logo
Leader for life? El Salvador's Bukele headed that way, critics say

Leader for life? El Salvador's Bukele headed that way, critics say

Reuters3 days ago
Aug 2 (Reuters) - There was no shortage of warning signs that El Salvador President Nayib Bukele would attempt to stay in power indefinitely, his critics say.
There was the time Bukele stormed the legislative assembly with armed soldiers during his first year in office. Or a year after that, when his allies in the congress removed top Supreme Court judges and the attorney general and replaced them with Bukele loyalists.
Then last year, Bukele ran for a consecutive term as president after the new Supreme Court judges reinterpreted the constitution.
But the final tipping point came on Thursday afternoon, when a little-known legislator from Bukele's ruling New Ideas party announced a proposal to amend the constitution to allow indefinite presidential reelection.
Bukele allies lined up one by one to sign a petition that would allow the assembly to vote on the legislation immediately, without it first going to committee for analysis or public debate.
A mere three hours passed from the time the legislation was introduced until the moment it became law. Fifty-seven lawmakers voted in favor, with three in opposition.
Ernesto Castro, the assembly president, framed the vote as a win for democracy. "The people will decide how long they want a leader to remain in office," Castro wrote on X. "With these decisive measures, we are ensuring a stronger, fairer and more efficient democracy."
Marcela Villatoro, one of the three legislators to vote against the measure, countered late on Thursday: "Democracy has died in El Salvador today."
The constitutional change also lengthened the presidential term by a year to six, eliminated runoffs, and moved up the next presidential election by two years to 2027, leaving little room for Bukele's scattered opposition to find a candidate.
Bukele, who swept to power in 2019, is extremely popular in El Salvador because of his strong-arm tactics that have eliminated the country's once-powerful street gangs. That, combined with his effective crackdown on opponents, virtually guarantees that the 44-year-old will remain in office until at least 2033 — and perhaps many years after that.
Human rights groups accuse Bukele of widespread abuses and corruption, and a flood of rights activists and journalists have fled the country in recent months after two outspoken critics were arrested and jailed.
A spokesperson for Bukele did not respond to requests for comment about the constitutional change, whether he plans to run for re-election, or the opposition's assertion that democracy was being destroyed.
In the U.S., El Salvador's constitutional amendment was largely met with silence. Bukele is Trump's strongest ally in Latin America, a relationship cemented by an agreement reached in March for El Salvador to house 238 Venezuelans deported from the U.S. in a maximum-security prison. In April, Trump called Bukele "one hell of a president."
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not respond to a request for comment on the constitutional change.
"The U.S. government is shielding the Bukele regime with its silence," said Gina Romero, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association. "Bukele has complete control of the courts, the congress, the media and the narrative. If that's not autocracy I don't know what is."
In El Salvador, the reaction to Thursday's measure was muted. Democracy is relatively new in the country -- it was established during 1992 peace accords that ended a brutal 12-year civil war -- and many Salvadorans consider it a failure given the power that gangs amassed during that time.
The news appeared on the front pages of the country's most popular papers. But there were no protests, and many people were more focused on getting ready for a week-long vacation, with government offices closed next week.
Many of Bukele's most outspoken critics have fled the country, including an estimated 100 journalists and human rights activists. In July, the country's leading human rights group suspended operations.
Bertha Maria Deleon, a lawyer and activist who worked for Bukele from 2015 to 2019, said Bukele's rise to power was fueled by what she saw at the time as a legitimate desire to improve El Salvador. He promised to end corruption after three consecutive presidents were accused of embezzling millions of dollars of public funds.
Deleon broke with Bukele after he occupied the parliament in 2020. She said everything he has done since then has been an effort to consolidate power.
"Ever since that takeover of parliament, he clearly began to execute the dictators' manual," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawmakers are fighting over election maps — here's how it works and why it's bigger than Texas
Lawmakers are fighting over election maps — here's how it works and why it's bigger than Texas

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Lawmakers are fighting over election maps — here's how it works and why it's bigger than Texas

A brewing war in Texas over political boundaries that could reshape control of Congress is spilling out into other states, as Democratic lawmakers vow to ' fight fire with fire ' to combat what they see as a wave of voter suppression efforts ordered by Donald Trump. The battle surrounds the redistricting process, in which state legislatures and other officials take a look at once-a-decade census results to redraw congressional districts to balance the changing population. But in Texas, Republican lawmakers — under the direction of the president and Governor Greg Abbott — are taking the rare step of drawing a new map in the middle of the decade, only a few years after the last redistricting cycle, in the hopes of picking up more Republican seats in the House of Representatives in 2026. Trump is hoping Republicans in other states do the same, as the GOP's slim majority in Congress braces for voter blowback in next year's midterm elections in response to the president's volatile second-term agenda. Democrats — who have accused Republicans of illegally diluting the voting strength of Black and Latino voters — are planning to retaliate, triggering a race to reshape the electoral map by the time Americans cast their ballots in 2026. What are Republicans proposing in Texas? Republicans proposed new boundaries so that several congressional districts held by Democrats could potentially flip, while two other competitive districts have a better chance of electing Republicans. On August 1, the Texas House redistricting committee held the only public hearing on the proposal. Republicans voted it out of committee the next morning on a party-line vote, setting up a quick vote in the full state House of Representatives, which Republicans control. Democratic members of the state House left Texas to break a quorum, derailing Republican plans to vote on the new map during the governor's 30-day special legislative session. Texas Democrats similarly fled the state in 2021 in opposition to Abbott's package of election-related legislation that critics say is undermining voting rights. Is gerrymandering illegal? GOP lawmakers were explicit that the new map was designed to improve 'political performance,' an act of political or partisan gerrymandering — in which a controlling party carves out maps to 'pack' likely opponents into a few districts, or 'cracks' them across multiple districts, thereby diluting their voting power. In other words: Gerrymandering gives politicians a chance to choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Gene Wu, the state's Democratic caucus chair, said the GOP has put forward a 'racist, gerrymandered map' that 'seeks to use racial lines to divide hard-working communities that have spent decades building up their power and strengthening their voices.' Abbott has done so 'in submission of Donald Trump, so Donald Trump can steal these communities' power and voice,' according to Wu. Federal courts have generally blocked the creation of congressional districts that 'crack' or 'pack' communities of color to dilute their voting strength. But the Supreme Court, after a series of rulings that have gradually chipped away at guardrails in the Voting Rights Act, has opened the door for states to move ahead with partisan-fuelled gerrymandering. A landmark Supreme Court decision in 2019 ruled that gerrymandering for party advantage cannot be challenged in federal court. What about racial gerrymandering? Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act adds teeth to constitutional protections against racial barriers to the right to vote, and ensures that voting districts are drawn fairly to prevent racially discriminatory boundaries that dilute, or exclude, minority communities. The law prohibits the 'denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color,' giving voters a key tool to file legal challenges against discriminatory maps and voting rules. But in 2013, the Supreme Court gutted a key provision of the law by striking down federal 'preclearance' guidelines that required states with histories of racial discrimination from implementing new elections laws without first receiving federal approval. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the Supreme Court found that congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led legislature had likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the strength of Black residents. The high court's decision effectively ordered lawmakers to go back to the drawing board and rewrite the state's congressional district map, finding that that previous one violates the Voting Rights Act. That map 'packed' most of the state's Black residents, who make up more than a quarter of the state's population, into one single congressional district out of seven. The Supreme Court will return to the issue of racial gerrymandering this year in a case stemming from constitutional challenges to Louisiana's congressional maps. That decision — from a court that constitutional scholars and election law experts see as hostile to the future of the Voting Rights Act —could have profound, far-reaching impacts for race-based redistricting. What are other states doing? Democrats in Congress repeatedly tried, and failed, to renew the Voting Rights Act during Joe Biden's administration, which warned that Republican threats to the right to vote posed an existential threat to democracy. That legislation proposed independent redistricting commissions — made up of equal numbers of Democrats, Republicans and independents — in an effort to end partisan and racial gerrymandering. That bill was defeated by Senate Republicans, who blocked a vote on the measure. But, as California Governor Gavin Newsom said, 'things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change.' His own state's redistricting efforts are in 'response to the existential realities that we're now facing,' according to Newsom. The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee has called on Democratic state legislatures to 'pursue redistricting mid-cycle,' but Democrats don't hold 'enough legislative majorities to win an all-out, state-by-state battle.' Republican state legislatures oversee 55 Democratic congressional seats. Democratic state legislative majorities, meanwhile, oversee only 35 GOP districts. 'All options must be on the table — including Democratic state legislatures using their power to fight back and pursue redistricting mid-cycle in order to protect our democracy,' committee president Heather Williams said in a statement. Democratic leaders in California, Illinois and New York — states that collectively have 95 seats in the House of Representatives — are laying the groundwork to redraw their states' maps in the hopes of sending more Democrats to Congress. But several states may have to rewrite laws or amend their state constitutions to move ahead on those places, adding more hurdles in a battle in which the GOP has an upper hand. Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin said Democrats are 'bringing a knife to a knife fight, and we're going to fight fire with fire.' Trump and Republicans are 'running scared' over fears they will lose a GOP majority in Congress and are hoping to gerrymander, 'lie, cheat, and steal their way to victory,' Martin said August 5. 'All's fair in love and war,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on August 4 as she signaled efforts to draw up new maps in her state 'as soon as possible.' 'This is a war. We are at war,' she added. 'And that's why the gloves are off, and I say, 'Bring it on.''

Fired ex-ABC news reporter admits his former network had deeply-ingrained bias against Donald Trump
Fired ex-ABC news reporter admits his former network had deeply-ingrained bias against Donald Trump

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fired ex-ABC news reporter admits his former network had deeply-ingrained bias against Donald Trump

Fired ABC News reporter Terry Moran has claimed his former network had a deeply-ingrained bias against President Donald Trump. Moran, 65, was let go from ABC after he said on X that top Trump adviser Stephen Miller was a 'world class hater ' earlier this year. 'Were we biased? Yes. Almost inadvertently, I'd say,' Moran wrote last week in Substack about his former employer of 28 years. 'ABC News has the same problem so many leading cultural institutions do in America: A lack of viewpoint diversity.' Moran wrote in his blog that while the network hired journalists from many backgrounds in recent years, it failed to recruit pro-Trump voices. The veteran journalist said 'It is no secret' that 'There are hardly any people who supported Donald Trump at ABC News—or the other corporate/legacy/mainstream news networks.' 'The old news divisions don't hear many of the voices of the country, because those voices aren't in the newsroom,' Moran added. 'Yes, news teams go out with a microphone and a camera and accost people at Trump rallies; but to me that often comes off as weirdly anthropological and inaccurate, kind of like trying to understand nature by visiting a zoo,' Moran continued. 'You don't really see a tiger at the zoo, just a version of a tiger.' Daily Mail reached out to ABC News for comment on this story. Moran also slammed the $8billion sale of Paramount to Skydance Media in his post, and the FCC's demand that CBS News, which owned by Paramount, appoint a bias monitor to oversee its coverage. The journalist wrote that FCC Chair Brendan Carr can 'go to hell.' 'The federal government has no business dictating the editorial content of news coverage,' Moran said of the FCC guideline. 'This isn't Viktor Orban's Hungary. Or the Law and Justice Party's Poland. Or Putin's Russia in the late 1990s.' Moran admitted that his description of ABC News as biased might be 'strange,' since he was fired for an anti-Trump post. 'The manner of my.. accelerated... departure from ABC News has earned me a reputation in many quarters as a raging, anti-Trump firebrand. So be it,' he added. 'I don't take back or regret a syllable of the post I wrote about Stephen Miller and Donald Trump that got me fired by ABC. I think it was an accurate, fair, and true description of those men.' Moran, an ABC News ex senior national correspondent and former Nightline co-anchor, was fired in June after he penned a social media post calling blasting top Trump advisor Stephen Miller as full of 'bile.' He wrote how Miller was the 'bile' behind the Trumpist movement he claimed was being fueled by 'hate.' 'Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world class hater,' Moran wrote just after midnight on Sunday. 'You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate,' the anchor continued. 'Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred only a means to an end, and that end his own glorification.'

The tech company winning big from Trump's presidency
The tech company winning big from Trump's presidency

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

The tech company winning big from Trump's presidency

Alex Karp, the chief executive of Palantir Technologies, was in no mood to be humble as the US tech giant revealed its results on Monday. 'I have been cautioned to be a little modest about our bombastic numbers,' Karp said. Yet in a note to shareholders, he said the company's current growth rate was 'without precedent or comparison'. Palantir, which develops artificial intelligence (AI) and data mining technology, reported a 48pc jump in its quarterly revenues to a record $1bn (£753m). Dan Ives, a technology analyst, said Palantir had 'blown away' expectations. Growth has been delivered in part thanks to the company's close ties to Washington and the US defence establishment, with US government sales up 52pc. Since Donald Trump's election victory in November, Palantir's stock has risen by almost 300pc. 'This is the perfect time for Palantir,' Karp told investors on a call. Palantir and Karp, a one-time Democratic Party donor and supporter of Kamala Harris, are well-placed to benefit from the Trump White House's focus on defence, homeland security and securing its borders. Last week, the US army signed a deal with Palantir worth up to $10bn over the next decade. Its work with the US military includes developing AI-powered mobile command trucks and a high-tech targeting system called Maven, which can do the work of a regiment of soldiers with just 20 people. Founded in 2003 by Karp and Peter Thiel, the outspoken Republican donor, Palantir's tools can synthesise vast pools of data for analysis or business decision-making. Its early work included contracts with the CIA and other intelligence services. The business and its leaders have always been outspoken believers in America's role as the bulwark of Western civilisation. In a military context, for instance, Palantir can gather information from an army's databases, satellites and drones, then combine it with publicly available information to help commanders make tactical decisions. However, it is not just military and intelligence chiefs who covet Palantir's technology. Its services have also been hotly sought after by corporations and the public sector. It is also a major supplier to the NHS. One relationship that has been under intense recent scrutiny is Palantir's work with the US immigration and customs enforcement (Ice) agency. Its technology has been deployed on the US border and Palantir has worked with Ice since 2014, largely on tools to aid criminal investigations. A deal signed in 2022 to extend this work was worth $95m. Its border work most recently expanded with a $30m deal in April to build an 'ImmigrationOS'. This, according to a federal contract, will help track known criminals, identify people overstaying their visas, and track deportation data. 'Palantir is the only source that can provide the required capabilities and prototype of ImmigrationOS without causing unacceptable delays,' a US tender document says. The contract was single sourced, meaning it was not offered in a competitive process. The Trump White House has already claimed victory over immigration and illegal border crossings. In a post on X, the White House claimed to have achieved the 'first negative net migration for the first time in 50 years'. Trump has hailed a dramatic fall in illegal border crossings as evidence that his policies of tougher border security and mass deportations of immigrants, shackled in chains and handcuffs, are working. However, the president's uncompromising approach to the issue has led to criticism of Palantir by association. Its offices have been targeted by 'Purge Palantir' demonstrators, mirroring the earlier 'Tesla Takedown' protests against Elon Musk's car business. Former staff, meanwhile, signed an open letter claiming Palantir executives were enabling a 'dangerous expansions of executive power' through their work for Trump. The company has previously admitted employees have 'left over disagreements on our work, now and in the past, and we pride ourselves on a culture of fierce internal dialogue'. Karp has repeatedly dismissed criticism from the 'haters' (although in one rebuke, Palantir published an over 4,000 word response to an article in the New York Times that interrogated its US government deals). 'Palantir gets attacked just because we help make this country even better,' Karp told investors on Monday. 'The people who think we are wrong have to be a little jealous.' Palantir is not the only tech company benefiting from the second Trump presidency. The 'big beautiful bill' earmarked a total of $6bn for border security technology, including AI-powered surveillance towers. These are likely to be designed by Anduril, another US defence technology start-up backed by Thiel, Palantir's founder. In fact, according to news organisation The Intercept, Anduril is a shoo-in. The law states that the towers must be certified by the US border patrol to get the funding – and only Anduril's technology meets that requirement. The bill has also given Ice a budget larger than many global militaries, climbing from $8bn to almost $28bn. Palantir pointed out in its financial results that its commercial sales have also soared as businesses have sought to use tools originally designed for the world's security agencies. Its US business sales climbed 93pc. 'The growth rate of our business has accelerated radically, after years of investment on our part and derision by some,' Karp wrote in a letter to investors on Monday. 'The sceptics are admittedly fewer now, having been defanged and bent into a kind of submission. Yet we see no reason to pause, to relent, here.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store