logo
Footy legend Nick Riewoldt slams the AFL for being TOO WOKE to take action over the most powerful woman in the game

Footy legend Nick Riewoldt slams the AFL for being TOO WOKE to take action over the most powerful woman in the game

Daily Mail​03-06-2025

Footy legend Nick Riewoldt has taken aim at the AFL for not demoting executive general manager of football Laura Kane sooner, labelling them 'social justice warriors'.
The AFL announced last week that Kane's AFL football operations role will be split into two roles, with the 34-year-old no longer overseeing key football areas.
Kane has become a lightning rod for criticism this season over issues such as the Willie Rioli saga, the standard of umpiring and AFL miscommunication around what happened when Collingwood player Lachie Schultz was concussed in a game against Fremantle.
A separate head of football performance role is now being created .
Kane will continue to oversee the AFL and AFLW, plus the VFL and VFLW and a newly formed medical and healthcare team that will oversee areas including mental health and concussion.
It was confirmed on Monday that Lions chief executive officer Greg Swann will take on the role as the head of football performance.
Riewoldt said Swann's arrival is long overdue.
'If the AFL weren't so consumed with being social justice warriors, Laura Kane would have been moved aside 12 months ago,' he said on Channel 7's The Agenda Setters on Monday night.
'It is (a win) now. Either the role was too big, or she was the wrong person (for the job).'
AFL chief Andrew Dillon insists there's nothing personal in the demotion of Kane.
'It was a big, big role,' Dillon told SEN radio on Friday.
'Decisions affect people but they're not personal.
'It's actually about what's the right thing for the AFL, not just for now, because the AFL's in an incredible position at the moment.
' ... We have now got a structure that actually allows us to continue to be successful for the next three to five years and that was the thinking.'
In a separate interview on ABC Radio, Dillon rejected the notion that unconscious gender bias was a factor in Kane's dealings with clubs and subsequent demotion.
'It's not a gender thing,' he said.
'Laura has broken down a lot of barriers. She is an incredibly talented administrator.'
Swann, who has been involved in club administration for more than 25 years, will oversee hot issues including the match review system, umpiring and laws of the game.
'I'm leaving to go the AFL to head up footy, I suppose, in the simplest terms,' Swann said when he confirmed his appointment to Lions colleagues.
Lions coach Chris Fagan said Swann would be a major boost for the AFL.
'I'm really pleased for Swanny, it will be great for the game,' he said.
'He's one of those composed, calm and experienced people. We're obviously sad to lose him ... but things don't last forever.
'ln this instance, it will be a great win for the AFL.
'He'll help bring another angle to decision making that perhaps hasn't been there in recent times.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dessie Farrell steps down as Dublin boss after quarter-final loss to Tyrone
Dessie Farrell steps down as Dublin boss after quarter-final loss to Tyrone

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Dessie Farrell steps down as Dublin boss after quarter-final loss to Tyrone

Dessie Farrell has stepped down as Dublin football manager following their loss to Tyrone in the All-Ireland quarter-finals. Tyrone finished strongly at Croke Park to win by 0-23 to 0-16 to condemn Dublin to a last-eight exit for a second successive year. Advertisement Malachy O'Rourke's led by a point at half-time after scoring a number of two-pointers. Dublin came out firing in the second-half but their shooting boots were missing and they were very wasteful with chances. However, substitue Luke Breathnach scored to reduce the deficit to a single point with seven minutes remaining. Ruairi Canavan and Ben McDonnell then restored Tyrone's lead. Advertisement Con O'Callaghan's effort fell short as Dublin desperately searched for scores before Darragh Canavan scored to give Tyrone a four-point lead with a minute remaining. Ruairí Canavan and Niall Morgan then added scores to put the icing on the cake for Tyrone. Farrell led Dublin to Sam Maguire success in 2020 and 2023, as well as five Leinster titles. Tyrone's Peter Teague and Daragh Canavan celebrates. Photo: James Crombie/Inpho "I would have informed the county board at the start of this season that regardless of what happened, this was going to be my last season," said Farrell. Advertisement "The players were aware of that and I just informed them inside just to confirm it. So it's been a privilege. Sport Donegal reach semi-finals after stunning comeback... Read More "As a player and as a coach, I've been involved with Dublin for the guts of 40 years. So it's a long, long time. It's been very much part and parcel of my life. "I've met some amazing people along the way. All the backroom teams, all the coaching of all the underage teams, minor teams, U21 teams and then senior teams for the last couple of years. So some great special people along the way. "And the players, you know, I've had a ringside seat in many ways to some of the greatest warriors that ever played the sport. I've been involved with some of them from U13 to right the way through to today. I've seen them grow from young boys to young men to older men, if you like. "That's a journey that I'm so, so grateful for. I'm delighted to have been involved for as long as I have. We've had good days and bad days and that's part of elite sport but some special memories and some special bonds and relationships."

‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era
‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘Real people, real families': Coalition signals dramatic shift away from anti-immigration rhetoric of Dutton era

The federal opposition will adopt a more empathetic approach to migrants that seeks to emphasise people's positive contribution to Australia, says the new shadow immigration minister, Paul Scarr, drawing a line under the harsh anti-immigration rhetoric deployed under Peter Dutton. Scarr, who is also shadow minister for multicultural affairs, told Guardian Australia it is a 'profound tragedy' that Chinese, Indian and other diaspora communities have abandoned the Liberals at the past two elections, as in his view, their values should naturally align with the party's core principles. His comments come as the pollster and former Labor strategist Kos Samaras says that to have any hope of winning those voters back, the Coalition would need to abandon an approach to multicultural Australia that acted 'like we are still living in 1996'. 'They have hard-baked a brand that they are not a political party that likes people who have come to the country over the past 15 or 20 years,' Samaras says. Immigration was one of the Coalition's main priorities under Dutton, who promised dramatic cuts to permanent migration and net overseas migration as he sought to directly link a post-pandemic influx of people to the housing supply and affordability crisis. The future of those policies is up in the air as the Liberals, now led by Sussan Ley, review their entire agenda after the election defeat. But one thing Scarr has immediately committed to is a new tone when talking about migrants, signalling a dramatic shift from the sort of inflammatory language associated with Dutton's immigration agenda. At various points during the previous term, Dutton – who has a long history of comments attacking refugees and asylum seekers – called for a temporary ban on people from Gaza coming to Australia and floated the idea of a referendum on deporting dual citizens who committed serious crimes. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Without reflecting on his former leader, Scarr says empathy would drive his approach to the immigration debate. 'One of the things I am passionate about is getting the tone of discussion right – I think that is of critical importance,' Scarr says. 'And any discussion of immigration must proceed, in my view, on the basis of the contribution that's been made to this country by so many people who have come to this country as migrants. 'So [when] we talk about immigration, we talk about numbers in a macro sense, but we should never forget that we're actually talking about real people, real families who have different, varying experiences.' The Queensland senator traces his commitment to multiculturalism to his pre-politics career as a lawyer, working in Papua New Guinea and later for a mining company with interests in Laos, Chile, Myanmar and Thailand among other countries. Scarr says he was aware of how hurtful 'loose', 'harsh' or 'clumsy' comments from politicians could be for migrant communities, and put the onus on his colleagues to be 'ever-mindful' of their language. He says it is hard to rebuild bridges if there is a lack of trust or a disconnect between politicians and communities. Multicultural communities were among voter groups to abandon the Coalition at the past two elections, with Chinese voters, for example, swinging heavily to Labor in seats such as Chisholm, Aston and Menzies in Melbourne and Bennelong and Reid in Sydney. 'It is a profound tragedy that we're currently in this situation where there is that disconnect,' Scarr says. 'The values of so many members of the multicultural communities are absolutely aligned with the values of the Liberal party, in terms of reward for effort, in terms of individual freedoms – because in many cases people have fled countries where they're deprived those freedoms – and in terms of the importance of the family unit.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Scarr has no immediate explanation of why migrant communities had deserted the party but suggests the Coalition's political opponents had been able to successfully weaponise public statements to tarnish their image. Labor seized on Jane Hume's 'Chinese spies' claim in the dying days of the federal election campaign, circulating a video message featuring Penny Wong speaking in Mandarin to voters on the social media app WeChat. Yun Jiang, at the University of Technology Sydney Australia-China Relations Institute, says the Liberal party has traditionally 'appealed' to many Chinese migrants who come on skills visas, set up small businesses in Australia and are socially conservative. But she says it will be 'difficult' for the Liberals to regain the support of the Chinese community, and that they will need to 'tone down their language' on China. 'The Liberals' [2022 election] postmortem said they need to be more mindful of language, but clearly, at the end of the last election campaign … they seemed to forget the lessons they had written down themselves,' she says. 'They [the Coalition] would need to be much more careful about their language around the threat of China, and especially on Chinese [people] being portrayed as spies or nefarious actors influencing the Australian political landscape … I think they also need to tone down the constant talk of war.' Samaras, who now works for research firm RedBridge, says it will take years for the Liberals to rebuild support among multicultural communities. The task is electorally critical, given the party's diminished numbers in parliament as well as the rapid growth in the Chinese and Indian diasporas, particularly in the outer suburbs of Melbourne. 'When we speak to them [voters in focus groups] and they walk through their values, which are all about wealth accumulation, aspiration, small business – these people should be, culturally, Coalition voters,' Samaras says. 'But then we ask them why they are not, [and] their answer is pretty blunt: 'They don't like us'.' Scarr accepts the assessment. 'Every single day between now and election day, and in fact, every single day after I was elected, I do everything I can to change and recalibrate those perspectives,' he says.

Australia's had two more years of gambling ad harm since the Murphy report. It's time for Labor to show some courage
Australia's had two more years of gambling ad harm since the Murphy report. It's time for Labor to show some courage

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Australia's had two more years of gambling ad harm since the Murphy report. It's time for Labor to show some courage

Two years ago this week the Murphy report was delivered to the government, recommending the banning of gambling ads. And for two years the Albanese government has failed to act in the face of pressure from vested interests. Over those two years Australians have gambled away another $60bn. In June 2023 Labor MP Peta Murphy said: 'Australians are the biggest losers in the world when it comes to gambling. We have a culture where sport and gambling are intrinsically linked. These behaviours are causing increasingly widespread and serious harm to individuals, families and communities.' Australians know we're the biggest losers by a large stretch over any other nation in the world. Australians know that gambling causes mental and financial stress. Australians know that gambling losses can trigger family violence. Australians know that gambling ads are normalising gambling, for children and adults. Australians want it to stop. Australia Institute polling in March reconfirmed the majority view that three in four Australians support a total ban on gambling ads phased in over three years. These numbers are mirrored in surveys by the AFL Fans Association. But the government is putting power before people. At a public forum run by Kooyong independent Dr Monique Ryan, Curtin independent Kate Chaney and me in Melbourne on Wednesday night, John, who has experienced gambling harm, said that because of failed policy 'a lot of people have seen suicide as the only option to escape the predatory behaviour of the gambling companies'. The failure runs long and deep and crosses party lines. Murphy represented the outer Melbourne seat of Dunkley, which has more than its fair share of struggling Australians. She knew, especially after the social policy committee inquiry proved it, that online gambling and its blanket advertising was preying on their vulnerabilities. She achieved rare multipartisan support for the report, which recommended a three-year phased gambling ad ban. That was just one of 31 recommendations, among them implementing a national strategy on harm reduction and national regulation, an ombudsman, a harm reduction levy, a public education campaign, more independent research and improved data collection. 'A phased, comprehensive ban on online gambling advertising is recommended within three years,' Murphy said. 'This will give major sports and broadcasters time to find alternative advertisers and sponsors, while preventing another generation from experiencing escalating gambling harm.' But to appease the gambling companies, broadcasters and sporting codes, both major parties have offered a halfway house, a partial ban to reduce ads per hour and keep ads out of prime-time sport. Previous similar policies have increased the number of ads in other programs including during news and family drama. When pressed on his reticence to implement a full ban, the prime minister has repeatedly implied that gambling is part of Australian culture. That's disingenuous. Firstly, this is not a debate about banning gambling, it's about the ads that are encouraging it and causing untold harm. Secondly, private sports betting has only been available since SportsBet was licensed in 1993. The 'culture' has been built by profit-driven industries, and it can be changed by a government with courage. Before an election, you can (perhaps) understand why a government may not want to defy powerful media companies that are embedded with sport in this country and historically have had the power to turn elections. After, with a more than 90-seat majority, what's the excuse? If the issue is the profitability of the broadcasters – and I'm all for a strong media landscape – that should be addressed separately. Our communities should not be saddled with gambling problems to keep media and multinational gambling companies profitable. Nor should fans be preyed on by sporting codes that get a commission from each bet. It is immoral. Had the government found its courage at the time, we would now be just one year off a full ad ban. Instead, they've failed to honour Murphy's committee'scommonsense recommendations. In turn, Australian communities have experienced another two years of gambling ads, normalising the link between betting and sport. During the last term of parliament, I twice tabled a private member's bill to ban gambling advertising. South Australian MP Rebekha Sharkie also tabled legislation to address the issue. In all cases the government refused to debate it. Now is the time. MPs Chaney and Ryan have kicked off a new 'ban gambling ads now' push this week. They have support from their communities, gambling advocates and fans. On the backbenches in both major parties there is also support for this change. The opportunity sits with Anika Wells, the new minister for sport and communications (a vexed coupling in this context), who must respond to the Murphy report. Peta Murphy died of breast cancer in December 2023. Her legacy must not be allowed to die with her. Zoe Daniel is a three-time ABC foreign correspondent and former independent member for Goldstein

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store