines that produce fresh water — sailors and soldiers may not have the tools, training or permission to fix them, due to the contracting rules under which the military cedes its 'right to repair' systems to contractors who built them. Many view this repair system as an Achilles' heel for the U.S. military. 'I can tell you that when the shooting starts, sailors will have to keep their ships in the fight at sea because we can't count on being able to bring civilian contractors onboard in a war zone,' a post-command Navy surface warfare officer captain told Task & Purpose. That's why the U.S. military and some lawmakers are both stepping up their focus on'right to repair'for weapons and other systems, ensuring that troops have the necessary tools, training and authorization to fix their own equipment, said Greg Williams, of the Project on Government Oversight, or POGO, a non-partisan watchdog group. Two senators introduced a bill this week that would make 'right to repair' a staple of military contracting, with rules requiring that future weapons systems be delivered with manuals, tools and access to parts and information that would make systems fixable by the military members who use them. Separately, the Senate Armed Services Committee has advanced its version of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act that also includes a 'right to repair' provision, which would require defense contractors to 'submit instructions for continued operational readiness necessary for operations, maintenance, installation, and training,' according to a summary of the bill that was released on Friday. A variety of equipment used by the military – from ships and aircraft to generators and handheld gear – is purchased with a warranty, and that means the manufacturer has the responsibility for making repairs, said Williams, director of POGO's Center for Defense Information. 'Now, that makes a lot of sense when, perhaps, you buy a car or a mobile phone,' Williams told Task & Purpose. 'It does not make a lot of sense when you're thousands of miles from home, potentially under fire; you have a piece of equipment you need either to succeed in your mission or simply to survive, and you want to be able to do whatever you can to repair that on the spot.' Another issue is that servicemembers are not allowed to try to fix certain types of equipment because the U.S. military does not own the intellectual property rights to it, Williams said. But the U.S. military wants service members to perform more types of repairs. In April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo ordering sweeping reforms to the Army, including directing the service to include 'right to repair' provisions in existing contracts and ensure such provisions are part of future contracts. While the Army has a general 'right to repair' its gear, soldiers face certain restrictions when fixes involve proprietary systems, advanced electronics, and software that is protected by intellectual property laws, or if making such repairs would void the warranty, said Army spokesperson Elias Chelala. 'Commanders often prefer having their soldiers perform basic and intermediate repairs to reduce downtime and increase operational readiness,' Chelala told Task & Purpose. 'This includes diagnostics, component-level replacements, mechanical repairs, and preventative maintenance tasks in the field.' Granting soldiers and sailors access to the tools, manuals, and software needed to repair more types of equipment would both increase their autonomy and sharpen their skills, he said. This would also require soldiers to undergo more training on using diagnostic tools, troubleshooting software systems, and repairing complex systems to avoid damage and injuries. The Navy operates many aircraft, weapons systems, and critical ship systems that either require flying contractors to the ship for repairs or making the fixes when the ship is in port, said Capt. Ron Flanders, a spokesperson for the office of the assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition. Sailors and Marines do not have the technical manuals or diagnostic capability to repair those items, which include helicopters, jets, radar systems, guns, fire control systems, reverse-osmosis water filtration systems, and even ovens, Flanders told Task & Purpose. 'Navy commanders would much prefer that sailors be given the technical manuals and diagnostics capabilities they need to perform maintenance on all manner of combat systems,' Flanders said. Flanders added that he is confident that sailors would be able to take care of systems currently serviced by contractors if they were provided with the necessary technical manuals and diagnostic tools. 'Rapid, effective maintenance is a warfighting imperative,' Flanders said. 'This is especially true in contested logistics environments, where self-sufficiency will be required. ' Toward that end, a bill introduced by Sens Sheehy and Warren, in at least one sense, captures the bipartisan consensus on the right to repair. Sheehy is a former Navy SEAL and staunch Donald Trump supporter while Warren is a leading Democrat who has championed consumer protections for over a decade, including right to repairs issues for heavy farm equipment. Along with dictating terms to defense contractors, their bill would also require the defense secretary to conduct a review to modify contracts to remove any intellectual property barriers that prevent service members from repairing equipment. 'It's about time we stand up to Pentagon contractors that are squeezing every last cent from us at the expense of our national security,' Warren said in a statement to Task & Purpose 'Our warfighters – and the American public – deserve better, and I'm proud to lead this bipartisan legislation to streamline bloated bureaucracy, increase competition, and provide our warfighters with the quality and quantity of equipment they need to win the next fight,' Sheehy said in a statement to Task & Purpose. Williams said the underlying reason why troops are prohibited from making certain repairs is that maintaining equipment is 'a very profitable business' for defense industry. 'I think it's important to recognize that we spend tens of billions of dollars annually on these types of repairs, and eventually that could be done a lot less expensively by our people in uniform and by civilian defense employees,' Williams said. 'They generally cost about one third the hourly or annual rate of a contractor.' While it will cost money to train service members to fix equipment that currently must be repaired by contractors, Wiliams said, 'You either pay that expense, or you pay the expense if they're not able to get their equipment fixed when a mission is underway.' Not only do current constraints prevent troops from making repairs under 'dire circumstances,' but they also mean that service members cannot practice fixing equipment when they are not in danger, Williams said. This also means that service members need to wait for contactors to arrive to make necessary repairs. 'Just in case it's illustrative, I don't know if you're a 'Star Trek' fan, but you can probably picture Captain Kirk calling down to engineering to ask Scotty how quickly he's going to repair something,' Williams said. 'Now keep imagining if Scotty's answer was: 'Well it will take three weeks for the contractor to get here at Warp 4. Until then, we can't touch it.'' UPDATE: 07/11/2024; this story was updated with information about a right to repair provision in the Senate version of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps learns an old lesson: Don't mess with Audie Murphy A breakdown of safety procedures 'directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death WWII Marine Raider who fought at Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal wants cards for 100th birthday Navy identifies special warfare sailor killed while parachuting Pentagon appears to pause renaming of Navy ships


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says he is considering 'taking away' the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival , actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland 'if they want her.'