logo
The Edmonton Oilers pick highly skilled center as first pick in 2025 NHL Draft

The Edmonton Oilers pick highly skilled center as first pick in 2025 NHL Draft

Yahoo4 days ago
The Edmonton Oilers first pick in the 2025 NHL Draft did not arrive until the third round, eighty-third overall, when the club selected Tommy Lafreniere.
The Oilers acquired this pick as compensation from the St. Louis Blues as a part of the Dylan Holloway offer sheet a year ago.
Lefreniere is out of Kamloops of the WHL, and eighteen-year-old from St-Sauveur, Quebec. He stands 5'11 and weight in at 170 LB.
A highly skilled player, he went 24-32-56 in 68 GP over the last season. That was second among WHL rookies.
He was ranked #76 by McKeen's Hockey, #89 by FCHockey, and #86 by FLOHockey.
One comparison made by a scout was 'a smaller Nick Suzuki'.
More to come…
Now on Bluesky @kurtleavins.bsky.social. Also, find me on Threads @kleavins, Twitter @KurtLeavins, Instagram at LeavinsOnHockey, and Mastodon at KurtLeavins@mstdn.social. This article is not AI generated.
STAPLES: Some Edmonton Oilers fans lose their minds over draft day rumours
LEAVINS: Will this be the Summer of Stan?
STAPLES: Trent Frederic signs
Bruce McCurdy, 1955-2025.
Don't miss the news you need to know — add EdmontonJournal.com and EdmontonSun.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oilers swipe Capitals' star with $7.2 million contract in free agency
Oilers swipe Capitals' star with $7.2 million contract in free agency

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oilers swipe Capitals' star with $7.2 million contract in free agency

The Edmonton Oilers are buying stock a bit low. It wasn't the best 2024-25 season for Andrew Mangiapane with the Washington Capitals. But now he gets a fresh start in Edmonton. The Athletic's Chris Johnston reports that it'll be two years at $3.6 million per year for Mangiapane ($7.2 million total). Advertisement Mangiapane put up a career-worst 28 points this past season for Washington. It was a far cry from his 35-goal season in 2021-22. MORE: Oilers and Connor McDavid haven't reached a deal yet But despite that, the 29-year old winger got a decent payday after 14 goals and 14 assists. The 5-foot-10 lefty from Toronto is an unquestioned NHL success story. The Flames took him in the sixth round in 2015. He played in parts of seven NHL seasons for Calgary. He had 109 goals and 106 assists in 417 games. MORE: Wild's Kirill Kaprizov chasing a record contract Last winter was his first season away from the Flames, and it wasn't always smooth sailing in the nation's capital for Mangiapane. Advertisement He opted not to return to D.C. and instead to head north and west. And it'll be the Oilers who try to unlock Mangiapane back up. He deserves a chance to shine, in life and the NHL. MORE NHL NEWS:

Jakob Poeltl's extension shows cost of Raptors' past contracts for core players
Jakob Poeltl's extension shows cost of Raptors' past contracts for core players

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Jakob Poeltl's extension shows cost of Raptors' past contracts for core players

One of the most surprising bits of news upon the start of free agency on Monday night probably didn't reach many fans' phones via push notifications. The NBA informed teams that the salary cap and all of its related appendages would increase by seven percent in 2026-27, instead of the expected 10 percent. The news, confirmed by The Athletic's Mike Vorkunov, is just a projection. If the league creates more basketball-related income than expected in the coming year, the cap will rise accordingly, up to a maximum of 10 percent. For now, the league is telling teams to prepare as if the salary cap will be set at $165 million instead of $170.1 million and the luxury-tax threshold will be $200 million instead of $206.7 million. Advertisement In the grand scheme of things, those differences don't seem like a big deal. But teams structure contracts the way they do for a reason, and any change in projections narrows the margins. Broadly, the lower projections mean there is less room for all teams, and that will disproportionately hurt teams who are close to either the tax or one of the league's aprons, trying to get under a given number. You could feel that come into play with the Raptors on Tuesday, when they addressed their centre spot for next year and beyond. In addition to adding Sandro Mamukelashvili as a backup on a two-year deal (including a player option for 2026-27) at the veteran's minimum, the Raptors agreed to a contract extension with starter Jakob Poeltl. He opted into next season at $19.5 million and agreed to terms on a three-year extension after that, worth a maximum of $85.5 million. The final year, 2029-30, is partially guaranteed. The Mamukelashvili signing is straightforward. Assuming the Raptors sign second-round pick Alijah Mitchell to a minimum deal and allow Jamison Battle's contract to guarantee next week, the Raptors had just one open roster spot, with any signing taking them over the tax threshold. The Raptors technically could have used more of the midlevel exception, but only offering the minimum kept them as close to the tax demarcation as possible. Barring unlikely incentives hitting for several players, the Raptors will go into next year nearly $2 million over the tax line, but will have the season to get under if they so choose. Although the Raptors could simply pay the tax, there can be team-building consequences in addition to financial consequences of staying over certain thresholds — which is where Poeltl's extension comes in. Before either of the centres agreed to their new deals, the Raptors had just more than $150 million guaranteed for five players in 2026-27: Scottie Barnes, Brandon Ingram, Immanuel Quickley, RJ Barrett and Collin Murray-Boyles. Once you worked in some club options that are likely to be picked up for Battle, Gradey Dick, Ja'Kobe Walter, Jonathan Mogbo and Jamal Shead, the Raptors' payroll would have risen to about $169 million for 10 players, not including a centre. Advertisement Poeltl could have opted out of the final year of the four-year contract he signed in 2026-27, and would have been eligible for an extension starting at $27.3 million. Instead, he opted into making $19.5 million, because keeping that number lower in the short-term was paramount — likely the difference between having about $12 million to fill out the roster before the tax and $4 million. For their trouble, the Raptors agreed to pay Poeltl for three extra years, which means he will be on the team's books until he turns 34. It doesn't seem like a huge overpay, but it is a commitment to an older player for a team that has proven very little. And it is a product of some of the negotiations they have done with their own players in the past. Whoa, hey, I wrote something very similar exactly 365 days ago. Would you look at that! One of Masai Ujiri's fondest lines as he dissected what went wrong with the Pascal Siakam/Fred VanVleet-led teams was that his players should not have been worried about their next contracts, as the Raptors had a long history of rewarding their own guys, almost regardless of the markets that would be waiting for them. He was right. It verged on franchise policy, at least going back to Kyle Lowry re-signing with the Raptors for the first time back in 2014. Ujiri wanted players to know that if they came to Toronto and performed for the Raptors, they would be treated well. It was part of making the Raptors a more respected organization. That is fine, right up until your team stops winning and you are rewarding players more speculatively than objectively. Let's not even discuss the maximum rookie extension for Barnes, which others don't like, but I thought was reasonable for the young player you hope is the face of the franchise. He's an excellent player, and you're building around him. That's fine. Advertisement At the same time as extending Barnes, the Raptors re-signed Quickley, a restricted free agent, to a five-year, $162.5 million deal. Seven months later, they traded for Ingram and gave him a three-year, $120 million contract after Ingram and the New Orleans Pelicans couldn't agree to a deal for months, and nobody was biting on the trade market. Those prices indicate ambitious expectations for both, although not altogether unrealistic ones. If Ingram plays like a borderline All-Star and Quickley plays like an average starting point guard, they will be 'worth' those contracts. Those goals aren't so silly as to be absurd. But both are textbook cases of the John Hollinger-coined 'Bird rights trap,' and have very real consequences. Quickley's contract was the fifth-most-expensive in total value and seventh-most-expensive in annual value handed out last summer, not counting extensions. The Raptors thought there could have been aggressive pushes by other teams, such as the San Antonio Spurs and Utah Jazz, and they might have been right. Ultimately, those teams didn't spend much. None of the teams that poached free agents from elsewhere, other than maybe the Orlando Magic, were likely destinations for Quickley. The Raptors traded for Ingram to complement Barnes, a much more capable scorer in the half court than anyone on the team. Part of the appeal of the deal was its cheap acquisition cost for a former All-Star — Indiana's 2026 first-round pick, a second-round pick, Bruce Brown and Kelly Olynyk. The Raptors didn't want Ingram to reach free agency, so they signed him to an annual salary that has not been approached by any player who has changed teams. Myles Turner agreed to a four-year contract worth $113 million with Milwaukee, which is currently in the lead for that category. Only the Brooklyn Nets figured to have significant room under the cap, while neither the trade market nor New Orleans' extension talks with Ingram indicated much desire from the league to get him at that price. Perhaps Ingram will play better because he is happy with the deal. It's possible. However, if the Raptors held out for a slightly cheaper deal, they wouldn't be facing a tax crunch, which could necessitate trading a player they like, a future pick or both. If so, you might as well add that to the cost of doing the Ingram trade. Likewise, if they shaved a few more million off of Quickley's or Ingram's salaries, perhaps they could have spent more on Poeltl's backup to make this year's team stronger or extended Poeltl's contract beginning next year and shortened its length. Instead, they could be making similar compromises over the next few years, or they will have to incentivize a team to take on Poeltl's deal if his play drops off as he approaches his mid-30s. It would also be dangerous to agree to a contract extension with either Barrett or Ochai Agbaji this offseason, even if the Raptors wanted to do so. Adding any more guaranteed money over the next few years is iffy. Advertisement Barnes, Quickley, Ingram, Poeltl — they're all good players. It remains to be seen whether they can unite to form a team, but most teams would be happy enough to have them on the roster. It's just that the Raptors are paying a premium to retain all of them. If they don't come together, and quickly, the Raptors could once more be in a position where they are paying for past mistakes.

How to watch the USWNT vs. Canada in the Americans' latest international tune-up
How to watch the USWNT vs. Canada in the Americans' latest international tune-up

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

How to watch the USWNT vs. Canada in the Americans' latest international tune-up

Summertime, and the living is easy; players are jumpin' and the goal count is high. The top-ranked women's soccer team in the world continues its round of exhibitions with a Canadian friendly in the U.S. capital. The U.S. women's national team has not allowed a goal across its last four outings. The Americans have won by a 4-0 final score in three straight friendlies. Last week, they put a combined 8-0 hurting on the Republic of Ireland. Dynamic forward Alyssa Thompson found the back of the net in both matches, while Rose Lavelle took a bow in her first USWNT showing since ankle surgery: Rose's 25th career international goal! 🌹#USWNT x @VW — U.S. Women's National Soccer Team (@USWNT) June 27, 2025 Head coach Emma Hayes said that she'd use the summer to test new call-ups and grant breathers to her players in European leagues. Hayes completely scrambled the starting lineup between the Ireland friendlies, and will all but certainly try more configurations in D.C. The former Chelsea manager has prioritized the U.S. youth pipeline in her nascent tenure — after Sunday's action in Cincinnati, her first 24 matches at the helm have yielded 24 debut caps. Izzy Rodriguez, a fullback for the NWSL's Kansas City Current, scored in her very first USWNT look on Sunday. In 66 total matches, the Americans have an absurd plus-147 goal differential versus Canada. This year's Canadian crew is led by goalkeeper Kailen Sheridan, a standout stopper with the San Diego Wave. Her domestic teammate Adriana Leon plays forward and leads the active roster with 44 international goals. Jessie Fleming is Canada's captain; she was forever enshrined in the country's sports history after her gold medal goal in 2020. Fleming also played under Hayes with Chelsea from 2020-24. Advertisement 2002: 'Mia Hamm chipped a shot over goalkeeper Karina LeBlanc 3 minutes 34 seconds into overtime to lift the United States to a 2-1 victory over Canada in the Concacaf Women's Gold Cup championship game last night in Pasadena, Calif. Hamm, who has 136 national team goals and ranks as the top scorer in women's international soccer, leaped in joy when her kick floated over the charging LeBlanc and into the net. A beaming Hamm then sprinted to the right corner and slid into the flag, with her teammates rushing over to pile on.' 2008: 'Angela Hucles scored the game's only goal in second-half injury time as the United States women's national team defeated Canada, 1-0, to win the Peace Queen Cup on Saturday in Suwon, South Korea. Hucles, a midfielder, won the golden ball as the tournament's most valuable player.' 2012: 'The game was more than two hours old. Over the first 122 minutes of the United States women's soccer team's Olympic semifinal with Canada, the Americans had been shocked by three goals from their opponent's best player, boosted by three separate rallies to tie the score, and helped by a referee's call so unusual even their own players admitted they had never seen it before. But now it was the 123rd minute — and most likely the last minute of extra time in overtime — and one final hopeful cross was floating into the area in front of the Canadian goal. Suddenly, a pink headband rose high in the air and Alex Morgan, the speedy American star forward, used her head to send the ball on a perfect arc, just over the goalkeeper's hand and just under the crossbar, for a 4-3 victory. Old Trafford, the venerable stadium here, exploded for one final time on a chilly English night as the United States prevailed.' Streaming and ticketing links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Alyssa Thompson: Ron Chenoy / Imagn Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store