President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement of a commission of inquiry over corruption within the police force was lacklustre
Image: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa really needs some lessons on how he engages with us during these family meetings. South Africans were hyped up, heightened anxiety – predictably so, given the serious allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi alluding to capture of our judiciary and police by drug cartels, corrupt businessmen, dodgy politicians and state entities. And that our national Police Minister, Senzo Mchunu had a finger or hand in it somehow.
Ramaphosa delivered the expected outcome, in typical Ramaphosa fashion. Deflated, neither shaken nor stirred and emotionally spent. No oomph and no presidential urgency in delivery. Just a 12 minute prompt reader announcing Mchunu to take 'special leave' while a commission of enquiry investigates Mkhwanazi's allegations. That's it. Bada-bing bada-boom. Twelve minutes, done and dusted. Another much loved ANC project - commission of inquiry to the rescue of brand reputation.
No mention of the term for this commission of inquiry – a critical oversight. Ramaphosa also chose a fellow comrade, an ANC veteran to step in as acting police minister – lawyer and politician Firoz Cachalia. An astute and respected cadre nut an odd choice, given he lacks any track record in state police but perhaps that may be a good thing, who knows.
But South Africans expected more. The Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture has not led to a single arrest. Out of that report emerged our president promising an end to corruption, a new dawn and a country which will 'emerge from a dark and difficult period'. The Zondo report also raised some of the same concerns flagged by Mkhawanazi. Promises were made to fix those state entities, to strengthen levels of governance.
Yet, here we are, in a very dark and difficult period again. Echoes of the past.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ramaphosa is a billionaire. He doesn't need to grease his hands. But he is fiercely protective of brand ANC. He is also fiercely loyal to his inner circle. And Mchunu being one of them. But he had no choice. He had to calm public anger and neutralise opposition clamour. Ramaphosa heeded the call for a commission of inquiry and suspended Mchunu - even if he called it 'special leave' - tomatoes, tomatos, same difference.
Appointing a commission of inquiry should be done expeditiously to ensure public confidence is regained in those critical areas compromised by allegations of corruption - crime intelligence, police and the judiciary. Having South Africans wait six months or more with the integrity of these state organs hanging in the balance is not a wise decision. Especially given some of the allegations have also emerged out of the Zondo commission of inquiry - but are yet to be acted on.
South Africans, as usual, are not afraid to speak their minds. And most are not impressed. There's anger at Mchunu being placed on paid leave while another acting police minister steps in. A double whammy for taxpayers footing the bill. There's also questions over why Mchunu's deputy could not have acted as the minister, saving money. Then there's anger over alleged glaring evidence. Mkhwanazi's alleged proof during his explosive tell all media briefing. He read out whatsapp texts and detailed - with specific references to dates, examples of what he claimed, was interference by Mchunu.
Given all that, why did Ramaphosa not call on Mkhwanazi to produce proof of his allegations? Call him in, have that conversation. Would that have saved us from another wasteful expense of a commission of inquiry? If Mkhwanazi did accept that offer and met with Ramaphosa, produced the receipts, so to speak, and if the proof is there - Mchunu would have had no choice but to resign.
Ramaphosa is no fool. He is a strategist. A commission of inquiry gives the ANC time to cushion any blows to the brand if Mchunu is found guilty of any wrongdoing. It's true that Mchunu has been tried in the court of public opinion since Mkhwanazi's claims. Mchunu's denial seems to have made little difference. Its either that Mkhwanazi's popularity or that he has the audacity to name Mchunu publicly in wrongdoing - and a timeline of evidence.
Interestingly, while those implicated by Mkhwanazi have denied his allegations - including Mchunu, further hint that Mkhwanazi has a trove of evidence to back up his allegations came from another popular South African figure, Gift of the Givers founder, Dr Imtiaz Sooliman. Just three days ago, the good doc says he spoke to Mkhwanazi. "It didn't take more than one minute for me to realize this man knows exactly what he's talking about. He's taken it to the Portfolio committee, to ANC branches, he told me a lot and that's why I'm prepared to back him," says Sooliman.
That gives serious no smoke without fire vibes.
Ramaphosa should have just settled this the African way. A meeting with Mkhwanazi. And this should have happened months ago when Mkhwanazi dcdsq sounded the alarm says Sooliman - but nobody listened. Until Mkhwanazi turned public whistle-blower.
Now, the horse has bolted. And a commission of inquiry is likely to expose what South Africans fear, another state capture.
It's never left. Same game, new players. Tom-ah-toes, tom-ay-toes.
* Zohra Teke is a seasoned freelance journalist and contributor.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
30 minutes ago
- The South African
Incoming acting police minister blasts 'corruption in ANC'
Professor Firoz Cachalia , the incoming acting Minister of Police, has strongly criticised corruption within the ANC, calling it 'an enormous source of shame.' In an interview with Newzroom Afrika, Kachalia said his political loyalties will not stop him from tackling wrongdoing. He pledged to act even if it involves members of his own party. 'My ANC conscience requires that I tackle these challenges with principles and a clear commitment to the country's democratic institutions,' he said. 'Corruption in the ANC is an enormous source of shame to me and to many of us.' Kachalia said he accepted President Cyril Ramaphosa's offer 'without a second's hesitation,' describing the role as an extension of his lifelong work in defending South Africa's democracy. The presidency announced the appointment will take effect from 1 August, after his academic term at the University of the Witwatersrand ends. The appointment has drawn political fire. The Economic Freedom Fighters and the MK Party claim the move violates Section 98 of the Constitution. They argue the president cannot assign ministerial functions to someone outside Cabinet. Kachalia defended the decision, noting that the president can appoint two ministers who are not Members of Parliament. 'These are political and ethical questions, not legal ones,' he said. 'The president had to act.' Asked about his approach to cleaning up the police ministry amid allegations of political interference and criminal infiltration. Kachalia said he would start by consulting senior police leadership and listening to their views. He also welcomed the formation of a judicial commission of inquiry, calling it a valuable fact-finding tool that will assist his office. 'The process that I need to follow is quite clear,' he said. 'I'm going to have the benefit of an objective, reliable process conducted by experienced judges.' Kachalia also chairs the National Anti-Corruption Advisory Council, which recently submitted a midterm and closeout report to the presidency. The reports highlight deep structural failures in SAPS crime intelligence and recommend urgent reforms, including the creation of a new anti-corruption agency. While the presidency has not yet made the report public or acted on its proposals, Kachalia said he now has an opportunity to bring those ideas into the Ministry of Police. He admitted the processing of the report 'has taken too long' and emphasised the urgency of implementing reforms. Kachalia will perform his duties in full for as long as the president retains him, despite the post being described as 'acting.' 'Once I'm sworn in, I'm the Minister of Police until the president says otherwise,' he said. 'And if he allows me to continue, I will.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Jayden-Lee Meek's mother likened to Kelly Smith after THIS comment
South Africans are comparing the actions of Jayden-Lee Meek's mother, Tiffany, to those of Kelly Smith, the mother of missing Saldanha Bay girl, Joslin Smith. This after the woman accused of murdering her 11-year-old son made similar comments that her child's appearance had made them internet famous. Like Kelly, Tiffany initially appeared as a concerned mother. However, both women were later accused of duping the public through soliciting sympathy. Kelly is currently serving a life sentence for kidnapping and child trafficking, while Tiffany will make her second court appearance on charges of murder, defeating the ends of justice and crimen injuria. In an interview with Newzroom Afrika just two days after Jayden-Lee Meek's death, Tiffany raised 'red flags' when she said: 'My child wanted to go viral. Unfortunately, this is the way it had to happen'. She added: 'His biggest thing was he was going to be a star, and he will remain a star in my life'. The clip recently resurfaced on social media, where many South Africans compared Tiffany's comments to those made by Joslin Smith's mother, Kelly. @tezzbarry: 'What did Kelly say? Joshlin made me famous. And now Tiffany says Jayden-Lee Meek always wanted to go viral 🙄biggest red flag' @renepillay888: 'She took everyone for a ride … Tiffany and Kelly, same WhatsApp group'. @simba000: 'She can now join Kelly Smith for life in prison. No mother in the right sense of mind will harm her own children'. @ Replying to @Lisa_p 🌹 #justiceforjayden #jaydenleemeek #jaydenlee #sanews #newsupdate #news ♬ original sound – Roxanne Bloem Like Jayden-Lee Meek's tragic case, Kelly Smith's sentencing made headlines around the country. During the kidnapping and trafficking trial, the court heard how the mother-of-three made shocking comments about her daughter before and after her disappearance. According to the testimony of Saldanha SAPS station commander, Lieutenant Colonel Lincoln Sebola, Kelly's behaviour 'concerned' him. He said: 'When she came into the charge office, she was communicating with a SAPS officer whom she knew. She was acting like it was normal that her child was not there. What concerned me was when she said in her own words: 'My child Joslin made me famous'. That made me worry. Especially as a parent'. Jayden-Lee Meek's mother Tiffany has been compared to Kelly Smith. Images via Facebook/ eNCA Similar words were made by fellow witness, community activist, Shakeera Ganief, also known as 'Shakes Warrior'. Shakes said of her liaison with Kelly: 'Something very disturbing took place that day. 'It was the moment the Temple Boys were performing a song for the kids [during a church service for Joslin Smith]. Kelly was busy dancing and having a good time, and she was just on top of the world that day, when she made reference again, Yoh, my kind [child] maak [making] my [me] famous.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Can SA forge a new consensus at G20 summit?
For the second time this year, the world's most powerful finance ministers have gathered in South Africa, this time at the lush resort of Zimbali north of Durban. But one minister will once again be conspicuous by his absence: that from the US. Scott Bessent, the mercurial US Treasury Secretary, has once again skipped the G20, choosing instead to send Michael Kaplan, the acting undersecretary for international affairs at the US Treasury. It all started when Secretary of State Marco Rubio refused to participate due to the host's vision of this year's G20 presidency being about 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability' — principles the current US administration theatrically rejects. In one sense, the timing of this South African presidency of the G20 could not be worse. Faced with the anti-globalist, protectionist bent of the US, what is usually a processional opportunity for showcasing a nation's soft power and producing vacuous missives about global cooperation has become a near impossible job of managing diplomatic fallout. As the first country from Africa to host the G20, South Africa had hoped to push issues vital for the very developing nations that stand to lose the most from the US president's trade war. With US aid budgets cut to virtual non-existence, and with tariffs about to decimate the export industries that, until now, had been the only hope for small African developing countries to build some semblance of a manufacturing sector, South Africa now finds itself managing the wreckage of international consensus. The G20 is a relatively new arrival to the international global system of forums and talk shops. Established as a response to the global financial crisis in 2008, the whole point was for countries like the US, the UK and the EU to include the faster growing nations of the Global South, which were becoming increasingly critical to the global economy. That promise now looks increasingly hollow. US vs the world: SA salvages G20 How naïve and quaint that looks, from the perspective of the realpolitik of 2025. In addition to Trump's threat of crippling levies on key trading partners from 1 August 2025, the US president has taken aim at the BRICS bloc of emerging economies — which includes host nation South Africa — threatening an extra 10% tariff for 'anti-American' policies. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, following the BRICS summit in Rio last week, was the first of the group to hit back. 'The president of the US must recognise that multiple centres of power now define the global landscape,' he said. Ramaphosa is still trying to convince Trump to attend a G20 leaders' summit in Johannesburg in November, where he is due to hand over the presidency of the group to the US. But hopes that Trump will support any of South Africa's G20 initiatives have largely been extinguished. Under fire from corruption scandals at home, Ramaphosa's efforts are increasingly looking to be in vain. The G20 international outreach also follows a highly publicised Oval Office dressing-down, where Trump repeated false claims about a so-called genocide against white South African farmers. Still, despite Washington's aggressions, South Africa has no option but to press ahead with this week's meetings, which culminate on Thursday and Friday with sessions led by finance ministers and central bank governors. South African Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana will, at least, be in the limelight as opposed to the embattled president. The EU is now in the firing line It is not only developing countries that have been targeted by Trump. On Saturday, the EU received a typically condescending letter from Trump, threatening blanket tariffs on European goods. In a message that appeared to be copied and pasted from the one sent to South Africa and countless other recipients, Trump invited the EU to 'participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World', while warning of sweeping new levies. His parting line, as ever: 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' The proposed 30% tariff rate, together with existing sectoral duties and an expected levy on critical goods, would take the increase in the US effective tariff rate on the EU to a brutal 26%. According to estimates from Goldman Sachs, if implemented and sustained, it would lower euro area GDP by 1.2% by the end of 2026. The US is the largest trade partner of the EU, with the sum of exports from the EU totalling $815-billion in 2024. The EU understands that such a trade restriction with its biggest partner is nothing short of an existential challenge. In response, the bloc is actively seeking to diversify its trade ties. Besides Canada and Japan, the bloc is now fast-tracking agreements with India and other Asia-Pacific nations. Speaking from Beijing, EU competition chief Teresa Ribera confirmed that discussions with India are expected to conclude by year's end. 'We need to explore how far, how deep we can go in the Pacific area with other countries.' Africa will undoubtedly be next. Can South Africa lead a G19 without the US? Where the tariff war ends is anyone's guess. But with the US — the architect of the post-war global order — now acting as a destabilising force, the need for alternative alliances and renewed multilateralism between other parties has never been clearer. Already, the US absence has drawn others closer. After Rubio's withdrawal, the EU publicly endorsed South Africa's G20 agenda. Within weeks, the EU and South Africa held their first summit since 2018, marking a thaw in previously strained relations. Strangely then this year's G20 could prove to be its most consequential since its inception. Will it become the moment when the rest of the world reaffirms a commitment to open markets, trade and mutually beneficial cooperation? Or will it cement the beginning of the end for the rules-based global economy? In that sense therefore the timing of South Africa's G20 presidency could not be better. As a nation that once symbolised the post-Cold War liberal ideals of inclusion and equality, it is perhaps fitting that it should fall to us to rally the Global South and like-minded powers toward a new consensus. But the challenge is enormous. Can Ramaphosa — wounded politically and isolated diplomatically — rise to the occasion? Can South Africa lead a meaningful G19 in the absence of the US? To quote Tennyson's Ulysses, while 'death closes all, some work of noble note may yet be done'. The South African president may identify with the itinerant Greek after his own interminable political odyssey. Given his patchy track record in office, the answer may not be encouraging. And yet, history never asks whether leaders are ready. It simply presents the moment. Ramaphosa now faces his. DM
