logo
China's New KJ-700 Multi-Intelligence Radar Plane's Interesting Features

China's New KJ-700 Multi-Intelligence Radar Plane's Interesting Features

Yahoo14-04-2025
We have gotten a new look at China's enigmatic KJ-700 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft in service with the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). This latest addition to China's rapidly proliferating family of AEW&C platforms remains somewhat mysterious, although it appears to be something of a 'multi-intelligence' aircraft, combining both airborne radar as well as an array of electro-optical and infrared sensors, likely intended to track targets across air, sea, and potentially land domains.
You can read our previous in-depth analysis of China's multi-layered and fast-growing AEW&C fleet here, with the KJ-700 being a new addition to the force, apparently now in both PLAN and People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) service.
The photo in question depicts the PLAN's KJ-700H version of the aircraft, apparently shown in flight for the first time. It shows the aircraft's extensive sensor suite, with the familiar rotodome on the top of the fuselage complemented by multiple other antennas and fairings. On the sides of the rear fuselage are prominent rectangular-shaped fairings, thought to contain additional side-looking airborne radar (SLAR) in the form of active electronically scanned array (AESA) antennas. There is also evidence of an array of electro-optical windows in the 'thimble' nose cone. Further sensors are fitted on the wingtips and in the tail cone. Not visible in this view is the satellite communications (SATCOM) antenna mounted on top of the rotodome.
Reports of the KJ-700's existence emerged in mid-2023, with the aircraft at that time rumored to have the alternative designation GX-16, making it the 16th member of China's Gao Xin (meaning High New) series of special-mission intelligence-gathering and surveillance aircraft.
The apparent first prototype of the KJ-700 was identified in satellite imagery of the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC) airfield in December 2020. By June 2023, another two KJ-700s had been spotted in satellite imagery. The KJ-700H version for the PLAN was first sighted in June of last year, when it was reported that the aircraft had entered service at a base in northeastern China, facing South Korea and Japan.
Well … according to some rumours, the PLAAF's next-gen AEW platform – successor to the KJ-500 and complement to the larger KJ-3000 – will be named KJ-700. Interesting are the changes at this site: in the middle is supposed to be the KJ-3000's radar right the KJ-700's one. pic.twitter.com/u6QkLJeI35
— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) December 17, 2023
When first revealed, it was anticipated that the KJ-700 would be China's next-generation 'medium' AEW&C aircraft, perhaps as a successor to the KJ-500 series.
In the past, we have discussed how these smaller types of AEW&C platforms, in particular the turboprop-powered KJ-200 and KJ-500 series, are especially well suited to operations from more dispersed and even austere bases. It's no surprise that they regularly appear at some of China's island outposts, as well as operating routinely in the highly strategic Taiwan Strait.
Like the KJ-500, the KJ-700 is based on the airframe of the Y-9 transport, a much-modernized version of the Y-8, itself a Chinese copy of the Soviet-era An-12. Characteristics of the Y-9 include uprated WJ-6C turboprops driving six-blade high-efficiency propellers.
The rotodome of the KJ-700 is thought to contain a pair of distributed aperture radar (DAR) antennas, operating in different bands, in a similar arrangement to that found on the carrier-based KJ-600 AEW&C aircraft.
This radar, as in earlier AEW&C platforms, is chiefly used to scan for enemy aircraft and missiles, over large swathes of airspace, allowing friendly interceptors to be vectored against them. An elevated 'look down' capability like this means that it can spot low-flying aircraft and missiles that would otherwise be shadowed by the horizon or terrain for surface and land-based radars.
Meanwhile, the combination of the fuselage-mounted SLAR arrays and long-range electro-optical/infrared sensors suggests a multi-intelligence function. These sensors could be used for sea or ground surveillance, even if in a secondary role after airspace surveillance. Putting AEW&C as well as broader, multi-domain intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance (ISTAR) capabilities into a single platform would make for a highly flexible asset.
The KJ-700's electro-optical/infrared suite reportedly includes large-aperture CCD cameras, imaging infrared cameras, and a powerful laser rangefinder. Putting an infrared sensor on an AEW&C platform isn't an entirely new concept. Such a sensor should be especially useful for identifying targets visually at long range, but the electro-optical/infrared suite could also be well adapted to detecting aircraft with low-observable characteristics. In terms of surveillance, a powerful electro-optical sensor system would also be able to investigate objects on the surface, especially in the maritime domain, after being cued by the radar. It could also be used used to support test activities, including tracking missile launches.
Other missions for the KJ-700 could include command and control (C2) as well as communications networking, especially valuable over the long distances in the Indo-Pacific theater.
Overall, the fact that China has introduced yet another AEW&C platform fits within its established doctrine of developing a range of different solutions to meet different aspects of this mission, as well as to keep pace with the expected types of threat.
Chinese AEW&C aircraft now do much more than keep watch over airspace and vectoring interceptors to respond to incoming fighters and bombers. As well as using their radar sensors for what was traditionally their primary task, these platforms are now much more than radar planes, with ESM suites that can passively detect and triangulate radio frequency emissions over long distances.
In the case of the KJ-700 specifically, if this is indeed a multi-intelligence aircraft, it is likely tailored to the kinds of missions that might be expected during a future conflict between China and the United States.
The KJ-700 would appear to be well suited to supporting operations in which China projects power over considerable distances, including into the highly strategic South China Sea. In this context, KJ-700s operating from smaller island and reef airstrips could play a vital role in detecting hostile aerial activity, not only by crewed fighters — including low-observable ones — but also drones and missiles that could otherwise pose a challenge for existing aerial surveillance systems.
Meanwhile, the startling pace of development in China's AEW&C sector is one highlight of the unclassified version of the latest annual Pentagon report to Congress on the country's military, released last December.
'Production and deliveries of the KJ-500 — the PRC's most advanced AEW&C aircraft — continued at a rapid pace, joining earlier KJ-2000 Mainring and KJ-200 Moth variants,' the report notes. 'These aircraft amplify the PLAAF's ability to detect, track, and target threats in varying conditions, in larger volumes, and at greater distances. It extends the range of the PLA's IADS [integrated air defense system] network. Furthermore, the PRC has produced at least one KJ-500 with an aerial refueling probe, which will improve the aircraft's ability to provide persistent AEW&C coverage.'
Whatever the precise role of the KJ-700, the aircraft now appears to be in service with both the PLAAF and the PLAN as one of a growing number of AEW&C platforms now in Chinese service. With at least 60 fixed-wing types now in AEW&C service, Beijing not only operates a notably large — and growing — force of radar planes but also continues to develop these aircraft with various different characteristics and specializations.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S.-China AI Competition In The Spotlight
U.S.-China AI Competition In The Spotlight

Forbes

time4 days ago

  • Forbes

U.S.-China AI Competition In The Spotlight

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 23: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the "Winning the AI Race" summit ... More hosted by All‑In Podcast and Hill & Valley Forum at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on July 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump signed executive orders related to his Artificial Intelligence Action Plan during the event. (Photo by) Recently both the United States and China have announced national policies for promoting the development of artificial intelligence. The Trump Administration's U.S. AI Action Plan features a deregulatory approach to driving innovation and building an American AI infrastructure that can be exported overseas. The Chinese Government AI plan instead proposes a global consensus-building organization that would seek a balance between AI development and security. The competition between these 2 contrasting approaches may be expected to have major implications for the adoption of AI around the world, and, thus, for the future of the global economy. A consistent deregulatory emphasis might be a winning American strategy. America's AI Action Plan 'America's AI Action Plan,' released by the White House on July 23, 2025, states that 'America must have the most powerful AI systems in the world,' and 'must also lead the world in creative and transformative application of these systems. Achieving these goals requires the Federal government to create the conditions where private-sector-led innovation can flourish.' The Action Plan features 3 pillars: (1) accelerate AI innovation; (2) build American AI infrastructure; and (3) lead in international AI diplomacy and security. The first pillar merits particular attention. The AI Innovation pillar includes a variety of specific initiatives designed to support the rapid adoption of and application of AI by government, businesses, and workers. Reducing regulatory burdens is the key policy that underpins the overall Trump AI innovation strategy. Most significantly, 'all Federal agencies . . . identify, revise, or repeal regulations, rules, memoranda, administrative orders, guidance documents, policy statements, and interagency agreements that unnecessarily hinder AI development or deployment.' The clear aim is to eliminate excessive federal AI regulation, to the extent legally possible. Biden-era Federal Trade Commission enforcement actions that 'advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation' are to be set aside. State AI regulation is actively discouraged, to the extent allowed by law. The AI plan also takes aim at state AI regulations that interfere with the Federal Communications Commission's ability to carry out its statutory responsibilities. Furthermore, the Plan seeks to discourage excessive state-level AI regulation by steering AI-related discretionary federal funding away from states whose 'regulatory regimes may hinder the effectiveness of that funding or award.' The AI Action Plan's deregulatory tilt reflects continued support for the U.S. policy of 'permissionless innovation,' which drove the development of the internet from its beginnings in the 1990s. Permissionless innovation means 'that anyone should be able to innovate without having to seek permission from a government or other authority.' That policy allowed the internet to grow freely without U.S. Government regulatory authorization and oversight placed over the firms that developed it. The direct result was unprecedented innovation and huge economic dividends generated by U.S. firms, benefiting the American and global economies. Permissionless innovation does not mean freedom from legal requirements that protect health, safety, and business on the merits. AI innovators, like the internet pioneers that came before them, remain fully subject to the full range of U.S. civil and criminal laws, including national security, antitrust, consumer rights, environmental protection, and civil rights, to name just a few. By reducing the expected weight of regulatory burdens, the AI Plan may be expected to incentivize additional investments in and the faster implementation of AI systems. In turn, these effects could stimulate American competition in AI-related sectors and speed innovation, providing economic growth dividends and benefits to American businesses and consumers. American international competitiveness in AI and AI-related markets would benefit. Nine separate proposals are aimed at creating a robust American AI Infrastructure. These include deregulatory streamlined permitting for AI-supported infrastructure, promoting an AI-supportive electric grid, developing a skilled workforce for AI infrastructure, and ensuring cybersecurity. This pillar emphasizes exporting American AI to allies and partners; strengthening AI-related export controls, national security protections, and risk assessments; and countering Chinese influence in international governance bodies. The Action Plan notes that international organizations that are proposing AI governance frameworks and development strategies too often have advocated for burdensome regulations, vague 'codes of conduct' that promote cultural agendas that do not align with American values, or have been influenced by Chinese companies attempting to shape standards for facial recognition and surveillance. In response, the Action Plan recommends 'leverage[ing] the U.S. position in international diplomatic and standard-setting bodies to vigorously advocate for international AI governance approaches that promote innovation, reflect American values, and counter authoritarian influence.' Chinese Government Global Plan for AI Chinese Premier Li Qiang proposed a global organization to oversee the development of AI in a July 26 speech, just 3 days after the release of the American AI Action Plan. According to the Chinese Government, Li 'call[ed] for the early formation of a global framework and rules that have broad consensus to guide the development and use of AI.' Li noted the need 'to strike a balance between development and security.' He added that China is willing 'to offer more Chinese solutions.' In particular, 'China stands ready to undertake joint technical research with other countries, and will be more open in sharing open-source technology and products.' China's support for a new global AI authority (though cloaked in 'consensus-building' language) stands in sharp contrast to the Trump Administration's deregulatory, competition-driven American AI model, which the U.S. would seek to promote through economic diplomacy focused on existing international bodies and friendly nations. The Big Competition The 2 recent government announcements provide a preview of the coming global competition between contrasting American and Chinese AI models. China and the U.S. are widely regarded as the 2 major global players in AI. China China is a formidable force in AI development. China's 2017 New Generation AI Development Plan revealed its intention to become the global leader in AI by 2030. China's Government has worked closely with its tech giants to make them AI leaders, and has encouraged the collection of data to build AI models. Chinese agencies and businesses have introduced AI at all levels. China has aggressively sought to have Chinese AI systems adopted in Asia, Africa, and South America. Moreover, with government support, Chinese firms are opening offices and entering partnerships in the Middle East, Europe, and the U.S. China is also investing heavily in AI education and in AI military applications. The U.S. The U.S. still leads 'leads the world in large-scale AI development, driven in part by its leading talent and innovation ecosystem, but also by its access to cutting-edge 'compute' – the specialized chips, data centers, and infrastructure needed to train and deploy the most capable AI systems.' The U.S. Government is not emulating China's heavy government control over AI development. The AI Action Plan's provisions dealing with labor and infrastructure reflect a 'light touch' approach. They primarily feature encouragement through easing burdens on the private sector, rather than detailed industrial policy directives. Most significantly, the AI Action Plan has an overarching deregulatory focus. It leaves it to entrepreneurs to produce new AI innovations, free from government micromanagement. The Bottom Line Competition on the merits among competing AI systems, like competition in general, should tend to benefit society. It can be a 'win' for economic welfare worldwide, yielding an optimal array of products and services. The extent of direct Chinese Government involvement in developing and promoting its vision of AI is, however, a complicating factor. The U.S. Government may be expected to resist Chinese policies that would generate anticompetitive market distortions in AI markets. A consistent U.S. Government approach of deregulation and 'permissionless invitation' just might be the 'secret sauce' needed to achieve global success for American AI, assuming geopolitical obstacles are surmounted.

Return of Meme Stock Mania Has Traders on Alert for Market Froth
Return of Meme Stock Mania Has Traders on Alert for Market Froth

Bloomberg

time7 days ago

  • Bloomberg

Return of Meme Stock Mania Has Traders on Alert for Market Froth

The reemergence of meme stock mania last week has professional investors facing a quandary: ride the excitement of retail traders or take it as the latest warning sign that the frothy markets are due for a pullback. The speculative stocks caught up in the frenzy this week, like Opendoor Technologies Inc. and Kohl's Corp., gave up some of their gains as the week went on, but most are still trading at their highest levels in months. The broader S&P 500 Index and Nasdaq 100 Index are doing even better, sitting at all-time highs after charging back from the early April selloff set off by President Donald Trump's tariff announcements.

What Every CMO Needs To Know About The Zero-Click World
What Every CMO Needs To Know About The Zero-Click World

Forbes

time24-07-2025

  • Forbes

What Every CMO Needs To Know About The Zero-Click World

Kathleen Lucente is the CEO and Founder of Red Fan Communications, a strategic communications and advisory firm for dynamic B2B tech brands. From agency roles to Fortune 500 marketing leadership to founding my own public relations agency 17 years ago, I've watched countless marketing trends come and go. Some reshape tactics; others shift budgets. But what's happening with zero-click search is unlike anything I've seen. It's a change that affects every function under a chief marketing officer's leadership. When Google launched AI Overviews in the U.S. in May 2024, most marketing leaders I spoke with treated it like another algorithm update—something the SEO team would handle. That lasted 90 days. By fall, the calls I was getting sounded very different: 'Our content isn't getting traffic.' 'Our thought leadership isn't reaching buyers.' 'We're invisible in our own industry.' Nearly 60% of Google searches now end without a single click to any website, according to SparkToro's 2024 Zero-Click Search Study, and that percentage will likely increase. What most CMOs still don't understand is that this isn't just a digital marketing problem. It's a complete reimagining of how buyers discover, research and evaluate solutions, requiring tight coordination from marketing, content and communications. Why This Affects Every Marketing Function Working extensively with B2B marketing leaders, I see that companies adapting successfully are treating zero-click as a revolution, not an evolution. When buyers stop clicking through to your website, every marketing touchpoint changes. Bain & Company research shows B2B software companies experiencing up to 30% drops in click-through rates. Forrester reports that 89% of B2B buyers now use generative AI tools during their purchasing process. When assessing technical requirements, 38% trust platforms like ChatGPT, according to Inbox Insight's 2024 study. The buyer journey that marketing teams have optimized for decades simply no longer exists. I tell every CMO that if 85% of buyers purchase from their 'day one' list—vendors they knew before searching—as Bain research shows, and AI answers industry questions without mentioning your brand, your demand generation strategy needs to be rebuilt. The Three-Team Coordination Challenge I've never seen a marketing shift that demands such cross-functional coordination. Zero-click success requires that marketing, content and communications teams work together in new ways. Marketing teams must reallocate budgets from keyword optimization toward proprietary research and executive positioning programs. Traditional metrics—traffic, leads, conversions—miss the influence gained through AI citations that never send users to your website. Content teams need complete strategy rebuilds. I'm seeing the smartest companies shift from publication frequency toward expertise demonstration. Content must lead with direct, extractable answers formatted for AI consumption. B2B content agencies are retraining writing teams to adopt question-and-answer-style formatting where brand expertise appears prominently in easily extractable formats. Communications teams have become central to marketing success. Research shows that the majority of signals informing AI's brand understanding come from editorial media sources. PR and analyst relations aren't supporting marketing anymore; they're driving it. My most successful clients are breaking down traditional silos to build consistent authority signals prioritized by AI systems. New Metrics That Matter After working with marketing leaders through every major digital shift since 2007, this measurement challenge is unlike anything we've faced. Traditional marketing metrics—click-through rates, website traffic, conversion funnels—don't capture the same business impact. Successful CMOs have implemented new frameworks. They track their brand's share of voice in AI responses—how often their brand appears in AI-generated answers for industry questions. They monitor executive recognition through speaking opportunities, media quotes and thought leadership citations. They analyze entity association, ensuring AI systems correctly connect their brand with core value propositions. Most importantly, they're developing attribution models that connect AI-driven brand exposure to business outcomes through direct inquiries, referral conversations and sales meetings that originate from AI-influenced awareness. Immediate Organizational Action Is Crucial Companies treating this as a tactical digital marketing adjustment are falling behind. Those succeeding recognize that zero-click requires organizational transformation. Marketing operations must implement new tracking systems that monitor AI platform mentions. Content calendars require complete rebuilds around expertise areas rather than keyword targets. Executive calendars must include regular thought leadership commitments as core business activities, not optional PR opportunities. Buyer behavior data underscores this. Research indicates that buyers are increasingly relying on AI agents for solution research, vendor evaluation and initial negotiations. Marketing strategies must be optimized for AI intermediaries, not just human decision makers. The Strategic Reality For Marketing Leaders I've watched many marketing 'revolutions' that became evolutionary. This isn't one of them. Zero-click represents a permanent shift that creates substantial competitive advantages for companies that adapt quickly. AI systems prioritize authoritative sources, meaning market leaders can dominate the industry share of voice in AI responses. The strategic advantage is significant: If AI answers 80% of industry questions and consistently cites your executives as experts, you capture more qualified mindshare than website traffic could ever provide. The playbook that built successful B2B companies is now obsolete. CMOs who adapt their entire marketing organization to zero-click will capture dominant market positions. When answers come without clicks, the brands with the best answers win everything. Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store