Kilmar Abrego Garcia tortured in El Salvador prison, U.S. court filings say
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran man residing in Maryland who was wrongly deported to CECOT, a mega-jail in El Salvador whose name translates roughly as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, says he was subjected to severe physical and psychological torture while detained.
According to new court documents filed Wednesday, Abrego Garcia suffered sleep deprivation, beatings, inadequate nutrition and psychological torment during his stint at the notoriously brutal prison.
The father of three was deported to El Salvador in March, despite a 2019 protection order prohibiting it, over claims he was involved in gang activity, but was abruptly transferred to a Tennessee jail last month on separate human smuggling charges after U.S. President Donald Trump and Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele repeatedly ignored lawmakers' demands to bring him back to the U.S.
Story continues below advertisement
View image in full screen
U.S. President Donald Trump meets with President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador in the Oval Office of the White House April 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Win McNamee / Getty Images
On June 25, a U.S. federal judge ruled that Abrego Garcia had a right to be released while he awaits trial on the smuggling charges. Nonetheless, he will remain in jail while lawyers spar over whether federal prosecutors can stop U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting him to El Salvador again.
View image in full screen
Director Belarmino Garcia speaks at the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in Tecoluca, in San Vicente, El Salvador on April 4, 2025. Alex Pena / Getty Images
Abrego Garcia was first transported to his country of birth on March 15 on one of several Trump-ordered flights from the U.S. carrying alleged criminals to CECOT. He claims to have endured severe abuse from the moment he arrived.
Story continues below advertisement
When disembarking the aircraft, he was grabbed by guards and pushed down the stairs head-first, the court documents say. He also claims the ordeal was filmed.
Shortly after, Abrego Garcia was 'pushed toward a bus, forcibly seated, and fitted with a second set of chains and handcuffs and was repeatedly hit by officers when he attempted to raise his head,' the court filing reads.
After arriving at CECOT, he and other inmates were greeted by a prison guard who allegedly said, 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave.'
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Abrego Garcia said he was then made to strip and dress in prison attire while being kicked in the legs with boots and struck on his arms and head to make him change his clothes faster.
His head was then shaved, and he was beaten with wooden batons while being frog-marched to his cell, he said. The next day, he said that visible bruises, marks and lumps had appeared on his skin.
Story continues below advertisement
According to the legal filing, Abrego Garcia was assigned to a cell housing 20 inmates, all of whom were then forced to kneel for nine hours straight between approximately 9 p.m. and 6 a.m., and struck by guards if they fell from exhaustion. During his time, Abrego Garcia was denied bathroom access and soiled himself, he claimed.
The young father claimed that he and his cellmates were held in overcrowded conditions with no windows, bright lights that stayed on 24 hours a day, metal bunks with no mattresses, and minimal access to sanitation.
After a week, he said he was put in a cell with seven other El Salvadorans who prison officials had determined had no gang affiliations, and 12 other suspected gang members were separated from the group.
The gang claims
The Trump administration initially deported Abrego Garcia over a 2019 claim that he is affiliated with a New York chapter of the MS-13 gang, despite never having lived there and never being charged with a crime.
It landed him in ICE detention the same year. He was eventually released after a judge denied him asylum but granted him legal status in the U.S. and protection from being deported back to El Salvador, from which he and his brother fled to the U.S. in 2011, because of a 'well-founded fear' of gang persecution.
Story continues below advertisement
ICE never appealed his release, and he continued to check in with authorities yearly while the Department of Homeland Security issued him a work permit. He joined a union and remained a full-time employee in the construction industry until his protection order was breached in March.
Wednesday's court filing said Salvadoran officials recognized that Abrego Garcia was not gang-affiliated based on his tattoos, telling him 'your tattoos are fine' but threatening to throw him in a cell with known gang members, who they assured would 'tear him apart.'
Abrego Garcia said he witnessed inmates whom he understood to be gang members violently harm each other with no intervention.
'Screams from nearby cells would similarly ring out throughout the night without any response from prison guards or personnel,' the filing states.
During his first two weeks at CECOT, Abrego Garcia said he lost 31 pounds, dropping from approximately 215 pounds to 184 pounds. On April 9, he and four others were photographed with mattresses and better food in what he says was a staged setup to document 'improved conditions.'
On or about April 10, Abrego Garcia said he was transferred alone to the Centro Industrial prison facility in Santa Ana, El Salvador, where he was denied visitation, communication with his family and access to counsel until Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen visited him on April 17.
Story continues below advertisement
View image in full screen
In this handout provided by Sen. Chris Van Hollen's office, Van Hollen (D-MD) meets with Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia (L) at an undisclosed location on April 17, 2025, in San Salvador, El Salvador. Sen. Van Hollen's office / Getty Images
A week before Van Hollen's visit, senior U.S. officials ignored a Supreme Court ruling ordering the U.S. government to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return, including U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi, who stated on April 16, 'he is not coming back to our country…. He's in El Salvador, and that's where the president plans on keeping him. '
0:58
U.S. Senator heads to El Salvador to push for return of mistakenly deported man
Trump claimed in a public interview that he had not been asked by his lawyers to contact Bukele to organize Abrego Garcia's return.
Story continues below advertisement
Abrego Garcia returns to the U.S.
After months of being denied his right to return to the U.S., on June 6, Abrego Garcia was flown home and charged with the smuggling of illegal aliens — including children and MS-13 gang members — across state lines from 2016 to 2025.
He pleaded not guilty at a court hearing on June 13.
View image in full screen
An undated file photo of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Murray Osorio PLLC via AP
The charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which he was driving a vehicle with nine passengers who didn't have any luggage.
Story continues below advertisement
Body camera footage shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. The officers discussed among themselves their suspicions of smuggling. One of the officers says, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had US$1,400 in an envelope.
He was let go with a warning.
Abrego Garcia's lawyers have characterized the case as an attempt by Trump's administration to justify his mistaken deportation in March and its inability to substantiate claims that he was involved in gang activity.
— With files from The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
37 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
MacDougall: Can Carney keep the Canadian dream from becoming a nightmare?
Article content Add this to a public service very much still resisting the urge/unable to work in offices in the downtown core, and the sense of impotence compounds. Article content And while it's surely un-Canadian to kick a man while he's down — and irrelevant — a lot of the blame can be placed at the feet of Trudeau. The former prime minister called an unnecessary election in the midst of the COVID pandemic. He got dinged three times by the ethics commissioner. He urged his MPs to stonewall legitimate lines of enquiry. He puffed up the public service to enormous levels. Is it any wonder the system isn't delivering? Article content Worst of all, Trudeau and his team saw the incoming threat of Trump and did zero to prepare. Instead of realizing that he was a busted flush and leaving in the summer of 2024, Trudeau soldiered on until early 2025, when the Trump nightmare was fully formed. And while Carney proved more adept than Kamala Harris in replacing a problematic leader, the process left our systems in neutral when the country needed to be in top gear. Article content Carney's assured start has him riding high in the polls. But the dream start will turn into a nightmare unless the prime minister finds ways to both galvanize and trust others to help. Re-establishing the Canada dream is beyond the efforts of one man, no matter how smart he might be.
Winnipeg Free Press
38 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Ukraine says it struck a Russian airbase as Russia sent hundreds of drones into Ukraine
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukraine said it struck a Russian airbase on Saturday, while Russia continued to pound Ukraine with hundreds of drones overnight as part of a stepped-up bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the more than 3-year-old war. Ukraine's military General Staff said Saturday that Ukrainian forces had struck the Borisoglebsk airbase in Russia's Voronezh region, describing it as the 'home base' of Russia's Su-34, Su-35S and Su-30SM fighter jets. Writing on Facebook, the General Staff said it hit a depot containing glide bombs, a training aircraft and 'possibly other aircraft.' Russian officials did not immediately comment on the attack. Russia fired 322 drones and decoys into Ukraine overnight into Saturday, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 157 were shot down and 135 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. According to the air force, Ukraine's western Khmelnytskyi region was the main target of the attack. Regional Gov. Serhii Tyurin said Saturday that no damage, injuries or deaths had been reported. Russia has been stepping up its long-range attacks on Ukraine. Waves of drones and missiles targeted Kyiv overnight into Friday in the largest aerial assault since Russia's invasion of Ukraine began, killing one person and wounding at least 26 others. The fresh wave of attacks came after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday that he had a 'very important and productive' phone call with U.S. President Donald Trump. The two leaders discussed how Ukrainian air defenses might be strengthened, possible joint weapons production between the U.S. and Ukraine, and broader U.S-led efforts to end the war with Russia, according to a statement by Zelenksyy. Asked Friday night by reporters about the call, Trump said, 'We had a very good call, I think.' When asked about finding a way to end the fighting, Trump said: 'I don't know. I can't tell you whether or not that's going to happen.' The U.S. has paused some shipments of military aid to Ukraine, including crucial air defense missiles. Ukraine's main European backers are considering how they can help pick up the slack. Zelenskyy says plans are afoot to build up Ukraine's domestic arms industry, but scaling up will take time. Russia's Defense Ministry said it shot down 94 Ukrainian drones overnight into Saturday, along with 12 further drones on Saturday morning. No casualties were reported.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canada, America — compare and contrast
Opinion Three days and 90 years. That's the difference in age between Canada and America. But the differences between Canadians and Americans have never been on starker display than this, our joint birthday week. It is truly a tale of two countries, a revolutionary society versus an evolutionary community. The United States today is undergoing a second American revolution, one that will determine whether it remains a republican democracy or becomes a presidential autocracy. The signs are ominous. Canada, meanwhile, is engaged in a debate about economic progress and regional and civil accommodation. The signs are hopeful. The Canadian Press files The Peace Tower is pictured on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. The Peace, Order and Good Government clause has shaped the character of Canada, David McLaughlin writes. Two bills tell the tale. Parliament passed Bill C-5 last month, the 'Build Canada Act' meant to eliminate internal trade barriers and accelerate infrastructure projects, with strong majority support from the governing and opposition parties. This past week, Congress passed the 'One Big Beautiful Act,' the largest wealth transfer from the poor to the wealthy in American history, on strict partisan lines. More than differences of policy are on display. Differences of values, culture, and the very role of government are coming to the fore. The U.S. today is asserting 'nationalist sovereignty,' projecting an America-first mindset to protect a perceived superior and threatened cultural way of life. Canada is asserting 'sovereign nationalism,' projecting a distinct and stronger political and cultural identity buttressed by greater domestic economic wherewithal. Consider less than half-a-year of America under Trump. Executive power has exploded at the expense of due legal process to deport migrants and immigrants, using the National Guard and masked, unidentifiable ICE agents to swoop and detain. Law firms have been forced to do free legal work for MAGA-type causes to protect their regular government work, a form of racketeering. Media companies have paid the president or his surrogates tens of millions of dollars to avoid government-sponsored lawsuits against them, threatening freedom of the press. Science and evidence have been shut down in favour of extremist, crank views on vaccines and climate change. Between 12 million and 15 million Americans are about to lose their health insurance, making people sicker and poorer. None of this is being mirrored in Canada, leftist Liberal and rightist Conservative complaints notwithstanding. Even when there is some alignment in policy goals — investing in national defence, more secure borders, less immigration — there is a legitimate Canadian difference. A difference not just in degree but in form. Not just what we choose to do but how we choose to do it. Peace, order, and good government. This sums up the Canadian difference. It sets out our governing culture in constitutional clothing. When Canada was formed in 1867, Parliament was given authority 'to make Laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada.' This 'POGG clause' was the constitutional device in vogue in the 19th century as the British Empire 'decolonized' itself. Across Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, and South Africa, each of these countries incorporated the phrase into their self-governing constitutions. Uniquely here, though, this means of figuring out who does what jurisdictionally between the national and subnational governments, grew into a governance ethos for Canada. Our constitutional history has not been without contention over this phrase. Federal governments have justified controversial pan-Canadian interventionism with it such as carbon pricing. But these fights have occurred in the courts of law and public opinion with acceptably civil discourse. Blatant disobedience rarely rears itself. This is due to a political culture in Canada that has been historically shaped and influenced by expectations of, and satisfaction with, peace, order, and good government in our political life. Not the legality of the clause but its sentiment. Even as we've experienced a decades-long decline in deference for traditional public, religious, and social institutions, Canadians have opted for an evolutionary reordering of society in response. No national guard deployed here. Even the most revolutionary development in Canada since Confederation itself, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. This is to be celebrated. For it is during the difficult, fraught periods of political and societal tension that constitutional norms and behaviour become most important. In short, it is how you get through to the other side. Especially now as we contemplate how to forge a successful transition of 'sovereign nationalism' from today's unipolar economic vulnerability tied to the U.S. market to tomorrow's multi-polar economic wealth model of multiple markets, a transition that will challenge entrenched political and economic orthodoxies across the country through wrenching, uncomfortable change. Imagine if Trump's 'national sovereigntists' had access to this type of constitutional clause to assert unbridled executive power for their federal government. For what is occurring in America today is the greatest assertion of presidential authority at the expense of congress and the judiciary in that republic's history. This has been a year of resurgent Canadian patriotism. Waving the maple leaf flags, singing the national anthem, and posting 'elbows up' are all on the rise. In this, our birthday week, we should celebrate the true unsung hero of our Constitution — the Peace, Order, and Good Government clause. Over a century and a half, it has shaped the character of governing and the distinctiveness of Canada. It has made us — and keeps us — Canadian. David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet secretary in the Manitoba government.
