
Our Médecins Sans Frontières staff are being killed in Gaza. Why are UK ministers enabling that?
This is part of the genocide that is being committed in Gaza. And the UK government is complicit.
At the beginning of April, we at MSF UK wrote to the foreign secretary, David Lammy, detailing our first-hand observations in Gaza. We described the massive influxes of wounded patients and dead bodies being received by MSF teams in medical facilities across Gaza on 18 March, as Israeli forces unleashed attacks of unprecedented intensity, shattering the short-lived ceasefire. We explained that MSF medical staff and their patients had already had to evacuate 17 health facilities and had endured a massive number of violent incidents, including airstrikes damaging and destroying hospitals and health facilities, tanks opening fire on humanitarian shelters, ground offensives being conducted in medical facilities, and humanitarian convoys and ambulances being fired upon by the Israeli military. We noted that not a single hospital in Gaza was currently fully functional, and that about half of them were no longer functioning at all. And we described the complete siege imposed by the Israeli authorities on Gaza.
We noted that this evidence was consistent with the description of ethnic cleansing and genocide provided by legal experts and human rights organisations. We requested a meeting to brief the foreign secretary further and to hear what concrete actions the UK planned, to hold Israel to account for its atrocities against the Palestinian people.
We did not receive a response.
So on 7 May, MSF wrote an open letter to the prime minister describing the use of starvation and collective punishment as weapons of war by the Israeli government against an entire population. We implored the UK government to uphold its obligations as a permanent member of the UN security council to act under international humanitarian law to protect all civilians in Gaza. We also called on the UK government to publicly condemn the Israeli government for the atrocities it is inflicting on the people of Gaza. We warned that failure to take immediate action and to adopt a clear position on these extensively documented and flagrant war crimes and breaches of international law would leave the UK government at high risk of charges of complicity.
We did not receive a response.
In fact, since 1 November 2023 we have repeatedly contacted the government to provide evidence of atrocities directly witnessed and experienced by our hundreds of colleagues in Gaza, to remind the UK of its power and its obligation to act, and to request an urgent high-level meeting.
We never received clear acknowledgment of the evidence that we have provided, nor have we ever been offered that meeting.
We can only conclude that the UK government just does not want to admit what everybody else can see: that genocide is being committed in Gaza, and it is being committed with the military, diplomatic and material support of the UK.
Eventually, on 23 June, we did receive a letter from the parliamentary under-secretary of state for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer. It was woefully inadequate and did not address any of our points. It said only: 'We need further action from the Israeli government now to lift all restrictions on aid, to enable the UN and aid partners to do their work, and to ensure that food and other critical supplies can reach people safely.'
But aid will not stop a genocide. We also need the Israeli government to stop the ethnic cleansing, the war crimes and the crimes against humanity, and to abide by international law and the advice of the international court of justice (ICJ).
Since October 2023, the entire population of the Gaza Strip has been subjected to relentless bombardment by the Israeli armed forces. Gaza's healthcare system has been destroyed, and medical workers, including our MSF colleagues, are systematically targeted by the Israeli military.
Due to the siege imposed by Israel and the obstruction of humanitarian aid, more than 2 million people are currently on the brink of starvation as part of a calculated strategy aimed at eradicating Palestinian society.
The UK government must acknowledge and respect the rulings of the ICJ, and abide by international law and the advisory of the ICJ regarding the plausibility of genocide. MSF has a responsibility to act with moral clarity and humanitarian consistency in the face of mass atrocities.
The same should apply to the UK government.
Dr Natalie Roberts is the executive director of Médecins Sans Frontières UK
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
13 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Hamas politicians and its military wing are not the same, BBC News chief says
The BBC's Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary was removed from iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture. It is understood Deborah Turness made the comments when she was asked about the documentary during a routine staff meeting. A video appears to show Ms Turness saying: 'I think it's really important that we are clear that (the narrator) Abdullah's father was the deputy agricultural minister and therefore, you know, was a member of the Hamas-run government, which is different to being part of the military wing of Hamas. 'And I think externally it's often simplified that he was in Hamas, and I think it's an important point of detail that we need to continually remind people of the difference and of that connection.' Hamas's military wing was proscribed in 2001 and that was extended in 2021 to include its political wing. After Ms Turness's comments were reported, a BBC spokesperson said: 'The BBC constantly makes clear on our programmes and platforms that Hamas are a proscribed terrorist organisation by the UK Government and others. 'We are also clear that we need to describe to our audiences the complexities of life in Gaza, including within the structure of Hamas, which has run the civilian functions of Gaza.' They added: 'Deborah Turness was answering a question about how we described the father of the narrator in our Warzone film. 'She did not imply that Hamas are not a single terrorist organisation. 'As we have said, there was an editorial breach in this film, and we are sorry. We will not show the film again in its current form and we should not have used this child as the narrator.' Ofcom announced on Monday that it will investigate the documentary after an external review found the programme had breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy. The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. It found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'. Ofcom said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.'

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Hamas politicians and its military wing are not the same, BBC News chief says
The BBC's Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary was removed from iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture. It is understood Deborah Turness made the comments when she was asked about the documentary during a routine staff meeting. A video appears to show Ms Turness saying: 'I think it's really important that we are clear that (the narrator) Abdullah's father was the deputy agricultural minister and therefore, you know, was a member of the Hamas-run government, which is different to being part of the military wing of Hamas. 'And I think externally it's often simplified that he was in Hamas, and I think it's an important point of detail that we need to continually remind people of the difference and of that connection.' Hamas's military wing was proscribed in 2001 and that was extended in 2021 to include its political wing. After Ms Turness's comments were reported, a BBC spokesperson said: 'The BBC constantly makes clear on our programmes and platforms that Hamas are a proscribed terrorist organisation by the UK Government and others. 'We are also clear that we need to describe to our audiences the complexities of life in Gaza, including within the structure of Hamas, which has run the civilian functions of Gaza.' They added: 'Deborah Turness was answering a question about how we described the father of the narrator in our Warzone film. 'She did not imply that Hamas are not a single terrorist organisation. 'As we have said, there was an editorial breach in this film, and we are sorry. We will not show the film again in its current form and we should not have used this child as the narrator.' Ofcom announced on Monday that it will investigate the documentary after an external review found the programme had breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy. The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. It found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'. Ofcom said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump says Coca-Cola agreed to use ‘real' cane sugar in US products
Donald Trump announced that Coca-Cola had agreed to use real cane sugar in its US products, claiming it would be a significant improvement. Currently, Coca-Cola in the US is made with high-fructose corn syrup, whereas cane sugar is utilized in other countries, including Mexico. A Coca-Cola representative responded by stating they appreciate Trump's enthusiasm and would soon share details on new innovative offerings, without directly confirming the cane sugar agreement. This move aligns with a broader 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative, which aims to combat chronic illness through wholesome food and environmental toxin elimination. Kennedy intends for the Food and Drug Administration to phase out the use of petroleum-based synthetic dyes in the nation's food supply, as seen in a recent pledge made by 40 US ice cream producers.