logo
DA posing a challenge to GNU internal resolution body

DA posing a challenge to GNU internal resolution body

IOL News27-05-2025
DA Federal Council chairperson Helen Zille said the party will challenge the Expropriation Act.
Image: Itumeleng English/ Independent Newspapers
The Government of National Unity's (GNU) Clearing House Mechanism, established to resolve policy disagreements within the 10-member coalition, has been questioned over its effectiveness by the DA and Rise Mzantsi.
Despite the mechanism's efforts to address disputes, the DA has continued to raise issues separately, including its latest challenge to the Expropriation Act, specifically the issue of nil compensation.
Recently DA federal council chairperson Helen Zille described the GNU clearing house mechanism as a "waste of time," stating that it does not work and "everyone acknowledges its ineffectiveness".
"What we need is a mechanism in the GNU to implement clauses 19 and 18 (in the terms of reference). We do not need to renegotiate the laws of the game or anything; what we need is mechanisms that implement the statement of intent," Zille said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The DA has launched several court challenges since its inclusion in the GNU, including a challenge to the Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEAA) and the Expropriation Act.
The party argues that these laws are unconstitutional and will negatively impact the economy.
The DA's lawyers will appear in the North Gauteng High Court to challenge the EEAA, which the party believes will repel investors and discriminate against certain races.
The party has reaffirmed its firm rejection of expropriation without compensation, vowing to defend private property rights through both legal and legislative means.
The party's Federal Council has passed a motion supporting Section 25 of the Constitution, which states that compensation for expropriated property must be "just and equitable" as determined by a court of law.
The DA will pursue a constitutional challenge to the Expropriation Act in the High Court, arguing that it poses a direct threat to the rights enshrined in the Constitution and undermines the country's investment climate.
Rise Mzansi spokesperson Mabine Seabe said his party would like to see the Clearing House Mechanism terms of reference finalised, so that the body has full effect.
'The body is only as good as the terms of reference and the goodwill of the signatories to the Statement of Intent. We will continue working through all fora to ensure that South Africa is a better place in 2029 than it is today,' Seabe said.
The Good Party's Brett Herron said the Clearing House had only dealt with one substantive dispute - on the implementation of the BELA Act - which was raised by the DA in the first Clearing House meeting.
'Although we dealt with the BELA Act it was not, in our view, a matter that was appropriately brought to the Clearing House. The dispute should've arisen in the GNU cabinet or between the Party Leaders and then be referred to the Clearing House as a dispute resolution mechanism,' Herron said.
'The Expropriation Act has already been passed by the last parliament and signed into law by the President. It's a product of another election mandate.
'If the DA wants to persuade the GNU parties to amend policy on expropriation it should raise the issue in the cabinet or the GNU party leaders forum and if their proposal leads to a dispute or cannot be resolved there, then it could be referred to the Clearing House,' he said.
Herron further said the Clearing House was not the place for the DA to reopen debate on policies and laws that it had already lost.
'I think the Clearing House could be more effective as a structure if it was properly used by the GNU parties. That hasn't really happened yet,' Herron said.
Despite the parties' skepticism, the GNU Clearing House Mechanism, led by deputy president Paul Mashatile, has made efforts to address disputes within the GNU.
The mechanism held its inaugural meeting on October 16, 2024, where it welcomed the draft Terms of Reference and agreed to finalise them in the next meeting.
The meeting was convened by Mashatile, who emphasised the importance of resolving policy disagreements within the GNU.
Political analyst Dr John Molepo said the effectiveness of the GNU Clearing House Mechanism remains to be seen.
'While this mechanism has provided a platform for discussion and resolution of disputes, the DA's continued court challenges raise questions about its ability to address the complex issues at hand,' he said.
Mashatile's acting spokesperson was unavailable for comment on Tuesday.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now that the Budget has finally been approved, GNU partners look ahead
Now that the Budget has finally been approved, GNU partners look ahead

Daily Maverick

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Now that the Budget has finally been approved, GNU partners look ahead

For some parties, the GNU will endure despite tensions, urging focus on service delivery and economic reforms post-Budget approval. 'The GNU will survive, full stop,' said Democratic Alliance (DA) spokesperson Karabo Khakhau after a marathon session on Wednesday to pass the Appropriation Bill, which all Government of National Unity (GNU) parties supported. While the 10-party coalition united in pushing through the important Bill that ensures South Africa does not fall into a fiscal crisis, where to next for the GNU? For some parties, the GNU will survive its teething pains, and for others, now is the time to put aside party politicking in favour of getting the work done. After a protracted process since the firing of the DA's Andrew Whitfield, the deputy minister of trade, industry and competition, and the DA's announcement that it would not support votes for 'corruption-accused' ministers from the African National Congress (ANC), the DA eventually agreed to support the Bill and thus, the Budget. This came after President Cyril Ramaphosa fired Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane over the unfolding scandal in the Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. But does this mean the GNU has managed to work out its differences? DA leader John Steenhuisen said, 'To preserve stability within the GNU, it is imperative that the Presidency urgently implements the dispute resolution mechanism outlined in the GNU Statement of Intent. Without it, governance risks being undermined by internal conflict. 'With the Budget now passed, the focus must shift decisively to service delivery and the rapid implementation of critical reforms to unlock economic growth and create jobs. DA-led ministries have already demonstrated measurable success, and we remain committed to delivering with excellence, professionalism, and integrity.' The fights between the two biggest parties in the GNU have often taken centre stage, from the signing into law of contentious legislation such as the Expropriation Act and the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act to Budget issues around the planned VAT increase, and recently, Whitfield's dismissal. Patriotic Alliance leader Gayton McKenzie dismissed the squabbles as 'growing pains'. He told Daily Maverick, 'We are voting together — let me tell you, all families fight.' The controversial minister of sports, arts and culture, whose party is the fourth-biggest in the GNU, said the formation was a 'family' that fought internally, but stood together externally. ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu said, 'The passing of the Budget is a crucial process in the order of business by the National Legislature. We thank all parties that voted for the Budget.' The Sunday Times has reported that the ANC was looking to reconfigure the GNU. This week, ANC parliamentary chief whip Mdumiseni Ntuli told Daily Maverick that at some point the GNU must be reset or reconfigured, 'but we never really drill it down to the details as to exactly what we mean by a reset or a reconfiguration'. But for other parties in the GNU, there needs to be clarity and re-evaluation. Rise Mzansi's national communications director, Mabine Seabe, said: 'Coalitions are by their very nature unstable, but the GNU can avoid many of the growing pains through maturity, particularly through an understanding that all political parties are equals — the often-peddled notion that smaller parties are in the GNU as a favour smacks of arrogance. We are all elected by constituencies, however big or small.' Seabe said that for this, the Leaders Forum and the Clearing House Mechanism needed to function and meet regularly, 'so that disagreements do not happen through media statements. 'This period has been punctuated by tussles over the Budget; therefore, all parties need to start those discussions earlier and with honesty so that the work of government and the Budget aren't held hostage by differing views.' The Good party's secretary-general, Brett Herron, said: 'Party political manoeuvring in the Government of National Unity is a distraction, defocusing the state from its parallel priorities to grow the economy and meet its constitutional obligations to provide social justice. 'Now that the nation has an approved Budget, the GNU partners must resist the creation of further crises and prioritise the work for which South African taxpayers, regardless of political affiliation, richly reward them.' DM

Malema's three-point comeback plan for fired higher education minister
Malema's three-point comeback plan for fired higher education minister

The South African

time9 hours ago

  • The South African

Malema's three-point comeback plan for fired higher education minister

Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema hosted a press conference on Thursday, 24 July, ahead of the party's 12th anniversary. During the briefing, he addressed a range of political issues, including President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent decision to remove Dr Nobuhle Nkabane from her position as Minister of Higher Education and Training. Malema, who has been a prominent figure in politics from a young age, shared some advice for Nkabane in the wake of her dismissal. The Red Berets leader believes that with just three changes, the former minister can make a comeback. 'It's so painful. She's so young, she still has a chance to come back. I've seen people get demoted politically, and then they go rework on themselves, and then they come back,' said Malema. The politician offered some constructive advice. 'The first thing she must do is to stop chewing gum in a meeting. She was still doing it even yesterday, there in parliament. The second thing is she must be humble and know that she doesn't know and be prepared to be guided and be advised by proper people,' said the EFF leader. Finally, Malema said Nkabane must go back to her branch and learn, saying she was not ready to be a minister. In an interview with eNCA , Nkabane said she accepted her removal and viewed it in a positive light. Ramaphosa dismissed Nkabane in terms of Section 91(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. He has since appointed Buti Kgwaridi Manamela as Minister of Higher Education and Training. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

Power still cut at Pretoria police stations as deputy mayor denies getting special treatment
Power still cut at Pretoria police stations as deputy mayor denies getting special treatment

The Citizen

time11 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Power still cut at Pretoria police stations as deputy mayor denies getting special treatment

Despite being criticised for putting residents' safety at risk, the City of Tshwane said it needs to optimise revenue collection. Many are confused about the City of Tshwane's decision to cut power to three police stations in the capital as part of its 'Tshwane ya Tima' campaign to get outstanding accounts up to date. Police spokesperson Brigadier Brenda Muridili has confirmed that the power was restored at the Moot police station on Wednesday night after the power supply was disconnected on Tuesday. 'Saps Garsfontein was switched off too, but they also have a generator. [At] Mamelodi East, they are using solar power for backup,' she added. City of Tshwane cuts power at police stations Muridili said police are working with the Department of Public Works and Administration to restore the power and resolve the matter. In June, the City of Tshwane mayor was criticised for cutting the power to the Weskoppies Psychiatric Hospital due to the Gauteng Department of Health's (GDoH) failure to settle R1.2 million in overdue electricity charges for March and April. ALSO READ: Power cut to police station sparks DA backlash over alleged favouritism DA Tshwane Caucus spokesperson Jacqui Uys said the City of Tshwane needs to implement its credit control policy to ensure the financial health and future of the city. 'However, this needs to happen fairly and without bias, following the correct intergovernmental processes. Currently, the ANC's patronage networks and the deputy mayor's own pocket are benefiting while our communities, who deserve police services, are paying the price,' she said. Deputy mayor accused of getting special treatment Uys said the power cut at the Moot police station is an indication that Deputy Mayor Eugene Modise is being treated differently from others. She also said it seems that the deputy mayor's own financial interest is more important than the safety of residents. 'The deputy executive mayor and MMC of finance, Eugene Modise, must provide a clear explanation regarding the special treatment of his company, Mzansi Resorts, who owes the city in excess of R20 million and has not had services cut, in relation to 'Tshwane Ya Tima' who on Tuesday cut power to Saps in the Moot,' she said. Modise denied the allegations and hit back at the DA. 'Mzansi is not indebted to the City of Tshwane and does not hold a municipal account with the city. If they believe otherwise, they must produce verifiable proof of any municipal account held by Mzansi with the City of Tshwane,' he said. Modise said instead of undermining the efforts of the 'Tshwane ya Tima' campaign, the DA should acknowledge the strides made in optimising revenue collection to strengthen service delivery. Power cut at Southern Sun Arcadia The city continued with the 'Tshwane ya Tima' campaign on Thursday and further disconnected Southern Sun Arcadia due to a R12 million debt. 'No pay, no power. Accountability is not optional,' he said. Modise said Shoprite also settled a R600 000 payment just as the city was about to pull the plug for more than R500 000 owed. 'Responsibility isn't a favour – it's a duty. Pay your municipal bills,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store