The city of Spokane Valley and Councilman Al Merkel destined for court following denial of settlement offer
The Spokane Valley City Council voted 6-0 Tuesday to decline a settlement offer proffered by Councilman Al Merkel that would have ended the lawsuit the city filed against him earlier this year as an effort to get the councilman to comply with state and city records-keeping rules.
Merkel was not allowed to vote due to the conflict of interest, and refused to leave the meeting for the discussion of the settlement.
The lawsuit stems from last year's investigation into Merkel's activity on the social media platform NextDoor launched last June following a complaint from Councilwoman Jessica Yaeger that he was not keeping proper record of his communications on the platform related to city business.
A third-party attorney found Merkel to be in violation of both the Washington State Public Records Act and relevant city policies, which eventually led to the council admonishing Merkel and removing his ability to represent the city on regional boards following a failed appeal attempt from Merkel.
The council took the extraordinary measure of suing Merkel in February, stating the city still does not have complete copies or access to Merkel's NextDoor records despite the determinations from the investigator and the contracted hearing examiner who ruled on the appeal. If the city were found in violation of the state's public records act by not being able to provide Merkel's materials to the public, it would carry hefty court-ordered fines.
Merkel has maintained the opposite; that he's provided everything even though he does not believe his social media use constitutes public records, and that the action is a "frivolous and politically-motivated lawsuit," not one intended to protect the city from legal ramifications.
"I want to take it to court," said Mayor Pam Haley. "I want to get the answer, and I want to have it be in black and white."
The meeting devolved into a raucous affair pretty quickly after City Attorney Kelly Konkright finished providing an overview of the terms of the settlement offer to the council, which, if approved, would would have led to the lawsuit being dismissed with prejudice. The city could not refile the same claim down the road for events before the settlement took effect.
Merkel's settlement terms also dictated that the city would cover his legal expenses past, present and future, "as they pertain to this dispute," and that he and the city identify and agree on an "independent master" to review his social media and determine what activity constitutes a public record moving forward. The city would have had to foot the bill for the role, and Merkel would have been legally obligated to produce only the content the "master" deems to be public records, the settlement terms state.
The discussion of the offer drew several Spokane Valley residents, who aired their frustrations with the council, with Merkel and with the general chaos and dysfunction that's dominated the Tuesday meetings since he joined the board at the start of 2024. Allegations and harsh feelings aimed at members of the council, city staff and audience peppered the comments regardless of what side of the dispute the individual supported.
Haley made several warnings to the public to maintain decorum, and at one point, usually soft-spoken Deputy Mayor Tim Hattenburg visibly lost his temper as some of Merkel's most ardent supporters ridiculed a perennial critic of his during that individual's opportunity to speak.
The raising of voices and flinging of accusations continued at the end of the meeting as Merkel took the opportunity to respond to the earlier denial of his offer during council comments. He said his settlement offer was not an admission of guilt, but was made "to stop the bleeding," and to "spare the public from more legal bills and more headlines, more dysfunction."
The councilman also repeated his claims of being politically persecuted, of a conspiracy among city staffers to oust him from power and that he's provided the necessary social media access and records to the city.
"They'd rather keep dragging the city through the mud, with lawyers laughing all the way to the bank," Merkel said. "Because, let's face it, they're the only winners here, the lawyers, not the residents, not the taxpayers, certainly not the reputation of this council."
Merkel then took aim at one attorney in particular, Konkright, after he tried to counter some of Merkel's claims. Merkel grew increasingly frustrated after an attempt to interrupt Konkright's speaking time, which was denied by Haley. He then began arguing the case with Konkright, citing calls and emails he said counter the city's position and the attorney's remarks.
Haley interrupted the back and forth with "Councilmember Merkel, allow other people to talk."
"He's interrupting me," Merkel responded. "He's not an elected official."
The heated exchange finally came to an end after Councilman Rod Higgins requested a point of order against Merkel for "trying to disrupt the meeting." Haley ruled in Higgins favor.
A hearing to consider a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, filed by Merkel's attorney, is scheduled for July 18 in front of Spokane County Superior Court Judge Rachelle Anderson. It will be the first official hearing since the lawsuit was filed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
27-07-2025
- CNET
My Guide to Discussing Police or ICE Raids on Your Ring and Nextdoor Apps
As the number of ICE raids has increased this year, so has the discussion on social media. And that includes a lot of talk on apps like Ring Neighbors and Nextdoor as people catch events through security cams or video doorbells. This has led to some conflict, too: Users want to post about police activity in their area and warn others, but many have found that their posts get taken down. That's led to worries that apps are censoring certain kinds of discussion -- so I reached out to the companies to see what was going on. The news is mostly good: Posting about events like ICE raids is allowed and these social apps want people to have as many open conversations as possible, but only if you follow certain rules. Here's how stay inside the lines and keep your neighbors informed at the same time. Rules about reporting law enforcement activity on apps like Ring Neighbors Posts that name streets and other nearby locations are less likely to be removed. Tyler Lacoma/CNET When I reached out to Ring about its Neighbors app policies regarding recent events and police raids (as well as Reddit reports about posts being taken down), the company provided helpful information about its specific policies. I found out the reasons why Ring tends to remove certain posts or stop them from going live on Neighbors. For one thing, posts about a general law enforcement presence can get nixed. So if someone said ICE was spotted in "Bell Gardens," their post would be denied because that's just too vague. Or if a post asked, "Hey, is there any ICE activity in town?" it wouldn't be allowed. Other posts get banned if they: Explicitly obstruct law enforcement Voice political opinions Assume immigration status, or other types of prejudice Don't pertain to local events Ring Neighbors does allow posts about specific law enforcement activity Ring posts generally allow for specific information, but not broad discussion or accusations. Tyler Lacoma/CNET Posts that cite an exact location, or images showing agents directly connected to an event, tend to be fine. If someone said, "I saw ICE knocking on doors at the IHOP on Florence and Pico," that would be allowed, according to Ring's guidelines. Other allowed posts provide info on the exact cross streets, addresses, complexes, blocks and so on. Bans aren't always immediate. Sometimes posts that violate guidelines are taken down after the fact, either as a result of postpublication moderation, user flagging or user deletion. And customers can usually appeal moderation decisions for the sake of consistency. When I turned to Nextdoor, another popular neighborhood app used for discussing events, a company spokesperson said something similar: "Our platform fosters discussions of local issues and, as such, our Community Guidelines prohibit broad commentary or personal opinions on national political topics." As long as it's a local issue and users follow the basic community guidelines (be respectful, don't discriminate and use your true identity), then posts should be fine. Guidelines for posting on Ring Neighbors and more App users need to give details and thorough descriptions in their posts, especially if they're including a picture. Tyler Lacoma/CNET When I visit my own Neighbors app, I see -- contrary to some reports -- that users frequently post about hearing sirens or police activity in their own neighborhoods, ask about masked strangers or raise questions about law enforcement. Posts like these make it clear: You can still post about security concerns on Ring Neighbors and other apps, even and especially when they involve police activity. You can also post about people you don't recognize and strangers knocking, which opens the door (not literally) to talking about masked federal ICE agents that aren't wearing any identifiers. In other words, it looks like what Ring said holds true. Explicit information citing current, local events, preferably with address data, is allowed. "Focus on the behavior that raised your suspicion," Nextdoor recommends. "Describe the potentially criminal or dangerous activity you observed or experienced -- what the person was doing, what they said (if they spoke to you). Include the direction they were last headed." If you post with an eye toward the safety of your neighborhood, your post is less likely to be removed. Finally, avoid posts that include gruesome content, or that violate someone's privacy, which are also red flags likely to lead to a block. Can users coordinate with one another on apps like Ring Neighbors? Ring tends to allow conversations about what people can share concerning ongoing police events. Tyler Lacoma/CNET This is a gray area and it's difficult to know if discussions will get removed. In my experience on the Neighbors app, many discussions about sirens and unexplained police presence were left up, allowing people to provide additional information from their own perspectives, what they heard on police scanners and more. It's possible that the more these posts mention ICE or federal enforcement, the more likely they'll be removed, and if conversations move into discussions about national issues or general legal advice, they may be taken down. But many people have reported that they've successfully used apps like Neighbors to talk about nearby law enforcement raids, so I don't see any evidence of a blanket ban. Groups using the Neighbors app to communicate important information or provide help should also be aware of the Neighbors Verified tag, which is available to both public safety agencies and community organizations. This tag makes it easier for users of Neighbors to trust information and announcements from specific accounts. Verified accounts don't have access to any additional information about users. Reports of law enforcement covering up home doorbells and cameras An NBC affiliate in Denver, 9News, published footage of what it reported were federal agents covering up a video doorbell during a raid. (The Independent reported that ICE said it "does not comment on specific tactics, capabilities, or operational details.") It's unclear if a move like this is illegal under protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, but civil rights attorneys have said it is. If anything like this happens, it's best to immediately save the recording -- and remember that agents almost always need a warrant to enter your home. A few final rules to follow Often the best response to a federal raid is no response at all, as well as remembering your rights. Westend61/Getty Images Whether you're concerned about federal raids, curious about what law enforcement is doing in your area or just want clarification about worrying events, remember a few basic rules as outlined by the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigrant Justice Center: Don't escalate: In cases where federal agents or people appearing to be agents have knocked on doors, people have done nothing and simply waited for agents to leave. Remember, without a warrant, they usually can't enter a house, and if you have a video doorbell, it can still record everything that happens. Avoid confrontation when possible, and don't give law enforcement anything to act on. Remember, everyone still has the right to remain silent. If you feel your safety is endangered, call 911 or seek help from a nonprofit: Calling 911 is very helpful if you feel unsafe because of nearby events. You can explain the situation and have a record of the call. 911 is an emergency response service and isn't in the business of reporting to federal agents. There are also local immigrant rights agencies you can contact to report ICE, and groups like the ACLU can usually point you in the right direction. For more information, take a look at the latest news on what Ring is letting the police see (it's good news for privacy fans), the legal ramifications of recording video or audio in your home, and what you and landlords can legally do with security cameras.
Forbes
18-07-2025
- Forbes
10 Years After ‘We Can Do It,' Germany Sees Mixed Integration Results
A crowd of people in Europe Roughly ten years after then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel's famous 'Wir Schaffen Das' ('We dan do it') speech, effectively committing Germany to taking in over a million refugees in 2015, a new report shows how well managed that process was. The results are positive but mixed, with strong labor market integration for men, while women are still struggling to find work and many families living for years in temporary housing. The brief comes from the Migration Media Service, an information service run by the German Council for Migration research group. It breaks down refugee integration along a number of different metrics, including employment, social benefits, housing and education. Perhaps the most notable theme in the report - and aside from security, one that German policymakers and the public have often focused the most on in recent years - is labor market integration. The news is broadly very good - with a huge increase in refugees in work compared to before 2015, and two-thirds of all the people who came in 2015 now having some kind of employment, the majority of those full-time. There is also a good spread of the kind of jobs refugees do, from 'skilled' and vocational professions to hospitality and tourism. In short, refugees appear to have been able to find jobs across the German economy, not limited to one small corner of it. It also appears that people who arrived in 2015 - the majority of whom being Syrians - tended to integrate more quickly into the labor market than previous generations of refugees. There are caveats to this success, however. While refugee men have done very well in employment, the same can not be said for women. Around 86% of employable refugee men had a job in 2024, but for women that number drops to just 33%. Refugee women face a whole raft of barriers to employment, some of them common to women of all classes, such as being the primary carer for children and housekeeper. Refugee women also face greater barriers because of lower education levels attained, and also tend to learn German slower than mean (no doubt in part due to their often having to stay at home more). The report also looked into the experience of school-age refugees. It found that, while there were initial mis-steps in how German administrations handled bringing these students into the mainstream education system, considerable effort was put in over the years to adapt and improve the experience. Nonetheless, the report notes students particular older ones, struggled to integrate into the school system, due to difficulties such as language barriers, the break in their schooling during they journey to Germany, and issues with accommodation. This last point - accommodation - emerged as one of the main problems for refugees who came in 2015. The report shows many refugee families struggling to get out of temporary, sometimes shared, refugee housing. This was due to, among other issues, financial problems and discrimination in the housing market. To this day, ten years later, the report notes that many refugee families who arrived in 2015 are still living in refugee accommodation.
New York Post
16-07-2025
- New York Post
New Yorkers unfazed as thieves swipe all 4 tires from cars near Gracie Mansion: ‘Typical day around here'
There goes the neighborhood. Upper East Side residents were mostly unfazed as a car left stripped of all four tires was left balancing on milk crates in the usually lowkey neighborhood near Gracie Mansion. A white Honda CRV had its tires — and wheel locks — swiped overnight into Tuesday on East 86th Street near York Avenue in front of a doorman building and just a couple of blocks from the mayor's residence. 'It's a typical day around here,' elevator mechanic Kim Harris, 44, told The Post. 'They pull up right next to your car… it's like an express tire shop that you didn't ask for.' 4 Ephraim Hirshberg, the boyfriend of the victimized car owner, stands in front of the battered SUV. Gregory P. Mango The CRV owner's boyfriend, Ephraim Heirschberg, called the pre-dawn raid stunning. 'I'm here 40 years in this building, and I've never seen anything like this before,' he said of the crime that had echoes of the city's grittier 'bad old days.' 'I think we live in a very safe area over here, the mayor's here, the police department is here … this is the first time I've encountered anything like this in this neighborhood.' The victim, who asked to be identified a Anna K., had a blunt reply when asked if she still felt safe in her neighborhood. 'No! I don't feel safe anymore,' she said with a laugh as her car was being towed. It's unclear when the robbery took place, but building staff on the block said workers might've been too busy handling rain in their basements following Monday's flash flood downpour. 4 The car needed a tow. Gregory P. Mango Anna wasn't the only motorist having a lousy day in the luxe Manhattan neighborhood. Another vehicle was also de-wheeled overnight Tuesday, according to photos provided to The Post. Numerous residents who live or work in the area said two other cars were also robbed of their tires recently. 'It's a thing now, I guess, they're targeting this area,' said Teresa A, who lives in the area. 'And it usually never happens in this area.' She added she's seen a few posts on NextDoor and an Upper East Side Facebook page about other tire thefts. 4 Multiple cars were left with milk crates holding the frame up. Ephraim Hirshberg A roadside assistance technician from MacArthur Towing, Jason Rivera, who was on hand to haul the white SUV away, said the thefts can be a quick pit stop. 'In and out, these guys that do this, give them 10 minutes and they're out of there,' the 31-year-old said. While robbery and burglary have dropped 11% and 13% in 2025 compared to the same time span last year, grand larceny and grand theft auto have increased modestly by 3.2% and 4.6%, respectively, according to NYPD data. Petit larceny has jumped 6.8% compared to the same time span last year. 4 The raid happened overnight into Tuesday. Gregory P. Mango Jason K., who works in a nearby building, said he's never seen a brazen theft like this in the neighborhood. 'I've only ever seen this in the Bronx,' he said. 'They were taking catalytic converters last year,' Kathleen O., 71, added. 'They wouldn't do it for fun, there's profit to be made.' Additional reporting by Amanda Woods
